These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Split Weapons Suck...

Author
Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#1 - 2013-04-25 07:17:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Garresh
...but Triple weapons are AWESOME.


It's rather interesting that every split weapon system in eve is a steaming pile of crap...*except* for the Typhoon. With split weapons disappearing, I find myself wondering why is it that the Typhoon succeeds when so many others have failed? What is it about the Typhoon that separates it from the other split weapon ships?

The answer is simple: Its drone bay. Split weapon ships were always attacked as being "too unfocused". They have slots competing between two weapon systems. Clearly specialization is the answer, right? To that I say, NO. The problem isn't that they're not focused enough, but rather that they're not general enough. Despite the lack of a drone bonus, the Typhoon has the same bandwidth as a dedicated drone ship such as Domi(but less capacity). If not for that, the Typhoon likely wouldn't be as respected as it is today. It would be mediocre, a crappy Raven. But that extra drone capacity pushes it past the weaknesses of split weapons, and gives it a triple threat. Dealing with 2 weapon systems is doable, but trying to counter or negate 3 weapons? Unlikely.

So answer me this: If all the split weapon ships of the past were given drone bays comparable to the dedicated drone ships of their class(but no bonuses), would they still be underpowered? Would they be overpowered? Would you fly them? I know I would.

Give the Scythe Fleet Issue a 75 bandwidth(as a vexor)
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Scythe_Fleet_Issue

Imagine if the old bellicose had 75 bandwidth? It would still be bad, but the blame would fall to bonuses instead of slots. That's progress my friends.
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Bellicose

And what about the split weapon Loki subsystem? Give that thing +35 bandwidth and +35 drone bay, and suddenly it's not looking too bad.

Now imagine a hypothetical battlecruiser with a 4/4 slot layout, a 5% RoF bonus to both weapons, and a 100 bandwidth drone bay. I guarantee that would see use.


Now with Tiericide coming to a close, don't take this as a complaint. All those other ships besides the Typhoon were terrible. The Scythe Fleet Issue still is. But with Rise acknowledging his intention to keep split weapons alive on the faction ships, (Scythe Fleet Issue and Typhoon Fleet Issue), I think it's time we study the successes of them, instead of the failings. The Typhoon still stands to this day as a testament to the viability of split weapon systems, if they are done right. Let's see them done right.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#2 - 2013-04-25 07:26:15 UTC
Get out - nobody likes you.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#3 - 2013-04-25 07:39:05 UTC
Eugene Kerner wrote:
Get out - nobody likes you.

You already got the Armageddon. Don't take any more from us Gallente drone users! Evil
ChromeStriker
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-04-25 07:47:21 UTC
typhoon worked because neuts are a weapon

No Worries

Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#5 - 2013-04-25 08:08:52 UTC
ChromeStriker wrote:
typhoon worked because neuts are a weapon


A valid point, yet all the other split ships could run neuts and still failed.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
#6 - 2013-04-25 08:11:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Sable Moran
Garresh wrote:
But with Rise acknowledging his intention to keep split weapons alive on the faction ships, (Scythe Fleet Issue and Typhoon Fleet Issue)


YES! Happy happy, joy joy.

Do you have a linky to where Rise says that?


Edit: Thanks Garresh

Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene.

Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#7 - 2013-04-25 08:18:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Garresh
Sable Moran wrote:
Garresh wrote:
But with Rise acknowledging his intention to keep split weapons alive on the faction ships, (Scythe Fleet Issue and Typhoon Fleet Issue)


YES! Happy happy, joy joy.

Do you have a linky to where Rise says that?



Quote:
This is my attempt to redeem the Minmatar split weapons tradition. Instead of forcing both weapon systems it gives both as viable choices.

I apologize. It was actually Fozzie. Oops
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=219607&find=unread

Quote:
If you’re one of those that has cherished access to projectiles, missiles, and drones, we would encourage you to remember that the Navy battleships, which will get looked at soon, will likely be able to fill some spaces created by the tech 1 rebalance.

Rise made the comment on the phoon though.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=223611&find=unread

Edit: damn phone.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

ChromeStriker
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2013-04-25 12:39:06 UTC
Garresh wrote:
ChromeStriker wrote:
typhoon worked because neuts are a weapon


A valid point, yet all the other split ships could run neuts and still failed.


Ok Ok let me try again...

typhoon worked because HEAVY neuts are a weapon Blink

....Also it could knock out 1000dps with full tackle

No Worries

Ritsum
Perkone
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-04-25 12:56:38 UTC
Define weapons.

ECM is a weapon, hell in general Ewar is a weapon.
Smartbombs are weapons.
Prop mods are weapons too in the right hands.
Nuets and NOS are weapons.

With that said, each and every ship has a "Split weapon" system they can use.

Now if you are talking about the High slot layouts of certain ships then all I can say is that they are there for you to use your imagination.

Sure a gun boat has a Missile launcher slot... Does not mean you have to use it in such a way, it is just giving you the choice. Some ships are classed as bad since not many know how to fit or use them.

Play EvE how you want to play it and do not let others dictate how you play. Evolve your playstyle to protect yourself from others! Even in "PVE", "PVP" is there, lurking in the shadows.

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#10 - 2013-04-25 16:37:15 UTC
Triple weapon systems wont be enough. There will be those who call for Quadruple weapon systems. Then...Quintuple. No one will be satisfied until all ships in game are some form of the Gnosis. Then..theyll want the t2 Gnosis...which will undoubtedly have 10 weapon systems bonuses, and CCP will have to rebalance everything again to make everyone happy.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Mr Ignitious
Lifeline Industries
#11 - 2013-04-25 18:23:29 UTC
I fully support your crusade garresh. Personally I find it tragic to see split weapon ships disappearing. Domi also had bonuses to two weapon systems, conveniently though they didn't compete for slots (well, they do compete for lows for damage mods). However, I think the domi will be ok, and sort of fun.

