These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AT XI Logistic ship rules
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Anaphylacti
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-05-30 01:27:35 UTC
I've been wondering about the use of a logi frigate in an at setting and am a little dissapointed at the current rule set and the role it gives logi frigates in the current meta.

Did you ever consider adjusting the rules so that a combination of logistics ships could be flown so as not to exceed 1 frig and 1 t1 cruiser logo or a combination of t1 frigate logistics so as not to exceed 3~5 frigate logis. I think it could add an interesting dynamic to the at setting having a main and support logistical arm or having multiple smaller logistics at the expense of DPs/ewar support.
Anaphylacti
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-06-05 17:39:35 UTC
Bump can I get a ccp response to this?

Specifically CCP Fozzy as I remember you commentating and describing how PL essentially flew their support and dps ships as two fleets in one (AT IX or X I can't recall exactly) and a logi frig plus T1 logi cruiser setup could help expand this "dual fleet" meta
Garmon
Gods Holy Light Bringing You're Penance
#3 - 2013-06-05 19:26:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Garmon
Anaphylacti wrote:
Bump can I get a ccp response to this?

Specifically CCP Fozzy as I remember you commentating and describing how PL essentially flew their support and dps ships as two fleets in one


lol u must be pretty new to this game

you know how when u're in a battle, and your commander tells u "primary is x", why does he say that? its becuase that ship is most thrat and he wants it 2 die fast, did u rly not think about this?

i disagree with the mind set, over complicating your strategy can only lead to more likely **** ups, focusing the same targets is not only more efficient in the land of no **** ups, but also it means the PRIMARY dies quicker, it's a primary for a reason you know.

People completely over complicate stuff and pay for it, everything is much easier if u just go sleipnirs + sabres etc and just kill same guy, I'm just teaching you all this because I'd like to have a good tournament this year, assuming we don't get banned, I'd much rather be thrown in a ring with people that are not completely gamely disabled - partially gamely disabled is fine, and being against partially gamely disabled people is most likely the best realistic possible outcome that we can all hope for
I like Duncan
Princess Saskia
Hyperfleet Industries
#4 - 2013-06-08 08:54:32 UTC
Garmon wrote:
Anaphylacti wrote:
Bump can I get a ccp response to this?

Specifically CCP Fozzy as I remember you commentating and describing how PL essentially flew their support and dps ships as two fleets in one


lol u must be pretty new to this game

you know how when u're in a battle, and your commander tells u "primary is x", why does he say that? its becuase that ship is most thrat and he wants it 2 die fast, did u rly not think about this?

i disagree with the mind set, over complicating your strategy can only lead to more likely **** ups, focusing the same targets is not only more efficient in the land of no **** ups, but also it means the PRIMARY dies quicker, it's a primary for a reason you know.

People completely over complicate stuff and pay for it, everything is much easier if u just go sleipnirs + sabres etc and just kill same guy, I'm just teaching you all this because I'd like to have a good tournament this year, assuming we don't get banned, I'd much rather be thrown in a ring with people that are not completely gamely disabled - partially gamely disabled is fine, and being against partially gamely disabled people is most likely the best realistic possible outcome that we can all hope for

But I thought it was fun to fly against mentally challanged retards v0v

 ♥