These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Retribution 1.2 patch notes highlights
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-05-06 16:34:05 UTC
amurder Hakomairos wrote:
And we get screwed by dust again. 4.5 hours of lost income for next to nothing


Dust is EVE and EVE is dust.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB
Ronan Huren
Revenant Tactical
#22 - 2013-05-06 16:35:00 UTC
HulkDriver001 wrote:
2 thoughts.

1) **** DUST, no one really wants it, having played for approx 15 hours over the past 2 weeks, all I can say is that it is at best an average FPS. Feedback from console bunnie friends indicate it is **** compared to the HALO franchise ... one even said it felt like a game from 2008.

2)Seriously **** DUST.


Oh its **** comparedto arguably the best FPS franchise on console? i wouldnt have guessed you considering its still in Beta.
Its still in Beta therefore stop hating until the full game comes out.... Then you can hate on it.
Kor'el Izia
#23 - 2013-05-06 17:46:39 UTC
Ronan Huren wrote:
HulkDriver001 wrote:
2 thoughts.

1) **** DUST, no one really wants it, having played for approx 15 hours over the past 2 weeks, all I can say is that it is at best an average FPS. Feedback from console bunnie friends indicate it is **** compared to the HALO franchise ... one even said it felt like a game from 2008.

2)Seriously **** DUST.


Oh its **** comparedto arguably the best FPS franchise on console? i wouldnt have guessed you considering its still in Beta.
Its still in Beta therefore stop hating until the full game comes out.... Then you can hate on it.

... which will be in 8 days
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#24 - 2013-05-06 18:21:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Kor'el Izia wrote:
Ronan Huren wrote:
HulkDriver001 wrote:
2 thoughts.

1) **** DUST, no one really wants it, having played for approx 15 hours over the past 2 weeks, all I can say is that it is at best an average FPS. Feedback from console bunnie friends indicate it is **** compared to the HALO franchise ... one even said it felt like a game from 2008.

2)Seriously **** DUST.


Oh its **** comparedto arguably the best FPS franchise on console? i wouldnt have guessed you considering its still in Beta.
Its still in Beta therefore stop hating until the full game comes out.... Then you can hate on it.

... which will be in 8 days

No offense to HulkDriver001's friends (however many that might be) but I think I'll go with the opinions given on the larger gaming sites instead... and they seem to like it, a lot.

And they haven't even got to play yet with the vastly better build that is being deployed.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
Ckra Trald
Ckra Trald Corporation
#25 - 2013-05-06 19:19:33 UTC
4.5 hours is fine. This isnt WoW if one server derps then "lol lets shut that down"

i think 4.5 hours to triple check a server that holds 600k+ players is fine

http://www.rusemen.com/ Join Tengoo xd
Aria Jimbojohnson
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-05-06 21:44:23 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Kor'el Izia wrote:
Ronan Huren wrote:
HulkDriver001 wrote:
2 thoughts.

1) **** DUST, no one really wants it, having played for approx 15 hours over the past 2 weeks, all I can say is that it is at best an average FPS. Feedback from console bunnie friends indicate it is **** compared to the HALO franchise ... one even said it felt like a game from 2008.

2)Seriously **** DUST.


Oh its **** comparedto arguably the best FPS franchise on console? i wouldnt have guessed you considering its still in Beta.
Its still in Beta therefore stop hating until the full game comes out.... Then you can hate on it.

... which will be in 8 days

No offense to HulkDriver001's friends (however many that might be) but I think I'll go with the opinions given on the larger gaming sites instead... and they seem to like it, a lot.

And they haven't even got to play yet with the vastly better build that is being deployed.


No, they like the concept. Most sites I've seen praise it talk about crap that isn't in and likely won't be in for a long, long time.

Also, the new build released today broke as much as it fixed, and a lot of the changes are very questionable. The main one being, all of the guns have total trash range now. You can literally see someone about 50 meters ahead of you and not be able to hit him with an assault rifle. But hey, at least it doesn't look like a PS2 game now, it's closer to PS2.5. It even seems to look quite a bit worse than the teasers/preview videos showed.
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#27 - 2013-05-06 22:26:43 UTC
Guys, seriously??
Illest Insurrectionist
Sparta.
#28 - 2013-05-06 23:05:41 UTC
HulkDriver001 wrote:
2 thoughts.

1) **** DUST, no one really wants it, having played for approx 15 hours over the past 2 weeks, all I can say is that it is at best an average FPS. Feedback from console bunnie friends indicate it is **** compared to the HALO franchise ... one even said it felt like a game from 2008.

2)Seriously **** DUST.


It sounds like you should be happy that they are patching dust up if you don't like it.
Previous page12