These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ice prices are too damn high!

First post
Author
None ofthe Above
#21 - 2013-04-30 14:52:50 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#22 - 2013-04-30 14:57:22 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

War on 'Bots. Changes in the mechanic will not significantly reduce supply - prices will rise, but not outrageously. But 'Bots are in for one helluva bad time. Multi-boxers should be able to cope, but the need to find new spawns of ice will mess with the 'Bots fiercely.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#23 - 2013-04-30 15:01:54 UTC
Currently prices for JIta are 211K buy and 233 K sell.

I'm patting myself on the back for buying a crap ton at 135K two days ago.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Haulie Berry
#24 - 2013-04-30 15:03:09 UTC
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!



Good.
None ofthe Above
#25 - 2013-04-30 15:09:11 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

War on 'Bots. Changes in the mechanic will not significantly reduce supply - prices will rise, but not outrageously. But 'Bots are in for one helluva bad time. Multi-boxers should be able to cope, but the need to find new spawns of ice will mess with the 'Bots fiercely.


The change in the mechanic makes a bit of sense to me, but this part about only spawning enough in high sec to meet 80% of high sec's demand has left me scratching my shiny head.

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#26 - 2013-04-30 15:10:57 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
silens vesica wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

War on 'Bots. Changes in the mechanic will not significantly reduce supply - prices will rise, but not outrageously. But 'Bots are in for one helluva bad time. Multi-boxers should be able to cope, but the need to find new spawns of ice will mess with the 'Bots fiercely.


The change in the mechanic makes a bit of sense to me, but this part about only spawning enough in high sec to meet 80% of high sec's demand has left me scratching my shiny head.
A little market manipulation too cool the economy a bit, I suppose. Manufacturing is getting a buff; need to offset a bit.
Maybe.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#27 - 2013-04-30 15:11:38 UTC
As a 3 year asteroid and Ice Miner, I approve of every single change for Odysssey.

Brilliant move on CCP's part.

Also, enjoying all the tears.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Danni stark
#28 - 2013-04-30 15:15:50 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
As a 3 year asteroid and Ice Miner, I approve of every single change for Odysssey.

Brilliant move on CCP's part.

Also, enjoying all the tears.


agreed.
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#29 - 2013-04-30 15:26:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Vincent Athena
silens vesica wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

War on 'Bots. Changes in the mechanic will not significantly reduce supply - prices will rise, but not outrageously. But 'Bots are in for one helluva bad time. Multi-boxers should be able to cope, but the need to find new spawns of ice will mess with the 'Bots fiercely.

The Bots will actually have the easiest time adapting. Because they can wait. Undock, wait for the scan, scrape the screen for the belt. Not there? Dock, wait, undock and repeat. When the spawn shows up, log in the fleet and go mine. Players will not tolerate that level of boredom. A bot does not get bored. Also, once the belt does pop the bot can note the time, log everyone out, wait 4 hours and log everyone back in.

But CCP can see that sort of behavior, so expect more dead bots.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#30 - 2013-04-30 15:30:17 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
silens vesica wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

War on 'Bots. Changes in the mechanic will not significantly reduce supply - prices will rise, but not outrageously. But 'Bots are in for one helluva bad time. Multi-boxers should be able to cope, but the need to find new spawns of ice will mess with the 'Bots fiercely.

The Bots will actually have the easiest time adapting. Because they can wait. Undock, wait for the scan, scrape the screen for the belt. Not there? Dock, wait, undock and repeat. When the spawn shows up, log in the fleet and go mine. Players will not tolerate that level of boredom. A bot does not get bored.

But CCP can see that sort of behavior, so expect more dead bots.
Not only is it visible, but it cuts production drastically. 'Bots are ISK/Hr beasts - If they spend, say, three hours scanning for an Anom, that's a serious hit.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

None ofthe Above
#31 - 2013-04-30 15:31:16 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:


The change in the mechanic makes a bit of sense to me, but this part about only spawning enough in high sec to meet 80% of high sec's demand has left me scratching my shiny head.
A little market manipulation too cool the economy a bit, I suppose. Manufacturing is getting a buff; need to offset a bit.
Maybe.


