These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Player morality in EVE online. Why did you leave it at the door?

First post
Author
Michael Holmes Holmes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#441 - 2011-11-02 00:16:07 UTC
I don't think anyone is arguing that combat or losing a ship is the real issue.

The real issue is how you behave as the aggressor, do you keep it in the context of the game or do you resort to personal attacks?

If you resort to personal attacks than you need to stop playing social games because nobody wants your teen angst garbage, and no amount of angst ridden "morals are for the weak" garbage will change that.

All you griefers need to get over yourselves and anyone that says "I have deep seated needs to be evil that this game allows me to release" needs to get help.


Nobody cares that you blew up our internet spaceships, we do care how you act after the fact.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#442 - 2011-11-02 00:19:25 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
The second is the "asshat". The just just mess with folks to mess with folks. These are the low life gankers and griefers that believe that because Eve is a "sandbox" their actions are justifiable and moral. The "I can get away with it so it must be OK folks". These folks are easy to spot with their "I love your tears" posts and general perference for combat where they have an overwhelming advantage or destruction of basically undefended targets. These folks do it just to inflict pain on another, not for any other in game reward. These are the Eve equivalents of folks that key randon other folks cars for grins.

I've been heavily involved in the griefing of incursions lately. It's been incredibly profitable for us, and has a number of motives which I have discussed elsewhere. But to those we've ganked, they simply view it as heartless griefing. THEY think we're the type of people you describe. We see ourselves very differently, as we know our true motives.

Don't be so arrogant as to think you know what goes on in the minds of others.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Thomas Orca
Broski is ded
#443 - 2011-11-02 00:21:40 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


But taking pleasure in hurting and humiliating others with childish taunts, now that is quite normal behaviour. The common theme with some of you seems to be to stir up the beehive by purposely upsetting and ridiculing players and then claim how immature they are while wanking at their tears. So yeah, I gues you should know a little bit about that high horse you speak of.

A few weeks ago when CCP was "rearranging pixels" some of you were acting like you were losing your first born. What happend? Are pixels no longer serious business?


Genghis Khan once said, “The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters.”

And he conquered the majority of Asia, in a time when it took months to traverse it. I would say he knew something about winning, and don't give me the "You can't win at EVE!" argument, because you can't really win at life either.


Also, I couldn't care less about the rearranging of pixels.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#444 - 2011-11-02 00:22:30 UTC
Michael Holmes Holmes wrote:
I don't think anyone is arguing that combat or losing a ship is the real issue.

The real issue is how you behave as the aggressor, do you keep it in the context of the game or do you resort to personal attacks?

If you resort to personal attacks than you need to stop playing social games because nobody wants your teen angst garbage, and no amount of angst ridden "morals are for the weak" garbage will change that.

All you griefers need to get over yourselves and anyone that says "I have deep seated needs to be evil that this game allows me to release" needs to get help.


Nobody cares that you blew up our internet spaceships, we do care how you act after the fact.


Ironicly most of the abusive language and real life threats come from the people getting ganked.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#445 - 2011-11-02 00:24:57 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
The second is the "asshat". The just just mess with folks to mess with folks. These are the low life gankers and griefers that believe that because Eve is a "sandbox" their actions are justifiable and moral. The "I can get away with it so it must be OK folks". These folks are easy to spot with their "I love your tears" posts and general perference for combat where they have an overwhelming advantage or destruction of basically undefended targets. These folks do it just to inflict pain on another, not for any other in game reward. These are the Eve equivalents of folks that key randon other folks cars for grins.

I've been heavily involved in the griefing of incursions lately. It's been incredibly profitable for us, and has a number of motives which I have discussed elsewhere. But to those we've ganked, they simply view it as heartless griefing. THEY think we're the type of people you describe. We see ourselves very differently, as we know our true motives.

Don't be so arrogant as to think you know what goes on in the minds of others.



kind of off topic but still

Its hard to imagine an 10 people strong fleet buffer tanked with logis support being compared to exhumer/barges or solo active tanked tengu with 16k ehp

And well Issler Dainzel wasnt talking about your "little adventure" specifically it was more like an generalization and in that case it was well written the part i bolded clearly defines such group.

