These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Put an end to the exploitation and scamming against new players... Grow your customer base

First post
Author
Valerian Dardanides
The Rangers of Eve
#1 - 2013-05-09 04:09:46 UTC
Dear CCP

You must put an end to the rampant scamming of new players by old players that is going on in Eve if you really intend to attract new players and continue growing your customer base. There is no tutorial warning new players of the various scams.The local channel has effectively become SCAM Channel especially in trade hubs in high sec were new players usually reside. There is no moderator to warn new players of the scams going on, and nothing is done against the offenders.

I understand that scamming is part of Eve but to allow the exploitation of new players makes you lose new customers... I see in the forum that you do not allow the baiting of new players in certain systems. Well the baiting and subsequent loss of a rookie ship is trivial compared to the damage being done by Scammers in local channel and Scam email offers.

For example how am I supposed to know as a two week old player that unlike in the market where a navy issue Augoror is actually a navy issue Augoror, in direct system trade ship items can be renamed by the player, so that you think you are buying a navy ship and it says so in the trade window... Except when you accept the trade, you find out that the ship is actually a normal Ship not a navy issue, it has just been renamed by the seller to navy issue to deceive the buyer... And just like that my hard earned 320 million isk, poof, Houdini style!

How did this happen? Simple, no tutorial pointed it out. Before I made the trade I even asked in the rookie channel if I can be scammed in direct trade but no one said I should look out for this. And so now I am turning to you the developers of Eve... I am asking for this to be rectified.

I have already written you a petition with the name of the offender and the details of what happened. I want my isk back and please implement some system to prevent more of cases like this, whether an addition to the tutorial or moderators in local or some way for a player based flagging system against scammers, especially those targeting new players.

Believe me, the silent condoning of the exploitation of new players will make you lose players, who just like me will quit Eve forever if justice isn't done. And when new players who planned to to be your paying customers for years to come, get turned away because of unscrupulous scammers, it's is no longer a selling point for you, it's an Achilles heel. The whole world of eve - as well as the profit margin of your company - will be worse off.

Thank you for taking the time to read this and I have high hopes that CCP will make a positive and proactive change in this regard

Best Regrads

Valerian Dardanides

Note: any smarty-pants player who would invoke caveat emptor and tell me I should have seen the scam myself, I answer that I usually do... But Eve is a huge game with so many facets and quite a complicated UI... You can not expect a new player to know all the nuisances of the system even though I completed all the tutorial missions and read hundreds of pages of info about it. And considering the vast majority of scammers are targeting new players, one can not guard against them all absent any advice from tutorials or moderators or repercussions against the offending scammer.
Haulie Berry
#2 - 2013-05-09 04:21:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Haulie Berry
Quote:
Dear CCP

You must put an end to the rampant scamming of new players by old players that is going on in Eve if you really intend to attract new players and continue growing your customer base.


They seem to have gotten on pretty well so far, so why "must" something be changed, now, exactly?


Quote:
For example how am I supposed to know as a two week old player that unlike in the market where a navy issue Augoror is actually a navy issue Augoror, in direct system trade ship items can be renamed by the player, so that you think you are buying a navy ship and it says so in the trade window... Except when you accept the trade, you find out that the ship is actually a normal Ship not a navy issue, it has just been renamed by the seller to navy issue to deceive the buyer... And just like that my hard earned 320 million isk, poof, Houdini style!


Your isk was not lost. It was exchanged for a very valuable lesson.


Quote:
Believe me, the silent condoning of the exploitation of new players will make you lose players, who just like me will quit Eve forever if justice isn't done. And when new players who planned to to be your paying customers for years to come, get turned away because of unscrupulous scammers, it's is no longer a selling point for you, it's an Achilles heel. The whole world of eve - as well as the profit margin of your company - will be worse off.


Ah. The old, "Trust me, I know better than you, even though I've been here for, I dunno, like... a minute. If you don't heed my advice, it will all come crashing down around you." Roll
NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#3 - 2013-05-09 04:24:52 UTC
Hello there.

I can understand that its very frustrating to loose ISK to a scam when you are a young player, but im sorry to say that CCP will most likely not reimburse your loss.

However i do agree that there should be some sort of warning in the tutorial that makes it perfectly clear that scamming IS legal in EVE, and encourage new players to do some research before they accept any contracts or similar. Please note that if there is such a warning in the tutorial i am not aware off it my self.

