These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated
#681 - 2011-11-03 02:41:38 UTC
Cearain wrote:

Yeah say what you want about "further immersiveness" and "truer virtual realities." But when ccp talks about wis they do not mean full body sensor suits and virtual glasses.

They are talking about dressing up computer avatars.

You may fail to understand this but that does not make me narrow minded.

Dressing up your avatar is just a start. After all, without a plausible, customized persona nothing goes, virtual reality wise. And you need immersive surroundings. Like I said: that's just where it starts. Once that door opens... oh wait, people like you sabotaged that future. Ironic, isn't it?

-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP

Taiwanistan
#682 - 2011-11-03 03:08:00 UTC
before any fixes to anything Issler Dainze fix your eyes what is wrong

i don't know why you wis ppl are upset, the engine is completed wis is coming, however later rather than sooner
sooner if ccp can optimize the engine
later if ccp just sit on their hands and wait 3 years as cpus and graphic cards double their power for the same price

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#683 - 2011-11-03 03:17:39 UTC
Ranka Mei wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Yeah say what you want about "further immersiveness" and "truer virtual realities." But when ccp talks about wis they do not mean full body sensor suits and virtual glasses.

They are talking about dressing up computer avatars.

You may fail to understand this but that does not make me narrow minded.

Dressing up your avatar is just a start. After all, without a plausible, customized persona nothing goes, virtual reality wise. And you need immersive surroundings. Like I said: that's just where it starts. Once that door opens... oh wait, people like you sabotaged that future. Ironic, isn't it?



Once that door opens we would get to walk in those clothes. And look at other people and what they dressed their computer avatars in. And walk and look and walk and look some more.

Maybe we would get a catwalk to strut on.

One thing we know we won't get, are guns to shoot eachother with. No guns no swords not even light sabres. We will be lucky if we can even shove eachother. No combat at all. Dust gets all the combat.

Most people know by now that there is little sense in making a computer game without combat. The last game that I recall not having combat was myst.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
#684 - 2011-11-03 03:19:52 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Bitter, pointless, lashing out at people, with no basis for attack and making completely inaccurate and laughable assumptions


The world is not black and white. WIS is potentially a great addition to the Eve Future. It is possible for a rational and intelligent Human Being to understand that and see that the issues raised by some of the FIS first people contain merit.


+1 for changing my statement into something else entirely, -10 for trying to pass off that false quote as factual.

A rational and intelligent Human Being wouldn't alter quotes while trying to prove a point.


I find it amusing that someone who posted in this thread about people insulting others seems to be the main instigator of that very activity. Especially after posting the following:

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Doesn't matter what you think, any anti-WiS reply or negative personal attacks against those who post support for WiS could be considered, per Forum Rules, as flaming and trolling in an attempt to derail thread and cause Flame war. As per Forum rules, that alone could be used as reason for removal of said posted replies..
All sounds very nice, keep your comments civil and all that, except:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
* You not only spam your biased opinions but you're also the loudest hypocrite posting in this thread.
* -10 for lack of reading comprehension and vocabulary skills..
* Go back to school and learn reading comprehension. Twisting my statements around in an attempt to justify your self-righteous attitude is fail troll.
* To those that can't adapt, go jump into the nearest Bio-Vat and be done with it.
* They lack the mental ability to envision any of the multiple possibility's that could arise from this.
* I'd love to see all of you closed minded trolls emo rage jump into the nearest Bio-Vat.
* God, I'm really getting sick and tired of seeing close minded simpletons spouting garbage like 'Space Barbie' bla bla bla 'FiS' bla bla bla 'No content for 18 months' bla bla bla.
So per the quote above would they be concidered 'negative personal attacks'? Well at least Phantom pegged him once for a personal attack in one of his threads, Phantom must have missed the others.


Well getting back on subject, it looks like CCP is doing what those few 'close minded simpletons' want with the winter expansion then huh. Roll (cynicism in case you missed it) Only CCP truly knows at this stage how many accounts were reactivated after the FiS refocus announcements and we'll have to wait to see it's effect on numbers after the winter expansion is released.

Moving forward, CCP need to rethink where they were headed with WiS and make it more about fun interesting sandbox game content and less about the cash shop.

Nex (Cash Shop) / Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future.

Stella SGP
#685 - 2011-11-03 03:28:06 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Yeah say what you want about "further immersiveness" and "truer virtual realities." But when ccp talks about wis they do not mean full body sensor suits and virtual glasses.

They are talking about dressing up computer avatars.

You may fail to understand this but that does not make me narrow minded.

