These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Battleships and above,...weapon systems and such

First post First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#101 - 2013-05-15 09:28:53 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Tuttomenui II wrote:
Battleships went away after WW2 because of carriers. Carriers made Battleships obsolete. Or something like that.


Which is why I trained drones when I first started, and it was good - for a while. Now I'm looking at Tengu prices like everyone else.

Cry


I'll sell you mine, if you want one. T2 rigs, CN BCUs, A-type SSB. ~1000 DPS with Scourge Rage. Hit me up in game.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Sumthinburnin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#102 - 2013-05-15 10:58:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Sumthinburnin
wow this blew up quick.
re-fire rate for the "406" was slow why????
because it was still being done by men not an auto-load system come on really, why even go there lol

someone noted that i was counting the mains by number of barrels.

First that's the way it was done I R L.
each gun could be fired independently (and as such its own separate system ) with the only real restriction being the fact that it was in a turret with 2 other guns.
Second although the 2 D drawings of weapons such as the 425 mm Large rail gun show 3 gun barrels (which would in reality mean 3 guns in a single turret) the actual render is still that of a single barrel single gun system.



Battleships by design were meant to go toe to toe with any other surface warship (not carriers at fighter distance obviously)

They did not fear gangs (lol battle groups/ fleets, whatever) of smaller vessels unless they were armed with torpedoes because,.....they couldn't touch them
(armor was to thick, and the hell they were throwing right back was insane). The number of secondary weapons SPECIFICALLY meant to deal with smaller vessels was High (double in the case of the mighty MO, i'm only counting the 127 mm as the others were AA for the most part)

All of the line warships should have some form of secondary armaments.
Battleships and above represent something more than what they are right now...1 just one should instill terror and fear in small fleets. Your first instinct should be to run from it, not laugh and kill it

damn gotta go again. later folks, thanks for the replies. nice history lessons.
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#103 - 2013-05-15 13:29:47 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Do you have any idea how much power is contained in a 425mm antimatter slug fired out of railgun?



The appropriate answer is "some", real men fit Arty for sniping job Lol

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#104 - 2013-05-15 14:48:20 UTC
To answer this question correctly we must learn a little of the EvE histories:

Once apron (in 2003 they hadn't invented the word upon yet) a time long long ago (2003) the EvE universe was fun and new and normal. CCP still had a "vision" that they were sticking to, battleships were rare, and Jita was still a backwater hick system.

I had just trained up cruisers, mined the materials (had to push ore up hills both ways back then too) for a friend to build me a brand new Thorax and headed out into Zero Zero space (named apparently for the number of people you would find out there).

Anyway after getting owned by some really nasty rats I figured I would GTFO of of there and go back to empire. So I spend an hour or so jumping and mwding a hundred or so jumps back to empire, when on the very last gate after FD-MJL I see my first battleship ever, a minny typhoon class. Assuming the pilot, a certain DrFeelGood of m0o corporation was a fellow intrepid explorer I continued on my merry way with a quick 0/.

Next thing I know he locks onto my ship with hardly any delay and despite my being a few hundred metres away and zipping along at hundreds of metres per second at a 90 degree angle his first salvo wrcks the fugg out my boat with pinpoint accuracy blowing half my stern off. I start spinning out of control, pooping in my pod water when I hear the glorious sound of a gate activation and I jump to safe space.

Short story - people whined and whinged so much that their sub million isk frigates and sub 10 million isk cruisers got killed too easily by 100 million battleships instalocking and instapopping them that they got nerfed to shite. You didnt need point defense because you could kill small shite with your main guns.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Sumthinburnin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#105 - 2013-05-15 16:25:52 UTC
ohhh so its the nerf hammer. Shame on you guys. lol
And i was gonna go on this whole rant too.

oh well
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#106 - 2013-05-15 16:41:19 UTC
Stockatar wrote:
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Notice how every time anyone, anywhere in the world, wants to give n example of a mighty battleship, they invoke the name of the USS Missouri.

I'm not one of those "Mericuh! F**k yeah!" kind of Americans.... but recognize that this nation of mutts I call home, built the single most destructive conventional weapon in the history of mankind.... :)


Honestly, if you want an example of a top-of-the-line real-world battleship, you name the Yamato, Musashi or Bismarck.


Orly? How come all of those are on the bottom of the ocean then? P



Undock a titan and slowboat around in open space and see what happens =)

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Alara IonStorm
#107 - 2013-05-15 16:47:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
I don't think the lack of point defense is really the big deal with Battleships, they should near require a support fleet to hit effectively far below them. Cruiser targets should be the mid ground of accuracy for them.

