These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#701 - 2011-11-03 09:13:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Jade Constantine
Stella SGP wrote:
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
Yea, thats why I said 'suppose'. Anyway from what I can recall they were talking more about selling 'conveniences', such as standings or sec statues, rather then straight up over-powered gold ammo. Weren't they?

Then again if they wanted to sell gold ammo in the NEX, they don't need WiS platform to do it. There is no reason to load WiS just to use the NEX. So, please don't mix the 2 together.

Unfortunately they are not as separate as you say, because CCP poluted WiS with the inclusion of microtransactions and this has given the pro-FiS players even more reason to despise anything involving WiS. Cash shop 'creep' has been seen in other games and with where CCP was headed with microtransactions the pro-FiS'ers were right to believe that it wouldn't be long before space aspects of the game had microtransactions attached to them.

Oh come on, you're smart enough to recognize that WiS and MT are 2 seperate issues, yet you still choose to lump them up together like all the others? CCP could have launched NEX without Incarna if they wanted to and start selling ship skins. One does not need the other! So, its silly for pro-FiS'ers to believe that space aspect will have MT because of WiS.

Edit - Anyway, if you want to argue about MT, in my opinion, the day CCP introduced PLEX, the floodgates have been opened for MT and its up to CCP whether gold ammo is introduced or not. Cause I really don't see the difference between selling a bunch of PLEX to buy a SC and spending some AURs on gold ammo to pwn others. Its just 1 more link in the chain. Real money or ISK -> PLEX -> AUR -> Gold Ammo, versus Real money -> PLEX -> ISK -> SC.


I have heard this argument several times from pro-MT/NEX quislings. That basically "we already surrendered Eve's virginity with PLEX so we might as well put her out on the street charging Aurum for NeX handjobs by the bus shelter."

But I do think its the logical fallacy of one point of compromise inevitably leading to full surrender of principle and virtue.

Yes PLEX is pay to win. But its pay to win by harnessing the labour of other PLAYERS (and paying them) to gain your own in-game advantage (flashy ships and implant sets etc). In essence PLEX is YOU paying another player somewhere else in the world $15 to mine you 350-400m isk. The stuff you buy with that isk also comes from other PLAYERS.

NEX/MT stuff is creeping MT corruption of the sandbox that threatens to extend further and further into the game like a malign cancer that removes content we should have as part of our subscriptions and delivers it in the cheap and nasty cash shop.

And this is the point that a lot of the MT supporters simply refuse to see - this "hybrid model" of subscription + MT is just insulting to the intelligence and integrity of players who have grown used to getting their Eve content in exchange for a premium rate subscription. Eve is not a cheap game to play - its subscripton is high. Nobody complained years ago when the CCP management declared that it was a premium product and premium costs so subs would remain high. But people surely have a right to complain when subs remain at the current level while other content is nickel and dimed on from the cash store.

But back to your point about PLEX. Yes, Eve years ago did lose her virginity. The Management told us they desperately needed the additional revenue stream and PLEX would serve the additional function of opening up the game to players from poorer countries without stable currency, to students, to the unemployed etc - who couldn't afford the premium subs and frankly that argument is true. That is the other side of PLEX.

Eve lost her virginity but partly through charity work.

Now you are suggesting that she start turning tricks by the hour for NeX clothes and ship skins and thats alright because we acquiesed to PLEX years ago? Sorry its not the same thing. People have standards and lines of behaviour things they will do and things they will not do. There is a limit to greed also, and how much a company will get to trade on its greed before the customers will go elsewhere.These limits we saw fully demonstrated this last summer.

On your initial point : while in principle I would agree that WiS didn't have to ALL be about the MT/NEX - in practise it was. Perhaps it was fortunate that we all got to see a glimpse into the future and see what a fully MT Eve would look like? Now we know, it looks like the NeX store.

