These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

First day - a little ice mining report

First post First post
Author
Seniae 0n3
#221 - 2013-06-06 18:28:20 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
belt spawn timers that only average once per four hours would give everyone a fair share of the pie.


Yeah I don't want the old system back. I also happen to come home right after downtime and then back again 4 hours later so guess what, I always get 2 spawns minimum a day.

But is it alright for all the others? I know it's very good for me but is it good for the game finances?

People are starting to dump their alts on characters bazaar, does that ring *some* bell?



People start to dump alts only rings the bell that isboxing and botting is getting harder


edit: quote fix
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#222 - 2013-06-06 18:28:32 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Zhade Lezte wrote:

Looking at your response and VV's elaborated response, I'd say that the problem with this mechanic is that it is so constant. The ice belts always spawning at the start of downtime and thus 4 hours after that, being controlled entirely by people whose only virtue is being able to play at these specific four hour increments, is dumb. If your playtime is 12:00-14:00 you should have the same chance as if your playtime is 14:00-16:00, instead of one of these playtimes always getting an ice spawn and the other never in practice.

Random ice belt spawn timers that only average once per four hours would give everyone a fair share of the pie.


Yeah I don't want the old system back. I also happen to come home right after downtime and then back again 4 hours later so guess what, I always get 2 spawns minimum a day.

But is it alright for all the others? I know it's very good for me but is it good for the game finances?

People are starting to dump their alts on characters bazaar, does that ring *some* bell?


Change intended to make ice mining no longer feasible to do with a massive fleet of alts succeeds at making ice mining no longer feasible to do with a massive fleet of alts. Owners of said massive fleets liquidate their fleets, which success VV takes as evidence of failure, for unknown reasons.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#223 - 2013-06-06 18:28:49 UTC
Seniae 0n3 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Quite sure the "1 hour to play a day" guy with his 1 ship and 1 account can just hop in low sec for some juicy fireworks. Oh wait, did you really mean, mining?



Why the envy? You too can play 1 hour a day with 1 ship and 1 account in lowsec.


Envy at what? At the moron taking Baltec troll and really going with a mining ship in low sec?
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#224 - 2013-06-06 18:31:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Vincent Athena
handige harrie wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
But nobody has taken away ice mining.

if you have like 1-2 hours to play and all ICE gravs are already depleted in this period of time then you can say "it was removed"


Thats only a valid excuse for 2 or 3 year olds.

Im sorry to tell you, but when you put your hands in front of your eyes, the world does not disappear.

A difference that makes no difference is no difference. For me if there is no ice when I can mine, then the fact it really is there at other times makes no difference to my mining.

Now it sure does make a difference if I'm a buyer of ice, as my buy order will get filled. But for a dedicated ice miner with short play times? There is little difference between the current mechanic and "All ice has been removed".

Edit: Ice belts are spawning with down time? I do not think that is intended. They are supposed to spawn 4 hours after being cleared, irrelevant of downtime. From the Dev blog:

"These belts will respawn in exactly the same system four hours after they are completed, to ensure that players from all time zones will be able to partake in ice harvesting and enjoy the spoils. "

That seems to say the respawn could be at any time, not linked to the artificial timing of downtime. Maybe this will happen once we get a downtime that does not introduce a patch. On Patch days CCP may have to reset all the timers.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#225 - 2013-06-06 18:32:10 UTC
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

Change intended to make ice mining no longer feasible to do with a massive fleet of alts succeeds at making ice mining no longer feasible to do with a massive fleet of alts. Owners of said massive fleets liquidate their fleets, which success VV takes as evidence of failure, for unknown reasons.


See, I don't give a duck about fleets and whatever, I only care for EvE to keep having funding enough to go ahead to its 20th anniversary.

If people are so strange to pay 50 subs for whatever crappy activity, I don't care at all, I care they PAY so that CCP can create new expansions.

While it's easy for the default 4Chan mentality EvE player to feel GOOD about other people quitting / unsubbing etc, they should also consider the game also lives on those "low lifers" who pay money to do crappy activities.
Seniae 0n3
#226 - 2013-06-06 18:32:38 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Seniae 0n3 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Quite sure the "1 hour to play a day" guy with his 1 ship and 1 account can just hop in low sec for some juicy fireworks. Oh wait, did you really mean, mining?