What I think they really need is more Scan Res and MWD Mobility and I was disappointed they didn't get it so far in the rebalance. They tank a while to even lock a BC let alone a Cruiser, I think 150-180 at max skill should be a good average with a Sebo bringing them up to Tier 1/2 BC lock times. The MWD should be able to last 5-7 minutes minutes on its own without anything else running, right now a Heavy Cap Booster is pretty much required for most fits, especially bad on Amarr and the Hyperion. A good run time would have been nice.

Besides those problems Drones cover them fine. Especially with two mids more likely to be free.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#108 - 2013-05-16 23:51:47 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
I don't think the lack of point defense is really the big deal with Battleships, they should near require a support fleet to hit effectively far below them. Cruiser targets should be the mid ground of accuracy for them.

What I think they really need is more Scan Res and MWD Mobility and I was disappointed they didn't get it so far in the rebalance. They tank a while to even lock a BC let alone a Cruiser, I think 150-180 at max skill should be a good average with a Sebo bringing them up to Tier 1/2 BC lock times. The MWD should be able to last 5-7 minutes minutes on its own without anything else running, right now a Heavy Cap Booster is pretty much required for most fits, especially bad on Amarr and the Hyperion. A good run time would have been nice.

Besides those problems Drones cover them fine. Especially with two mids more likely to be free.

I agree they should find it hard to hit smaller targets but I think when they do hit they should really obliterate them, not hit for crap. The "size of the shell / explosion is bigger than the ship so it doesn't do full damage' argument is horsecrap.

Drop a 14,000lb bomb on a Prius and tell me that Prius doesn't take full damage...

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2013-05-17 01:07:12 UTC
Sumthinburnin wrote:
This vessel is about the size (in length ) as a Coercer(278 m), has guns as big 406 mm (Very near eve's biggest rail gun)
You seem to be missing some very important points about the guns in EVE. Firstly, a 425mm railgun fires slugs that are 425mm in diameter, but the railgun and barrel take up a considerable amount more space. Railguns fire slugs much smaller than ballistic guns because the slugs are fired at much higher muzzle velocity and the barrel system is very complex rather than just a tube of metal.

The battleship autocannons in EVE go up to 800mm -- these fire explosive shells that are 800mm in diameter, MUCH larger than those 406mm artillery shells fired by the battleship you listed. But these 800mm autocannons I believe are fired in pairs (for a single turret), and they fire several shells in a split-second volley. Their muzzle velocity is several times that of the 406mm guns, and their damage throughput is MANY times higher per shot, and they can fire MUCH faster.

The battleship artillery goes up to 1400mm, and those beasts fire those huge shells still faster than the 406mm cannons I believe. Don't quote me on that though. But a 1400mm shell is tremendous, and when it impacts traveling several times the speed of sound, it'll tear through metal like so much water.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Sumthinburnin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#110 - 2013-05-31 03:41:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Sumthinburnin
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Akirei Scytale wrote:

It was probably the most influential battleship ever constructed, as it caused the freaking Royal Navy to panic.



Most influential probably has to go to the Merrimack and Monitor. The Battle of Hampton Roads made every warship prior obsolete.



just like the first ship with a gun made every Bow equipped ship obsolete,..or the first man with a metal weapon made most stick wielding rock throwing noobs obsolete.

Metal ships were already in existence by the time of that fight. HMS Nemisis 1839 and HMS Warrior(1861 ish) were among the first metal plated or metal warships. The monitor was very important because of the turret. Took a bit though before they were incorporated.

Most influential,..pfft im not sold.
Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
#111 - 2013-05-31 03:54:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Ioci
In real life lasers are used for tertiary weapons systems and don't deliver any real damage. Oh wait, that's true in EVE too. As you were.

But on another note. I fit Mediums on PvE Battleships. You won't get ship bonus but it still eats through frigates and cruisers much faster than Drones or Large and you keep the tank.

R.I.P. Vile Rat

Sumthinburnin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#112 - 2013-05-31 03:56:34 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Sumthinburnin wrote:
This vessel is about the size (in length ) as a Coercer(278 m), has guns as big 406 mm (Very near eve's biggest rail gun)
You seem to be missing some very important points about the guns in EVE. Firstly, a 425mm railgun fires slugs that are 425mm in diameter, but the railgun and barrel take up a considerable amount more space. Railguns fire slugs much smaller than ballistic guns because the slugs are fired at much higher muzzle velocity and the barrel system is very complex rather than just a tube of metal.