Question we need to ask ourselves on the future of Eve is do we like that NeX store icon on our station services? How are we going to feel about it when the NeX/MT gurus who survived the 20% chop at CCP start arguing for ship skins and alliance logos by NeX? Are we going to listen to the Mittani NeXt time he tells us its just "vanity" (and doesn't matter) despite the fact that ship painting/colour schemes has been a long term promise for Eve gameplay for everyone not just credulous idiots who somehow think that MT in a subs game is something good.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Sinistra Arc
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#702 - 2011-11-03 09:19:34 UTC
Wow.

I'm poasting in a Goon-jack thread.

In all seriousness however, I wanted the initial incarnation of WiS. Never desired MT. Ever.

Nothing but a bummer to have to throw that idea out the window. Why CCP? Why?!
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#703 - 2011-11-03 09:38:23 UTC
Sinistra Arc wrote:
Wow.

I'm poasting in a Goon-jack thread.

In all seriousness however, I wanted the initial incarnation of WiS. Never desired MT. Ever.

Nothing but a bummer to have to throw that idea out the window. Why CCP? Why?!


Blame the "industry experts" they hired that told Hilmar the players would eat up being double charged for content and would buy the $1000 jeans argument. Some people in CCP HQ were literally living in cloud cuckoo land to believe that gamers were somehow insulated from a world wracked with economic woes and financial crisis and actually cared about "defining themselves" by spending $72 on an ugly virtual monocle rather than taking their girlfriends out for a fish supper.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Sinistra Arc
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#704 - 2011-11-03 10:31:51 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
Sinistra Arc wrote:
Wow.

I'm poasting in a Goon-jack thread.

In all seriousness however, I wanted the initial incarnation of WiS. Never desired MT. Ever.

Nothing but a bummer to have to throw that idea out the window. Why CCP? Why?!


Blame the "industry experts" they hired that told Hilmar the players would eat up being double charged for content and would buy the $1000 jeans argument. Some people in CCP HQ were literally living in cloud cuckoo land to believe that gamers were somehow insulated from a world wracked with economic woes and financial crisis and actually cared about "defining themselves" by spending $72 on an ugly virtual monocle rather than taking their girlfriends out for a fish supper.


Understood.

Ironic how the new buzz is nike/hellokitty skins for ships. Go figure.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#705 - 2011-11-03 11:02:01 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
The responses in this thread proved that beyond my expectations and no counting is required to make my case.

30+ pages of you and the other Barbie fetishists getting trolled is proof of what exactly?


I applaud your commitment to content free trollness! You do the goons proud!

But currently you are only an average troll. To move past that you need to consider branding! For example I have worked on making "asshat" a standard Eve term. I for example would call you an "asshat" not only to characterize your content free trolling but to also make the concept of me calling someone like you an "asshat" as part of the Issler brand.

There is a great Zefrank video about branding you might study to help you develop your brand!

I am sure with just a little effort you can make your insanely ugly troll face into a seriously recognized brand in Eve! Maybe calling folks space barbies could be part of your brand.

For now I will focus on my brand by calling you an "asshat" for your weak efforts at trolling!

Issler
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#706 - 2011-11-03 12:23:24 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Ranka Mei wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Most men are not interested in dress up. I know I don't speak for everyone. Some people really want dress up and have spoken out about it. But stastically dress up games are not going to appeal to the sci fi demographic.

Exactly how limited has a mind to be to think of further immersiveness and truer virtual realities only in terms of playing 'dress-up'? What is it that the man said?! "You, Sir, are so narrow minded, that if you fell on a pin it would blind you in both eyes."



Yeah say what you want about "further immersiveness" and "truer virtual realities." But when ccp talks about wis they do not mean full body sensor suits and virtual glasses.

They are talking about dressing up computer avatars.

You may fail to understand this but that does not make me narrow minded.


You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

On that note however...the ship explosions themselves could really use some work...they are rather boring.



Ok if the point of "Walking in stations" was not to dress up your avatar and have it "walk in stations" then what was it?

Was it so we could play virtual store clerk?