Why the envy? You too can play 1 hour a day with 1 ship and 1 account in lowsec.


Envy at what? At the moron taking Baltec troll and really going with a mining ship in low sec?


my bad ... read it the wrong way. Took it as you were saying you had to work so hard mining with 20 alts. Apologies pls
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#227 - 2013-06-06 18:35:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Nathalie LaPorte
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


But nobody has taken away ice mining.


Nobody has taken away gold either. You just have to manage to slip in a bank safe and get handfuls of it.


Which has been the case for centuries, so you're agreeing that ice mining is still basically the same.


Ice mining became as accessible as gold in a safe. You can be the banker, that is an elite the "EvE gods" decided to enable to get it OR you can be one of many and be locked out.

Sure, it's still there to take... just behind a bullet proof glass formed by your personal play time availability.


The best way to mine ice prepatch = run EVE on 80 clients with 4 PCs on 8 monitors. (And those elite miners ran their fleets 40+ hours a week, grabbing the lion's share of the ISK devoted to buying ice for themselves)

The best way to mine ice postpatch = less accounts, less clients, less PCs, less monitors. The ISK flowing into the ice market is now more evenly distributed (and of a greater amount).

Ice mining is now less elitist, overall. Those people who have extremely limited playtime and find that highsec ice mining is no longer for them should go mine ice in low/null, or find something else to do. Judging by the extreme overcrowding in highsec ice fields which I've personally witnessed, your theory about the privileged few and the unlucky masses is a massive exaggeration, btw.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

See, I don't give a duck about fleets and whatever, I only care for EvE to keep having funding enough to go ahead to its 20th anniversary.

If people are so strange to pay 50 subs for whatever crappy activity, I don't care at all, I care they PAY so that CCP can create new expansions.


So after 12 pages, you admit that you don't care about any of the issues raised in this thread, you only care about subscription numbers? o_O So wait a few months and see what happens to subscription numbers, instead of making a bunch of wild guesses about what effect this will have. p.s. people with 50+ account mining fleets aren't paying real money for their subs, and they're not providing content for plex-buyers to justify taking 50+ plex off the market every month. They are(were) leechers taking advantage of a broken game mechanic, simple as that.
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#228 - 2013-06-06 18:57:25 UTC
Ice mining is still very doable with multiboxing. I spend 10% more time setting up targets, but mine ice at twice the speed.

I can't speak for all multiboxers, but I am loving this expansion :-)

Also I'm going to test the whole respawning after downtime thing. I'm getting conflicting reports.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#229 - 2013-06-06 18:59:32 UTC
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:


The best way to mine ice prepatch = run EVE on 80 clients with 4 PCs on 8 monitors. (And those elite miners ran their fleets 40+ hours a week, grabbing the lion's share of the ISK devoted to buying ice for themselves)


1) I said I don't want the old (and crap too) system back.
2) Those "80 clients" would earn *proportionally* more than the 2 clients guy. Both would bring home the ISK.

Now the 80 clients guy is gone (good riddance) but also the 2 clients guy who can't spend extensive time in game.


Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

Ice mining is now less elitist, overall.


How could it be elitist when before the patch everyone from the shoddiest T1 (un)fitted retriever to the super duper guy with Orca+ freigther all had full access?



Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

Those people who have extremely limited playtime and find that highsec ice mining is no longer for them should go mine ice in low/null, or find something else to do.


Lol how can a guy with limited time mine in low / null? I have mined in low and null and in order to survive I had to be in a time demanding corp who would appropriately secure the gates and WHs.

A loner? Come on.


Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

So after 12 pages, you admit that you don't care about any of the issues raised in this thread, you only care about subscription numbers? o_O So wait a few months and see what happens to subscription numbers, instead of making a bunch of wild guesses about what effect this will have. p.s. people with 50+ account mining fleets aren't paying real money for their subs, and they're not providing content for plex-buyers to justify taking 50+ plex off the market every month. They are(were) leechers taking advantage of a broken game mechanic, simple as that.


1) I *also* care for the game design and the users experience but those take a second seat behind the game. EvE is the enabler to every activity so it takes the priority.

2) 50 PLEX means someone PAID those 50 PLEXes. Again, 50 PLEXes = more money than 50 subs = good for EvE, regardless of who / what / why provides such money.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#230 - 2013-06-06 19:10:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
@Above

Real time picture of me not having any issue grabbing half the belt for myself even as I post.

