These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Does Tengu Need a Nerf?

Author
Jerick Ludhowe
Internet Tuff Guys
#81 - 2011-11-04 14:28:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
why do t1 and t3 ships have 3 rigs and t2 have 2?
Because T2 ships are specialised on one task and giving them too many rig slots would let them somewhat break out of that specialisation.


I call pure and utter BS. 1 more rig slot is not going to allow a ship to "break out" of it's specialization.... How did you even come to this conclusion other than "quoting" what ccp said years ago when they introduced rigs.
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#82 - 2011-11-04 14:30:54 UTC
Djakku wrote:
Hungry Eyes wrote:
just saying, this cruiser is capable of numbers like 670dps while omnitanking 900dps, for example. it is the gold standard in PVE, and there isnt really a reason to fly anything else (at cruiser/BC level). Tengu is the go-to PVE boat, and people dont have a reason to use anything else.

should it be this way?


Those stats you mentioned are less than a Battleship, why do you think the Tengu needs a nerf again?

The ship is fine, it's a T3, it's supposed to be good, don't forget a lot of T3's are pimped, if anything needs changing the skill requirements should be greater (if you consider how much training is required for command ships and thier performance compared to a T3)


because those numbers are godly for a cruiser, even if it's T3. no other T3 cruiser can achieve such high dps at virtually unlimited range.
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#83 - 2011-11-04 14:34:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Hungry Eyes
Lord Ryan wrote:
Mystical Might wrote:
I see This chain occuring;


Nerf the Tengu!!
Ohno, Now Loki is OP. Nerf the Loki!!
Ohno, Now the Legion is OP, Nerf the Legion !!!
Ohno, Now the Proteus is OP, Nerf the Proteus!!
Ohno, Now the Tengu is OP, Nerf the Tengu!!

Just imagine it repeated down the page.
OR, you can accept that different ships are good at different things and move on?
Or fly a different ship.


+1


basically my whole point is, T3 ships are not in line. not even close. the Tengu is TOO GOOD at raping and pillaging everything PVE, and hands down the best cruiser in the game in PVP in pretty much any situation. with very high SP and faction gear of course. a perfectly flown and fit Tengu laughs at Machariels even. so there is little reason to fly anything else.
Elistea
BLUE Regiment.
#84 - 2011-11-04 14:40:59 UTC
Both Tengu and Loki are no doubt prime candidates in pve/pvp when we look at T3 cruisers.
However nefing them would be contraproductive. Instead of that lets look a bit on other 2 T3s.

Legion is definitely a bit behind (only real use in incursions,mby some gatecamps)
Active tanked its not bad for PVE, however if u want to do PVP buffer-tank fit, it gets terribly slow and any other T3 easyly outkites it.
I think small speed/agility boost would help a lot here.

Proteus is definitely least used one. I dont have Xperience flying it but i hope it gets better after hybrid/T2 ammo boosts.
Buzzmong
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2011-11-04 15:08:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Buzzmong
I don't fly T3's, so I'm not going to state if individual ships should be nerfed/buffed but looking at the stats, how they're used and their popularity, there's obviously some disparity.

From what I understand the general design rule was that T2 are specialised vessels (ie, things like the Diemost getting near BS level dps) which excel at one defined role while the T3's were meant to be not quite as good as a T2 at a specific role but retain much more flexibility and can do many roles.

Currently the other T3's don't seem to eclipse the T2 cruiser line up but it does seem as if the Tengu simply dicks over any of the T2 cruiser line up with regards to PVE (and possibly, over quite a few in PvP) and not only that, it also does seem to be better than the classes that are bigger than it (BC/BS) at their roles.

If the other T3's don't completely nullify their T2 (or T1) counterparts but the Tengu does, then it's not wrong to logically assume that the other 3 are relatively balanced on the entire shipscape and that the Tengu needs looking at to bring it in line.

Thing is as I don't fly it, I dunno if it's because of the ship itself, the weapons, or the bonuses to the weapons that make it seem to stand head and shoulders above the rest.
Naomi Knight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#86 - 2011-11-04 16:29:57 UTC
hml buffer fit , yeah too good , other fits sux , so only nerf if those get a boost to be usefull
oldmanst4r
oldmanst4r's Corporation
#87 - 2011-11-04 16:30:58 UTC
Hey the tengu is good no doubt about that. Solo it's a good exploration and great mission ship and in gangs it turns WHs into easy mode.