Its fine if you want to dress up computer avatars and have them walk around looking in the mirror and at how other avatars are dressed. But most men don't want to do that. Pretending otherwise is stupid. CCP has realized that why can't you?

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#707 - 2011-11-03 12:33:59 UTC
Sinistra Arc wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
Sinistra Arc wrote:
Wow.

I'm poasting in a Goon-jack thread.

In all seriousness however, I wanted the initial incarnation of WiS. Never desired MT. Ever.

Nothing but a bummer to have to throw that idea out the window. Why CCP? Why?!


Blame the "industry experts" they hired that told Hilmar the players would eat up being double charged for content and would buy the $1000 jeans argument. Some people in CCP HQ were literally living in cloud cuckoo land to believe that gamers were somehow insulated from a world wracked with economic woes and financial crisis and actually cared about "defining themselves" by spending $72 on an ugly virtual monocle rather than taking their girlfriends out for a fish supper.


Understood.

Ironic how the new buzz is nike/hellokitty skins for ships. Go figure.


It had better not be. Regardless of how foolish some players are being about considering ship skins "vanity" (and hence ideal targets for the MT clowns) I have hope that CCP management has learned its lesson and will deliver ship skins/painting and logos etc by traditional methods within the sandbox and will not risk another storm of player discontent by trying to nickel and dime us on what has been long promised as game content for everyone.

If NeX sells ship skins this game will take another staggering lurch towards free-to-play oblivion as the subscriptions will again take a hit.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
#708 - 2011-11-03 12:40:45 UTC
Stella SGP wrote:
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
Yea, thats why I said 'suppose'. Anyway from what I can recall they were talking more about selling 'conveniences', such as standings or sec statues, rather then straight up over-powered gold ammo. Weren't they?

Then again if they wanted to sell gold ammo in the NEX, they don't need WiS platform to do it. There is no reason to load WiS just to use the NEX. So, please don't mix the 2 together.

Unfortunately they are not as separate as you say, because CCP poluted WiS with the inclusion of microtransactions and this has given the pro-FiS players even more reason to despise anything involving WiS. Cash shop 'creep' has been seen in other games and with where CCP was headed with microtransactions the pro-FiS'ers were right to believe that it wouldn't be long before space aspects of the game had microtransactions attached to them.

Oh come on, you're smart enough to recognize that WiS and MT are 2 seperate issues, yet you still choose to lump them up together like all the others? CCP could have launched NEX without Incarna if they wanted to and start selling ship skins. One does not need the other! So, its silly for pro-FiS'ers to believe that space aspect will have MT because of WiS.

If you are talking about how WiS has been handled regarding establishments, rollout, etc, then yes it is a separate issue from MT. However the fact remains that CCP chose to remove features from what was previously shown in Ambulation for no other reason than to shoehorn them in the cash shop, so how can you view WiS and MT as separate knowing the history of Incarna. CCP themselves have linked them.

Now regarding FiS with MT, that's the problem just as you have said, people are saying it. How wide spread is the dislike for WiS based on the potential impact of MT to FiS, I guess we wont ever really know because we can only gauge what we see on the forums. There could be any number of players that do not post on the forums that have that view.
Quote:
Edit - Anyway, if you want to argue about MT, in my opinion, the day CCP introduced PLEX, the floodgates have been opened for MT and its up to CCP whether gold ammo is introduced or not. Cause I really don't see the difference between selling a bunch of PLEX to buy a SC and spending some AURs on gold ammo to pwn others. Its just 1 more link in the chain. Real money or ISK -> PLEX -> AUR -> Gold Ammo, versus Real money -> PLEX -> ISK -> SC.

PLEX does not circumvent the EVE economy or the players that manufacture goods, straight out cash shop purchases do.

Nex (Cash Shop) / Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future.

Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated
#709 - 2011-11-03 12:51:56 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:

It had better not be. Regardless of how foolish some players are being about considering ship skins "vanity" (and hence ideal targets for the MT clowns) I have hope that CCP management has learned its lesson and will deliver ship skins/painting and logos etc by traditional methods within the sandbox and will not risk another storm of player discontent by trying to nickel and dime us on what has been long promised as game content for everyone.

If NeX sells ship skins this game will take another staggering lurch towards free-to-play oblivion as the subscriptions will again take a hit.

I think it's a foregone conclusion skins will be sold via the NeX (or webstore directly). I highly doubt we'll get em for free, though.

And truth be told, I'd pay real money for a Hello Kitty Kestrel skin. P What's life without a little fun? And honestly, I don't care. I'm paying office rent and stuff too. If they'd let me rent a nice 3D office, I'd pay extra for that too.

Don't get me wrong: I'd rather have it for free, of course (or rather, have it included as part of my monthly subscription); but I'm fair certain this is the stuff we'll have to pay extra for, though.

-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#710 - 2011-11-03 12:59:28 UTC
Ranka Mei wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:

It had better not be. Regardless of how foolish some players are being about considering ship skins "vanity" (and hence ideal targets for the MT clowns) I have hope that CCP management has learned its lesson and will deliver ship skins/painting and logos etc by traditional methods within the sandbox and will not risk another storm of player discontent by trying to nickel and dime us on what has been long promised as game content for everyone.

If NeX sells ship skins this game will take another staggering lurch towards free-to-play oblivion as the subscriptions will again take a hit.

I think it's a foregone conclusion skins will be sold via the NeX (or webstore directly). I highly doubt we'll get em for free, though.

And truth be told, I'd pay real money for a Hello Kitty Kestrel skin. P What's life without a little fun? And honestly, I don't care. I'm paying office rent and stuff too. If they'd let me rent a nice 3D office, I'd pay extra for that too.

Don't get me wrong: I'd rather have it for free, of course (or rather, have it included as part of my monthly subscription); but I'm fair certain this is the stuff we'll have to pay extra for, though.


I think it was listening to focus group feedback like this that led them to mess up Incarna with MT in the first place and led to the fiasco of last summer and massively dropping subscriptions.

Still I have to acknowledge that you do represent a player of this game who DOES want Microtransactions - I know they do exist.

But I can only hope you continue to be in the minority because speaking frankly - if this game does become infested with microtransactions and content gets artifically-tagged "vanity" just so it can be nickel and dimed in through the cheap and nasty cash shop then I for one will be done with it.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated
#711 - 2011-11-03 13:10:02 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
I think it was listening to focus group feedback like this that led them to mess up Incarna with MT in the first place and led to the fiasco of last summer and massively dropping subscriptions.

Still I have to acknowledge that you do represent a player of this game who DOES want Microtransactions - I know they do exist.

But I can only hope you continue to be in the minority because speaking frankly - if this game does become infested with microtransactions and content gets artifically-tagged "vanity" just so it can be nickel and dimed in through the cheap and nasty cash shop then I for one will be done with it.

Didn't say I want MT; only that it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that skins and such will be vanity items we'll have to pay extra for. So, the only question then is, will you pay for it? Personally, I haven't bought NeX clothes or anything. But they start offering ship skins, I don't see the harm in buying one or two. And why would I? It's a space game, as we're reminded of so often; so I'd be buying a spaceship skin for the spaceship game -- that's gotta be not wrong in at least a few universes. :)

-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#712 - 2011-11-03 13:21:22 UTC
Ranka Mei wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
I think it was listening to focus group feedback like this that led them to mess up Incarna with MT in the first place and led to the fiasco of last summer and massively dropping subscriptions.

Still I have to acknowledge that you do represent a player of this game who DOES want Microtransactions - I know they do exist.

But I can only hope you continue to be in the minority because speaking frankly - if this game does become infested with microtransactions and content gets artifically-tagged "vanity" just so it can be nickel and dimed in through the cheap and nasty cash shop then I for one will be done with it.