I am really talking for the guys who can't any more.

Player driven sandbox = GOOD and EvE.

NPC timer driven crapbox = BAD and not EvE.
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#231 - 2013-06-06 19:15:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Nathalie LaPorte
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

1) I said I don't want the old (and crap too) system back.
2) Those "80 clients" would earn *proportionally* more than the 2 clients guy. Both would bring home the ISK.

Now the 80 clients guy is gone (good riddance) but also the 2 clients guy who can't spend extensive time in game.


No, judging by the massive overcrowding in the ice fields, most of the 2 clients guys who can't spend extensive time in game are still there. The 2 clients guys who can only log in 30 minutes a day--I never usually saw them before either, because they barely play. Not rocket science here.

Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

How could it be elitist when before the patch everyone from the shoddiest T1 (un)fitted retriever to the super duper guy with Orca+ freigther all had full access?


I explained how, in a very detailed fashion. Feel free to thank me.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

Those people who have extremely limited playtime and find that highsec ice mining is no longer for them should go mine ice in low/null, or find something else to do.


Lol how can a guy with limited time mine in low / null? I have mined in low and null and in order to survive I had to be in a time demanding corp who would appropriately secure the gates and WHs.

A loner? Come on.


Noizygamer blogs often about ice mining in low, solo, in limited time.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

2) 50 PLEX means someone PAID those 50 PLEXes. Again, 50 PLEXes = more money than 50 subs = good for EvE, regardless of who / what / why provides such money.


Someone buying 100,000 dollars of illegal drugs on street corners in Oakland, where I live, means that someone PAID 100,000 dollars. 100,000 dollars is better for the national economy than 0 dollars, therefore, illegal street drug sales are good for the economy, regardless of who/what/why the money comes from.

The logical flaw in the above analogy is that it ignores the opportunity cost, i.e., that 100,000 dollars would likely have been spent on something else, something much better than dangerous and illegal street drugs. The opportunity cost in the EVE scenario is that those 50 plex could have been consumed by someone(some group of people) who contributes much, much more to the EVE community/gameplay experience than someone mining ice with 50 accounts. Better EVE community/gameplay means more subscribers/PLEX buyers down the road, which is good for EVE. I know that you are an economic whiz when it comes to playing the market, and so I'm incredibly surprised that you would ignore something so basic as opportunity cost in this context. (Sliding down to the next 50 marginal buy offers on PLEX could also reduce the total plex volume so that now you're looking at <50 PLEX, but PLEX prices have gone up recently, so this possible effect appears to have been dominated by other changes in Odyssey or the speculative effects thereof, at least in the short term)
Grozen
Mateber Mining and Manufacturing Company
C U L T
#232 - 2013-06-06 19:24:41 UTC
Here is my 2cents as well.The systems that i was mining ice have seen MASSIVE drop in the amount of players mining ice somewhere between 40-60 people less.I've spoken to many miners and the general conclusion is at the moment ice is not worth mining.Sure its faster sure you know when it will spawn, but it directly takes away your choice of when YOU want to mine ice.It forces you into a type of gameplay that is favored in one part eve and this is making people angry.CCP should have thought more about this change its not delivered well enough.You have broken something that didn't need fixing.Many people liked ice mining mainly because it was afk-able, it gave you the oportunity to make isk so that you can actually use that isk for other non-afk activities, this was one of the great parts of eve because it allowed you playing the game while also taking care of your life.Imo the best desicion will be to revert ice to where it was before, but I'm sure CCP can see for themselves when their subs drop.Right now this change is only of favor to the people like me who stockpiled lots of ice and what happens when those stockpiles are gone?You will have to adapt or bring down your pos and cancel more accounts.Bad move.

knowledge is power.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#233 - 2013-06-06 19:29:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

No, judging by the massive overcrowding in the ice fields, most of the 2 clients guys who can't spend extensive time in game are still there. The 2 clients guys who can only log in 30 minutes a day--I never usually saw them before either, because they barely play. Not rocket science here.