BUT...who cares if a (pimped) t3 cruiser can match a faction battleship in lvl 4 efficiency. (lol lvl4s) Solo exploration it's good but not uber by a long shot. WHs, I'll grant you, tengus excel at, but that's the only area where imo they beat a lot of other ships hands down. That's mainly because they combine ease of use, low barrier to entry, and relatively high efficiency. (sort of like a drake lol)

PvP...I've never actually flown a tengu in pvp solo because I just don't have that kind of cash to throw around. But from the ones I've fought and killed and been killed by, I can say that the amount of pimping you need to put into a tengu to solo pvp in an uber way is ridiculous. And recons will screw you over.

Overall, I'm far more in favor of buffing the other t3s up to tengu performance level. Tbh, I think if you nerf the tengu in any significant way it will suck totally and people will stop flying it overnight.
Tore Smith
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#88 - 2011-11-04 16:41:03 UTC
Hungry Eyes wrote:
just saying, this cruiser is capable of numbers like 670dps while omnitanking 900dps, for example. it is the gold standard in PVE, and there isnt really a reason to fly anything else (at cruiser/BC level). Tengu is the go-to PVE boat, and people dont have a reason to use anything else.

should it be this way?


it surly is a very good pve boat compared to the other t3, but honestly if you only fly tengu, you dont know what nightmare, paladin, cnr, golem, mach, vargur, absolution, sleipnir, hell even domi, vindi and kronos are capable of.
Naomi Knight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#89 - 2011-11-04 16:42:58 UTC
Tore Smith wrote:
Hungry Eyes wrote:
just saying, this cruiser is capable of numbers like 670dps while omnitanking 900dps, for example. it is the gold standard in PVE, and there isnt really a reason to fly anything else (at cruiser/BC level). Tengu is the go-to PVE boat, and people dont have a reason to use anything else.

should it be this way?


it surly is a very good pve boat compared to the other t3, but honestly if you only fly tengu, you dont know what nightmare, paladin, cnr, golem, mach, vargur, absolution, sleipnir, hell even domi, vindi and kronos are capable of.

vargur is the best muhaha consider subcaps only
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#90 - 2011-11-04 16:47:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniel Plain
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
What does it matter which ship is best for PvE?
Yes. The paper scissors rock balance should apply to specific pve uses as well as pvp.
The problem is that in in PvE, there is no paper or scissors, and the Tengu just happens to be granite compared to the Legion's sandstone.


By rock paper scissors pve I mean:
Tengu: Best in Caldari space. Terrible in Gallente space. Below average in Minmatar space. Above average in Amarr space
Loki: Bestt in Minmatar space. Terrible in Amarr space. Above average in Gallente Space. Below average in Caldari space
Proetues: Best in Gallente Space. Terrible in Caldari Space. Above average in Minmatar space. Below average in Amarr space
Legion: Best in Amarr space. Terrible in Minmatar space. Above average in Caldari space. below Average in Gallente space.

Yes I know that doesn't really happen - but it I like the idea.


the only reason why tengu is op in pve is its ridiculous damage projection. if all other strategic cruisers somehow magically got all their optimals and falloffs doubled, tengu would be outclassed by pretty much all three.

I should buy an Ishtar.

MukkBarovian
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#91 - 2011-11-04 17:00:53 UTC
Balance is never and should never be done on a basis of PVE.

For tiny-small Gang PVP
Tengu 100MN AB good tank and good damage projection
Good PVP boat when facing noobs without adequate tackle

Loki 50KM Web/Point decent speed
Very nice tackler

Proteus Nice buffer with facemelting DPS and can fit long scram
Useful in low mobility situations

Legion Umm? HAM dual MAR
Never seen one in action but they can theoretically tank a bit.

For medium+ sized Fleet
Tengu - You can make a fleet of Tengus that do bad things to people.
Loki - Its still just a tackler. A couple in fleet can be nice if you have the money. Rapier may be more cost effective though even if its going to be a lot thinner.
Proteus - Not really wonderful in fleets. Can fit a long point I suppose. Or for cheap you could use an Arazu and point further.
Legion - If this isn't AB AHACs GTFO. If this is AB AHACs why didn't you just get a zealot?

Therefore T3s, while all being able to do stuff small gang, aren't uniformally useful in fleets. If anthing the not-Tengus need a minor buff.
Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
#92 - 2011-11-04 18:09:58 UTC
OP Doesn't know WTF he's talking about!