The battleship autocannons in EVE go up to 800mm -- these fire explosive shells that are 800mm in diameter, MUCH larger than those 406mm artillery shells fired by the battleship you listed. But these 800mm autocannons I believe are fired in pairs (for a single turret), and they fire several shells in a split-second volley. Their muzzle velocity is several times that of the 406mm guns, and their damage throughput is MANY times higher per shot, and they can fire MUCH faster.

The battleship artillery goes up to 1400mm, and those beasts fire those huge shells still faster than the 406mm cannons I believe. Don't quote me on that though. But a 1400mm shell is tremendous, and when it impacts traveling several times the speed of sound, it'll tear through metal like so much water.



You missed a Large part of the point.
nice hack job too.
point was a ship the size of a Coercer carried far more armaments than our super sized Eve warships.
the simple fact that even one eve gun (and its more than one lol ) are similar in size to WW2 components tells me our ships are WAY under gunned.

The fact that Auto cannons and arty are huge doesn't really change anything. facts are these ships are weaker than they should be.

800mm existed. it was german arty on a train =p do we even need to figure out how small a train car is ....I think not


baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#113 - 2013-05-31 05:15:56 UTC
Quote:



You missed a Large part of the point.
nice hack job too.
point was a ship the size of a Coercer carried far more armaments than our super sized Eve warships.
the simple fact that even one eve gun (and its more than one lol ) are similar in size to WW2 components tells me our ships are WAY under gunned.

The fact that Auto cannons and arty are huge doesn't really change anything. facts are these ships are weaker than they should be.

800mm existed. it was german arty on a train =p do we even need to figure out how small a train car is ....I think not



That train car was the size of a frigate...

Our battleships are far from under gunned.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#114 - 2013-05-31 06:14:39 UTC
Regarding the under-gunned thing. Its a bit tough because its a fictional environment but size of the ship and size of the gun are not necessarily connected.

I mean generally tech is pushed to its limits but its also rationalized that if you can build multiple somethings that is sufficient for destroying another unit then that's better then building one that will obliterate a unit but suffer consequences of less of those things and the additional issues that crop up.

The Japanese and Germans in WW2 were great at building huge cutting edge monster ships with huge monster guns but they would have been better building multiple smaller units like the Americans and English. Yamato was great but it got pwned by smaller cheaper ships. Tirpitz and Bismark were awesome but they got pwned too. Had the Germans churned out a few hundred more uboats instead of those two ships they probably would have defeated England before US got involved.

TL;DR

Maybe because the guns are sufficient to destroy other ships, and are balanced around tracking / cap penalties they're superior to huge monster gunned ships that would track like crap and blow half the ships cap for a few shot n probably miss.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Sumthinburnin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#115 - 2013-05-31 09:03:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Sumthinburnin
The Germans didn't build Huge warships they were limited by the treaty of Versailles. Anglo-German Naval Agreement in 1935 allowed the Germany to build Bismark and all the other warships that fought WW2 but they were still limited in size. German battleships were smaller, but that made them faster. Their gun size was limited but that just made Germany make better smaller guns.

Japan on the other hand made huge battleships that spent most of the war as troop and supply transports as they wanted to save them for some massive fleet engagement that never happened. With their limited supplies of steel they would have benefited from more carriers, but would 4 or 5 more carriers have really mattered,...maybe lol

As to them NOT being under gunned, well we probably will never agree.

Part of my argument is based on size.

Yes eve is fictional, however they did go so far as to give them (the ships)very real sizes. Based on that and the fact that weapon systems of similar caliber also exist currently, these vessels are, just by space alone under gunned.

The argument that guns are "sufficient" to destroy other vessels maybe true. However, battleships unless lucky, are no threat to frigs, destroyers, or cruisers because their weapon systems simply cannot engage smaller faster vessels.
Those vessels were however in history crunchy little treats for battleships and their BIG GUNS

Battleships are victims of game balance. Instead of them being a true pinnacle of sub capital (lol Battleships sub capital. They ARE capital ships in reality lol) they are a money sinks for eve.

Strategic and command cruisers are far more capable vessels that put out roughly the same amount of DPS and have better abilities
smokess
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#116 - 2013-05-31 09:32:38 UTC
Eve ≠ real life.