I see from 222 down to 25-50 people in local, no "overcrowding". Due to me "working" from home I also can play 18 hours a day so I actually see who plays and for how long. Many know me as well and like the fact I bring their concerns to the forum.
They are not hardened enough to deal with being against the EvE Politically correct null-PVP-player-who-feel-they-are-the-only-legit-gameplay groupthink.


Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

I explained how, in a very detailed fashion. Feel free to thank me.


Confused fashion. You can detail it if you want, won't help.


Nathalie LaPorte wrote:

Those people who have extremely limited playtime and find that highsec ice mining is no longer for them should go mine ice in low/null, or find something else to do.


Noizygamer blogs often about ice mining in low, solo, in limited time.

Just the fact you know 1 by name means it's so rare it's worth mentioning him by name and him writing it on a blog.

I am also sure that Kil2 could mine in low sec. Does it make it "normal"? No.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

2) 50 PLEX means someone PAID those 50 PLEXes. Again, 50 PLEXes = more money than 50 subs = good for EvE, regardless of who / what / why provides such money.


I do despise multiboxers a lot, but their gameplay was deemed legit by CCP so no, you can't compare to drug vendors.

Also, like the regular EvE elite-null-PvP-I-am-the-one-legit-gameplay you arrogate yourself the right to judge somebody else paid entertrainment.

They are legit and they play for what they pay. Your association (ofc to imply negatives) does not hold.


Finally, the trader in me would just reply you that business is business. They don't break the EULA, they do what they want.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#234 - 2013-06-06 19:40:03 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Seniae 0n3 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Quite sure the "1 hour to play a day" guy with his 1 ship and 1 account can just hop in low sec for some juicy fireworks. Oh wait, did you really mean, mining?



Why the envy? You too can play 1 hour a day with 1 ship and 1 account in lowsec.


Envy at what? At the moron taking Baltec troll and really going with a mining ship in low sec?


We are mining in null sec with BL hunting for their next Fcom titan. Low sec is rather tame compared to our space and we have barges all over the place.

CCP has finally given ice miners a reason to leave high sec.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#235 - 2013-06-06 19:46:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
baltec1 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Seniae 0n3 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Quite sure the "1 hour to play a day" guy with his 1 ship and 1 account can just hop in low sec for some juicy fireworks. Oh wait, did you really mean, mining?



Why the envy? You too can play 1 hour a day with 1 ship and 1 account in lowsec.


Envy at what? At the moron taking Baltec troll and really going with a mining ship in low sec?


We are mining in null sec with BL hunting for their next Fcom titan. Low sec is rather tame compared to our space and we have barges all over the place.

CCP has finally given ice miners a reason to leave high sec.


Dude I was doing what you do in 2009.

I was in a cospiquous corp like you are, I had officers dealing with setting up scouts, guards, plan the best paths, clear the systems around...

Now, find the difference between this, and being the 1-2 account guy who's not lucky like you are (and I was).

Stop always thinking everyone are pro and elite like you are, MMOs are *massive* multiplayer games made for the masses not elite epeen showing grounds.

And, not so little detail, MMOs financials depend on keeping those masses so they can't cut off "the bads".
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#236 - 2013-06-06 19:51:11 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


Dude I was doing what you do in 2009.

I was in a cospiquous corp like you are, I had officers dealing with setting up scouts, guards, plan the best paths, clear the systems around...



We don't do any of that.
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#237 - 2013-06-06 19:51:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Nathalie LaPorte
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

I see from 222 down to 25-50 people in local, no "overcrowding". Due to me "working" from home I also can play 18 hours a day so I actually see who plays and for how long. Many know me as well and like the fact I bring their concerns to the forum.
They are not hardened enough to deal with being against the EvE Politically correct null-PVP-player-who-feel-they-are-the-only-legit-gameplay groupthink.


I've been mining in Abudban, which has gone from 100-120ish to more like 80-ish. Since the total login numbers for tranquility seem steady, it looks like people are trying out the new features introduced in the expansion. You've obscured where you mine, so there's no way to check your numbers.

Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Confused fashion. You can detail it if you want, won't help.


Since I'm not 8, I won't respond to this vague insult, other than to chide you on it.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Noizygamer blogs often about ice mining in low, solo, in limited time.

Just the fact you know 1 by name means it's so rare it's worth mentioning him by name and him writing it on a blog.

I am also sure that Kil2 could mine in low sec. Does it make it "normal"? No.


