These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Separate the four empires with low security space.

First post
Author
Loki Feiht
Warcrows
Sedition.
#341 - 2013-05-02 22:46:01 UTC
I think its strange we get hulkaggedon and burn jita type events but never a make it safe event eh?

More NPC - Randomly Generated Modular Content thread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=220858

Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#342 - 2013-05-02 23:28:24 UTC
Loki Feiht wrote:
I think its strange we get hulkaggedon and burn jita type events but never a make it safe event eh?

Get a bunch of pure hisec occupants and start securing rancer or something. It CAN be done, but the level of dedication and organization required is opposite of what most casual gamers can commit to.

Still, there were players shooting TEST and Goonies and helping Concord. Just because we don't have a lot of time to play, doesn't mean we can.t defend ourselves.

Hisec =/= Carebear

Hisec = Secure

You can find carebears in every type of space, and with the upcoming expansion, you'll find far more in Null.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?

Erutpar Ambient
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#343 - 2013-05-03 05:27:18 UTC
You know, when the Battle for Caldari Prime thing happened there was something said about things changing with the caldari breaking the pact with CONCORD or something to that effect. Maybe there is already stuff in the works to this effect. Maybe it's sooner than expected :)
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#344 - 2013-05-03 13:29:08 UTC
Ruze wrote:

Get a bunch of pure hisec occupants and start securing rancer or something. It CAN be done, but the level of dedication and organization required is opposite of what most casual gamers can commit to.

Still, there were players shooting TEST and Goonies and helping Concord. Just because we don't have a lot of time to play, doesn't mean we can.t defend ourselves.

Hisec =/= Carebear

Hisec = Secure

You can find carebears in every type of space, and with the upcoming expansion, you'll find far more in Null.


Lived in hisec for a long time wardecing carebears.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Claire Raynor
NovaGear
#345 - 2013-05-03 15:44:45 UTC
I've never really known why the highsec empires needed to border one another. The area people do FW in is pretty small too.

I really like the idea of CCP grabbing the four corners of the Empire Space and ripping them apart leaving a ton of lo-sec regions between them.

As a concession I wouldn't mind the radius of the region gates to be made a little bigger - or more region gates to be put up into this new dead man's land. Amamake and Rancer aren't fun - It's kinda "Yeah, I get it" - but meh. There's something about Rancer that is just naff - whereas me losing my massive freighter off of Atlar was kinda fun (in a morbid way) it was a chase of sorts.

And my story of losing that freighter is a case-in-point of why splitting the empires up would be good. My Freighter was on it's way to the Orien Island of High-sec southeast of the Minnie High Sec. It WAS worth the risk - I'd done similar stuff before - in Amamake - risk/reward - read the EVE Kill comments on that kill - Turn Left are ace PVP'ers and I still nearly got my Freighter away!! We play games for fun - and that was fun - the chase had my heart rate up a fair bit. Afterwards loads of people started turning up to see if they could get the lootz too - dunno if there were any fights over it.

So yeah - Split up empire space - Go for it!
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#346 - 2013-05-03 17:49:38 UTC
Claire Raynor wrote:
I've never really known why the highsec empires needed to border one another. The area people do FW in is pretty small too.

I really like the idea of CCP grabbing the four corners of the Empire Space and ripping them apart leaving a ton of lo-sec regions between them.

As a concession I wouldn't mind the radius of the region gates to be made a little bigger - or more region gates to be put up into this new dead man's land. Amamake and Rancer aren't fun - It's kinda "Yeah, I get it" - but meh. There's something about Rancer that is just naff - whereas me losing my massive freighter off of Atlar was kinda fun (in a morbid way) it was a chase of sorts.

And my story of losing that freighter is a case-in-point of why splitting the empires up would be good. My Freighter was on it's way to the Orien Island of High-sec southeast of the Minnie High Sec. It WAS worth the risk - I'd done similar stuff before - in Amamake - risk/reward - read the EVE Kill comments on that kill - Turn Left are ace PVP'ers and I still nearly got my Freighter away!! We play games for fun - and that was fun - the chase had my heart rate up a fair bit. Afterwards loads of people started turning up to see if they could get the lootz too - dunno if there were any fights over it.

So yeah - Split up empire space - Go for it!


There ya go, CCP.