I will also admit that if there are scamming going on in local in the starter systems this might be something that should be changed and align more with the rules in the recruitment channel (no scamming IN the channel, however the people are still allowed to convo you and of course from there you can get scammed). It would make it a bit more of an effort for people who are deliberately going after new players because they are more likely to fall for a scam, without completely removing the threat.

But i can not say i would like to see new players being fully protected against scams for a certain amount of time. EVE is harsh, its meant to be, and putting down rules along the lines off "cant scam a player that is less then 1 month old" would do more harm then good i think...

Sorry but EVE is a love or hate game. You get scammed at an early age and one of two things happen.
a) You learn a lesson, never trust anyone again, and note the name for payback some time in the future.
b) You rage quit.

I wish you the best of luck tho, and remember you can recover from any loss. It takes time, and its frustrating, but it is possible and things like these are what makes EVE such an unique game.

Thomas Builder
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2013-05-09 04:25:49 UTC
Interesting scam, I hadn't thought of that.

And I am surprised that nobody in Rookie chat invoked the rule "Never use direct station trading, except with yourself" as there are a couple of other scams around it.

Anyway, scams are part of EVE, although I agree with you that CCP could do more to inform new players about them. They even have a very nice list of things to watch out for (http://community.eveonline.com/support/knowledge-base/article.aspx?articleId=34) Linking to that article during the tutorials would be good. Tip #6 would have saved you those 320 million ISK.
Sakura Nihil
Faded Light
#5 - 2013-05-09 04:51:05 UTC
Might as well learn early.
Oraac Ensor
#6 - 2013-05-09 04:57:03 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
They seem to have gotten on pretty well so far, so why "must" something be changed, now, exactly?

So they can do even better in the future?
Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#7 - 2013-05-09 05:00:25 UTC
It's a right of passage, a trial by fire, a weeding out process to see who quits easily and who pays attention to details and rolls with the punches when necessary.

Oh, and caveat emptor
Haulie Berry
#8 - 2013-05-09 05:06:57 UTC
Oraac Ensor wrote:
Haulie Berry wrote:
They seem to have gotten on pretty well so far, so why "must" something be changed, now, exactly?

So they can do even better in the future?


Yes, I'm sure changing their core philosophy for the sake of some whiny git who failed to pay attention would result in their "doing better" in the long run. Roll
CC Avalos
METACORTEX LLC
#9 - 2013-05-09 05:24:47 UTC
Vortexo VonBrenner wrote:
It's a right of passage, a trial by fire, a weeding out process to see who quits easily and who pays attention to details and rolls with the punches when necessary.

Oh, and caveat emptor


This ^

Its a hard lesson. I can understand your pain, sucks. But if new players leave because of this they were never meant to play EVE in the first place. One of my favorite things about EVE is all these crazy scams that goes on, puts you on your toes for sure.

Good luck!

Check out my YouTube Channel for Eve Online Videos YouTube

Shao Huang
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-05-09 05:27:29 UTC
I dunno. I don't think CCP can meaningfully regulate such things without seriously gimping many, many other things. How would you suggest telling new players (like me) that the game is just 'dangerous', you know beyond naming the game 'Everyone v Everyone' and all the other ways that information is almost ubiquitously present. It does not matter how much you publicize it really. Structurally regulating is both philosophically and functionally inconsistent with the game itself.

The primary way that you learn about these things is that you lose 320m ISK, or load up a shiny ship and fly it into a gate camp, etc., etc. The other players are the actual tutorial. Maybe you should consider sending your scammer a thank you note and a little symbolic bonus payment. I am serious. This might lead to a very interesting interaction.

Personally, I feel like a house cat that has been HALO'd into a jungle. My eyes take up most of my head and I am still pretty careful about certain kinds of moves, particularly having to do with the market and any out of ship interactions. They are far more dangerous than ship to ship interactions. In the pewpew itself you can't really get scammed, just killed a lot, and that has a fixed cost, established by you. Losing ships is really about the safest activity in EVE.

I am a new player and am assuming that you are as well? Why exactly were you buying a faction ship anyway? I am not saying don't. Do whatever appeals. And I suspect, without knowing of course, that your answer to that question is what made the scam able to function, not the misapprehension of game mechanics, such as renaming ships. For new players, love of shiny = loss. Only variable is time.

Private sig. Do not read.

NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#11 - 2013-05-09 05:33:31 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
Oraac Ensor wrote:
Haulie Berry wrote:
They seem to have gotten on pretty well so far, so why "must" something be changed, now, exactly?

So they can do even better in the future?


Yes, I'm sure changing their core philosophy for the sake of some whiny git who failed to pay attention would result in their "doing better" in the long run. Roll


Well changing something as simple as adding in a warning about scams in the tutorial wont really change much. Its information that can be found elsewhere, but having it in the tutorial means that a new player will have no excuse not to be aware off it (if they dont do the tutorial or proper research its their own fault).

It does not make the game "easier", just allows for more..awareness? and a new player can prepare them self better for what is 95% sure to happen at some point during their EVE career.
Older players that get scammed normally knows that it was their own fault and have grown used to the fact that this happens, thus wont take it as hard as a brand new player.
dark heartt
#12 - 2013-05-09 05:43:35 UTC
NightCrawler 85 wrote:

Well changing something as simple as adding in a warning about scams in the tutorial wont really change much. Its information that can be found elsewhere, but having it in the tutorial means that a new player will have no excuse not to be aware off it (if they dont do the tutorial or proper research its their own fault).


This alone would make it worthwhile to implement this.
Valerian Dardanides
The Rangers of Eve
#13 - 2013-05-09 06:36:44 UTC
For those posting positive feedback or insight, I say thank you. Much appreciated.

For those who have regaled us with their turds of wisdom, here's my answer to some of the posts above...

No, scamming new players is not "trial by fire" to "weed out the weak"... This is Eve, not the F@&$=#% Navy Seals.

This is not a "valuable lesson"! I play Eve to have a good time, not to get "valuable lessons" courtesy of some punk in his mama's basement.

And as for the luminary virtuoso who said that Eve is already doing great... Why should they change... you display no notion of understanding how businesses work. "Why change [for the better]" is the modus operandi of most companies that end up filing for bankruptcy.

Yes make no mistake, Eve is ultimately a Business. And the health of a business depends on the influx of new players, especially in a game where it is the new players who pay with real money whereas many old players pay with isk.

The developers must realize this since they tried to curb baiting new players in starter systems into duels... If duels are bad then scams preying on new players are infinitely worse because it is a form of market pvp and it is through a system that is "on" by default... Eve mail and Eve local chat, and what makes it really bad is that the damage done is so great that the player will likely rage quit, and rightfully so because allowing this sort of thing to happen is total BS... It is akin to driving school teaching someone how to drive in a Nascar ring during a match!

Even the army has a bootcamp, they don't throw you in with enemy combatants from day one... They train you first in a controlled environment. That's how you learn without losing an arm and leg.

Eve must give new players a heads-up on the scams going on in a safe tutorial-like environment...

Scammed players will feel spurned and many spurned players will leave Eve and never come back. 9 out of 10 of those who rage quit will not file a complaint... They will simply go away. I am doing the company a service by taking a couple of hours of my time to write this and give them a heads-up on what's going on.

And it gets worse. Statistically satisfied customers inform one person on average about a product they like. However when they don't like the product, particularly if they feel they have been wronged, they tell ten times that number. The opportunity cost in this is immense.

Eve has nice players who are interesting to talk with... But unless scamming against new players is curbed, new players are being primarily exposed to the unscrupulous bas@#%* who intentionally target new players and lurk where new players are found. Just check local chat channel in any hub and you will see what I mean...

All companies encounter circumstances that lead to customer dissatisfaction... The ones who gain their customer's loyalty and stay in the green on the balance sheet are the one who address their customers complaints, make sure it does not happen to others and do damage control by reimbursing the affected customer thereby turning a negative into a positive. I hope whoever handles customer service for Eve has the business acumen to do that.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#14 - 2013-05-09 06:47:15 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Really....whine threads belong in GD.


Scamming is allowed. And like in the real world....use your brains.
If I walk up to you and say, give me all your money, I will double it. Would you do that? Well, same counts for EVE....

IF IT SOUNDS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE....IT IS.


p.s. I find it very lame to scam new players, but it's totally allowed and should not be disabled. People will just make alts to get away from scams.

Malcanis' law:Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-05-09 06:58:46 UTC
Valerian Dardanides wrote:
For those posting positive feedback or insight, I say thank you. Much appreciated.

For those who have regaled us with their turds of wisdom, here's my answer to some of the posts above...