I sell clues, want to buy 1? Only 100 mils.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#686 - 2011-11-03 03:42:21 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
All of you saying "If you don't like FiS then EvE isn't for you" are the ones that will ultimately kill EvE or at the very least prevent CCP from ever increasing their profits. MMO's have to change and bring new and fresh things to survive. EvE has done so by doing exactly this so far but to completely ignore all the people out there that don't play EvE simply because you can't walk around outside your ship is stupidity.

Ignorance really is bliss in EvE as made evident by many of you in this thread alone.

Nobody is against CCP expanding Eve and making more money. The problem was that they were neglecting the primary reason people play Eve to create dress-up barbie dolls attached to a ridiculous microtransaction store. Now CCP has woken up and is expanding the core gameplay of Eve and it will be more successful because of it.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#687 - 2011-11-03 04:09:16 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Ranka Mei wrote:
Cearain wrote:

Most men are not interested in dress up. I know I don't speak for everyone. Some people really want dress up and have spoken out about it. But stastically dress up games are not going to appeal to the sci fi demographic.

Exactly how limited has a mind to be to think of further immersiveness and truer virtual realities only in terms of playing 'dress-up'? What is it that the man said?! "You, Sir, are so narrow minded, that if you fell on a pin it would blind you in both eyes."



Yeah say what you want about "further immersiveness" and "truer virtual realities." But when ccp talks about wis they do not mean full body sensor suits and virtual glasses.

They are talking about dressing up computer avatars.

You may fail to understand this but that does not make me narrow minded.


You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

On that note however...the ship explosions themselves could really use some work...they are rather boring.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Caldari Acolyte
Shark Enterprises
#688 - 2011-11-03 04:10:53 UTC
WIS...No, The Sims is that way----->
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#689 - 2011-11-03 04:47:39 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

The point of WiS was it's use as a platform for microtransactions.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Pent'nor
#690 - 2011-11-03 04:50:54 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Nobody is against CCP expanding Eve and making more money. The problem was that they were neglecting the primary reason people play Eve to create dress-up barbie dolls attached to a ridiculous microtransaction store. Now CCP has woken up and is expanding the core gameplay of Eve and it will be more successful because of it.


If the core game elements were always put first or prioritized higher, then would there be as many angry people or anti wis people? I totally understand many of their point of views and agree with some of them. The majority of the playerbase are fis players and to take their money and pump it into wis as a priority one was not the way to go about it. I think many had a problem with this and that turned them into anti-wis. Also there may not be currently enough resources to do anything with incarna, which is another point that has been brought up, so it is best to wait till the company is in better shape to try again. Another very valid point. I have no idea how incarna development works and they may actually need a largish force to get any headway on it.

However many from both sides can agree that the concept of incarna could bring in new blood, expand its playerbase, and give ccp more subs/money. The barbie comments are just a fun way to describe the junk we currently have with incarna. It could be so much more and if it is not that, but rather just a side note to fis, then incarna was a failure before it ever started. A side note wont bring in that many new players. I'm not going to dock up at a station and spend the extra load time for a side note. There must be content, things to do and the ability to feel like living in a station is just as much apart of the game as flying spaceships. There are many ideas even posted in this thread about how to do that.

Although, how do we get there? How can ccp make an incarna that does not annoy its current playerbase? The end result of a finished incarna could be a huge payoff for ccp and enrich the eve players life, however, it is a long term goal. Trying to spit out incarna as fast as possible is not the correct path. I believe the path is to keep it as a long term goal and assign resouces to it as such. Always keeping the core elements of our current eve universe as priority one, but not forgetting about incarna.
Stella SGP
#691 - 2011-11-03 04:54:52 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

The point of WiS was it's use as a platform for microtransactions.

Nah, the micro-transaction portion is "suppose" to be optional like how it is now. WiS was "suppose" to allow booster trading in hi-sec (something along those lines at least) and gambling on mini games.
Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
#692 - 2011-11-03 05:31:20 UTC
Stella SGP wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

The point of WiS was it's use as a platform for microtransactions.

Nah, the micro-transaction portion is "suppose" to be optional like how it is now. WiS was "suppose" to allow booster trading in hi-sec (something along those lines at least) and gambling on mini games.

It seems some people have missed some of the facts surrounding the whole microtransaction debacle. When the shite was hitting the fan over the Fearless newsletter regarding 'gold ammo', etc, yes for anyone who cared to look into it further they would have seen that it was just some internal CCP theorising. So that by itself meant little as to where CCP's stance was on the subject of microtransactions.

Now having said that if we look at the context of the Fearless newsletter talking about 'gold ammo', golden geese and microtransactions on many things other than clothing, etc, then view Hilmar's email, please tell me where this 'suppose' line is coming from because Hilmar stated where CCP was headed with microtransactions in EVE.