Didn't say I want MT; only that it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that skins and such will be vanity items we'll have to pay extra for. So, the only question then is, will you pay for it? Personally, I haven't bought NeX clothes or anything. But they start offering ship skins, I don't see the harm in buying one or two. And why would I? It's a space game, as we're reminded of so often; so I'd be buying a spaceship skin for the spaceship game -- that's gotta be not wrong in at least a few universes. :)


Why do you conclude it is a foregone conclusion? The economics of the situation would argue otherwise - the utterly disasterous introduction of NeX clothing last summer cost CCP an awful lot more in lost subs than it gathered in MT income.The company took a significant hit from the player base protesting against its introduction that led the CEO to make a public apology. Why do you believe that CCP will go on to make the same mistake again with Ship Skins - I grant you it is possible they will :CCP: and all that, but the usual response for a person escaping a burning building is not to put their head the neighbours oven!

The harm of you directly buying skins through MT is that you are once again supporting the erosion of the eve online player market by cheating your fellow players of the content around building and providing these services in-game. At the minimum ship skins should come from the LP store that players purchase and can resell in a try and tested ingame fashion. Preferably ship painting (ie colour customization) should be a station service that is available to all.

Supporting the MT'ing of ship skins and painting is the same harm that can be pointed at NeX and avatar clothng - its a cheap and nasty intrusion of money-grubbing nickel and diming in a player led economy that has no need (EVE already has PLEX) and is positively harmed (suspension of disbelieve and erosion of the sandbox) by it.

Like I said, I don't know CCP will be stupid enough to try to NeX it up again in the near future. I guess we listen to see what Soundwave has to say at future alliance tournaments to see that.

But its a fair assumption that unless the player base can speak with a united voice on this and say no to single-server player led economy breaking microtransactions at some point some other "industry expert" inside CCP will try it on and we'll get Jita Riots 2 (if there is anybody still playing by then.).

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#713 - 2011-11-03 13:37:48 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

The point of WiS was it's use as a platform for microtransactions.



Well some people think "walking in stations" does not equal "walking in stations"

They think "walking in stations" = "so much more than walking in stations"


As for the point of WIS. I think there were two. 1) hoping for some cash from the mt. 2) was to get the infrastructure to develop many other games. Games where you can smash computer avatars faces in.

But I find it hard to believe ccp thought men would like to dress up a computer avatar and walk it around looking at how other men dressed up their computer avatars.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Chi Ftele
Doomheim
#714 - 2011-11-03 14:01:57 UTC
Captain's quarters are good for immersion, like "hey look, I do have a body after all", but I believe there are better things to use resources on than WiS, such as more cool new ships and guns!!

I don't think there should only be single ships filling single roles, like one sniper battleship per race etc.

CCP should mix them up, find something new to add, which they are in fact doing (hello, Tornado!), but more, more, more!

That is all.

Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated
#715 - 2011-11-03 14:15:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranka Mei
Jade Constantine wrote:

Why do you conclude it is a foregone conclusion? The economics of the situation would argue otherwise - the utterly disasterous introduction of NeX clothing last summer cost CCP an awful lot more in lost subs than it gathered in MT income.The company took a significant hit from the player base protesting against its introduction that led the CEO to make a public apology. Why do you believe that CCP will go on to make the same mistake again with Ship Skins - I grant you it is possible they will :CCP: and all that, but the usual response for a person escaping a burning building is not to put their head the neighbours oven!

The harm of you directly buying skins through MT is that you are once again supporting the erosion of the eve online player market by cheating your fellow players of the content around building and providing these services in-game. At the minimum ship skins should come from the LP store that players purchase and can resell in a try and tested ingame fashion. Preferably ship painting (ie colour customization) should be a station service that is available to all.

Supporting the MT'ing of ship skins and painting is the same harm that can be pointed at NeX and avatar clothng - its a cheap and nasty intrusion of money-grubbing nickel and diming in a player led economy that has no need (EVE already has PLEX) and is positively harmed (suspension of disbelieve and erosion of the sandbox) by it.

