These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dust, money well spent eh?

First post
Author
Jame Jarl Retief
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#21 - 2013-05-30 15:52:13 UTC
Well, let's be fair, IGN is not the only one that's giving the game lukewarm reviews.

I remember when Dust hit open beta earlier this year. What happened? Nothing! Like, literally, nothing. I dropped by many prominent sites that would cover something like this, and not a word. Meanwhile, when games like Vindictus or Dragon's Nest were approaching beta, there were weeks of coverage. So, right out of the gate, Dust was a niche within a niche (EVE).

There's very little Dust coverage from what I saw, and most of it wasn't all that good. One review especially made me chuckle because the last point of Pros and the last point in Cons was the same - future potential tied to EVE Online. And the cons were weak graphics and bad controls - the two things you do NOT want in a first person shooter. And did we mention it was for PS3-only? When EVE is PC-only? Makes so much sense... But hey, all of this was covered already so many times, so why am I rehashing it yet again.

At this point though, I really don't think Dust can even be saved. FPS games have been making quite impressive strides forward. The Rage game by id Software had spectacular enemy animations (mutants attacking by leaping off walls, executing rolls to avoid thrown blades and so on), the Battlefield series is still going strong with its destructible environments and somewhat new mechanics such as suppression, lens glow on scopes to help deal with snipers, not to mention stunning graphics. Call of Duty I can't comment on, it's a little too ADD for me, but they manage to sell the same crap every year with record numbers, so they must be doing something right, right? And where is Dust in all of this? Oh, yeah, it's F2P, so there's no sales to report really.

And later this year we're getting Battlefield 4, and where will Dust be compared to it? Graphics? Controls? Features? Short on all of those. The only thing Dust has is the connection to EVE, a PC game that your average PS3 FPS gamer never played and never will, and thus the connection is utterly meaningless. I made this comparison before, but imagine if there was a connection between EVE and World of Warcraft. On a Venn diagram, the overlap of the two circles would be virtually invisible. I have a strong suspicion it's the same for Dust on PS3 and EVE on PC. One is an FPS on a console, and one is an MMO on a PC. Overlap between those? Not that great.

OK, all right, I admit that EVE is unique. Mostly because there really hasn't been any MMO about spaceships out there in a very long time. When was the last one? Jumpgate? More than a decade ago? But releasing an FPS sci-fi shooter, an F2P one, within months of MMOFPS like Planetside 2 or a bunch of futuristic F2P FPSers? Madness.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#22 - 2013-05-30 15:54:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:
The review raises quite a few very valid issues with the game, wether the fanboiz would agree. I will say that when more 'credible' review sources come in say the same things, how will the fanboiz defend CCP's decision then?

Edit: I got interrupted mid post, so my grammar train was derailled. :(

If that happens, and it really hasn't so far, they will probably respond by stating the obvious.

DUST isn't a game that is released once as is and then "might" receive an update at some point to address flaws. DUST will be continuously improved, with bug fixes, upgraded game play, and new content every few months.

Also the number of DUST players could stay fairly low for the first few months and it wouldn't affect it's long term viability in the slightest, as they are in no way dependent on initial sales to make their profit.

For DUST, unlike virtually every other console game out there, reviews that point out weak parts of the game are actually helpful in it's ongoing development process. For other games that type of review would kill initial sales, and since their entire revenue is based on this it would effectively kill the game. Not so for DUST.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2013-05-30 15:54:55 UTC
Othran wrote:
Wow that's a bad bad review. Couldn't get a lot worse than that.

This bit made me laugh Lol

"And truth be told, most normal players will never participate in a battle of real significance anyhow, because at this point nearly every territory is held by well-run super corps that have more than 200 members and strong ties to the most influential EVE guilds."

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose as the garlic eaters would say.....


IKR? That is like saying you can't play EvE becuase its Hard, or that there is a steep learning curve. Or that by joining now you cant do anything because all the null sec is already controlled by some Sov holding entity.
MidnightWyvern
Fukamichi Corporation
SAYR Galactic
#24 - 2013-05-30 15:55:49 UTC
FLUFFY DELIVERIES wrote:
I will keep it short, with all the money invested in dust... its kinda sad it can only pull a rating of 5.8 from ign?

