These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I for one, Am not happy with no new nebulae in Wormhole space.

Author
legwarmer
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2011-11-03 19:09:41 UTC
I love the new nebulae, They're simply beautiful and when CCP said they will be making nebulae darker and more sinister when it goes into more unsecured space, PLUS the fact that they were going to make it so you have a sense of direction in the universal anomalies and phenomenon, I was horrified when i saw that the wormhole systems will not be getting new nebulae.

At the moment, Wormhole systems are kinda cool i must admit, but when you bring in the brand spanking new nebulae into the known space, The unknown space which is actually the most dangerous in all eve in some aspects, Is being left behind.

Here is my proposal, And i dear to god hope that i get support from both the playerbase and even CSM or devs themselves.


A), Stick to your content promise which you have just recently made, and DO NOT THROW THINGS OUT EARLY. I will be mortified if i log onto my home C6 and not see the nebulae in its full glory. If your going to bring out a whole new form of art into a currently beautiful game, Then rework it all and release it at once.

B) I really don't doubt that you have a wormhole structure in your database. I would laugh pretty hard if you just put wormholes and random locations and gave them random statics. I have heard stories of a mirror image of the known universe, Where the C6's and the like are at one end, the low and nullsec end, Making the majority of their statics lowsec and null, and then the c1's having the highsec end for the majority of highsec statics (i'm not saying that this is always the case, As statics are also probable for unknown space as well.) In the case that you DO have a wormhole structure, Give us a sense of direction with the nebulae as you are with the known space. It will bring in a huge amount of research into making maps, and it will let players say "Oh my god we're near here", In a place where they have never been before.



Please, find it in your hearts for us wormholers :<

Legwarmer.
Jodis Talvanen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2 - 2011-11-03 19:19:10 UTC
legwarmer wrote:
I was horrified when i saw that the wormhole systems will not be getting new nebulae.

Sause?
mkint
#3 - 2011-11-03 19:22:39 UTC  |  Edited by: mkint
This is what you're looking for. That said, even if there are regions and such in the database for w-space, would you rather have the art team spend time working on making you new nebulae that won't really mean anything because they will still appear random, (especially when your current ones are 'good enough') or would you rather have them working on modular POSes? Last I heard, it was the art team that's holding up the show on a LOT of features.

edit: for all we know, the WH's already use nebulae based on your location in 3D space. And even if they did, so what? It's not like your location in 3D space in w-space means anything at all, as far as anyone has been able to reliably determine.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#4 - 2011-11-03 19:27:09 UTC
legwarmer wrote:
I love the new nebulae, They're simply beautiful and when CCP said they will be making nebulae darker and more sinister when it goes into more unsecured space, PLUS the fact that they were going to make it so you have a sense of direction in the universal anomalies and phenomenon, I was horrified when i saw that the wormhole systems will not be getting new nebulae.

At the moment, Wormhole systems are kinda cool i must admit, but when you bring in the brand spanking new nebulae into the known space, The unknown space which is actually the most dangerous in all eve in some aspects, Is being left behind.

Here is my proposal, And i dear to god hope that i get support from both the playerbase and even CSM or devs themselves.


A), Stick to your content promise which you have just recently made, and DO NOT THROW THINGS OUT EARLY. I will be mortified if i log onto my home C6 and not see the nebulae in its full glory. If your going to bring out a whole new form of art into a currently beautiful game, Then rework it all and release it at once.

B) I really don't doubt that you have a wormhole structure in your database. I would laugh pretty hard if you just put wormholes and random locations and gave them random statics. I have heard stories of a mirror image of the known universe, Where the C6's and the like are at one end, the low and nullsec end, Making the majority of their statics lowsec and null, and then the c1's having the highsec end for the majority of highsec statics (i'm not saying that this is always the case, As statics are also probable for unknown space as well.) In the case that you DO have a wormhole structure, Give us a sense of direction with the nebulae as you are with the known space. It will bring in a huge amount of research into making maps, and it will let players say "Oh my god we're near here", In a place where they have never been before.



Please, find it in your hearts for us wormholers :<

Legwarmer.


Wormholes already have their own non-random background system. Each class of wormhole gets a specific background, making six unique backgrounds in total. This is supposed to imply that like-classed systems (i.e. All Class 1 systems) are located nearby each other in their own regions, thus sharing the same skybox. This is exactly what they are now doing to k-space. By looking at the background, you can know where you are.

Since w-space doesn't benefit from a star-map, and the backgrounds never were randomized in the first place, wormhole space doesn't need this update.