Do this.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

General Guardian
Perkone
Caldari State
#347 - 2013-05-05 23:17:09 UTC  |  Edited by: General Guardian
This idea gets GG's stamp of approval.

Getting players to actually be sitting at thier computer instead of afking freighters all day making abundant amounts of isk would probably reduce suicide ganking a bit as well. This would also encourage newer players to experience low sec space while exploring different faction space without forcing them to PvP. Its reasonably easy to get through low sec in a frigate.

Although I can see the argument pop up about how easy it is to lose implants via being podded for less experienced pilots and that high sec players shouldnt be forced to use empty clones or update clones when something goes wrong because they're unsure how to get away in their pod quickly
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#348 - 2013-05-06 22:58:40 UTC
General Guardian wrote:
This idea gets GG's stamp of approval.

Getting players to actually be sitting at thier computer instead of afking freighters all day making abundant amounts of isk would probably reduce suicide ganking a bit as well. This would also encourage newer players to experience low sec space while exploring different faction space without forcing them to PvP. Its reasonably easy to get through low sec in a frigate.

Although I can see the argument pop up about how easy it is to lose implants via being podded for less experienced pilots and that high sec players shouldnt be forced to use empty clones or update clones when something goes wrong because they're unsure how to get away in their pod quickly


We shouldn't design the game to accommodate the ignorant people who have been playing long enough to have expensive implants and not realize that low sec is dangerous.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Erutpar Ambient
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#349 - 2013-05-07 01:35:20 UTC
Commander Ted wrote:
General Guardian wrote:
This idea gets GG's stamp of approval.

Getting players to actually be sitting at thier computer instead of afking freighters all day making abundant amounts of isk would probably reduce suicide ganking a bit as well. This would also encourage newer players to experience low sec space while exploring different faction space without forcing them to PvP. Its reasonably easy to get through low sec in a frigate.

Although I can see the argument pop up about how easy it is to lose implants via being podded for less experienced pilots and that high sec players shouldnt be forced to use empty clones or update clones when something goes wrong because they're unsure how to get away in their pod quickly


We shouldn't design the game to accommodate the ignorant people who have been playing long enough to have expensive implants and not realize that low sec is dangerous.


Agreed

You do get a warning when you enter low sec anyways.
Job Valador
Professional Amateurs
#350 - 2013-05-07 01:59:55 UTC
I am a trader and ship builder and I approve of this idea as well. Good idea Ted, we need more ways to create emergent game play and this would defenately be a good step forward.

As someone already said, "true traders corp would emerge and escort their goods creating conflict and not these ten man alt corp"

"The stone exhibited a profound lack of movement."

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#351 - 2013-05-07 03:53:39 UTC
Job Valador wrote:
I am a trader and ship builder and I approve of this idea as well. Good idea Ted, we need more ways to create emergent game play and this would defenately be a good step forward.

As someone already said, "true traders corp would emerge and escort their goods creating conflict and not these ten man alt corp"


Oh look, your alt thinks it's a good idea. And lol @ "escort."Lol
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#352 - 2013-05-07 14:28:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
sabre906 wrote:


Oh look, your alt thinks it's a good idea. And lol @ "escort."Lol


If you don't have anything to contribute leave.
I already debunked your points and you for some reason choose not to actually argue but to instead troll.

If you can do nothing but make false accusations then maybe there is something wrong about the viewpoints you are trying to put forward.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Llyona
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#353 - 2013-05-07 14:47:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Llyona
Commander Ted wrote:
Ruze wrote:

Get a bunch of pure hisec occupants and start securing rancer or something. It CAN be done, but the level of dedication and organization required is opposite of what most casual gamers can commit to.

Still, there were players shooting TEST and Goonies and helping Concord. Just because we don't have a lot of time to play, doesn't mean we can.t defend ourselves.

Hisec =/= Carebear

Hisec = Secure

You can find carebears in every type of space, and with the upcoming expansion, you'll find far more in Null.


Lived in hisec for a long time wardecing carebears.


Yeah? No one cares.

Do you want to get some super awesome tears from a nearly endless source of carebears? Go into an anom system in nullsec (Military 5) with a cloaky. Watch as the tears stream in from all the nullbears, mainly because they can't run their bots or anoms. Nullsec anom systems are quite possibly the biggest concentration of carebears in EVE.

EVE is an illness, for which there is no cure.

