These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The new Apoc model

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nagarythe Tinurandir
Einheit X-6
#121 - 2013-05-01 11:40:24 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Reiisha wrote:
Eli Green wrote:
Looks loads better, can't wait too see it in Paladin/Navy form!


Paladin apparently gets a unique model.... <3


thats what i said during the presentation but we have yet to start working on it


is there any way for a non-HDstream-buyer to see this presentation?
sadly it was not part of the "common"-stream.
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
#122 - 2013-05-01 11:46:53 UTC
Oh yeah. I'll definitely have to train Amarr BS to 5 now. And I don't mean their religion with that. Twisted
Warde Guildencrantz
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#123 - 2013-05-01 12:11:28 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
http://imgur.com/5A9w99u

just to get a few more likes :D here have a navypoc screen


good work!

now give the paladin some golden statues or something...

joking.

TunDraGon ~ Low sec piracy since 2003 ~ Youtube ~ Join Us
Xer Jin
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#124 - 2013-05-01 14:49:19 UTC
James Razor wrote:
a whole bunch of whines




shut up

also you are bad at eve and at posting tooPirate
GAJY
The Monkey Island Cannibals
#125 - 2013-05-01 14:57:23 UTC
I don't get it, looks the same to me lol.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#126 - 2013-05-01 17:47:04 UTC
James Razor wrote:
U know, a lot of us would be simply happy if we could get our golden amarrian ships back.

This is realy good enough: http://www.eveandbeyond.de/wp-content/iimage/e32006/apocalypse_1_new.jpg


I dont need a pregant anorexic whale. Because that is how the new model looks like.

Most of u where pretty happy with these colors: http://www.eve-wiki.net/images/thumb/7/79/Model-Apocalypse.jpg/273px-Model-Apocalypse.jpg

The design was simple, yet elegant. The new design reminds me of this one: http://www.flugzeug-bild.de/bilder/a-300f4-608st-beluga-1397.jpg

And this aint a good looking bird.


The Apoc of old, especially the Navy Apoc was one of the best looking ships in the game. I didnt hear ppl complain about it, at least not more than they complained about everything else.

But i am realy curious if someone from CCP can explain me something:

People have asked for a redone Naglfar model since i started eve in 2007. We where told that making a new model was to complicated. And still, the changes to the naglfar are still only ment to compensate for its lack of a third turret slot.

So, making a new Naglfar model is to complicated, but ruining another of the amarr ships is no problem?

"I don't get that aesthetics are inherently subjective and CCP can't possibly please everyone. I demand that CCP caters to my sense of aesthetic only."

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Lucius Razor
RazorEnterprise
#127 - 2013-05-01 18:58:41 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
James Razor wrote:
U know, a lot of us would be simply happy if we could get our golden amarrian ships back.

This is realy good enough: http://www.eveandbeyond.de/wp-content/iimage/e32006/apocalypse_1_new.jpg


I dont need a pregant anorexic whale. Because that is how the new model looks like.

Most of u where pretty happy with these colors: http://www.eve-wiki.net/images/thumb/7/79/Model-Apocalypse.jpg/273px-Model-Apocalypse.jpg

The design was simple, yet elegant. The new design reminds me of this one: http://www.flugzeug-bild.de/bilder/a-300f4-608st-beluga-1397.jpg

And this aint a good looking bird.


The Apoc of old, especially the Navy Apoc was one of the best looking ships in the game. I didnt hear ppl complain about it, at least not more than they complained about everything else.

But i am realy curious if someone from CCP can explain me something:

People have asked for a redone Naglfar model since i started eve in 2007. We where told that making a new model was to complicated. And still, the changes to the naglfar are still only ment to compensate for its lack of a third turret slot.

So, making a new Naglfar model is to complicated, but ruining another of the amarr ships is no problem?

"I don't get that aesthetics are inherently subjective and CCP can't possibly please everyone. I demand that CCP caters to my sense of aesthetic only."