And just in case you missed the quote in Hilmar's email referencing microtransactions that should have made any EVE player more than a little concerned.

Hilmar's Email wrote:
We have communicated our intention here internally in very wide circles through the Virtual Economy Summit presentation at the GSM, our Fearless newsletter, sprint reviews, email lists and multiple other channels. This should not come as a surprise to anyone.

One of the problems was that Hilmar clearly thought that like in other games the players in EVE would just bend over and take the addition of microtransactions and the monetizing of more aspects of the game. Maybe just maybe he might stop listening to these supposed industry experts telling him that he'd be rolling in money and show the playerbase that he actually gives a **** about the integrity of EVE the sandbox game. And not try and turn it into EVE the wanna be themepark, microtransactioned up the wahzoo game.

Nex (Cash Shop) / Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future.

Stella SGP
#693 - 2011-11-03 05:43:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Stella SGP
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

The point of WiS was it's use as a platform for microtransactions.

Nah, the micro-transaction portion is "suppose" to be optional like how it is now. WiS was "suppose" to allow booster trading in hi-sec (something along those lines at least) and gambling on mini games.

It seems some people have missed some of the facts surrounding the whole microtransaction debacle. When the shite was hitting the fan over the Fearless newsletter regarding 'gold ammo', etc, yes for anyone who cared to look into it further they would have seen that it was just some internal CCP theorising. So that by itself meant little as to where CCP's stance was on the subject of microtransactions.

Now having said that if we look at the context of the Fearless newsletter talking about 'gold ammo', golden geese and microtransactions on many things other than clothing, etc, then view Hilmar's email, please tell me where this 'suppose' line is coming from because Hilmar stated where CCP was headed with microtransactions in EVE.

And just in case you missed the quote in Hilmar's email referencing microtransactions that should have made any EVE player more than a little concerned.

Yea, thats why I said 'suppose'. Anyway from what I can recall they were talking more about selling 'conveniences', such as standings or sec statues, rather then straight up over-powered gold ammo. Weren't they?

Then again if they wanted to sell gold ammo in the NEX, they don't need WiS platform to do it. There is no reason to load WiS just to use the NEX. So, please don't mix the 2 together.
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#694 - 2011-11-03 05:55:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
Issler Dainze wrote:


I haven't counted ANY posts. And my post started out to prove there are SOME people that wanted WiS work to continue contrary to Himlars comments. I am saying even without counting this thread proves that nicely.

So get your facts straight.

Issler


Issler Dainze wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Zleon Leigh wrote:
@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.

Just in case you were counting votes


apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.


If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point.

Issler



ah youre not lying, youre making it up. Fair enough

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Azahni Vah'nos
Vah'nos Family
#695 - 2011-11-03 06:01:18 UTC
Stella SGP wrote:
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
You fail to see the point to WiS. Completely failed to see the point.

The point of WiS was it's use as a platform for microtransactions.

Nah, the micro-transaction portion is "suppose" to be optional like how it is now. WiS was "suppose" to allow booster trading in hi-sec (something along those lines at least) and gambling on mini games.

It seems some people have missed some of the facts surrounding the whole microtransaction debacle. When the shite was hitting the fan over the Fearless newsletter regarding 'gold ammo', etc, yes for anyone who cared to look into it further they would have seen that it was just some internal CCP theorising. So that by itself meant little as to where CCP's stance was on the subject of microtransactions.

Now having said that if we look at the context of the Fearless newsletter talking about 'gold ammo', golden geese and microtransactions on many things other than clothing, etc, then view Hilmar's email, please tell me where this 'suppose' line is coming from because Hilmar stated where CCP was headed with microtransactions in EVE.

And just in case you missed the quote in Hilmar's email referencing microtransactions that should have made any EVE player more than a little concerned.

Yea, thats why I said 'suppose'. Anyway from what I can recall they were talking more about selling 'conveniences', such as standings or sec statues, rather then straight up over-powered gold ammo. Weren't they?

Then again if they wanted to sell gold ammo in the NEX, they don't need WiS platform to do it. There is no reason to load WiS just to use the NEX. So, please don't mix the 2 together.

Unfortunately they are not as separate as you say, because CCP poluted WiS with the inclusion of microtransactions and this has given the pro-FiS players even more reason to despise anything involving WiS. Cash shop 'creep' has been seen in other games and with where CCP was headed with microtransactions the pro-FiS'ers were right to believe that it wouldn't be long before space aspects of the game had microtransactions attached to them.

Nex (Cash Shop) / Aurum - removing sand from the sandbox since Incarna. Currently the only use for aurum is to buy virtual items in the in-game store, but Cockerill expects to expand its uses in the future.

