Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Bump! I still want to share hangars between my chars at my accounts.

I think it is a nice addition to bring more people to eve, and one more reason to get that another account you always want it. Bring the real power of two!

Yeah, I understand your point, with is very true.

But, let´s me explain my point. Several players have two or more accounts, and some time the characters are at different corporations, and stills players want to share they hangar, since the chars belong to the same player.
And even when they are in the same corporation, most of time that corporation have another players, and because that they cannot put they personal stuffs at the shared corporation hangar, since with they want (and I) are share hangar between they (my) characters only.
So, shared characters hangar should be possible using the same mechanism that are used at corporation hangar, but with the privacy of your player accounts only. Maybe some small fee should be applied (like 1 plex), with I personally will take it, without problems.

Bump!

As before, I want to share my hangars between my chars accounts.
And I will not give up

Thank you

Multiboxing is already buffed too much. We do not need feature that makes it more easier.

There are many activities in eve that get much easier by having 2nd account because eve is too easy game to be controlled. Multiaccounts make bad division between people and risk eve getting more fresh blood because you could say that certain activities you should own second account. For example wormhole life gets more easier when you have scout that you can park on wormhole. This is quite mandatory in mid/low grade wormholes because the reward is not balanced with the risk.

I say CCP should open their eyes and try make multi accounting less favorable and making the game more social that they claim. The truth is that probably half or more of the logged on chracters in eve are alts making the real active players not so many.

+ new players
- boo multiaccounts

The idea behind this is to make the management of your personal assets more easy between your chars at different accounts, after all, it´s all yours in the end.
If CCP allow you to share your hangar between your chars at different accounts your will get ride off this trade windows and contract forms to manage your stuffs.
I know contract is a type of ISK sink, but as I said before, they can apply a small fee, like one plex, and already keep the ISK sink for contract form and similar.
Multiboxing is already a part of the game, and probably will stay that way for some time. Creating mechanisms for making it easy and less time consuming will only helps the game, in my vision.
Thank you all for your thoughts.

Castelo

If I could give you more than +1, I would.

probably it wouldnt force you to use the multi acc/char hangars, so you should be able to keep your items at differenct acc-s
,also i cant see why people who hate to do booooring,repetable,frustrating time sink,0 difficulty tasks are lazy, imho it is called dont want to be a bot with vegatitve brain stage

Personally, I don't feel there's any reason why they shouldn't add a new type of hangar service to stations which you can set permissions to on a by-individual basis.

By and large the permission system in EvE is very limited. It's either yours, your corps, or everybodies. Adding new mechanics, like new POS modules and station services, that allow for more permission diversity would be great. Here's my example:

Ruze flies to his local home office, and rents one of 250 'Public' hangars much like he would rent a corporate hangar. Yet, the payment of these hangars are on his character alone, not on the corporation or anyone else. This 'Public Hangar' is his, and he is then eligible to set who can and cannot access, view, and remove items from it.

The Public Hangar does not included divisions, and is limited in size. At any point in time, any guest to this station can see that he has a Public Hangar here. He can add or block specific individuals and individual corporations from viewing, placing or removing items from this hangar, and can lock items down as he chooses. A warning appears to anyone else accessing this hangar that the items within will be considered the property of the individual paying the rent on the hangar.

If that rent is ever skipped, the items within shift to a lockdown and can be delivered to the renting individuals private hangar.

The important dynamic here is individual permissions, a system I feel needs to be added separate of the current permission code. The item itself saves an assortment of 100 permission 'rules', so you can add/block at least 100 entities (player or corporate or even alliance). This dynamic permission system can be used on new POS structures, outposts, and a variety of other mechanics, and has a very simplified and easy to understand interface much like the Orca permission system. You add a specific entity, select the icon for permissions that they have, and can quickly view/edit those permission at any time by simply accessing the device again.

I got more accounts and i want my chars hangars stay seperated. Why? You are aware that at least the CEO / Directors can take a look in your hangar?

Also i´d end searching for stuff on Char A while B is using it.
Did just someone say "escrow"?

Fist, thank for the ones who support it. And thanks for the others ideas. I really like the public hangar for renting, it solve several problems, for several others types of players.

To the one who do not like the idea, no problem at all. As I said before, this is something with I (personally) see as an improvement, and no, I do not want to spend dev time in this and block the development of other important game mechanisms. But this is something that could be done with a few dev time, since part of that mechanism are already at the game as corp hangars.

And this forum are the place to put this type of ideas, and I (personally) see it as something with will enhance the gameplay for multiboxing, and even to other type of game play as stated by Ruze.