I am hardly the only one complaining about CCPs course of actions. Back when i joined this game in 2007 i did this also because of the aesthetics. Especially those of the Amarr Empire. Also, according to the books every ship, gate, station in the entire Empire is enveloped in 24 Karat of gold. I dont see any gold on my ships. Not anymore.

If they change the aesthetics of Eve, they change Eve.

And not everyone here is approving change because of change itself. Not to mention that there are more urgent issues. I still have no answer on my question regarding the Naglfar.

If u dont care about what your ship looks like, fine, congrats. I do care and as a paying customer i have the right to voice my disaprovel of these changes. Eve is losing more and more of its charme. And the amarr did get hit very hard in recent years. And with the upcoming changes they will get hit even harder.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#128 - 2013-05-01 19:55:36 UTC
Lucius Razor wrote:

I am hardly the only one complaining about CCPs course of actions. Back when i joined this game in 2007 i did this also because of the aesthetics. Especially those of the Amarr Empire. Also, according to the books every ship, gate, station in the entire Empire is enveloped in 24 Karat of gold. I dont see any gold on my ships. Not anymore.

If they change the aesthetics of Eve, they change Eve.

And not everyone here is approving change because of change itself. Not to mention that there are more urgent issues. I still have no answer on my question regarding the Naglfar.

If u dont care about what your ship looks like, fine, congrats. I do care and as a paying customer i have the right to voice my disaprovel of these changes. Eve is losing more and more of its charme. And the amarr did get hit very hard in recent years. And with the upcoming changes they will get hit even harder.

He voiced his approval, which is not the same as not caring. Also most of the redesigns and new designs have received a greater amount of support by far than disapproval. This thread is far more positive regarding this change than not, all from paying customers like yourself. Thus James' response is entirely on point.
Lyron-Baktos
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#129 - 2013-05-01 20:07:32 UTC

Lol they changed the blue for a washed out grey
Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#130 - 2013-05-01 20:08:37 UTC
Don't Change the Apoc.

New Model Cry

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.
Verlaine Glariant
The Kudur Cult
#131 - 2013-05-01 20:18:56 UTC
New Apocalypse model is absolutely awesome. I really expect CCP to totally ignore the **** that want the old Apoc.

www.amphysvena.org
Ocih
Space Mermaids
#132 - 2013-05-01 20:49:59 UTC
The return of the mighty pulse-poc?

Never happen. Too much splodey goodness for one game.
Aria Jimbojohnson
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#133 - 2013-05-01 21:00:27 UTC
While the model itself is better than the old, I really, really don't like the new NApoc. It looks like a slightly greyer version of the regular Apoc, what happened to the blue and black theme? The Amarr navy line for battleships had the best color scheme in game, why would you change it to this washed out grey?
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#134 - 2013-05-01 21:09:49 UTC
Aria Jimbojohnson wrote:
While the model itself is better than the old, I really, really don't like the new NApoc. It looks like a slightly greyer version of the regular Apoc, what happened to the blue and black theme? The Amarr navy line for battleships had the best color scheme in game, why would you change it to this washed out grey?

1: The black used for Navy ships is glossy and fairly reflective. This pic is on the sunny side of the ship.
2: Not ready for release yet, so likely not fully detailed.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#135 - 2013-05-01 21:18:43 UTC
Lucius Razor wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
James Razor wrote:
U know, a lot of us would be simply happy if we could get our golden amarrian ships back.

This is realy good enough: http://www.eveandbeyond.de/wp-content/iimage/e32006/apocalypse_1_new.jpg


I dont need a pregant anorexic whale. Because that is how the new model looks like.

Most of u where pretty happy with these colors: http://www.eve-wiki.net/images/thumb/7/79/Model-Apocalypse.jpg/273px-Model-Apocalypse.jpg

The design was simple, yet elegant. The new design reminds me of this one: http://www.flugzeug-bild.de/bilder/a-300f4-608st-beluga-1397.jpg

And this aint a good looking bird.


The Apoc of old, especially the Navy Apoc was one of the best looking ships in the game. I didnt hear ppl complain about it, at least not more than they complained about everything else.