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#696 - 2011-11-03 06:15:45 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:


I haven't counted ANY posts. And my post started out to prove there are SOME people that wanted WiS work to continue contrary to Himlars comments. I am saying even without counting this thread proves that nicely.

So get your facts straight.

Issler


Issler Dainze wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Zleon Leigh wrote:
@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.

Just in case you were counting votes


apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.


If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point.

Issler



ah youre not lying, youre making it up. Fair enough


I never "counted" anything. That was the number the forum provided for "likes". I quoted it. Others have counted stuff. In fact others pointed out some likes were not in favor of WiS. Doesn't matter because enough were from some WiS development to continue.

All I intended to convey to CCP was Hilmar's implication in his interview was wrong, Everyone in Eve did not hate WiS and only want FiS. That many folks wanted some WiS development to continue and not be "put on ice".

The responses in this thread proved that beyond my expectations and no counting is required to make my case.

I mostly try and ignore your responses as they are clearly trolling but you provided a legitimate reason for a bump! Keep 'm cumin'!

Issler
Stella SGP
#697 - 2011-11-03 06:16:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Stella SGP
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
Yea, thats why I said 'suppose'. Anyway from what I can recall they were talking more about selling 'conveniences', such as standings or sec statues, rather then straight up over-powered gold ammo. Weren't they?

Then again if they wanted to sell gold ammo in the NEX, they don't need WiS platform to do it. There is no reason to load WiS just to use the NEX. So, please don't mix the 2 together.

Unfortunately they are not as separate as you say, because CCP poluted WiS with the inclusion of microtransactions and this has given the pro-FiS players even more reason to despise anything involving WiS. Cash shop 'creep' has been seen in other games and with where CCP was headed with microtransactions the pro-FiS'ers were right to believe that it wouldn't be long before space aspects of the game had microtransactions attached to them.

Oh come on, you're smart enough to recognize that WiS and MT are 2 seperate issues, yet you still choose to lump them up together like all the others? CCP could have launched NEX without Incarna if they wanted to and start selling ship skins. One does not need the other! So, its silly for pro-FiS'ers to believe that space aspect will have MT because of WiS.

Edit - Anyway, if you want to argue about MT, in my opinion, the day CCP introduced PLEX, the floodgates have been opened for MT and its up to CCP whether gold ammo is introduced or not. Cause I really don't see the difference between selling a bunch of PLEX to buy a SC and spending some AURs on gold ammo to pwn others. Its just 1 more link in the chain. Real money or ISK -> PLEX -> AUR -> Gold Ammo, versus Real money -> PLEX -> ISK -> SC.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#698 - 2011-11-03 06:58:15 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
The responses in this thread proved that beyond my expectations and no counting is required to make my case.

30+ pages of you and the other Barbie fetishists getting trolled is proof of what exactly?

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Sathynos
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#699 - 2011-11-03 08:28:54 UTC
Hey CCP,

I think a little clarification is needed. Few people opposed Incarna as a concept. In fact a lot of people would love a new, broader, groud-based aspect of the game. What people opposed was half-bred version of that idea, the captain quaters being forced upon us. I'd love meaningfull interactions with an avatar, poker games for ISK and stuff.
Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated
#700 - 2011-11-03 08:47:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranka Mei
Azahni Vah'nos wrote:
Unfortunately they are not as separate as you say, because CCP poluted WiS with the inclusion of microtransactions and this has given the pro-FiS players even more reason to despise anything involving WiS.

Incarna and the money-grubbing aspirations of a certain CEO really are two separate issues. Incarna goes way back, when Ambulation was just a gleam in the eye of developers who were faced with hardware that couldn't nearly make their dreams a reality yet. Then Hilmar injected greed into the equation; allegedly because some Korean demographics had shown him that he could make money, hand over fist, pushing Needlessly EXpensive stuff down our throats. And he actually even botched that too (how sad is that!?), as he didn't even offer anything of value in his store -- other than the silly monocle, of course (which wasn't even a monocle, LOL, but an ocular implant which looked so slapped-on that people started calling it a monocle).

Anyway, as you yourself say, WiS became polluted with the NeX. That was Hilmar's doing alone. And it wasn't even necessary. If he wanted microtransactions, he could have sold things like ship skins/corp logos, etc. You know, stuff people actually wanted. Alas, he went with a very poor selection of even more poorly designed clothes. That still baffles me; any business man with half a sense will tell you not to open up a store until you... have actually something to sell!

As an anyway to my anyway, WiS and NeX are separate entities. As a consequence, I hope to see less of the latter, and a little more of the former.

-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP