Missions & Complexes

Both lowsec exploration and wormholes (c3) has solo mission scale encounters, and honestly if you've been around the game for 9 years, you should have the mental and skillpoints toolbox to be able to do either without much in the way of shiploss.

I find the availability of all 3 to be a far better entertainment set than adding further L4s, and there is nothing stopping you going back and doing some L4s on a day when you just have an hour and don't feel like dealing with lowsec.

meh, a few years ago I probably would have agreed with you, but really once you have done the mission a few times all the newness has dried out.

If you remove L4s from hisec you will remove important part of the game.
Do not vote for removing contect you dont use. It maybe attractive for others.

OP has right we need vast impriovement in missions number and ability to... create mission by pilots. Or some randomness put into missions. Random variable generator to twist missions and make them less predictable.

A rework of the whole mission framework to make it much more dynamic and player involving (I give you a mission) is much better than a few new missions in the current framework. Also to take advantage of the new NPC AI and the "tiericide", perhaps making mission fits a bit more PvP like.

"How would player involving missions work?" That is the big question indeed and the topic for many brainstorm sessions. It is obvious the scope would be beyond existing game mechanics. Perhaps we could tie the price of certain NPC goods with some mission activities, or that I could invest effort/money in specific mission activities which then promotes benefits/penalties for the system I am in.


Perhaps TRIAD has some input on the topic too.

not this game.

Your point of view, personally pvp didn't bring me to this game it's something I fell into because the actual PVE content is so poor.

Lot's of people like to think pvp is the actual endgame but it isn't it's part of it, like pve is.

It's like saying 0.0 is the only thing in eve that you should aim for. It's all a persons perspective, some people only live in 0.0 (e.g me) and other people have no intention into going 0.0 route, both have valid points but one isn;t better than the other as well as people trying to push people into areas they have no intention of going just because people think you should.


If someone is happy doing missions in high-sec let them do it, if you try to force change to that because you think they should be doing something else all that will happen is you will lose another subscriber.

I've spent that much time in 0.0 I actually feel safer there than I do in high-sec now.

Can we just turn this into a fix all of PvE thread yet?

Rather than new missions, I'd like to see the current ones revamped to be more dynamic and have more random spawns and layouts, instead of the same predictable ones every time.

In all seriousness CCP left the Risk vs reward up to the players. They made it so that you can wardec and bounty them (mission runners). So if people REALLY didn't want others running missions in hisec anymore because they felt the risk:reward ratio was off, they could change it.

Guess it was all a lot of **** talk.