These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Worried about plex

Author
Sturmwolke
#21 - 2011-11-05 11:32:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Sturmwolke
fuer0n wrote:

they could stop that in an instant if they wanted to by putting sell by dates (expiry date) on the plex.


That creates more problems than it solves.

The simplest way to mitigate speculative attempts is to simply limit the number of PLEX each character can hold (e.g. maximum 6months worth).
It raises the cost of speculation because then, you'd need an army of alts to even begin anything major. Got friends? No problem. Can you fully trust them? Big smile
Ok, you've got friends you can trust your mom/wife/kids with? You'd still face a hard limit.

Store them in floating containers? Hmm .. maybe allowing PLEXes to be transported was a bad idea after all.
Did I miss anything else?

Those things said though, I'd doubt CCP would take the trouble to stamp out the speculation until things persistently gets out of hand.
It'll usually take a major hoo-hah for them to act decisively.
fuer0n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2011-11-05 12:25:37 UTC  |  Edited by: fuer0n
they wont limit plex numbers per account as they are selling them in $199 batches and this will just hurt them.

maybe no expiry date on the original purchase of plex but once it's passed on from the char who createdt it .... genuine people who buy the plex for game time are ok everyone else is taking a gamble? the poroblem is RMTers can manipulate at the moment and plex/gamecards is something that was brought in to combat this scurge. only ccp know whats really happening tbh and if they want to solve/needs solving they will.

what are the problems you see with the expiry dates?
Stealing Honest
Stealing Honest Speculation Group LLC
#23 - 2011-11-05 15:17:46 UTC
The proper value has not been attained yet to release reserves. Though i would prefer 600m, it seems 480m is where the advisory counsel believes is the proper trigger. We shall see.


SH
Sturmwolke
#24 - 2011-11-05 16:42:39 UTC
fuer0n wrote:
they wont limit plex numbers per account as they are selling them in $199 batches.


Solving that is trivial.

fuer0n wrote:
what are the problems you see with the expiry dates?


Host of issues (not limited to) :
- Needing each token uniquely registered into the database, increasing complexity unecessarily.
- Market issues. It's simply not designed for it.
- Act of god issues like downtimes, etc. People will scream at CCP because their PLEXes timed out. Wasted energy & resources to spent to correct the issues.
- Rules out legitimate reasons for keeping PLEXs on personal reserve for an indefinite period. e.g if they plan to take a break.
- Limited impact to speculation. They'll just cycle through the volume faster - more volatility. Cost of speculation is still the same.

To kill manipulation attempts, you need to prevent excessive hoarding.
Putting an expiry date on PLEX may seem like a good idea, but it's not. It's a complicated solution to a simple problem.
Tasko Pal
Spallated Garniferous Schist
#25 - 2011-11-05 17:06:24 UTC
Why are people in this thread attempting to come up with all sorts of ways for limiting how to speculate on PLEX when the answer is simple: do nothing. That's the obvious solution for a non-problem.
Companion Qube
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2011-11-05 20:44:28 UTC
Tasko Pal wrote:
Why are people in this thread attempting to come up with all sorts of ways for limiting how to speculate on PLEX when the answer is simple: do nothing. That's the obvious solution for a non-problem.

At least we've managed to collect most of the shitpoasting in md into one thread.
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#27 - 2011-11-05 23:49:27 UTC
Companion Qube wrote:
At least we've managed to collect most of the shitpoasting in md into one thread.

You're being waaay too magnanimous in that assessment...

Sturmwolke
#28 - 2011-11-06 00:08:35 UTC
Tasko Pal wrote:
Why are people in this thread attempting to come up with all sorts of ways for limiting how to speculate on PLEX when the answer is simple: do nothing.


Because it''s fun? Big smile
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#29 - 2011-11-06 00:52:03 UTC
Because I don't feel like typing it all over again, I'll just say that you can click here to read why the idea that CCP is meddling with isk prices is complete bullshit.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#30 - 2011-11-06 00:59:58 UTC
fuer0n wrote:
they wont limit plex numbers per account as they are selling them in $199 batches and this will just hurt them.

maybe no expiry date on the original purchase of plex but once it's passed on from the char who createdt it .... genuine people who buy the plex for game time are ok everyone else is taking a gamble? the poroblem is RMTers can manipulate at the moment and plex/gamecards is something that was brought in to combat this scurge. only ccp know whats really happening tbh and if they want to solve/needs solving they will.

what are the problems you see with the expiry dates?


I'm certain that expiration dates would be illegal. You can't give someone a service for their cash, than give them a limit to use that service or it disappears. Many laws have changed surrounding gift cards, and promotional offers like Groupon, to prevent this kind of customer abuse.

Simply put, CCP could not legally make you pay your $19.99 cash for a PLEX than destroy it without refunding your money in the process. The fact that you waited a while to use it does not matter, the law is the law.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Companion Qube
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2011-11-06 09:11:26 UTC
Akita T wrote:
Companion Qube wrote:
At least we've managed to collect most of the shitpoasting in md into one thread.

You're being waaay too magnanimous in that assessment...


That'll teach me to be generous when reading forum poasts.
Avensys
The Waterworks
#32 - 2011-11-06 10:15:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Avensys
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Because I don't feel like typing it all over again, I'll just say that you can click here to read why the idea that CCP is meddling with isk prices is complete bullshit.

your post is complete bullshit.

(a) EyjoG openly told us that he would meddle if necessary.
(b) we had a series of log-in screen adverts and special offers that just happened to coincide with high PLEX prices.

Both (a) and (b) are pretty strong examples of meddling.

Maybe his experiment did fail and he lost the necessary credibility for future meddling, I am open to arguments on that point.