So if you did it because of different reasons you clearly do not go under this particular section.
Xien Anh
Xezan Federation
#446 - 2011-11-02 00:27:19 UTC
Michael Holmes Holmes wrote:
I don't think anyone is arguing that combat or losing a ship is the real issue.

The real issue is how you behave as the aggressor, do you keep it in the context of the game or do you resort to personal attacks?

If you resort to personal attacks than you need to stop playing social games because nobody wants your teen angst garbage, and no amount of angst ridden "morals are for the weak" garbage will change that.

All you griefers need to get over yourselves and anyone that says "I have deep seated needs to be evil that this game allows me to release" needs to get help.


Nobody cares that you blew up our internet spaceships, we do care how you act after the fact.

Someone roleplaying a pirate will act like a pirate. Last I checked, they're not the nicest crowd.

Only a ginger can call a ginger a ginger!

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#447 - 2011-11-02 00:27:59 UTC
Michael Holmes Holmes wrote:
IAll you griefers need to get over yourselves and anyone that says "I have deep seated needs to be evil that this game allows me to release" needs to get help.


I don't "need" to be evil, I just rather enjoy it. It's like flexing a muscle I don't often get to use.

In the past couple of months I've come to know a lot of griefers. What I've seen is generally they don't make any effort to get tears out of their victims, and most of us respect those players who don't cry about lost ships or stolen goods. In fact, when we ganked the battleship of an old acquaintance of mine (I didn't have time to figure out where I knew his name from), we reconnected and I helped him out a bit because he was in a tight spot after losing his incursion ship. He was relaxed about the whole matter and we talked for a while afterward.

It's when the victim starts making a scene that we all get some popcorn and sit down to watch, and sometimes to encourage them to get even more irate. And I must admit, it makes for a much more interesting story when you tell it to your friends.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#448 - 2011-11-02 00:35:41 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
kind of off topic but still

Its hard to imagine an 10 people strong fleet buffer tanked with logis support being compared to exhumer/barges or solo active tanked tengu with 16k ehp

And well Issler Dainzel wasnt talking about your "little adventure" specifically it was more like an generalization and in that case it was well written the part i bolded clearly defines such group.

So if you did it because of different reasons you clearly do not go under this particular section.


My point is, he might be putting a label on people without understanding their motives.

I've ganked and seen ganked a lot more than just incursion ships. The goons are out wrecking ice miners because it drives up the price of blue ice products. A lot of time gankers are out there doing things because it benefits them (or someone paying them) in ways you don't understand.

I know a guy who set out to take over a highsec industrial alliance that was about to be formed. He knew the whole thing centered around one miner who had organized the whole thing. He paid a substantial amount of money to have that miner's orca and exhumers ganked and his corp wardec'ed by a pirate corp in order to keep him from being able to form the alliance. That way, he was able to offer up his own corp as the head and establish himself as the leader. To anyone else, they were just random acts of violence. To the few of us who know the whole story, it was a hostile takeover. Motive is often hidden. Sometimes it's not even known by the person(s) hired to carry out an act.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Michael Holmes Holmes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#449 - 2011-11-02 00:37:31 UTC
So you point and laugh?

That is really the only part that I cannot agree with, that takes things out of the game and makes them personal, that is not needed at all.

You make it sound like a school yard beating where if they fight back you just hit them harder.
Apollo Gabriel
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#450 - 2011-11-02 00:41:08 UTC
I love being civil within Eve for when I need to be a **** it means something.
Always ... Never ... Forget to check your references.   Peace out Zulu! Hope you land well!
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#451 - 2011-11-02 00:41:29 UTC  |  Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Thomas Orca wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


But taking pleasure in hurting and humiliating others with childish taunts, now that is quite normal behaviour. The common theme with some of you seems to be to stir up the beehive by purposely upsetting and ridiculing players and then claim how immature they are while wanking at their tears. So yeah, I gues you should know a little bit about that high horse you speak of.