No, scamming new players is not "trial by fire" to "weed out the weak"... This is Eve, not the F@&$=#% Navy Seals.

This is not a "valuable lesson"! I play Eve to have a good time, not to get "valuable lessons" courtesy of some punk in his mama's basement.

And as for the luminary virtuoso who said that Eve is already doing great... Why should they change... you display no notion of understanding how businesses work. "Why change [for the better]" is the modus operandi of most companies that end up filing for bankruptcy.

Yes make no mistake, Eve is ultimately a Business. And the health of a business depends on the influx of new players, especially in a game where it is the new players who pay with real money whereas many old players pay with isk.

The developers must realize this since they tried to curb baiting new players in starter systems into duels... If duels are bad then scams preying on new players are infinitely worse because it is a form of market pvp and it is through a system that is "on" by default... Eve mail and Eve local chat, and what makes it really bad is that the damage done is so great that the player will likely rage quit, and rightfully so because allowing this sort of thing to happen is total BS... It is akin to driving school teaching someone how to drive in a Nascar ring during a match!

Even the army has a bootcamp, they don't throw you in with enemy combatants from day one... They train you first in a controlled environment. That's how you learn without losing an arm and leg.

Eve must give new players a heads-up on the scams going on in a safe tutorial-like environment...

Scammed players will feel spurned and many spurned players will leave Eve and never come back. 9 out of 10 of those who rage quit will not file a complaint... They will simply go away. I am doing the company a service by taking a couple of hours of my time to write this and give them a heads-up on what's going on.

And it gets worse. Statistically satisfied customers inform one person on average about a product they like. However when they don't like the product, particularly if they feel they have been wronged, they tell ten times that number. The opportunity cost in this is immense.

Eve has nice players who are interesting to talk with... But unless scamming against new players is curbed, new players are being primarily exposed to the unscrupulous bas@#%* who intentionally target new players and lurk where new players are found. Just check local chat channel in any hub and you will see what I mean...

All companies encounter circumstances that lead to customer dissatisfaction... The ones who gain their customer's loyalty and stay in the green on the balance sheet are the one who address their customers complaints, make sure it does not happen to others and do damage control by reimbursing the affected customer thereby turning a negative into a positive. I hope whoever handles customer service for Eve has the business acumen to do that.


You won't last long in this game, better to give me whatever stuff you have left now.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Shao Huang
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2013-05-09 07:41:49 UTC
It is unclear what you actually want from this thread really. Agreement? To persuade others of something, about which you feel right and assert that they are wrong? Not likely to go exactly how you wish, I am guessing. But I can't really tell what you want, beyond expressing a complaint.

Your understanding of business models is also not complete. They have a business model and your suffering, for better or worse, happens to be part of it and one of the distinctive value propositions associated with the game. It is not what keeps people from playing, it is why people play. Your upset is evidence that the model is working. Whether or not you agree with or like the model is a different matter altogether. Hard to get I know. They are expanding on that model by the addition of DUST and considering mobile platforms for parts of the game, not by implementing something along the lines of your pretty limited understanding of business models.

You also seemed to have failed to receive feedback about the quality of your own disposition leading to your current circumstance. You may not have been asking for such feedback. I am not saying all the extreme versions of this that you distort in your last post. I am saying that as long as this remains the case, and you are not constructively suggesting something to CCP, but rather hiding your own disposition of victimization within the rhetoric of making a contribution, you will continue to suffer the game and likely quit. You will also continue to be angry, since it is someone else's fault, whether the scammer, or some assertion of failure on CCP's part, etc. What happened, and this thread is the tutorial. It is player driven. You seem to be resisting that. The player driven dynamic does not seem to respond well to the assertions of victimization. Well, there is a response, just not the one someone who feels victimized is likely to appreciate. Take that completely subjective observation on my part as you will.

Private sig. Do not read.

Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#17 - 2013-05-09 08:06:11 UTC
A proper newbie wouldn't have the cash, not after 1 week, to buy a Navy Augeror unless he's an alt or he "cheated" his way past the isk problem using plex (or RMT) frantically wanting to power game.

Apart from that, deal with it. Outside the designated starter systems it's a free for all and it doesn't matter if you get exposed to it early or later on. Also, it would be impossible because at what point does a person become responsible for his own (in)actions... 1 week or 2, perhaps 3 months?

