These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Launcher failed again?

Author
Jasdar Doberia
Doberian Anarchist Dept. of Destruction Inc.
#1 - 2013-05-23 17:09:49 UTC
Hi,
I am receiving a different problem now. Please help!!
"the EVE launcher cannot update a directory from which processes are running. Please close the following processes:ccpbrowser.exe"
WTF ???
Any help in correcting CCP's **** up would be appreciated.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2 - 2013-05-23 17:10:54 UTC


--> Issues, Workarounds & Localization

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Drunken Bum
#3 - 2013-05-23 17:11:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Drunken Bum
Jesus christ on a pogo stick! Another launcher thread. This is just what we needed!

After the patch we're giving the market some gentle supply restriction, like tying one wrist to the bedpost loosely with soft silk rope. Just enough to make things a bit more exciting for the market, not enough to make a safeword necessary.  -Fozzie

Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#4 - 2013-05-23 17:13:21 UTC
Jasdar Doberia wrote:
Hi,
I am receiving a different problem now. Please help!!
"the EVE launcher cannot update a directory from which processes are running. Please close the following processes:ccpbrowser.exe"
WTF ???
Any help in correcting CCP's **** up would be appreciated.



You *like* pissing off an entire forum, don't you?

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#5 - 2013-05-23 17:16:38 UTC
If only some enterprising individual would start a bounty campaign against everyone who makes launcher threads.....



Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Danni stark
#6 - 2013-05-23 17:22:55 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
If only some enterprising individual would start a bounty campaign against everyone who makes launcher threads.....





i honestly think CCP should redirect the new topic button to the search function.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#7 - 2013-05-23 19:32:55 UTC
Drunken Bum wrote:
Jesus christ on a pogo stick! Another launcher thread. This is just what we needed!


I don't think it was a pogo stick.

Pogo sticks have springy bottoms and fewer nails.

Participation of the occupant is entirely optional on a pogo stick as well.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Zak Breen
Breen Enterprises
#8 - 2013-05-23 20:13:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Zak Breen
Jasdar Doberia wrote:
Hi,
I am receiving a different problem now. Please help!!
"the EVE launcher cannot update a directory from which processes are running. Please close the following processes:ccpbrowser.exe"
WTF ???
Any help in correcting CCP's **** up would be appreciated.


None of you actually helped him.

It's a simple fix, Jasdar: press Ctrl+Alt+Delete, open the Task Manager (or, right-click the task bar in Windows 7/8 and click Task Manager), and under "Processes" find ccpbrowser.exe -> right-click -> end task.

edit: spelling

Maturity, one discovers, has everything to do with the acceptance of not knowing. http://www.di.fm/spacemusic

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-05-23 20:16:46 UTC
Sry for you OP, if you haven't read yet all those threads about this, the sticky thread about this you're either blind or idiot.

Also: stop using OS and hardware from 70's might help not having issues at all with new launcher, mkay?

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-05-23 20:18:11 UTC
Drunken Bum wrote:
Jesus christ on a pogo stick!


He bounced for our sins.

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.