But i am realy curious if someone from CCP can explain me something:

People have asked for a redone Naglfar model since i started eve in 2007. We where told that making a new model was to complicated. And still, the changes to the naglfar are still only ment to compensate for its lack of a third turret slot.

So, making a new Naglfar model is to complicated, but ruining another of the amarr ships is no problem?

"I don't get that aesthetics are inherently subjective and CCP can't possibly please everyone. I demand that CCP caters to my sense of aesthetic only."


I am hardly the only one complaining about CCPs course of actions. Back when i joined this game in 2007 i did this also because of the aesthetics. Especially those of the Amarr Empire. Also, according to the books every ship, gate, station in the entire Empire is enveloped in 24 Karat of gold. I dont see any gold on my ships. Not anymore.

If they change the aesthetics of Eve, they change Eve.

And not everyone here is approving change because of change itself. Not to mention that there are more urgent issues. I still have no answer on my question regarding the Naglfar.

If u dont care about what your ship looks like, fine, congrats. I do care and as a paying customer i have the right to voice my disaprovel of these changes. Eve is losing more and more of its charme. And the amarr did get hit very hard in recent years. And with the upcoming changes they will get hit even harder.

In the past we also only had one color scheme for a ship available. In the future we will have many variations on color schemes for a given ship.

For Amarr it appears that a standard civilian model will go more with a bronze and tan color, while those more closely affiliated with "royal houses" tend to have a lot of gold on them... which makes perfect sense from an Amarr point of view.

To be blunt, as a 2007 player the lore you are familiar with is not in many cases precisely the same lore that older players read when they first entered the game.

Lore changes and is updated to more perfectly match in game developments all the time, including retroactive changes. In fact, there is a whole department dedicated to doing just that at CCP.


View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
Zaitsev Sabezan
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#136 - 2013-05-01 21:58:38 UTC
As a pilot of mainly Amarr ships, I would just like to voice my approval of the new designs. The Apoc is an iconic ship, but i like how they've modernized the skin. The Navy Apoc is just pure sexiness. I can't wait to see it in person. Bring on the Paladin!
Judge Wilhelm
Doomheim
#137 - 2013-05-02 21:26:23 UTC
Can we see her port side?
PinkKnife
The Cuddlefish
Ethereal Dawn
#138 - 2013-05-02 22:52:17 UTC
James Razor wrote:
U know, a lot of us would be simply happy if we could get our golden amarrian ships back.

This is realy good enough: http://www.eveandbeyond.de/wp-content/iimage/e32006/apocalypse_1_new.jpg


I dont need a pregant anorexic whale. Because that is how the new model looks like.

Most of u where pretty happy with these colors: http://www.eve-wiki.net/images/thumb/7/79/Model-Apocalypse.jpg/273px-Model-Apocalypse.jpg

The design was simple, yet elegant. The new design reminds me of this one: http://www.flugzeug-bild.de/bilder/a-300f4-608st-beluga-1397.jpg

And this aint a good looking bird.


The Apoc of old, especially the Navy Apoc was one of the best looking ships in the game. I didnt hear ppl complain about it, at least not more than they complained about everything else.

But i am realy curious if someone from CCP can explain me something:

People have asked for a redone Naglfar model since i started eve in 2007. We where told that making a new model was to complicated. And still, the changes to the naglfar are still only ment to compensate for its lack of a third turret slot.

So, making a new Naglfar model is to complicated, but ruining another of the amarr ships is no problem?


Speak for yourself, I HATED the apoc model, and refused to fly it because of that.
Niko medes
Freeman Technologies
#139 - 2013-05-02 23:05:46 UTC
meh, in those screenshots it looks all fat and stubby now. I'll take a look at the model once its in Sisi though
TheNewestTwin
Subsidy H.R.S.
Xagenic Freymvork
#140 - 2013-05-03 00:57:48 UTC
Looks good but compared to older battleship models in game currently it just seems so much more detailed (same with other new models).

Also can we take a look at the faction versions?