Cool? Ice joke in there somewhere.

At first it will heat up, which we are seeing now, but likely to depress POS related activities in the long run. Is this really a good thing? They are simultaneously making POSes easier to use and at the same time making them more costly to maintain. Confusing.

I reiterate my request to Malc, and widen to any CSM7 or 8 Member to look into this, and if the explanation doesn't make sense, talk to the appropriate devs about it.

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#32 - 2013-04-30 15:42:08 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
Not only is it visible, but it cuts production drastically. 'Bots are ISK/Hr beasts - If they spend, say, three hours scanning for an Anom, that's a serious hit.


I seriously doubt that CCP would make ice mining require 3 hours of continous scanning to find a belt to ice mine.

If that were true, then no one in their right mind would waste their time to ice mine anymore because it was so unreliable and the only people left were people who figure how how to get their bot program to find the belt.

I mean seriously, would you spend 3 hours looking at the scanner for something that is less profitable than regular mining which is more reliably found.

Hrm.... Of course if I am wrong, then that means no one will ice mine anymore, continuing to make the prices rise, making the POS complaint camp valid after all or at least everyone who hoarded ice very rich.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Haulie Berry
#33 - 2013-04-30 15:49:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Haulie Berry
silens vesica wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


So get out there and mine some?


Malc,

While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?

Tin foil hat says they are retaliating for the threadnaught and being forced to work on the bad code, making sure POSes truly are a small portion of the community.

I figure it's more the usual CCP way of shooting themselves in the foot while looking to the stars, but that's what the CSM is supposed to help with.

War on 'Bots. Changes in the mechanic will not significantly reduce supply - prices will rise, but not outrageously. But 'Bots are in for one helluva bad time. Multi-boxers should be able to cope, but the need to find new spawns of ice will mess with the 'Bots fiercely.


This is absolute nonsense. This change will be trivially overcome by bots. Anyone who thinks this change was meant to combat botting is seriously delusional.

The intention of the change was to reduce the quantity of available ice from infinite to less-than-infinite.
Acac Sunflyier
The Ascended Academy
#34 - 2013-04-30 15:54:06 UTC
Amarr Citizen65821 wrote:
What gives CCP?!!!

Ice has more than doubled in the past week.

If this travesty keep up I will have to tear down all my WH POS becauyse I cannot aford it!


The goal has been reached.
Haulie Berry
#35 - 2013-04-30 15:59:53 UTC
Quote:
While you are here, can I ask you to look into why CCP decided to do a restriction on the ice minable in high sec for Odyssey?

Who thought there was too much ice? That ice was too cheap?


Anyone who hasn't been living under a rock?
Anyone who has ever done the math on ice isk/hr?

I think better questions would be, "Who DIDN'T think there was too much ice? Who DIDN'T think that ice was too cheap?"

It will be a drastically shorter list.
Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2013-04-30 16:01:19 UTC
The tinfoilery in here is incredible.

Here's what's going to happen: A bunch of dudes are going to cry rivers and go mine something else or rage quit and we're all going to point and laugh at how dumb they are. Anyone with two braincells will realize that the ice anoms aren't going to be mined out in ten minutes (well, unless you're right next to Jita) and that people like The Wiz aren't going to be able to multi-box like they used to, and that bots are going to be fuckered up by this change, meaning more ice for legit dudes. Ice miners will spread out and we'll eventually see a fairly uniform mining rate across systems with some serious competition near trade hubs, which is as it should be, and dudes will still be able to mine ice, just not AFK and not while doing laundry, which is as it should be.

CCP has no sense of humour.

Friggz
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#37 - 2013-04-30 16:04:37 UTC
The prices at the moment are a result of speculation, not changes. There hasn't been a change in supply and demand, it's just people buying it and waiting to see the moment before the bubble bursts. Prices will go back down, but won't hit pre-fanfest levels ever again.

