These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

The 3 targets of CSM 8

First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#41 - 2013-04-29 16:42:02 UTC
Dramaticus wrote:
I personally cannot wait for the 'Tornados immune to CONCORD' Initiative to be railroaded through.


Well there's only so much we can reasonably ask CCP to do in one year.

Please turn out to vote for CSM9!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

vyshnegradsky
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#42 - 2013-04-29 16:44:26 UTC
Dilbert HighSeed wrote:
Watch how high sec burns, as this group can do more damage in an afternoon to high sec than any ganking campaign by sociopaths can do in a year.

The 3 goals of this CSM, in no particular order are :

1. Wiping out high sec incursion income by at least half.

That one is easy enough to do, and can be accomplished by changing about 8 static variables on payouts (4 size classes, LP and ISK/ each size class). The wh group of course is all for it, since it "convinces" members of wh groups who make marginal income (by wh standards) to return to their wh groups, and the same goes for wh players of rich groups who were not getting their fair share of the blue loot and left them. The null sec contingent, are actually more ambivalent about this since a large number of their player base are far too incompetent to take advantage of the riches of null, and run Incursions now. However, null will need / attract a lot more miners now making Incursion-like money, and when those people start returning to null, that means null will have no further use of high sec incursions, and will then allow CCP to slaughter the ISK / hour.

2. Removing T2 production from high sec.

Greyscale and soundwave are both on record in these forums about their desire to remove T2 mfg from high sec. Given the the additional mfg slots now available in null, it is only natural that null sec will encourage this, since there is no longer any impediment to production there. This will create another huge income stream for the cartel leadership, as they will have the ability to skim off the top using science and mfg slot taxes. If T2 invention is removed from high sec, people will be forced to use the station invention slots.

3. Destroying L4 mission income.

This won't be through an overt reduction in payouts (though soundwave was interviewed at last years Fanfest and was openly mulling it over.) It is more likely going to be through the mantra that "Eve is a MMO, and solo play is bad, therefore missioning should be made more like PvP and we will increase the rewards, while significantly increasing the difficulty" (again, as the AI changes in December already smashed L4 income). Of course, any experience player knows that running sites solo is far more profitable than teaming up. Even in 2 people went into a site with the twice the rewards, their individual income goes down as their are always redundancies. This is the same reason that null sec players rat solo, but that fact will be buried under all the upcoming propaganda and null sec ratters will be left alone to rat solo in their carriers in deep sov enclaves.

There are supposedly 1 high sec member of the CSM, a 2nd one that COULD be, (RvB) candidate, and Trebor, who seems to actually care for the entire game. These are the only people who can fight against this ongoing attack. But I believe they will be drowned out by the braying of the remaining 11, who will work directly with the game designers and devs who have been plucked straight from the very null sec cartels that benefit from these attacks on high sec.

Oh, and for those that think that the replacement of passive income from static moon goo with active ring mining is happening soon, think again. CCP just wasted how many programmer-weeks building some idiotic new exploration mini-game, when they could have instituted a complete removal of static moo goo operations instead. There is zero chance that CCP is touching moon operations until other, more lucrative income streams are first ensured for the null sec cartels.


You're a special kind of person aren't you?

This one's a bit over the edge guys.

Locked for breaking... well, pretty much all the rules.

  • CCP Falcon
Falin Whalen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2013-04-29 16:45:21 UTC
Danni stark wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Danni stark wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Danni stark wrote:
so we need to take off the wizard hat and stop speaking before we say something bad?
Depends. Do you just want to have fun, or do you want to try to coax some sanity or reasoning out of someone who's most likely acutely allergic to both of those?

i'm always up for fun, although it usually gets me in trouble...

Well then…


i regret clicking that.

I regret nothing.

"it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves." The Trial - Franz Kafka 

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#44 - 2013-04-29 16:49:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaju Enki
Oh look, another lobotomized dumb post from this guy.

The Tears Must Flow

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#45 - 2013-04-29 16:49:31 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Can't break it 'till I sign it! Cool


My father laid on you a heavy yoke; I will make it even heavier. My father scourged you with whips; I will scourge you with scorpions.’

thats some pretty messed up stuff there bro.

does this mean you are pro ecm? and increasing mass on ships/

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#46 - 2013-04-29 17:00:07 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Hi, Dinsdale.

Your list is pretty good as far as it goes, but I'm afraid you've only seen page 1. I'll summarise the rest of the list...

Shocked

Damn, I'm glad I voted for you. Lol
How else would Hi-Sec be punished for playing so wrong? Cool

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

CCP Dolan
C C P
C C P Alliance
#47 - 2013-04-29 17:01:46 UTC
Locking this thread:

31. Rumor mongering is prohibited.

Rumor threads and posts which are based off no actual solid information and are designed to either troll or annoy other users will be locked and removed. These kinds of threads and posts are detrimental to the wellbeing and spirit of the EVE Online Community, and can create undue panic among forum users, as well as adding to the workload of our moderators.

CCP Dolan | Community Representative

Twitter: @CCPDolan

Gooby pls

Previous page123