In short: Welcome to EVE.
Valerian Dardanides
The Rangers of Eve
#18 - 2013-05-09 08:23:02 UTC
Shao Huang wrote:
It is unclear what you actually want from this thread really. Agreement? To persuade others of something, about which you feel right and assert that they are wrong? Not likely to go exactly how you wish, I am guessing. But I can't really tell what you want, beyond expressing a complaint.

Your understanding of business models is also not complete. They have a business model and your suffering, for better or worse, happens to be part of it and one of the distinctive value propositions associated with the game. It is not what keeps people from playing, it is why people play. Your upset is evidence that the model is working. Whether or not you agree with or like the model is a different matter altogether. Hard to get I know. They are expanding on that model by the addition of DUST and considering mobile platforms for parts of the game, not by implementing something along the lines of your pretty limited understanding of business models.

You also seemed to have failed to receive feedback about the quality of your own disposition leading to your current circumstance. You may not have been asking for such feedback. I am not saying all the extreme versions of this that you distort in your last post. I am saying that as long as this remains the case, and you are not constructively suggesting something to CCP, but rather hiding your own disposition of victimization within the rhetoric of making a contribution, you will continue to suffer the game and likely quit. You will also continue to be angry, since it is someone else's fault, whether the scammer, or some assertion of failure on CCP's part, etc. What happened, and this thread is the tutorial. It is player driven. You seem to be resisting that. The player driven dynamic does not seem to respond well to the assertions of victimization. Well, there is a response, just not the one someone who feels victimized is likely to appreciate. Take that completely subjective observation on my part as you will.


It is you who does not understand the business concept of "value proposition". Scamming other players is not the value proposition of Eve... The sandbox nature of eve is a feature not an end in itself. The value proposition of eve like any other game is to let the player have a good time through the various features and tools that it provides in game.

If the majority of players played eve primarily so they can scam new players and new players tolerated that and grew into scammers themselves... Then from a business sense the feature of scamming new players would be appropriate.

But that is not the case.

The fun factor of eve is not dependent on a minority of punks who derive their fun from scamming new players... After which they will pay for their game in isk and hence not benefit the makers of eve financially while turning off new players who would likely pay with their credit card.

New players do not get their fun out of eve by being scammed. New players enjoy mostly the pve, pvp, exploration, the process of upgrading to new ships and better equipment... These are the features that contribute to the value proposition for a new player...

Ergo, to sum this all condoning the scamming of new players is completely counterproductive to the value proposition of Eve, at least as far as the new players are concerned.

And if the purpose of my message has alluded you, well it is simple really...

Bring CCP's attention to the issue and hope they rectify the situation for their own sake by implementing one of the suggestions that were touched upon to curb that sort of thing from happening and get my isk back as well because I do not intend to grind days of gameplay to get my isk back because of something that shouldn't have been allowed to happen in the first place.

Valerian Dardanides
The Rangers of Eve
#19 - 2013-05-09 08:34:17 UTC
Vilnius Zar wrote:
A proper newbie wouldn't have the cash, not after 1 week, to buy a Navy Augeror unless he's an alt or he "cheated" his way past the isk problem using plex (or RMT) frantically wanting to power game.

Apart from that, deal with it. Outside the designated starter systems it's a free for all and it doesn't matter if you get exposed to it early or later on. Also, it would be impossible because at what point does a person become responsible for his own (in)actions... 1 week or 2, perhaps 3 months?

In short: Welcome to EVE.


Yes using plex bought from the developers to their benefit should be frowned upon...CCP should discourage players from buying stuff from them because joe shmoe considers it "power gaming"...

Dimwit.
Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#20 - 2013-05-09 08:41:08 UTC
Smile heh. Well, OP, I seem to have offended you...and I'm one of the "nice" guys in EVE - I predict great difficulty and anger for you dealing with the folks of New Eden...if you stay... Sorry if the truth bothers you. "Housecat HALO'd into the jungle" is about right. Everything you said has been said many, many times before yet EVE has continued go on for ten years. One thing that helped me a lot was googling "eve scams". Quite a few results and helped me be aware of/avoid many scams. Don't feel bad, it's said "EVE isn't for everybody"...of course, it's also said "other MMOs hold your hand and give you a cookie - EVE takes your cookie and laughs at you for bringing one in the first place". I would say EVE is a lot of fun with more positive aspects by far than negative - but I won't as I wouldn't want to upset you. I hope you find enjoyment in whichever game you go to.
123Next pageLast page