Caljiav Ocanon
The Holy Rollers
#354 - 2013-05-07 15:05:01 UTC
People say that no one has a right to anything in EVE right?

So why do people feel they have deserve an easy, minimal risk target rich environment?

That's what this proposal is asking for in a nutshell.
Nahkep Narmelion
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#355 - 2013-05-07 15:10:54 UTC
Commander Ted wrote:


I have already said probably 5 times why Caldari space would not be concentrated and you seem to ignore my points every time.


You keep having to say it because your reasons are note very good. You've already admitted that this goal of this is to reduce trade. One outcome might be that even more is concentrated in Jita than prior to this change. I've noted way back up stream I used to do invention and manufacturing. I did it in Gallente space. After this change I'd have incentive to pick up shop and move it if I could (and if I considered) it still profitable enough (this one is questionable--invention is click intensive and boring).

Of course not everyone would move, but Jita is already the main trade hub. Would this change break that? IDK, but null sec people might still want to use it (maybe Amarr for people in the south).

Quote:
If everyone lived in caldari space then caldari ores, LP items, and ice would be ******* insanely cheap. All station slots would have 4 year long ques, it would suck balls.
If carebears move to other empires, then war dec corps will follow. If their is a high demand for replacement goods traders will follow.


Or not. If everyone lived there, there would also be higher demand. Thus it is possible prices might not change, could be higher or could be lower. You really make yourself look foolish with the statements couched in absolute certainty. You don't know what the **** would happen. Neither do I, but I admit it.

Quote:
So if items in other empires are more valuable, that means living in other space has an advantage, unlike solitude.
So your point is not thought through and ignorant.


It depends on the demand doesn't it. Sure a T1 blaster might cost 3x what it does in Gallente space vs. Jita post change, but if I can't even sell enough to earn the same profit as I could selling a larger batch in Jita at a lower price/gun...why bother? Price isn't everything. Price changes tell you where to re-allocate resources. To take an extreme example, prices, after a disaster, for things like water and canned goods sky rocket. Why? That is the market "saying"--"Hey, over here we have considerably shortages and unsatisfied demand; send lots more stuff ASAP." You can also see it with monopolists. A monopolist could maximize the price he charges. Do monopolists do this? No.

Quote:
The reason everyone is in Jita is because it is so easy to get to other empires. Having a central super hub is convenient since the money it saves is so great versus the time their is no reason not to. I believe in the 2012 fanfest or maybe 2011 the CCP economist deduced that excluding Jita the populations in the empires are equal in population.
Jita might remain the biggest hub after this change if large alliance would continue to purchase their goods from there.


Exactly why the change you've been pimping might not work. You've finally admitted it. Players like having a super-hub. After this change, they might still like having a super-hub and this may do nothing to stop that. At best it might make a second super-hub (Amarr). Might it be at the expense of Jita? Possibly, but it could very well be at the expense of Rens and Dodixie.
Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#356 - 2013-05-07 15:53:25 UTC
Nahkep Narmelion wrote:
Commander Ted wrote:


I have already said probably 5 times why Caldari space would not be concentrated and you seem to ignore my points every time.


You keep having to say it because your reasons are note very good. You've already admitted that this goal of this is to reduce trade. One outcome might be that even more is concentrated in Jita than prior to this change. I've noted way back up stream I used to do invention and manufacturing. I did it in Gallente space. After this change I'd have incentive to pick up shop and move it if I could (and if I considered) it still profitable enough (this one is questionable--invention is click intensive and boring).

Of course not everyone would move, but Jita is already the main trade hub. Would this change break that? IDK, but null sec people might still want to use it (maybe Amarr for people in the south).

Quote:
If everyone lived in caldari space then caldari ores, LP items, and ice would be ******* insanely cheap. All station slots would have 4 year long ques, it would suck balls.
If carebears move to other empires, then war dec corps will follow. If their is a high demand for replacement goods traders will follow.


Or not. If everyone lived there, there would also be higher demand. Thus it is possible prices might not change, could be higher or could be lower. You really make yourself look foolish with the statements couched in absolute certainty. You don't know what the **** would happen. Neither do I, but I admit it.

Quote:
So if items in other empires are more valuable, that means living in other space has an advantage, unlike solitude.
So your point is not thought through and ignorant.


