These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Summer expansion SP

First post
Author
J1LT
Interstella Misfits
#321 - 2013-04-24 12:53:16 UTC
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:



Let's assume (hypothetically) that US collapses into separate states in 2030. And everyone who was born before 2030 gain universal residency permit (can settle and resettle anywhere anytime within old US) and let's call it 'old rights'. Those who were born after 2030 gain only 1-state residency (can settle only within 1 state). Did anything change for older citizens? Did they get any free rights? No. Nothing changed for them. Do the younger citizens feel the same? No! And guess what? One guy says: 'let's make a law so that younger people can live in bordering states too' (to equal the rights a bit). Everyone replies: 'No! We didn't get any free rights and you won't too"
Do you understand now how absurd your 'I can fly the same ships as before' claim sound?



Well with that train of thought i should be allowed to drive up to a 7.5 ton vehicle as the generation before me can.

Things change!

I got my driving license AFTER a change so therefore do not get 'grandad' rights and have to do a separate test for 7.5 ton and bigger.

Do i feel i need to write to the DVLA (British driving authority) and ask for some compensation as others before me have some thing i do not.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#322 - 2013-04-24 12:58:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:
1. I myself (actually training it) might get it on time (or even if not be short like 4-5 days). I hope it is clear. But people who just started or will start playing a bit later wont.
…and that is just the nature of evolving games where new skills are added: people who have played longer have more, and people who start later have more skills to wade through.

Quote:
Do you understand now how absurd your 'I can fly the same ships as before' claim sound?
No. Largely because your scenario doesn't reflect what's going on in the game: that everyone gets the same deal. All that's happening is a bit of time shifting, and the only “strange” thing about it is that unlike with most additions, this shift does not happen on patch day but roughly one month before. So how is it in any way absurd that the status quo is retained? That no-one gains or loses any abilities? Or, more relevantly, how is this status quo more absurd than saying that just because some people retained their abilities, all the others should be given tons more?

Quote:
Hopefully that clarifies something.
Yes, it clarifies that you are unduly focused on an irrelevant stat: SP. The only thing that matters is ability, and abilities remains completely untouched.

Quote:
But I hope that at least some of you will listen to voice of reason
Sure. Could you give a reason why some people should be given new abilities just because others retain theirs?

Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Very simple if we use completely different premises and conclusions than the ones in question:

P₁: Current skill system is bad.
P₂: Current skill system is better than before.
C: Old skill system was bad.
Fixed. So that's a no, then, as expected. It's ok, we've already established that you realised why I was right all along and that you're just evading the question now, constantly moving the goalposts and injecting straw men in a desperate attempt to say right.
As you're so fond of saying: /discussion.
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#323 - 2013-04-24 13:19:51 UTC
Miles Harker wrote:

My intention was to beeline the +5S but this change for odyssey changed that.

Of course I'm going to buy a PLEX when im going to get 6m million additional skill points which is what 3-4 months of subscription charges?

You'd be daft not too...


Smart guy. ^ It's good to see players thinking ahead so early in the game. Perhaps your thinking a little too far ahead though and will lose some enjoyment of the game, so one piece of advice I would give is to set aside some time to train up some skills which will give you some immediate effect alongside the long term planning. What your doing kind of reminds me of how I first started the game, and one regret I have was pinning myself a little to strongly to a long term goal without having the space to train for shorter term immediate goals which came into my mind.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#324 - 2013-04-24 13:24:18 UTC
thing is, your comparison for 2 is flawed in that you're talking about access to space/land.

Older players are not getting anything that the newer players cannot get. CCP's not locking you into (or out of) anything after the patch.

A better example (still horribly flawed) is that

1. US changes driving laws in 2014 that you need a "standard transmission" license if you want to drive a car with standard (manual) transmission.
2. anyone with a current licence is granted "std transmission" license, provided that they own/lease a car with a standard transmission.
3. anyone who isn't licensed by 01/01/14 (or doesn't have a std transmission car) defaults to the "automatic transmission only" license, but can test to have the "full" license.


