These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Imperial Outlaws [I.LAW] Commence Operations

First post
Author
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#61 - 2011-11-03 00:11:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Arkady Sadik
Tiara Sikai wrote:
So, why fly for the Milita if not to herd a few million minmatar into the next transport and cackle manically? Because it is the right thing to do for an Amarr. It is the right thing to do to defend our civilization
We need you to reclaim the Minmatar from the drudge, chaos and inhumanity in which they currently dwell, and into God's light. We are their angels. We must be their saviors. By your power they shall be rescued from the dark. God wills it, and so it shall be.

-- 24th Imperial Crusade recruitment text.
Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#62 - 2011-11-03 00:16:56 UTC
Ms. Sikai,

While that is a fascinating seque, it does seem to derail the purpose of this thread. There have been many lengthy discussions at this summit regarding that very subject. For now, however, I would ask that this thread be used to discuss I.LAW, and the questions that pertain to it.

Thank you,

Ryven Krennel
I.LAW Diplomatic Director

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#63 - 2011-11-03 00:21:58 UTC
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
Apologies for thread hijacking and thank you for the confirmation.

I am sure I do not need to make clear my sentiments about stating you are anti-slavery while flying for the Empire Militia.

Elsebeth Rhiannon



I do feel this requires a response from me.

People fly for militias for many differing reasons. Whatever the recruitment text says, I didn't join the 24th Imperial Crusade to enslave anyone. I joined the Knighthood, once upon a time, to find my own salvation, and to fight for a faith I embraced.

I moved to I.LAW to continue fighting a war because the Empire is my new home, and I defend it as such. Slavery, honestly, has nothing to do with my reasoning.

Now, my personal views on slavery as a practice are public and can be found easily with little or no searching. Do not, however, make the mistake of believing everyone joins the 24th for the same reasons. They don't.

Now, if you don't mind, let's keep things to the stated topic rather than devolving into the usual flurry of accusation and argument with no real outcome. This is essentially a Q&A, not a platform for your own political agendas.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Kuan Yida
Huang Yinglong
Electus Matari
#64 - 2011-11-03 18:01:45 UTC
From part of the original KOTMC charter:

Quote:
The Knighthood is considered liberal by Amarrian standards. It's members generally believe that the Amarr Empire must adapt to a changing world in order to survive and they strive to maintain diplomatic relations with a greater variety of organizations than is typical for Amarrian loyalists. Religiously the order follows the Imperial Rite and venerates Empress Jamyl Sarum I. Her slave emancipation initiatives and claim that the age of slavery is coming to an end are embraced wholeheartedly by these progressive capsuleer knights.

The dragon knight treasures the state, friendship, duty, promises, kindness, vengeance, honor, and righteousness more than his own life._ _- The Way of the Dragon Warrior Random Posts from Auga

Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#65 - 2011-11-04 02:07:09 UTC
Mr. Yida,
That is not from KOTMC's charter, since we didn't have one. That was a snippet of flavor text from a public relations and information hub. I suggest you try reading for context. I would also recommend you try to grow up a little, rather than childishly posting a bit of text erroneously trying to prove a point that doesn't even matter, nor hold any relevance whatsoever to the topic. What KotMC did or did not do is completely irrelevant at this juncture, since that organization is no longer active. We were talking about my organization, Imperial Outlaws, a separate entity, very much active, and very much separate from KotMC. Also, very much still in deliberations on the subject of slavery.



"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#66 - 2011-11-04 02:40:47 UTC
After deliberations, I.LAW has adopted an anti-slavery stance.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Kuan Yida
Huang Yinglong
Electus Matari
#67 - 2011-11-04 18:47:02 UTC
Quote:
I would also recommend you try to grow up a little, rather than childishly posting a bit of text erroneously trying to prove a point that doesn't even matter, nor hold any relevance whatsoever to the topic.


An un-called for insult, sir. I was not in any way attempting to be childish or prove any point. Posters to this discussion had expressed being un-aware of any previous KOTMC stance against slavery. I had known that KOTMC publicly declared support for the new Empress' anti-slavery agenda. Why you find this an issue at all, or erroneous in any way, and why you believe I was attempting to prove a point, is at best mystifying to me.