Reminds me of walking in stations... another ground breaking project that took years to construct and was ultimately a massive flop.

other peoples thoughts?

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2013/05/30/dust-514-review

>2013
>Giving a **** about IGN

Rattati Senpai noticed us! See you in the next FPS!

Alts: Saray Wyvern, Mobius Wyvern (Dust 514)

Prince Kobol
#25 - 2013-05-30 15:59:42 UTC
Its IGN.. we are talking about a site that gave the latest Lotro expansion, Riders of Rohan a 8.3

Fecking 8.3 for what is possibly the worst expansion ever to hit a MMO

Yeah.. IGN know there stuff lol
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#26 - 2013-05-30 15:59:54 UTC
Dust will become a niche game until CCP do a massive rework of the shooting mechanics and poor graphics and integrate it fully into eve. Then I reckon it will slowly become more popular as it is gradually improved just like Eve has done. Anyone who has played it though would know they need to improve the shooting and vehicle mechanics, as the reviewer said they just don't feel good. I would prefer it to work more like battlefield played on hardcore mode.
Kult Altol
The Safe Space
#27 - 2013-05-30 16:10:38 UTC
This is how I think about IGN

1)a game I like gets good reviews. The Reviewer has good taste.

2)a game I like gets a bad review. Wtf where did they get this joke of a "journalist"?

[u]Can't wait untill when Eve online is Freemium.[/u] WiS only 10$, SP booster for one month 15$, DPS Boost 2$, EHP Boost 2$ Real money trading hub! Cosmeitic ship skins 15$ --> If you don't [u]pay **[/u]for a product, you ARE the [u]**product[/u].

Skeln Thargensen
Doomheim
#28 - 2013-05-30 16:11:57 UTC
since this shouldn't be a thread about IGN, here's the eurogamer review.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-05-24-dust-514-review

forums.  serious business.

Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#29 - 2013-05-30 16:14:02 UTC
People still read reviews????

wumbo

Robus Muvila
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#30 - 2013-05-30 16:14:06 UTC
Although I can see some valid points from a lot of this review. The first half of the review is basically "I'm playing a game that isn't MWO or CoD, WHY ISN'T THIS GAME MWO OR COD"

TMC Senior Developer http://themittani.com - Because EvE has needed a proper news site for ages

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#31 - 2013-05-30 16:14:51 UTC
Well, everything being under control of super-corps is probably a valid point.


Who wants to play a game where they get OMGWTFSPANKED every two minutes? Yeah yeah, I know, go back to WoW, blah blah blah.

And they will.

But hey, limitations on resources would topple the super corps and the blue donut. Just let belts and moons become finite and make wreck salvage yield actual tonnage in scrap (so when everybody destroys the natural resources, they can fight over salvage too).

Until then, this is corporatism online and that's too much like the real world.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#32 - 2013-05-30 16:17:12 UTC
Send lots of money to IGN for a 9.0+ review.

Actually that works for most "professional" reviewers.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#33 - 2013-05-30 16:19:57 UTC
Not really a surprise.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Kult Altol
The Safe Space
#34 - 2013-05-30 16:20:18 UTC
Read the review, the only point I agree with is that the bunnies are getting the raw deal when it comes to holding territory.

[u]Can't wait untill when Eve online is Freemium.[/u] WiS only 10$, SP booster for one month 15$, DPS Boost 2$, EHP Boost 2$ Real money trading hub! Cosmeitic ship skins 15$ --> If you don't [u]pay **[/u]for a product, you ARE the [u]**product[/u].

Jak Onren
Jak's Salvage
#35 - 2013-05-30 16:24:35 UTC
I like DUST.

I was one of those that played it in early beta, but RL got in the way, so I didn't manage to pick up again until last Saturday. Spent all day on it. My sniper rifle had horrible sway, so I tracked down the skill to cure it. I quite like the clunky movement. It reminds me of Dead Space. I am moving around in a bulky suit with a rifle nearly as long as I am tall after all.