The change is basically because CCP wants to make null-sec industry a thing. They want people actually mining in null-sec and producing products in null-sec. That's why null-sec ores have had their yields greatly increased when it comes to the low end minerals normally imported from high-sec. That's why outposts are being buffed to make industry easier. It's also behind the ice changes. That extra 20% that high-sec can't support has to come from somewhere, and it's probably going to be null-sec since it's easier to defend.

Ice had to be moved to anoms. Belts always spawn after downtime, and if ice was in belts it would all be harvested by one timezone before the others had a chance at it. They had to untie it from timezone, and moving it to anoms was a simple way to do it without overhauling the belt spawning rules entirely. The fact that it hurts botter is icing on the cake.

Tshaowdyne Dvorak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2013-04-30 16:11:58 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Danni stark wrote:


i'm convinced miner gankers are like the boogie man.

i've never seen one.
it's a story to scare small children.


It depends on where you mine. I gank miners with some regularity (when they can be caught) in wormholes and null:

Edit:
34. Posting of kill reports outside of the Crime & Punishment forum channel is prohibited.

More often than not, posts of this nature are made with inflammatory intent and are designed to promote trolling and flaming. Therefore, the posting of links to kill reports from any third party site, or the direct copy-pasting of kill reports from in game is prohibited on all forum channels of the EVE Online Forums, with the exception of the Crime & Punishment Channel.
ISD Ezwal.



Of course, I'll gank anything else I get my hands on too. I don't ruin my sec status too badly by ganking in low or high sec, but that may change come the Odyssey expansion where I'll be able to buy my way out of it (assuming the tags are easy enough to come by).
Haulie Berry
#39 - 2013-04-30 16:16:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Haulie Berry
Quote:
...and that bots are going to be fuckered up by this change...


Okay, seriously, why the **** do you people believe this?

Here are the givens:

-The new scanner can be configured to fire on session change, so they don't even have to bot the scan aspect of it (not that that wouldn't be a trivial few minute's worth of coding to overcome).
-We know exactly which systems ice anoms will spawn in, so it's not like a bot really even has to go looking for them.
-Existing bots are already capable of doing things like warping around.

This basically means the net difficulty added to a botter's life is identifying the correct anomaly to warp to. These are not difficult tasks. I would go so far as to label them the very definition of trivial. The fact that the ice will deplete has no unique detrimental impact on the botter (that particular aspect is felt equally by both legit players and bots).

I'm reasonably certain, in fact, that there are a number of bots that already farm high-sec anomalies for escalations, so there's a pretty good chance that any changes that would need to be made to mining bots already have functional code in the wild that could easily be implemented into a mining bot.

Dealing with bots is a security issue - not a gameplay mechanics issue. It would be EXTREMELY difficult, if not impossible, to devise gameplay mechanics that would be difficult to bot without also being extremely impractical or unpleasant for human players (think CAPTCHAS...IN...SPAAAAACE!).

This will not deter bots, and that's okay. It's not meant to.
Danni stark
#40 - 2013-04-30 16:18:45 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Tshaowdyne Dvorak wrote:
Danni stark wrote:


i'm convinced miner gankers are like the boogie man.

i've never seen one.
it's a story to scare small children.


It depends on where you mine. I gank miners with some regularity (when they can be caught) in wormholes and null:

Edit:
34. Posting of kill reports outside of the Crime & Punishment forum channel is prohibited.

More often than not, posts of this nature are made with inflammatory intent and are designed to promote trolling and flaming. Therefore, the posting of links to kill reports from any third party site, or the direct copy-pasting of kill reports from in game is prohibited on all forum channels of the EVE Online Forums, with the exception of the Crime & Punishment Channel.
ISD Ezwal.


Of course, I'll gank anything else I get my hands on too. I don't ruin my sec status too badly by ganking in low or high sec, but that may change come the Odyssey expansion where I'll be able to buy my way out of it (assuming the tags are easy enough to come by).


yeah, null sec kills don't really count for what i was referring to.