But there is no doubt that he has meddled with PLEX prices several times during the last year.
Companion Qube
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2011-11-06 10:40:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Companion Qube
Avensys wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Because I don't feel like typing it all over again, I'll just say that you can click here to read why the idea that CCP is meddling with isk prices is complete bullshit.

your post is complete bullshit.

(a) EyjoG openly told us that he would meddle if necessary.
(b) we had a series of log-in screen adverts and special offers that just happened to coincide with high PLEX prices.

Both (a) and (b) are pretty strong examples of meddling.

Maybe his experiment did fail and he lost the necessary credibility for future meddling, I am open to arguments on that point.

But there is no doubt that he has meddled with PLEX prices several times during the last year.

You've pretty much nailed it, but I'll try to clarify: The incentive for CCP is to keep plex prices low enough that a large number of players will pay for their game time with PLEX instead of credit cards.

Think about it - if you pay with a credit card you're paying $11usd to $15usd a month - if you buy a plex with isk then _someone_ is paying $17.50usd in exchange for your isk. That's a pretty clear win for CCP every time someone uses a plex to keep their subscription active.

So, to continue, CCP's motivation is to keep plex prices low enough that the largest possible proportion of plex capable players will choose to use plex rather than pay with dollars or euros and high enough that PLEX RMT is competitive with other forms of RMT.

Yadda yadda, hurd durf, et cetera and ergo henceforth.

edit: there's nothing about credibility anywhere in there - if CCP pushes plex prices down from their current level that's a good thing for them - it means more players can consume plex and "pay" $17.50 a month instead of $11-$15. CCP's issue now is optimizing the number of plex consumed per month by balancing the price of plex relative to disposable isk available per player.
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#34 - 2011-11-06 11:21:24 UTC
got darn close to 500M at one point didn't it.
Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2011-11-06 18:09:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Florestan Bronstein
Companion Qube wrote:
edit: there's nothing about credibility anywhere in there - if CCP pushes plex prices down from their current level that's a good thing for them - it means more players can consume plex and "pay" $17.50 a month instead of $11-$15.

Credibility is the secret sauce that makes a "High PLEX prices - A massive boon for traders" advert have an impact on PLEX prices without CCP having to set up any market orders.




Guess you can argue that any such ad makes people check out PLEX prices on the market and might lead to some opportunistic PLEX sales but imo it is mostly a friendly "I am watching this space and I don't like what I see" from CCP.
A veiled threat of direct intervention on the market which is employed to readjust price expectations, if you will.
As long as the threat is credible no further intervention is required and prices adjust.

However, at least in my eyes EyjoG's credibility has suffered a lot during the last week - and I think the market does mostly share my opinion.

PLEX prices tested the 400/410m barrier, we got some half-assed PLEX promotions, after some further back and forth PLEX prices soared free and EyjoG appeares to do nothing substantial.

In fact we got a "power of 2" promotion that did probably increase PLEX demand - which while probably not directly attributable to EyjoG directly counteracts what we believed to be his goals.

Why did he not follow up on his words with actions?

(1) He is not allowed to spawn PLEX from thin air - his means are restricted to Login adverts and (basically) revenue-neutral promotions.
The market called his bluff and he folded.
If that is the case and he intended to go on confidence alone without ever being put to the test he is stupid.

(2) He believes that PLEX prices are driven by fundamentals and not speculation. His mandate is to stabilize prices against speculative excesses, not to keep them out of equilibrium for prolonged periods of time.
If that is the case (and even if (1) is true this is a great way to save face and what little credibility can be saved) EyjoG should talk to us and explain his stance as soon as possible.


EyjoG talked repeatedly about the way EVE markets model real-life especially with regards to speculation, the role of expectations and preemptive price adjustments. That (and what we know about central banks irl) is why my interpretation of his words and actions concentrates on expectation management rather than any direct "real" effects they may have.
Claire Voyant
#36 - 2011-11-07 01:39:13 UTC
Florestan Bronstein wrote:
A whole lot of stupid.

Just go back and read MD from 6 months ago. Same old, same old.
Trader Horizon
Novartis Industries
Brack Regen
#37 - 2011-11-07 03:07:24 UTC
Nerf highsec incursions, way too many highsec carebears are making a killing from doing sites, only takes 4 hours to make a plex now so why would you pay RL money to play?

Highsec Incursions have totally imbalanced the game, people from nullsec are moving to highsec because they can make more isk since the sanctum nerf. weren't CCP trying to get people out to nullsec and not the other way around? They really f**ked this one up.
Lexmana
#38 - 2011-11-07 11:44:25 UTC
PLEX will go up up up.You can quote me on that.
Claire Voyant
#39 - 2011-11-07 12:53:07 UTC
PLEX will go up down up down up down up down up. You can quote me on that.
Cyniac
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2011-11-07 13:11:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Cyniac
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
I'm certain that expiration dates would be illegal. You can't give someone a service for their cash, than give them a limit to use that service or it disappears. Many laws have changed surrounding gift cards, and promotional offers like Groupon, to prevent this kind of customer abuse.


I'll remember not to ask you to ever represent me in court. Having said that - yes expiration dates are a bad idea. Even a date at which PLEX is automatically added to your gametime is a bad idea.

Companion Qube wrote:
Yadda yadda, hurd durf, et cetera and ergo henceforth.


This really. Plex will go up. Then they will go down and will cycle over time. Right now overall trend is to go up. Tomorrow is another day.

I'm still not sure what CCP will do about plex prices but yes they try to meddle. Problem is the more they meddle the less effective their meddling becomes. Will they come up with a more effective meddling technique if plex prices displease them greatly? I'm sure we'll find out.

For that reason alone Plex is unique amongst EVE investments - CCP has reserved the right to intervene in that market and no one knows for sure how far they are willing to go in their interventions.
Previous page123Next page