With some more integration with EVE, I think the game will be a winner. Not a blockbuster, but a winner.

I had a very enjoyable time with it and will certainly be playing it again.

And I really, really hope the future integration is such that DUST raiders can invade EVE stations!

I congratulate CCP on this 'experiment'. I don't think the reviewer saw it as this and didn't seem to think deeply at all about what CCP are attempting.
Admiral Sarah Solette
Lmao Ty For Structure
#36 - 2013-05-30 16:28:15 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:
The review raises quite a few very valid issues with the game, wether the fanboiz would agree. I will say that when more 'credible' review sources come in say the same things, how will the fanboiz defend CCP's decision then?

Edit: I got interrupted mid post, so my grammar train was derailled. :(

If that happens, and it really hasn't so far, they will probably respond by stating the obvious.

DUST isn't a game that is released once as is and then "might" receive an update at some point to address flaws. DUST will be continuously improved, with bug fixes, upgraded game play, and new content every few months.

Also the number of DUST players could stay fairly low for the first few months and it wouldn't affect it's long term viability in the slightest, as they are in no way dependent on initial sales to make their profit.

For DUST, unlike virtually every other console game out there, reviews that point out weak parts of the game are actually helpful in it's ongoing development process. For other games that type of review would kill initial sales, and since their entire revenue is based on this it would effectively kill the game. Not so for DUST.


Except it has happened. IGN isn't the only review site to give Dust a poor rating.

Poor controls, graphics, and gameplay progression have nothing to do with implementing future content.
Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#37 - 2013-05-30 16:40:28 UTC
Jame Jarl Retief wrote:
And the cons were weak graphics and bad controls - the two things you do NOT want in a first person shooter.


A review from someone that can't plug a mouse and keyboard into a PS3 is not to be taken seriously.
It also looks fine on my TV, but then my perception of the in game environment is coloured by my knowledge of the lore of the eve universe, I expect to see desolate wastelands.


The impression I get is that it's only being compared to the standard lobby based shooters, something that dust is not.
There's no persistency in the game worlds of CoD or BF, there is in dust.


Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#38 - 2013-05-30 16:51:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:
The review raises quite a few very valid issues with the game, wether the fanboiz would agree. I will say that when more 'credible' review sources come in say the same things, how will the fanboiz defend CCP's decision then?

Edit: I got interrupted mid post, so my grammar train was derailled. :(

If that happens, and it really hasn't so far, they will probably respond by stating the obvious.

DUST isn't a game that is released once as is and then "might" receive an update at some point to address flaws. DUST will be continuously improved, with bug fixes, upgraded game play, and new content every few months.

Also the number of DUST players could stay fairly low for the first few months and it wouldn't affect it's long term viability in the slightest, as they are in no way dependent on initial sales to make their profit.

For DUST, unlike virtually every other console game out there, reviews that point out weak parts of the game are actually helpful in it's ongoing development process. For other games that type of review would kill initial sales, and since their entire revenue is based on this it would effectively kill the game. Not so for DUST.


Except it has happened. IGN isn't the only review site to give Dust a poor rating.

Poor controls, graphics, and gameplay progression have nothing to do with implementing future content.

But it has everything to do with implementing regular game play improvements and bug fixes, which are facts I pointed out that you have chosen to conveniently overlook. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Darth Kilth
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#39 - 2013-05-30 16:54:28 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
Send lots of money to IGN for a 9.0+ review.

Actually that works for most "professional" reviewers.

Don't forget Doritos and Mountain dew!
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#40 - 2013-05-30 17:00:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Skeln Thargensen wrote:
since this shouldn't be a thread about IGN, here's the eurogamer review.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-05-24-dust-514-review

Slightly more insightful, however whenever a reviewer mentions grinding in relation to DUST that is a sure sign that they don't really understand how the game works... and that at least to a degree they are still stuck in a typcial FPS mindset.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.