A few weeks ago when CCP was "rearranging pixels" some of you were acting like you were losing your first born. What happend? Are pixels no longer serious business?


Genghis Khan once said, “The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters.”

And he conquered the majority of Asia, in a time when it took months to traverse it. I would say he knew something about winning, and don't give me the "You can't win at EVE!" argument, because you can't really win at life either.


Also, I couldn't care less about the rearranging of pixels.


My man Genghis Khan said that? Brother, why didn't you say so before!? If HE himself enjoyed the suffering of others then who is anybody to question this enjoyment? Sadism is now officially A-OK in my books. My apologies. Carry on.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#452 - 2011-11-02 00:42:26 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
The second is the "asshat". The just just mess with folks to mess with folks. These are the low life gankers and griefers that believe that because Eve is a "sandbox" their actions are justifiable and moral. The "I can get away with it so it must be OK folks". These folks are easy to spot with their "I love your tears" posts and general perference for combat where they have an overwhelming advantage or destruction of basically undefended targets. These folks do it just to inflict pain on another, not for any other in game reward. These are the Eve equivalents of folks that key randon other folks cars for grins.

I've been heavily involved in the griefing of incursions lately. It's been incredibly profitable for us, and has a number of motives which I have discussed elsewhere. But to those we've ganked, they simply view it as heartless griefing. THEY think we're the type of people you describe. We see ourselves very differently, as we know our true motives.

Don't be so arrogant as to think you know what goes on in the minds of others.


I wouldn't call it griefing if there is profit in it for you. That puts you in the first category of conflict. So please try and re-read what I wrote. I support a lot of what some folks call "griefing" as appropriate activity in Eve. No need to defend what you are doing to me, sounds great!

To another poster that commented about "playing someone as pure evil" in game, sure, ok, that is your choice. I'd suggest however that it says something about your character if you find yourself deriving real pleasure from just the pain you inflict on others. If you are doing it as your "RP" expression, go nuts, but ask yourself what about that path attracts you.

As to what goes on in peoples minds, I make no claim to begin to understand that!

Issler
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#453 - 2011-11-02 00:45:40 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
kind of off topic but still

Its hard to imagine an 10 people strong fleet buffer tanked with logis support being compared to exhumer/barges or solo active tanked tengu with 16k ehp

And well Issler Dainzel wasnt talking about your "little adventure" specifically it was more like an generalization and in that case it was well written the part i bolded clearly defines such group.

So if you did it because of different reasons you clearly do not go under this particular section.


My point is, he might be putting a label on people without understanding their motives.

I've ganked and seen ganked a lot more than just incursion ships. The goons are out wrecking ice miners because it drives up the price of blue ice products. A lot of time gankers are out there doing things because it benefits them (or someone paying them) in ways you don't understand.

I know a guy who set out to take over a highsec industrial alliance that was about to be formed. He knew the whole thing centered around one miner who had organized the whole thing. He paid a substantial amount of money to have that miner's orca and exhumers ganked and his corp wardec'ed by a pirate corp in order to keep him from being able to form the alliance. That way, he was able to offer up his own corp as the head and establish himself as the leader. To anyone else, they were just random acts of violence. To the few of us who know the whole story, it was a hostile takeover. Motive is often hidden. Sometimes it's not even known by the person(s) hired to carry out an act.



fair enough,

Altho many suicide kills/assaults are against people in NPC corps with "next to none" impact on any larger aspect of the game. Those are people who tried having an small corp, been wardeced lost people, lost subs and moved back to NPC to get rid of it.
And basically ganking such does not provide any benefit to anyone. Well thats probably not true, market manipulations etc. is truth beyond suicide ganking.

Yet i spoke with few after they killed my hulk / was afk on an alt doing stuff on the main/ either way they would have destroy it so no big deal. And they told me they were bored and chose my hulk because it was easier target then the next one. So i say farewell take care fly safe and its been over.