For your minmatar observation and proposition, I think you're right to a degree. I think it's a good thing that the typhoon is a swiss army knife of awesome. My concern though, as a guy who had mim and gal bs 5 and capable of flying all T2 ships bc and down, I am worried that the unique style of gallente is being encroached upon. The amarr drone boats are stupid good, they have the same damage potential of the gallente versions but with more hp and crazy stupid toolkits. I'm actually genuinely upset that the prophecy and armageddon are the way the are, and going to be respectively.

For your minmatar proposals, it could be fine so long as they don't get any actual bonuses to drones, but just have large drone bandwidth. Like 75/75 for bellicose, sure. And for the typhoon, 125/150 or something. And the hurricane is pretty shite atm, so maybe a drone mbit increase is in order as well.

With this hopeful review of split weapons, I'd hope reviewing bonusing drones is looked at. It's an extremely finicky system. Plus, with all the new emphasis on sentries I'd like to see some changes to them. Something like increase the pick up radius to 10km. Or make them tractorable =D
Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#12 - 2013-04-25 18:25:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Garresh
Nobody wants OP ships. But split weapons are awesome when they work.

Edit: yeah minmatar have larger than average drone bays on some of their ships but NO bonuses to drones ever.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#13 - 2013-04-25 20:28:26 UTC
The Typhoon: one of the cheapest and ugliest of battle ships, yet one of the most versatile and capable of sheer badassitude.

It even had little fangs.

As a cross trained drone and missile specialist, I can do some interesting things with a phoon. I usually don't fly BS and can't run them well in some lvl 4 missions (keeping the tank up)


But when I do, I use a typhoon.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#14 - 2013-04-25 21:14:40 UTC
Garresh wrote:
...but Triple weapons are AWESOME.


It's rather interesting that every split weapon system in eve is a steaming pile of crap...*except* for the Typhoon. With split weapons disappearing, I find myself wondering why is it that the Typhoon succeeds when so many others have failed? What is it about the Typhoon that separates it from the other split weapon ships?

The answer is simple: Its drone bay. Split weapon ships were always attacked as being "too unfocused". They have slots competing between two weapon systems. Clearly specialization is the answer, right? To that I say, NO. The problem isn't that they're not focused enough, but rather that they're not general enough. Despite the lack of a drone bonus, the Typhoon has the same bandwidth as a dedicated drone ship such as Domi(but less capacity). If not for that, the Typhoon likely wouldn't be as respected as it is today. It would be mediocre, a crappy Raven. But that extra drone capacity pushes it past the weaknesses of split weapons, and gives it a triple threat. Dealing with 2 weapon systems is doable, but trying to counter or negate 3 weapons? Unlikely.

So answer me this: If all the split weapon ships of the past were given drone bays comparable to the dedicated drone ships of their class(but no bonuses), would they still be underpowered? Would they be overpowered? Would you fly them? I know I would.

Give the Scythe Fleet Issue a 75 bandwidth(as a vexor)
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Scythe_Fleet_Issue

Imagine if the old bellicose had 75 bandwidth? It would still be bad, but the blame would fall to bonuses instead of slots. That's progress my friends.
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Bellicose

And what about the split weapon Loki subsystem? Give that thing +35 bandwidth and +35 drone bay, and suddenly it's not looking too bad.

Now imagine a hypothetical battlecruiser with a 4/4 slot layout, a 5% RoF bonus to both weapons, and a 100 bandwidth drone bay. I guarantee that would see use.


Now with Tiericide coming to a close, don't take this as a complaint. All those other ships besides the Typhoon were terrible. The Scythe Fleet Issue still is. But with Rise acknowledging his intention to keep split weapons alive on the faction ships, (Scythe Fleet Issue and Typhoon Fleet Issue), I think it's time we study the successes of them, instead of the failings. The Typhoon still stands to this day as a testament to the viability of split weapon systems, if they are done right. Let's see them done right.

I think I prefer this approach to split weapons systems:

Scythe Fleet Issue: This is my attempt to redeem the Minmatar split weapons tradition. Instead of forcing both weapon systems it gives both as viable choices.
Cruiser skill bonuses:
10% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret rate of fire
10% bonus to Missile damage
Slot layout: 5(-1) H, 5(+1) M, 5(+2) L, 4(+1) Turrets, 4(+1) Launchers

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Garresh
Mackies Raiders
Wild Geese.
#15 - 2013-04-26 05:46:33 UTC
I'll concede the new Scythe Fleet issue looks pretty awesome, but I'd still like to see a split weapon system with heavy drone capacity implemented. Honestly, I think the Loki subsystem would be the perfect testing ground for a change like that.

This Space Intentionally Left Blank

Andrea Griffin
#16 - 2013-04-26 12:39:05 UTC
I loved the Merlin in its previous incarnation. The old Merlin worked and it worked well. It didn't need a drone bay.

The main problem with split weapon systems seems to be that you had to decide which weapon system would get the damage modules. This made fitting a little inefficient in some cases. In most cases it wasn't much of an issue though; whichever weapon system did the most damage by default would get a damage mod.

And, really, it's okay for such ships to not have the raw damage output of a single weapon system ship. They should be able to make up for it in other ways. For the Merlin, it could run a great buffer to help it outlast higher damage opponents. Other ships could follow suit, or have greater agility or speed, or a very low signature, or some other benefit that helps outweigh the inherent drawbacks of the split systems.

I'm sad to see that only the expensive navy vessels will have these now.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2013-04-26 13:37:36 UTC
Triple split? Haha, what noobs!

There are ships where you can fit one of each weapon system. Guaranteeing that you will NOT be countered by ANYTHING.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!