Like I said, I don't know CCP will be stupid enough to try to NeX it up again in the near future. I guess we listen to see what Soundwave has to say at future alliance tournaments to see that.

But its a fair assumption that unless the player base can speak with a united voice on this and say no to single-server player led economy breaking microtransactions at some point some other "industry expert" inside CCP will try it on and we'll get Jita Riots 2 (if there is anybody still playing by then.).


You make some good points. I just don't see CCP giving up monetizing on virtual items any time soon, is all. For one, they haven't solidly bid the NeX store farewell yet. It's just sitting there, waiting to be filled with... something. I just fear we'll get either no ship skins/paint jobs, etc, or we'll have to pay extra for it. We'll see. Would be nice, though, if history proves you right.

-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#716 - 2011-11-03 14:25:57 UTC
Ranka Mei wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:

Why do you conclude it is a foregone conclusion? The economics of the situation would argue otherwise - the utterly disasterous introduction of NeX clothing last summer cost CCP an awful lot more in lost subs than it gathered in MT income.The company took a significant hit from the player base protesting against its introduction that led the CEO to make a public apology. Why do you believe that CCP will go on to make the same mistake again with Ship Skins - I grant you it is possible they will :CCP: and all that, but the usual response for a person escaping a burning building is not to put their head the neighbours oven!

The harm of you directly buying skins through MT is that you are once again supporting the erosion of the eve online player market by cheating your fellow players of the content around building and providing these services in-game. At the minimum ship skins should come from the LP store that players purchase and can resell in a try and tested ingame fashion. Preferably ship painting (ie colour customization) should be a station service that is available to all.

Supporting the MT'ing of ship skins and painting is the same harm that can be pointed at NeX and avatar clothng - its a cheap and nasty intrusion of money-grubbing nickel and diming in a player led economy that has no need (EVE already has PLEX) and is positively harmed (suspension of disbelieve and erosion of the sandbox) by it.

Like I said, I don't know CCP will be stupid enough to try to NeX it up again in the near future. I guess we listen to see what Soundwave has to say at future alliance tournaments to see that.

But its a fair assumption that unless the player base can speak with a united voice on this and say no to single-server player led economy breaking microtransactions at some point some other "industry expert" inside CCP will try it on and we'll get Jita Riots 2 (if there is anybody still playing by then.).


You make some good points. I just don't see CCP giving up monetizing on virtual items any time soon, is all. For one, they haven't solidly bid the NeX store farewell yet. It's just sitting there, waiting to be filled with... something. I just fear we'll get either no ship skins/paint jobs, etc, or we'll have to pay extra for it. We'll see. Would be nice, though, if history proves you right.


Well if the summer of rage 2011 teaches us anything it is that we are not the slaves of history and we don't have to sit here mutely passive when CCP are making terrible mistakes. We (the players of Eve) managed to get CCP to change direction once and return to a spaceship focus, revisting the many many abandoned aspects of this game, and thats something that makes me extremely proud as an Eve player. There is no reason to suppose we cannot do this again.

I do share your concern that they haven't altogether removed the NeX store though. As long as it remains in the client there will be there as a temptation for evil MT developers to dream of ill-gotten $ signs while tossing and turning on their $1000 sheets.

Fingers crossed the memory of the player backlash, bad press and jita riots win over the seductive poison of the MT leeches at CCP HQ!

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#717 - 2011-11-03 14:41:06 UTC
Here is an example of someone twisting my statements around and portraying them out of context. Not to mention the entire post is off-topic. They spent a lot of time searching and grouping together single sentences from various posted replies in an attempt to discredit and portray me as the bad guy.

Omitting the core subject matter of my various posted replies made in response to statements directed towards me by other players shows how someone can manipulate and change a thread. Maybe their intention is to derail this thread and escalate a forum flame war. Usually whenever someone personally singles me out with negative replies, I'll respond likewise.