So sometimes killing is happens because people are bored. They do not claim any reward.
Thomas Orca
Broski is ded
#454 - 2011-11-02 00:46:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Thomas Orca
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


Man, why didn't you say so before!? If Genghis Khan himself enjoyed the suffering of others, then who is anybody to question this enjoyment? My apologies. Carry on.


Point is, tis a natural thing to enjoy making others suffer, deal with it.

EDIT: Also, Genghis Khan was a badass, and you would do well to listen to advice he gave.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#455 - 2011-11-02 00:51:46 UTC
Thomas Orca wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


Man, why didn't you say so before!? If Genghis Khan himself enjoyed the suffering of others, then who is anybody to question this enjoyment? My apologies. Carry on.


Point is, tis a natural thing to enjoy making others suffer, deal with it.

EDIT: Also, Genghis Khan was a badass, and you would do well to listen to advice he gave.


If you are part of Sicilian mafia or Russian mafia or Brazil mafia or some other mafia than it would have some merit.
Otherwise in the society commonly known as modern, there is no use for his advices.
Thomas Orca
Broski is ded
#456 - 2011-11-02 00:57:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Thomas Orca
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Thomas Orca wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


Man, why didn't you say so before!? If Genghis Khan himself enjoyed the suffering of others, then who is anybody to question this enjoyment? My apologies. Carry on.


Point is, tis a natural thing to enjoy making others suffer, deal with it.

EDIT: Also, Genghis Khan was a badass, and you would do well to listen to advice he gave.


If you are part of Sicilian mafia or Russian mafia or Brazil mafia or some other mafia than it would have some merit.
Otherwise in the society commonly known as modern, there is no use for his advices.


Or you know, trying to run a spaceship pirate group, or trying to forge an empire in space.

And only an idiot would throw out advice of those who came before him that were successful in their endeavors.
Thomas Orca
Broski is ded
#457 - 2011-11-02 00:57:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Thomas Orca
not empty posting because I was ganked,
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#458 - 2011-11-02 01:02:18 UTC
Thomas Orca wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


Man, why didn't you say so before!? If Genghis Khan himself enjoyed the suffering of others, then who is anybody to question this enjoyment? My apologies. Carry on.


Point is, tis a natural thing to enjoy making others suffer, deal with it.

EDIT: Also, Genghis Khan was a badass, and you would do well to listen to advice he gave.


You know, I give you credit for at least keeping it honest. And I sincerely mean this; I hope one day you realize that the suffering of others is nothing to enjoy or desire.

In any case, +1 to you.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Thomas Orca
Broski is ded
#459 - 2011-11-02 01:06:20 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Thomas Orca wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:


Man, why didn't you say so before!? If Genghis Khan himself enjoyed the suffering of others, then who is anybody to question this enjoyment? My apologies. Carry on.


Point is, tis a natural thing to enjoy making others suffer, deal with it.

EDIT: Also, Genghis Khan was a badass, and you would do well to listen to advice he gave.


You know, I give you credit for at least keeping it honest. And I sincerely mean this; I hope one day you realize that the suffering of others is nothing to enjoy or desire.

In any case, +1 to you.

Nope, because it is an important part of the social structure of mankind. Having someone around who is an absolute **** is good, keeps you honest.
Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#460 - 2011-11-02 01:07:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Cyprus Black
Not everyone in EvE is a morally bankrupt person.

I consider myself an upright character of virtue and I take pride in my honesty and loyalty. I would never scam, steal, grief, or otherwise do anything that would be considered morally questionable or devious. I take great offense that you would insinuate that all players behave in such a way.

In a strange twist of coincidence, I'm tired of this game and have decided to give it away. Just giving it to anyone is boring and lacks grace and tact. No no, I will only give it away in a manner of isk matching. Send me X amount and I will send you the same amount back doubled. Sounds like a weird game I know, but it's a game of blind trust.

Let me prove to you that there are, in fact, still decent and honest people in this game. You just have to take that leap of faith. I promise you won't fall. Your trust will be your wings and you will soar magnificently.

I promise. Your faith in humanity will be restored.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33