It depends on the demand doesn't it. Sure a T1 blaster might cost 3x what it does in Gallente space vs. Jita post change, but if I can't even sell enough to earn the same profit as I could selling a larger batch in Jita at a lower price/gun...why bother? Price isn't everything. Price changes tell you where to re-allocate resources. To take an extreme example, prices, after a disaster, for things like water and canned goods sky rocket. Why? That is the market "saying"--"Hey, over here we have considerably shortages and unsatisfied demand; send lots more stuff ASAP." You can also see it with monopolists. A monopolist could maximize the price he charges. Do monopolists do this? No.

Quote:
The reason everyone is in Jita is because it is so easy to get to other empires. Having a central super hub is convenient since the money it saves is so great versus the time their is no reason not to. I believe in the 2012 fanfest or maybe 2011 the CCP economist deduced that excluding Jita the populations in the empires are equal in population.
Jita might remain the biggest hub after this change if large alliance would continue to purchase their goods from there.


Exactly why the change you've been pimping might not work. You've finally admitted it. Players like having a super-hub. After this change, they might still like having a super-hub and this may do nothing to stop that. At best it might make a second super-hub (Amarr). Might it be at the expense of Jita? Possibly, but it could very well be at the expense of Rens and Dodixie.


Honestly, I like the idea because I feel that it will minimize the 'central trade hub' idea a lot and start pushing local hubs a lot more. The centralized hub of Jita, in my mind, needs a lot of it's oomph taken out and more placed in regional and local hubs.

Plus, if it's dangerous to haul goods, the value of said goods will vary more greatly in each region. I'll have lasers all day in Amarr, but getting missiles or autocannons might cost me more than they would in their areas.

Finally, as mentioned earlier, I hate the fact that mass-trade is mostly a solo endeavor. Single accounts living in NPC corps, flying freighters to and from Jita. They stick to NPC corps to keep from getting war dec'd, to avoid loss. I like the fact that this idea would sincerely push those who are willing to make trade into a group endeavor into more profitable territory, while nuking the solo trader's profit margin considerably.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?

Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#357 - 2013-05-07 15:56:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Ted
Llyona wrote:


Yeah? No one cares.

Do you want to get some super awesome tears from a nearly endless source of carebears? Go into an anom system in nullsec (Military 5) with a cloaky. Watch as the tears stream in from all the nullbears, mainly because they can't run their bots or anoms. Nullsec anom systems are quite possibly the biggest concentration of carebears in EVE.


>Says no one cares, then proceeds to ramble off topic about something people care less about. Roll

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#358 - 2013-05-07 15:57:43 UTC
Caljiav Ocanon wrote:
People say that no one has a right to anything in EVE right?

So why do people feel they have deserve an easy, minimal risk target rich environment?

That's what this proposal is asking for in a nutshell.


Why do you feel you deserve a easy risk free environment for moving across hisec, despite the fact that you would still have hundreds of systems in each empire for you to carebear in?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#359 - 2013-05-07 16:13:42 UTC
Nahkep Narmelion wrote:
TL;DR


A super hub is only possible due to how trivial it is to travel to.
If i make things, and I load them into the freighter to take them to market, will I move them to dodixie which is 3 jumps away, or Jita.
Jita will only take my freighter an extra hour to get to and a fraction of the time to sell my wares, obviously I will go to Jita.

If low sec was in the way, I would not do this.

If everyone wanted to move to caldari space to build things, then all station slots would be eternally buttraped, you would never get a que.
You would make no money mining ice because the ice belts would all be instantly mined (ice anoms coming soon)
You would make less money running missions because their is only so much demand for caldari navy invulns.
You would make less money doing incursions because they are often not in caldari space.
You would make less money selling pvp items to the other factions militias.
You would make less mining belts because they would be stripped down even faster.
You would make less money doing exploration because of competition.

All of these are reasons not to live in caldari space, so the likelihood of people not selling things in jita, is greater then everyone living out of jita.

The possibility of jita becoming a bigger hub is probably one of the least likely of all the possible outcomes of this change.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Caljiav Ocanon
The Holy Rollers
#360 - 2013-05-07 16:20:18 UTC
Carebear
Noun
A word used by generally unemployed/unemployable males to describe anyone who they dislike in a video game, usually teenage virgins or "men" in their 30s and 40s with no life.