While I am gladdened by I.LAW's stance, your insult needs addressing. Hopefully I will have an opportunity soon to do so in space.

The dragon knight treasures the state, friendship, duty, promises, kindness, vengeance, honor, and righteousness more than his own life._ _- The Way of the Dragon Warrior Random Posts from Auga

Mitara Newelle
Newelle Family
#68 - 2011-11-04 18:52:09 UTC
Ryven Krennel wrote:
After deliberations, I.LAW has adopted an anti-slavery stance.


Would you care to expand on the meaning of this 'anti-slavery stance'?

Lady Mitara Newelle of House Sarum, Holder of the Mekhios province of Damnidios Para'nashu, Champion of House Sarum, Sworn Upholder of the Faith, Divine Commodore of the 24th Imperial Crusade

Admiral of Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#69 - 2011-11-04 18:56:45 UTC
Kuan Yida wrote:
Quote:
I would also recommend you try to grow up a little, rather than childishly posting a bit of text erroneously trying to prove a point that doesn't even matter, nor hold any relevance whatsoever to the topic.


An un-called for insult, sir. I was not in any way attempting to be childish or prove any point. Posters to this discussion had expressed being un-aware of any previous KOTMC stance against slavery. I had known that KOTMC publicly declared support for the new Empress' anti-slavery agenda. Why you find this an issue at all, or erroneous in any way, and why you believe I was attempting to prove a point, is at best mystifying to me.

While I am gladdened by I.LAW's stance, your insult needs addressing. Hopefully I will have an opportunity soon to do so in space.


If you are looking for clarification concerning KotMC policies, they were supposed to be what was describe in the corporation description you cited above. Though being guidelines only, they were not rules, and it was not totally uncommon to find several members that were slavers themselves.
Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#70 - 2011-11-04 19:01:55 UTC
So, you are mystified? Perhaps I should explain. The issue was settled. I addressed it. You countered after the fact with a quotation you put forth as some sort of charter, which it wasn't. Seeing as it was not accompanied by any sort of explanation, I took it as you deliberately countering what I had said. I found that insulting, since, having been a member of the Knighthood, having you throw that quotation at me was essentially the equivalent to you saying you know better because you read a brochure. Further, it continued to disrupt the purpose of this discourse, which is I.LAW, not KotMC. So, I lost my temper.

If I was insulting, it was in response to a percieved insult. You still feel sore about it, fine. There was nothing stopping us shooting each other anyway.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#71 - 2011-11-04 19:06:57 UTC
As an expansion: We are opposed to the idea of slavery. We do not hold slaves. We do not capture slaves. Our ships are not crewed by slaves. We are still loyal to the Empire, but hold the view that slavery is indeed a policy that must end, or at the very least change greatly.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#72 - 2011-11-04 19:11:41 UTC
Ryven Krennel wrote:
As an expansion: We are opposed to the idea of slavery. We do not hold slaves. We do not capture slaves. Our ships are not crewed by slaves. We are still loyal to the Empire, but hold the view that slavery is indeed a policy that must end, or at the very least change greatly.


This gladdens my heart.

Best wishes to you and yours as you fight for the empire, Captain.
Darc Kaahar
Space Men
#73 - 2011-11-05 14:19:52 UTC
How exciting!
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#74 - 2011-11-05 14:28:31 UTC
Ryven Krennel wrote:
As an expansion: We are opposed to the idea of slavery. We do not hold slaves. We do not capture slaves. Our ships are not crewed by slaves. We are still loyal to the Empire, but hold the view that slavery is indeed a policy that must end, or at the very least change greatly.
Good news, and thank you.

This raises a few questions.

Is your corp allowing the attack of Republic space? (I would assume so, this is war after all)
Such attacks supports the Empire's Reclaiming of the free Minmatar as slaves - how does that fit with your ideals as stated above?
If it is not slavery that you wish to bring to the Republic by invasion, what is it? What would your corp do with the Minmatar should you win, if your corp had any say in this?
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#75 - 2011-11-05 14:40:45 UTC
I stated my opinion on calling yourself anti-slavery and flying for the Empire Militia in another thread. Since this now is relevant here too, I take the liberty to copy and paste here:

Since, apparently, contrary to what I said in the original post, I do need to spell out my feelings on this, here goes.

