These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Reporting rulebreakers on station
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
big miker
Frogleap Factories
#1 - 2013-05-17 19:17:52 UTC
Hi there,

There's been an incident on the test server. A random supercapital gang started killing our 2 supercarriers on station.
No combat allowed on station yet after saying that multiple times they kept on going.
Not to mention dictor / heavy dictor bubbles ruining other peoples testing.

Here are some screenshots:

Agressing screenshot
Screenshot 1 - bubbles + agressing

I have the feeling these guys do this more often, it's annoying and people like these shouldn't be allowed on this server anyways. Rules are rules...

Best regards, big miker

Latest video: Ferocious 9.0 - Vertical Supremacy

Nano Naglfar!
Kora Ethereal
Ethereal Beings
#2 - 2013-05-17 19:22:53 UTC
I can confirm this:

Bubbles were gone after they found out they were getting reported...

http://puu.sh/2VpYL.jpg

Lance something was aslo attacking me on station.
de4deye
Phantom Space
Space Madness.
#3 - 2013-05-17 19:23:50 UTC
+1. Yes, I also saw this. These guys do this more often than this, however. Sorry I have no proof, but it should show up in the logs. This distracts from testing and must be dealt with soon.
The Sinister
Interbellum
#4 - 2013-05-17 19:23:57 UTC  |  Edited by: The Sinister
I was undocking my carrier for testing capacitor stability at the staition undock and this guy Doomsdayed Me for no reason. I want someone to do something about this. http://true-sansha.com/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=119668 I did not get a Screenshot because i was instapoped by the Avatar doomsday.

The Name of the toon is Zeita102 and i dont want to find him again in SiSi
SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-05-17 19:26:34 UTC
Confirming that a supercapital fleet killed at least one supercarrier on the station, while deploying bubbles and being all-around mentally-challenged dudes.
Ciens
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#6 - 2013-05-17 19:28:03 UTC
Same happend to me a few after miker died.

2013.05.17 19:21:00

Victim: Ciens
Corp: FoFoFoFoFoFofFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFoFo
Alliance: Unknown
Faction: Unknown
Destroyed: Wyvern
System: 6-CZ49
Security: -0,2
Damage Taken: 3695748

Involved parties:

Name: StarshipTrooper (laid the final blow)
Security: 2,60
Corp: ALL LUCK NO SKILL
Alliance: ALL LUCK NO SKILL.
Faction: None
Ship: Erebus
Weapon: Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I
Damage Done: 1408813

Name: Commander Zulu
Security: 2.7
Corp: 0utbreak
Alliance: None
Faction: None
Ship: Nyx
Weapon: Cyclops
Damage Done: 819155

Name: Alvin Nyx
Security: 5.0
Corp: Elite Aeronautic Developer Syndicate
Alliance: Test Alliance Please Ignore
Faction: None
Ship: Nyx
Weapon: Cyclops
Damage Done: 770240

Name: Rak Bar
Security: 5.0
Corp: Elite Aeronautic Developer Syndicate
Alliance: Test Alliance Please Ignore
Faction: None
Ship: Aeon
Weapon: Cyclops
Damage Done: 621487

Name: Stubbins
Security: 5.0
Corp: Lunatics.
Alliance: Test Alliance Please Ignore
Faction: None
Ship: Aeon
Weapon: Cyclops
Damage Done: 74317

Name: treges
Security: -2.1
Corp: Reikoku
Alliance: The Retirement Club
Faction: None
Ship: Bhaalgorn
Weapon: Heavy Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Damage Done: 1736

Name: Garaky
Security: 4.9
Corp: Lunatics.
Alliance: Test Alliance Please Ignore
Faction: None
Ship: Devoter
Weapon: Small Nosferatu II
Damage Done: 0

Destroyed items:

Damage Control II
Firbolg (Drone Bay)
Malleus, Qty: 3 (Drone Bay)
Tyrfing, Qty: 3 (Drone Bay)
Mantis, Qty: 2 (Drone Bay)
Power Diagnostic System II
Einherji, Qty: 3 (Drone Bay)
Dragonfly (Drone Bay)
Capital Core Defense Field Extender II
Heavy Energy Neutralizer II
Power Diagnostic System II
Scan Resolution Script
Cyclops, Qty: 5 (Drone Bay)
Capital Core Defense Field Extender II
Capital Core Defense Field Extender II
Explosive Deflection Field II
Power Diagnostic System II
Warp Disruptor II


http://img5.fotos-hochladen.net/uploads/20130517191ecp8lhdnkg.png <-- just a pic of the action
Princess Saskia
Hyperfleet Industries
#7 - 2013-05-17 22:01:35 UTC
It might have had something to do with the constant smacktalking in local and the pretending you'd be safe on station.

 ♥ 
Octoven
Stellar Production
#8 - 2013-05-18 00:19:41 UTC
Princess Saskia wrote:
It might have had something to do with the constant smacktalking in local and the pretending you'd be safe on station.


Smacktalk aside, as far as the rules are concerned you SHOULD be safe on station, for another player to challenge this assumption is this breaking the rules and needs to be banned. Personally, I don't care if you think someone is safe or not on station, if CCP says hey no station fights without permission, then as far as Im concerned you ARE safe on station, doesnt matter if the actual mechanics of shooting have been disabled or not.
Princess Saskia
Hyperfleet Industries
#9 - 2013-05-18 09:05:12 UTC
Octoven wrote:
Princess Saskia wrote:
It might have had something to do with the constant smacktalking in local and the pretending you'd be safe on station.


Smacktalk aside, as far as the rules are concerned you SHOULD be safe on station, for another player to challenge this assumption is this breaking the rules and needs to be banned. Personally, I don't care if you think someone is safe or not on station, if CCP says hey no station fights without permission, then as far as Im concerned you ARE safe on station, doesnt matter if the actual mechanics of shooting have been disabled or not.

Agressing back means you suddenly agree and pvp becomes consented.

gf.

 ♥