These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hisec ice removal

Author
Bloody Wench
#101 - 2013-04-28 09:27:42 UTC
The time is nigh for an Ice Interdiction.

[u]**Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote: **[/u]  CCP should not only make local delayed in highsec, but they should also require one be undocked to use it. Then, even the local spammers have some skin in the game. Support a High Resolution Texture Pack

Dave stark
#102 - 2013-04-28 09:30:18 UTC
Bloody Wench wrote:
Dave,

again it will depend on how many miners that an individual site can support. Those systems will multiple belts (anoms) *may* be heavily contested.


yeah because i didn't just say that?
OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#103 - 2013-04-29 04:57:03 UTC  |  Edited by: OldWolf69
Have your -10 alt in system, log it off there. Get a shitload of catalysts on a Orca alt. Get a good warp in point. Popppp. Concord kills your Catalyst, but your pod is still like new. No problem at all, if you have 100 new catalysts waiting in station, on your alt account. Do this for a week. Then start extorcating people.
We come again to the "why?" problem. Problem coming in conflict with miner's greed, and the fact you will get killed you pay or not. With any real problem for the griefer. Because there won't be a single one. There will be all griefers youc an imagine, with their mothers and grandma's.
Who will hit this sh*t? Nullsec will handle it to the end. What about WH players?
Ofc, there will be ways to avoid this inutile ****. I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real. And avoiding means not is also lucrative anymore.
Whole thing is more complicated that the joy to see people's easy incomes die and your incomes rise. Ofc, not at first look, and not in the first week.
I must insist, what they did is called "cheating". I'm shure some of you understand why i say that.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#104 - 2013-04-29 08:24:06 UTC
I am pleased CCP have listened to the intelligent part of the player base, that is to say nullseccers and the New Order, and are introducing this much needed balance to ice mining. Truly for the betterment of EVE.

Bloody Wench
#105 - 2013-04-29 10:38:05 UTC
OldWolf69 wrote:
Have your -10 alt in system, log it off there. Get a shitload of catalysts on a Orca alt. Get a good warp in point. Popppp. Concord kills your Catalyst, but your pod is still like new. No problem at all, if you have 100 new catalysts waiting in station, on your alt account. Do this for a week. Then start extorcating people.
We come again to the "why?" problem. Problem coming in conflict with miner's greed, and the fact you will get killed you pay or not. With any real problem for the griefer. Because there won't be a single one. There will be all griefers youc an imagine, with their mothers and grandma's.
Who will hit this sh*t? Nullsec will handle it to the end. What about WH players?
Ofc, there will be ways to avoid this inutile ****. I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real. And avoiding means not is also lucrative anymore.
Whole thing is more complicated that the joy to see people's easy incomes die and your incomes rise. Ofc, not at first look, and not in the first week.
I must insist, what they did is called "cheating". I'm shure some of you understand why i say that.



dafuq?

[u]**Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote: **[/u]  CCP should not only make local delayed in highsec, but they should also require one be undocked to use it. Then, even the local spammers have some skin in the game. Support a High Resolution Texture Pack

OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#106 - 2013-04-29 13:40:41 UTC
dafuq yourself?Big smile
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn
Department 10
#107 - 2013-04-29 14:46:29 UTC
I think it is reasonable that some changes had to be made to improve industrial capabilities & resources for the nul-sec community. And that is coming from a high-sec resident such as myself. Whether the already announced changes and the proposed other ideas such as decreasing high-sec refining rates & increasing high-sec NPC manufacturing costs/decreasing high-sec NPC station manufacturing capability are good for New Eden remains to be seen.

To be honest the moral to be drawn from these changes is that the CSM now has teeth and EVERYONE that didn't get off their ****, get organised, & place votes at the CSM 8 elections can hold themselves alone to blame for everything that goes wrong. Admittedly the wormhole community did get organised pre CSM 7 and were successful in getting a voice on that year's CSM and will now receive a little love in the forthcoming changes to POS hangers etc. Also the Incursion community formed a coordinated response during the CSM 8 elections and now have their chosen candidate, Ripard Teg, on the CSM. But still the majority or the power on the CSM lies with the nul-centric 'Nul is the "real" game' candidates.

I haven't looked up the details of all the successful candidates for CSM 8 yet but at a glance I didn't recognise most of the names.I was expecting Steve of Fuzzworks fame to be elected to represent the 'third party' developers etc but it wasn't to be. Cry It would have been great if the FW community got organised, put aside their racial differences temporarily, and voted for one candidate to represent them too. Maybe they did - I don't know yet.

Please everyone. Release yourself from your 'real life' apathetic opinions of the voting process and make sure you place a vote with all your accounts at next years CSM elections. You will be on the back foot but the CSM will still have teeth and you can make changes for your communitie/s . In 'real life' I acknowledge that placing a vote can, and may actually be, a futile act but with the CSM in New Eden this is not the case.

It's a call to arms ! Big smile

" They're gonna feel pretty stupid when they find out. " Rick. " Find out what ? " Abraham. " They're screwing with the wrong people. " Rick. Season four.   ' The Walking Dead. ' .

Haulie Berry
#108 - 2013-04-29 14:59:40 UTC
Quote:
I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real.


You would have to be preternaturally stupid to think the purpose of this change is to stop bots.

The purpose of this change is to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.