The only improvement that could be made is resolution, and frankly... based on the screenshots, the quality of both looks roughly the same.

Katrina Oniseki

Pattern Clarc
Citeregis
#5 - 2011-11-03 19:30:25 UTC
I too am disapointed. Given how long the base artwork took to create for k-space, I doubt there will be any changes to w-space backdrops anytime soon...

Maybe just paint it black....

/emo.

Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#6 - 2011-11-03 19:31:41 UTC
Pattern Clarc wrote:
I too am disapointed. Given how long the base artwork took to create for k-space, I doubt there will be any changes to w-space backdrops anytime soon...

Maybe just paint it black....

/emo.



If anything, k-space is being brought up to par with w-space. The two have had such drastic differences in quality for a long time.

Katrina Oniseki

Pattern Clarc
Citeregis
#7 - 2011-11-03 19:33:27 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Pattern Clarc wrote:
I too am disapointed. Given how long the base artwork took to create for k-space, I doubt there will be any changes to w-space backdrops anytime soon...

Maybe just paint it black....

/emo.



If anything, k-space is being brought up to par with w-space. The two have had such drastic differences in quality for a long time.

Sure,

And given that we're getting corp bookmarks, I'll live.

Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction

Xercodo
Cruor Angelicus
#8 - 2011-11-03 19:37:06 UTC
WH's already have higher res nebulae

Not disappointed

I'm just happier regular space is now finally gonna be on par

If the WHs are now gonna be worse it's hardly noticeable to me

The Drake is a Lie

ShadowMaster
#9 - 2011-11-03 19:58:14 UTC
It makes sense to not make new sky boxes for w-space.

The new sky boxes are generated from a 3D model. CCP artists place the nebula in a 3D physical representation of EVE and the system kicks out cube maps for each region of space based on its relationship to the nebula. This allows for the nebula to always appear in the right spot and the artists don't have to try and guess how small/big or where a nebula should be placed when painting the cube map.

The limiter here is that each cube map that the system out puts needs a lot of work done to it before you get the quality you see in the dev blog. That is the main reason why the smallest change is at the region level and not system level.

So if CCP was to provide new cube maps for w-space they would need to give away how the systems are physically organized (which if you look at the data dump they do have a physical placement in the universe) which would break the lore of the w-space systems being in unknown locations. The other problem is that if CCP broke the nebula down to region level in w-space they would either have to lose the variance in wormhole class or they would need a lot more nebula. Four (I think there are four nebula representing the different wormhole classes.) for each region instead of just one. So to use the new system CCP would have to break the lore of wormhole systems being in unknown locations (even relative to each other) and they would either have to forget making them different based on wormhole class or have four times more work to do.

If CCP does not use the new system to make the nebula have physical locations then there is no reason to redoing them at all since they are already higher resolution and look fantastic.

I say leave w-space as an unknown and enjoy the current sky boxes.
Jodis Talvanen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#10 - 2011-11-03 20:55:29 UTC
But the current w-space nebulae looks **** compared to the new ones for k-space... Demanding a unified revamp.

They are doing Jove space as well, why don't you ask what is the point of that. I don't see how difficult it is to do the same thing 50% more when you have already done 100%. (there are roughly half the number of k systems of w systems)
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2011-11-03 21:08:15 UTC
If enough of your tears spill into space, you can make your own nebulae.
Joneleth Rein
#12 - 2011-11-03 23:56:06 UTC
In theory it shouldn't be that hard, specially if the code is solid they could populate w-space with nebulae fast. And I wouldn't mind if it didn't get priority in this patch just as long as it got done sometime. It would be a bummer if w-space didn't have nebulae :(

Spider Pig! Spider Pig! Does what a Spider Pig does.. Can he swing? From a web.. No he can't. He's a pig.

Masamune Dekoro
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#13 - 2011-11-04 00:25:12 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
If enough of your tears spill into space, you can make your own nebulae.


Our tears, they will blot out the sun.
Lucjan
Deutzer Freiheit
#14 - 2011-12-17 20:19:24 UTC
No, wormhole skyboxes are quite the ugly compared to the gorgeous nebula we have been introduced to in normal space.
And yes they could move around too like the ones in empire. There is still x,y,z in the wormhole system map to base it off of.

I just hope they haven't gotten around to it yet.

I will be avoiding the uglies for now.
Morganta
The Greater Goon
#15 - 2011-12-17 20:25:28 UTC
think of it as incentive to come out of your cave and play eve with the rest of us