Also, balance.
Ultim8Evil
Exit-Strategy
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#117 - 2013-05-31 10:09:32 UTC
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Notice how every time anyone, anywhere in the world, wants to give an example of a mighty battleship, they invoke the name of the USS Missouri.

I'm not one of those "Mericuh! F**k yeah!" kind of Americans.... but recognize that this nation of mutts I call home, built the single most destructive conventional weapon in the history of mankind.... :)


Can I just interrupt your "U S A, U S A" chanting for a second and point out that the Yamato-class battleships had both superior firepower and range over the Iowa-class (USS Missouri).

It took 19 torpedoes and 17 bombs to sink the Musashi
It took at least 11 torpedoes and 6 bombs to sink the Yamato

Follow me on Twitter for literally no good reason @TheUltim8Evil

Kult Altol
The Safe Space
#118 - 2013-05-31 10:37:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Kult Altol
Ultim8Evil wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Notice how every time anyone, anywhere in the world, wants to give an example of a mighty battleship, they invoke the name of the USS Missouri.

I'm not one of those "Mericuh! F**k yeah!" kind of Americans.... but recognize that this nation of mutts I call home, built the single most destructive conventional weapon in the history of mankind.... :)


Can I just interrupt your "U S A, U S A" chanting for a second and point out that the Yamato-class battleships had both superior firepower and range over the Iowa-class (USS Missouri).

It took 19 torpedoes and 17 bombs to sink the Musashi
It took at least 11 torpedoes and 6 bombs to sink the Yamato


So did your mom, lol. Joking.


Also, what is more important battles or wars?
Just because something is mechanically superior doesn't make the entity superior. Our tanks where out matched in world war 2 I believe as well.

[u]Can't wait untill when Eve online is Freemium.[/u] WiS only 10$, SP booster for one month 15$, DPS Boost 2$, EHP Boost 2$ Real money trading hub! Cosmeitic ship skins 15$ --> If you don't [u]pay **[/u]for a product, you ARE the [u]**product[/u].

Ultim8Evil
Exit-Strategy
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#119 - 2013-05-31 11:24:05 UTC
Kult Altol wrote:
Ultim8Evil wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Notice how every time anyone, anywhere in the world, wants to give an example of a mighty battleship, they invoke the name of the USS Missouri.

I'm not one of those "Mericuh! F**k yeah!" kind of Americans.... but recognize that this nation of mutts I call home, built the single most destructive conventional weapon in the history of mankind.... :)


Can I just interrupt your "U S A, U S A" chanting for a second and point out that the Yamato-class battleships had both superior firepower and range over the Iowa-class (USS Missouri).

It took 19 torpedoes and 17 bombs to sink the Musashi
It took at least 11 torpedoes and 6 bombs to sink the Yamato


So did your mom, lol. Joking.


Also, what is more important battles or wars?
Just because something is mechanically superior doesn't make the entity superior. Our tanks where out matched in world war 2 I believe as well.


My point ---> .














\o/ <--- You

Follow me on Twitter for literally no good reason @TheUltim8Evil

Sumthinburnin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#120 - 2013-05-31 12:22:36 UTC
Ultim8Evil wrote:
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
Notice how every time anyone, anywhere in the world, wants to give an example of a mighty battleship, they invoke the name of the USS Missouri.

I'm not one of those "Mericuh! F**k yeah!" kind of Americans.... but recognize that this nation of mutts I call home, built the single most destructive conventional weapon in the history of mankind.... :)


Can I just interrupt your "U S A, U S A" chanting for a second and point out that the Yamato-class battleships had both superior firepower and range over the Iowa-class (USS Missouri).

It took 19 torpedoes and 17 bombs to sink the Musashi
It took at least 11 torpedoes and 6 bombs to sink the Yamato



Oh yes they were sooo superior,....that's why they reside on the ocean bottom. Big Mo and her sisters were still rockin an rollin even into the 1990's,....and your superior ships were where,....oh yea rusting on the ocean floor. Up until this moment I wasn't chanting USA or" Mericuh! F**k yeah".

I had some knowledge of the ship, I used it because it was a survivor.
In that way I didn't have losers pointing out the fact that my example was,...rusting on the bottom of the ocean.
Instead I have some anti American BULLS**T to deal with.
Like it or not, ALL Axis owned Battleships are inferior to the Iowa class, why because they got sunk.

so,..... Mericuh! F**k yeah

Until someone builds a battleship that can and does sink an Iowa, all y'all just got owned.