It has abso-*******-lutely posi-*******-tively nothing to do with preventing "botting".
Naughty Ferret
Czerka.
What Could Possibly Go Wr0ng
#109 - 2013-04-30 20:22:45 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
Quote:
I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real.


You would have to be preternaturally stupid to think the purpose of this change is to stop bots.

The purpose of this change is to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.

It has abso-*******-lutely posi-*******-tively nothing to do with preventing "botting".


But surely once the ice becomes less than infinite it will be much harder to actually bot - if there is no ice in the ysstem for hours at a time what will the bots do?
Danni stark
#110 - 2013-04-30 20:33:01 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
Quote:
I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real.


You would have to be preternaturally stupid to think the purpose of this change is to stop bots.

The purpose of this change is to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.

It has abso-*******-lutely posi-*******-tively nothing to do with preventing "botting".


you'd be naive to assume this isn't a trial for moving ore to anoms too, so they can start to get rid of downtime.
Danni stark
#111 - 2013-04-30 20:33:25 UTC
Naughty Ferret wrote:
Haulie Berry wrote:
Quote:
I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real.


You would have to be preternaturally stupid to think the purpose of this change is to stop bots.

The purpose of this change is to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.

It has abso-*******-lutely posi-*******-tively nothing to do with preventing "botting".


But surely once the ice becomes less than infinite it will be much harder to actually bot - if there is no ice in the ysstem for hours at a time what will the bots do?


mine ore.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#112 - 2013-05-01 17:32:22 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote:


Also the Incursion community formed a coordinated response during the CSM 8 elections and now have their chosen candidate, Ripard Teg, on the CSM. But still the majority or the power on the CSM lies with the nul-centric 'Nul is the "real" game' candidates.


It's a call to arms ! Big smile


It took alot of work for me to get HI SEC incursioners to vote! BUT IT PAID OFF IN SPADES Lol Ripard got enough votes to become a permenant attendee which I'm sure surprised alot of peeps thinking Goons & HBC would hold those those 2 positions exclusively. Also we were pushing Mike Azrah for the 2nd STV slot choice pretty hard & he surprisingly got voted into the CSM8 Big smile
Still the CSM is very NULL centric but if incursioners can organize how come industry/miners can't organize next elections too & push a HI SEC candidate(s)?
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Haulie Berry
#113 - 2013-05-01 17:38:58 UTC
Danni stark wrote:
Naughty Ferret wrote:
Haulie Berry wrote:
Quote:
I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real.


You would have to be preternaturally stupid to think the purpose of this change is to stop bots.

The purpose of this change is to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.

It has abso-*******-lutely posi-*******-tively nothing to do with preventing "botting".


But surely once the ice becomes less than infinite it will be much harder to actually bot - if there is no ice in the ysstem for hours at a time what will the bots do?


mine ore.


No, no, don't be ridiculous. Bots will be rendered completely impotent by this change. Nobody could ever figure out how to program a bot to load a saved fitting.
Danni stark
#114 - 2013-05-01 17:40:58 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
Danni stark wrote:
Naughty Ferret wrote:
Haulie Berry wrote:
Quote:
I say inutile because this won't stop the bots, for real.


You would have to be preternaturally stupid to think the purpose of this change is to stop bots.

The purpose of this change is to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.

It has abso-*******-lutely posi-*******-tively nothing to do with preventing "botting".


But surely once the ice becomes less than infinite it will be much harder to actually bot - if there is no ice in the ysstem for hours at a time what will the bots do?


mine ore.


No, no, don't be ridiculous. Bots will be rendered completely impotent by this change. Nobody could ever figure out how to program a bot to load a saved fitting.


saved fitting?
just swap ship, much quicker.
Haulie Berry
#115 - 2013-05-01 17:50:04 UTC
Danni stark wrote:


saved fitting?
just swap ship, much quicker.


Probably not actually faster for a bot, but a good option if you're rigging for yield.
Danni stark
#116 - 2013-05-01 17:50:50 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
Danni stark wrote:


saved fitting?
just swap ship, much quicker.


Probably not actually faster for a bot, but a good option if you're rigging for yield.


which you should be, for ice.

although i generally use rets so it doesn't matter much...
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#117 - 2013-05-01 18:05:40 UTC
Current ratting bots can tell if there are rats on overview, and warp when there isn't. So I don't see that mining bots won't be able to do the same.

However, they will have to sit somewhere in space and scan for a new anom regularly. Could do it from a POS, which would be smart. They could log out for 4 hours, log in, scan, and then decide what to do next.

I don't see any changes that will hurt ice bots' functionality. But their isk/hr ratio is about to die a cold icelandic death.

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#118 - 2013-05-01 18:15:45 UTC
So, yeah, this change won't affect bots,Lol
Haulie Berry
#119 - 2013-05-01 19:00:24 UTC
OldWolf69 wrote:
So, yeah, this change won't affect bots,Lol


Yes, we're aware of that.

It's not supposed to affect bots, so what point you're attempting to make remains to be seen.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#120 - 2013-05-01 19:20:19 UTC
ICE belts are begining to get gett crowded! So crowded you may want to look into purchasing the ORE Faction ICE harvestors I put up for sale in Jita that increase your range & make bumping that much more difficult!

Also once Odyssy hits & ICE starts depleteing faster then an ice cube in hell these ORE Faction harvetors will give you an edge in fast draining the next ICE slab thats just out of reach to the poor noobs that don't have the boosted range you'll have!
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'