Yes, it is possible to join the Empire Militia for reasons other than the wish to support slavery. Some of these possible motives are entirely honourable: the wish to defend your homeland and your kin from an imminent invasion is hardly something that we can begrudge anyone. The state of war between our nations is as regrettable as it is inevitable, and many good people on both sides are drawn into it against their will and despite the larger picture of politics.

So, I would say that it is entirely possible to not be pro-slavery and be a member of the Amarr Militia.

However, I would not say it is possible to claim you are actually anti-slavery, while your clearest association in space is that to the Empire. What you fight for directly contributes to The Reclaiming and the status quo of the Empire. No matter how much you talk, your actions speak louder than your words. You might certainly wish you could be truly anti-slavery in actions as well as in words, but in the choice of fighting the Empire's war, you put that sentiment aside as secondary to the need to defend your nation, and consider slavery the lesser evil to being invaded by the Republic.

Mind you, if you are a free Amarrian citizen, I am not saying you are in the wrong. You are under attack. We do threaten your home and your kin. Your choice is between a moral evil and a personal threat, and I do not envy you for having to make it, nor pretend that I can advice you on the most honourable course in your particular situation.

But what you need to do, if you want to remain honourable, is to acknowledge that this choice exists and that you face it - not pretend that you are not making it.

Elsebeth Rhiannon
CEO
Gradient, Electus Matari
Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#76 - 2011-11-05 15:09:40 UTC
Reasonable words. How do we deal with a dilemma such as this. Perhaps the answer lies in the nature of war, and also in impatience. For the moment, there are many suppositions being made. One is the supposition that by reclaiming space, we take slaves. This is not confirmed. This is something that is simply supposed. No evidence of this exists. Further, it is supposed that slavery and the status quo can simply up and end. Also not likely, but theoretically possible. The nature of the situation is one of waiting and hoping. We are fighting a war that can not simply be fought defensively. Initiative is a crucial thing, and offensive operations are a better course of action. I would venture that we are anti-slavery, wish for change, and understand that it is slow in coming. However, as the number of anti-slavery capsuleers grows, I can hope for that eventual change. That is about tomorrow. Today, I have enemies at my door. Call our stance empty if you will, but the reality of the moment is, we have a war to fight. I can simply say my organization is against the practice. With any luck, the Empire's political view will eventually change and this will all be moot. In the meantime, the best we can do is increase our influence.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#77 - 2011-11-05 15:55:14 UTC
Ryven Krennel wrote:
One is the supposition that by reclaiming space, we take slaves. This is not confirmed. This is something that is simply supposed. No evidence of this exists.
*Cough*

All evidence so far has been that the Amarrian Reclaiming is about taking slaves. Every instance of Reclaiming was to take slaves. Some of the Amarr on this very forum have claimed to take prisoners of war as slaves.

The only evidence we have to the contrary is some Amarr on IGS claiming that this time, this is totally not the case.
Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#78 - 2011-11-05 16:44:50 UTC
All the evidence you are pointing to so far is historical, i.e. a long time ago, or hearsay. I asked for evidence, not anecdotes.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Ryven Krennel
Hopscotch
#79 - 2011-11-05 16:48:24 UTC
And, incidentally, slavery is a means to an end, not an end of its own. People seem to forget that. While slavery was a consequence of past reclaimings, it is a means to the end of bringing people to God. That is still the purpose of Reclaiming. I simply feel there should be other means to that end.

"Oh, good, we're surrounded.  That makes this easy."

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#80 - 2011-11-05 17:25:13 UTC
Ryven Krennel wrote:
I simply feel there should be other means to that end.
Yes. But it does not matter to the Empire what you feel. And your actions within the 24th Imperial Crusade further the goals of the Empire.

So I take it you accept that conquest and slavery are results of your actions, even though you would personally prefer otherwise. Thank you for the clarification.