I could also search through this thread and group together all of that players negative statements in a posted reply. I could also report them as well as other posted replies and have them edited and or removed.

But that would only continue to escalate this forum flame war and help derail this thread. I have better things to do, mainly go in-game and do some FiS.
Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
#718 - 2011-11-03 14:53:47 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
Question we need to ask ourselves on the future of Eve is do we like that NeX store icon on our station services? How are we going to feel about it when the NeX/MT gurus who survived the 20% chop at CCP start arguing for ship skins and alliance logos by NeX? Are we going to listen to the Mittani NeXt time he tells us its just "vanity" (and doesn't matter) despite the fact that ship painting/colour schemes has been a long term promise for Eve gameplay for everyone not just credulous idiots who somehow think that MT in a subs game is something good.
Speaking of the CSM and the NEX Store.
It's interesting when you look back at the CSM6 talking about modular POS. I wonder if it has dawned on them that CCP could very well class a modular POS as a 'vanity item'.

Just think about that for a minute. CCP could make them where all the different modules could be fitted together perhaps in various ways to make something unique giving players some creative licencse with it's overall look, but the way the POS actually functions overall doesn't change from what we have now. So it's not gamebreaking, it's only vanity right. Do the CSM not realise to what extent this only 'vanity item' crap could be taken?

It may be on the extreme end of potential vanity items, but where does the line get drawn.



On a side note, going back and reading the CSM6 minutes from May I can only /facepalm at some of the comments from CCP Apollo and Zinfandel.

Nex (Cash Shop) / Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future.

Stella SGP
#719 - 2011-11-03 16:21:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Stella SGP
Jade Constantine wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
Yea, thats why I said 'suppose'. Anyway from what I can recall they were talking more about selling 'conveniences', such as standings or sec statues, rather then straight up over-powered gold ammo. Weren't they?

Then again if they wanted to sell gold ammo in the NEX, they don't need WiS platform to do it. There is no reason to load WiS just to use the NEX. So, please don't mix the 2 together.

But I do think its the logical fallacy of one point of compromise inevitably leading to full surrender of principle and virtue.

Yes PLEX is pay to win. But its pay to win by harnessing the labour of other PLAYERS (and paying them) to gain your own in-game advantage (flashy ships and implant sets etc). In essence PLEX is YOU paying another player somewhere else in the world $15 to mine you 350-400m isk. The stuff you buy with that isk also comes from other PLAYERS.


Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
PLEX does not circumvent the EVE economy or the players that manufacture goods, straight out cash shop purchases do.

Yea about cutting out labor from the economy part. I've given it some thought before, now what if gold ammo was sold in the form of BPCs?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating MT, actually I don't really care about MT if it is vanity only. I'm interested in WiS.

Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
If you are talking about how WiS has been handled regarding establishments, rollout, etc, then yes it is a separate issue from MT. However the fact remains that CCP chose to remove features from what was previously shown in Ambulation for no other reason than to shoehorn them in the cash shop, so how can you view WiS and MT as separate knowing the history of Incarna. CCP themselves have linked them.

I believe what you saw in trailer regarding Ambulation was build on a completely different engine, and that was all trashed, in favor of Carbon. So, no I won't go so far as to say features were cut out in favor of MT, but rather Incarna was incomplete at launch, god they only had 1 CQ out of 4 races, how pathetic was that?
Metis Laxon
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#720 - 2011-11-03 17:27:18 UTC
Ayumi Hinoki wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Oswald Patsee wrote:
EVE is about flying in space. Anything else is a different game that just screws up EVE and flying in space.

This guy knows what's up.


Sure, trading, industry, exploration, planetary interaction and other fields of EVE Online just ruin the game.

Have you noticed that there are more skill groups than Gunnery, Spaceship Command or Missile Launcher Operation? Even if you don't use them, they exist and are the primary source of income and gameplay style for a lot of players.

Take a look at this, this, this, and also this if you have time, because EVE is not just about flying in space. Is a lot more than that.


Just to give this some visibility again.