Who said it was normal? He does it. It's a fact. This random person could do it too. That's all. You have no hesitation posting your own singular experience in finding an uncrowded ice belt, although without enough detail for it to really impart any information.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

I do despise multiboxers a lot, but their gameplay was deemed legit by CCP so no, you can't compare to drug vendors.


Since I did, clearly I can. If you are really hung up on the 'legality' aspect, then fine, replace illegal street drugs with a legal but harmful drug like cigarettes. That's probably a better analogy anyway. The point I made is "opportunity cost", bringing up 'legitness' is you erecting a straw man to knock down.


Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Also, like the regular EvE elite-null-PvP-I-am-the-one-legit-gameplay you arrogate yourself the right to judge somebody else paid entertrainment.

They are legit and they play for what they pay. Your association (ofc to imply negatives) does not hold.


You made the judgement that 1 ice miner with 50 accounts is good for EVE's financial outlook. I made the counter-judgement that it is not. If you want to say that making this kind of judgement is not 'right', then you should restrain yourself from making that kind of judgement before objecting to my objection to your judgement. I made no judgement of 'legitness of gameplay' or 'entertainingness of an entertainment', I'm merely making the exact same sort of judgement which you had already made. Since CCP made a change which seemed to be aimed at exactly that type of miner, CCP seems to agree with my judgement--since you're so concerned with what CCP deems. perhaps you should consider that again. (and p.s., i'm not an elite-null-pvper, I'm more of a trader/whbear, and I make no claims that my playstyle is superior to others--except that I think people playing 50 accounts simultaneously are bad for the long term future of EVE)
Grozen
Mateber Mining and Manufacturing Company
C U L T
#238 - 2013-06-06 19:53:02 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Seniae 0n3 wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Quite sure the "1 hour to play a day" guy with his 1 ship and 1 account can just hop in low sec for some juicy fireworks. Oh wait, did you really mean, mining?



Why the envy? You too can play 1 hour a day with 1 ship and 1 account in lowsec.


Envy at what? At the moron taking Baltec troll and really going with a mining ship in low sec?


We are mining in null sec with BL hunting for their next Fcom titan. Low sec is rather tame compared to our space and we have barges all over the place.

CCP has finally given ice miners a reason to leave high sec.


Dude I was doing what you do in 2009.

I was in a cospiquous corp like you are, I had officers dealing with setting up scouts, guards, plan the best paths, clear the systems around...

Now, find the difference between this, and being the 1-2 account guy who's not lucky like you are (and I was).

Stop always thinking everyone are pro and elite like you are, MMOs are *massive* multiplayer games made for the masses not elite epeen showing grounds.

And, not so little detail, MMOs financials depend on keeping those masses so they can't cut off "the bads".



This is just a simple psychology here.You can check everywhere on the net that in the past where different societies were forced to make changes to their way of living, thinking etc. they always resisted strongly, but when they were presented with a choice and explained the cons and pros to each choice they changed without the need someone to poke them to adapt.It is the same with eve miners if someone wanted to mine expensive ice like dark glitter he would have moved to null even before the ice change.

knowledge is power.

Cage Man
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#239 - 2013-06-06 19:59:21 UTC
I think the new ice system is a bit sucky for people in the TZ that is active int the few hours before DT. I log on round 0700 EVE time and play till round DT. I have in the last 2 days got 15 pieces of from 3 mack pilots. If I am lucky the belt is still up when I log on, it dies within 30mins and 4 hours later is DT and my bed time.. guess I don't need them accounts anymore.. 3 will become 1. Luckily it happened 2 months before I renew for another year..
Tre Circuit
Ghosts of New Eden
#240 - 2013-06-06 20:30:33 UTC
I like the concept of the way ice belts are now, but I feel they will need some tweaking, either through faster respawn times or increases in the amount of ice in each spawn.

I would even consider having the ice belts spawn randomly in systems instead of being in static systems, if they increased the number of possible belts by a factor of 3 or greater and had the respawn time to instant. This would give more meaning to traveling around looking for ice vs camping a single system.

For those of you suggesting that if ice cannot be found in high sec we should go to low, I will gladly mine in low if at the same time, you use a full mining fit Mackinaw to go run level 4 combat missions. What's that you say, a mining barge or exhumer is not a combat vessel??

My 2 cents.