My 1100dps Nightmare would **** on your Tengu for pretty much every L4. Even against annoying Angels!
Captain Nares
O3 Corporation
#93 - 2011-11-04 18:15:54 UTC
Does Tengu Need a Nerf?

Tengu doesn't need a nerf.

Heavy missiles need a nerf.
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#94 - 2011-11-04 18:16:57 UTC
Herman Klaus wrote:
OP Doesn't know WTF he's talking about!

My 1100dps Nightmare would **** on your Tengu for pretty much every L4. Even against annoying Angels!


you sound like a moron. who the hell is talking about L4's and battleships?
Captain Nares
O3 Corporation
#95 - 2011-11-04 18:32:43 UTC
Hungry Eyes wrote:
<...>
should it be this way?


Tengu is just a regular strategic cruiser in any aspect, xept DPS projection.

Exellent DPS projection makes it (as well as it makes Drake the best BC) best SC.


IMO heavy missiles is the problem. Not Tengu/Drake itself.
Naomi Knight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#96 - 2011-11-04 18:50:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Naomi Knight
Captain Nares wrote:
Hungry Eyes wrote:
<...>
should it be this way?


Tengu is just a regular strategic cruiser in any aspect, xept DPS projection.

Exellent DPS projection makes it (as well as it makes Drake the best BC) best SC.


IMO heavy missiles is the problem. Not Tengu/Drake itself.

how so hml is the problem? tell us pls
i see hml the only good missile platform, the rest is crapy maybe rockets work too ,but I dont use those
Jennifer Starling
Imperial Navy Forum Patrol
#97 - 2011-11-04 18:54:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Jennifer Starling
Hungry Eyes wrote:
basically my whole point is, T3 ships are not in line. not even close. the Tengu is TOO GOOD at raping and pillaging everything PVE, and hands down the best cruiser in the game in PVP in pretty much any situation. with very high SP and faction gear of course. a perfectly flown and fit Tengu laughs at Machariels even. so there is little reason to fly anything else.

Tengus aren't that great vs EM weak rats, in that case their DPS is less than a Loki's - let alone battlehips with EM type ammo.
Also the fact that you lose SP for being ganked doesn't make it exactly a riskless business flying one.
In PvP they sacrifice significant DPS for survivability. It´s not all that `Iwin`.

I do admit it´s the most versatile T3 hands down. But we have the best ship for everything. Should we nerf the Rifter too? Or the Rupture? The Thrasher? The Curse? The Iteron V? The Nyx? Just because they're the best in their class?
Hertz Sabezan
FLIC OU NINJA
#98 - 2011-11-04 19:20:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Hertz Sabezan
wrong thread - please ignore
Froz3nEcho Sarain
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#99 - 2011-11-04 19:25:07 UTC
Jennifer Starling wrote:
Hungry Eyes wrote:
basically my whole point is, T3 ships are not in line. not even close. the Tengu is TOO GOOD at raping and pillaging everything PVE, and hands down the best cruiser in the game in PVP in pretty much any situation. with very high SP and faction gear of course. a perfectly flown and fit Tengu laughs at Machariels even. so there is little reason to fly anything else.

Tengus aren't that great vs EM weak rats, in that case their DPS is less than a Loki's - let alone battlehips with EM type ammo.
Also the fact that you lose SP for being ganked doesn't make it exactly a riskless business flying one.
In PvP they sacrifice significant DPS for survivability. It´s not all that `Iwin`.

I do admit it´s the most versatile T3 hands down. But we have the best ship for everything. Should we nerf the Rifter too? Or the Rupture? The Thrasher? The Omen? The Iteron V? The Nyx? Just because they're the best in their class?


The Omen? THE OMEN? Best in his class? I really hope you meant another ship.

[i]~ When everything fades away, an echo is the only sound that will remain ~   ~ Chaos is a name for any order that produces confusion in our minds ~[/i]

Tore Smith
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#100 - 2011-11-04 21:07:54 UTC
Hungry Eyes wrote:
Herman Klaus wrote:
OP Doesn't know WTF he's talking about!

My 1100dps Nightmare would **** on your Tengu for pretty much every L4. Even against annoying Angels!


you sound like a moron. who the hell is talking about L4's and battleships?


well for one your shitpost wasn't specific on the pve content, so assuming l4s are part of your "problem" wasn't so far fetched for him. so only if you're talking whs the tengu shines. but even there you have better options if you're not alone. is there any real argument up your sleeve?