That's all that CCP is changing/adding with the skill change things.

After this patch, you're "encouraged" by the skill trees to stick more with one race -- not that you're encouraged these days to train everything -- specialization >>>>>>>>> versatility.

For example, I could only fly an Oneiros for months before I even considered being ready (support-skills wise) to fly any of the other logi boats. Amarr was the easiest (just needed energy transfers), but Basi/Scimi took forever (shield tanking, remote shield xfer, etc).

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#325 - 2013-04-24 13:24:40 UTC
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:

Quote:
complains bitterly when people point out your error.


How do u detect my bitterness? Telepathy? More likely just a bold phrase (all your phrases are bold actually)


I wonder how on earth anyone could confuse you for being bitter, to me you come across as a happy little butterfly. :)
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#326 - 2013-04-24 13:30:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Rebecha Pucontis
Deaconn Frostt wrote:
Instead of trying to give reasons why you haven't trained them start looking into possibilities that will get them trained. By getting these trained you will save yourself about 90 days worth of training on all the iv and v racial cruiser training by my calculations, correct me if I'm wrong.


What I find amusing is that you new players do not realise is that training every single racial and battlecruiser to level V is really not necessary at all especially for such young players, and in some cases it is actually detrimental as your skill clone cost is soaring.

But I can't blame you for trying to max out your skills as this knowledge comes with experience. I'm only sticking to two of the racial BC myself as have no need for the other two. My suggestion would be to go for level IV on each skill, that will give you more that enough benefit and you will still be capable of flying each BC if you wish for a fraction of the time. Then you can train soemthing which is actually fun. :)
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#327 - 2013-04-24 13:33:37 UTC
silens vesica wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
...except that he didn't use the word "thought", but he did use the word "bad", in the 4 sentence excerpt under discussion.
…and it's still my view of the skill tree that was in question — i.e. what I thought about it.

Not that it matters, the non-sequitur is the same: “improvement” does not mean that it was bad before.

"New and Improved" only means that the previous version was "Old and Inferior" in comparison to the updated version - This is not an absolute scale, but a relative one.


I have never liked that phrase - New and Improved. If it's New, it's never existed in it's current form before, so how can it be improved? And if you're improving it, doesn't that mean that it was already new at some some previous point in time?

I think the issue is that people are fixated on that word new. New is cool, new is shiny, new is what all the cool kids want. Improved implies it was bad before, when in reality it was only, as pointed out, relatively worse than the existing product.

Also, this thread is now about Bacon and Eggs. (Thanks Tippia, now I'm hungry).

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

flakeys
Doomheim
#328 - 2013-04-24 13:36:22 UTC
So changes are made for the benefit of the noobs ....and then we get a noob complaining about how us veterans want it all our way and how this change SO much benefits us.


That alone wasn't enough offcourse , no the OP needed to be one of the most stubborn posters on the forum and keep shouting how unfair it is to the noobs.



These are the times where i want to give the new players the ''old playstyle'' again.Just to show how much it all changed to make it a crapload better for new players.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#329 - 2013-04-24 13:36:33 UTC  |  Edited by: silens vesica
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:
Abraham Nalelmir wrote:
1- I am a new player, I dropped all my Guardian plans, T2 large guns plans, even I delayed hull upgrades 5 just to train BC to 5
2- They "decided" they are responsible for their decision
3- Giving them 2 million SP FREE to allocate anywhere is not fair for me, I who spent 1.5 months maxing out BC & Destroyers with all racial frigates/cruisers skills

I have joined after the titan nerf and after caps were kicked out of high sec, am I entitled to have a titan and a cap in my starting home system?


U still get 6mil SP, which is way better than 2.

You still don't get it. Those 6 mil SP are locked up - in skills that give him nothing new. You still think those 6 mil SP are going to give an advantage that he doesn't already possess - which is false. SP mean nothing. Ability to fly ships means something. Guess which won't have changed?

Hammer this through your thick head: He will be able to do nothing new with those points, and they will give him precisely the same abilities he has today, and nothing else.

You must be either an incredibly capable troll, or utterly obtuse if you can't understand that.

Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:

League of legends only and always helps newer players by slowly cutting advantages of older players.
LoL would be the same as EVE if everyone who starts playing that game is forced to purchase characters in their release order. Do u think anyone would play it?
Supporting newer players is the only viable option as older players get bored by the game/change lifestyle etc. CCP on the other hand does the opposite.
EVE growing year by year. But who are they? New players? Returnig? Alts?
LoL has over 30 mil accounts. Can u remind me how much ever-growing EVE has?

League of Legends =! EVE Online

What applies to one game means nothing in the other. That should be clear even to you.

Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:

The amount of approving posts here does not imply anything. I'll gain more support as time X comes closer.

No. You'll only gain increasing amounts of contempt.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#330 - 2013-04-24 13:45:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Velicitia wrote:
A better example (still horribly flawed) is that

1. US changes driving laws in 2014 that you need a "standard transmission" license if you want to drive a car with standard (manual) transmission.
2. anyone with a current licence is granted "std transmission" license, provided that they own/lease a car with a standard transmission.
3. anyone who isn't licensed by 01/01/14 (or doesn't have a std transmission car) defaults to the "automatic transmission only" license, but can test to have the "full" license.

That's all that CCP is changing/adding with the skill change things.
Hell, you can even keep the fractured-state scenario:

1. US gets split into UCAS, CAS, NAN and CFS in 2017 after the treaty of Denver.
2. All old US permanent residents are granted quadruple residencies by default, and can thus travel freely just like before.
3. Anyone wanting to become a resident after 2017 has to go the respective embassies to apply for the full set of permanent residencies so they can travel freely too.

The only difference is that the old geezers got it in the mail, whereas the poor newbies have to make those trips to the embassies (which the old ones had to do too, at some point, btw). Oh, and the old guys will have to carry around extra leafs in their old passports to signify this new and complicated setup — something the old passports were not always designed for, and which makes them break more often.

De'Veldrin wrote:
I have never liked that phrase - New and Improved. If it's New, it's never existed in it's current form before, so how can it be improved? And if you're improving it, doesn't that mean that it was already new at some some previous point in time?
Just mentally inject the word “version” and it all works out. Nothing is ever new these days — it's all just revisions (good and bad) of the old. Blink
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#331 - 2013-04-24 13:48:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Rebecha Pucontis
Miles Harker wrote:
Quote:

Using +3 implants you'd only gain 350k fewer skillpoints, which is about 1 weeks worth of sub time.

I liken this change to learning skills, you think you're gaining skp by focusing on one thing. However, the best way to gain skillpoints is to enjoy the game so that you don't quit. I've learned this the hard way.

The character bazaar can be used to effectively buy skillpoints if you get good at making ISK.

I don't think I'm gaining skill points; I am gaining skill points and therefore time. Fact.

I agree with you that you should do what you enjoy, not try min/max for the sake of it. It is a game. However, my personal circumstances, work etc. and my "long term" view on EVE accommodates the approach I'm currently taking with my skill plan. But that might not necessarily be the right choice for others.

Here is one tip which I think may come in useful to you and also many new players who are focusing on long term planning. Something to remember about +5 implants is that a full set of +5 implants is the equivalent price of a PLEX which is a month of training time. I worked this out a long time ago, but basically if you install two +5 implants, one for the primary attribute and one for the secondary attribute, it will take roughly one year of extra training to be as cost efficient as simply buying a PLEX. And this is assuming that your +5 implants actually last for year.

If your looking at a full set of +5 implants then your talking over 2 years of training to match the cost efficiency of simply buying a PLEX.

If you are not concerned about money and have lots of real life money to burn or are very successful at making isk in the game then you can obviously get both. But to play this game smart it is good to think in terms of the opportunity costs of what you are doing despite +5s initially seeming like a good option.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#332 - 2013-04-24 14:01:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
Here is one tip which I think may come in useful to you and also many new players who are focusing on long term planning. Something to remember about +5 implants is that a full set of +5 implants is the equivalent price of a PLEX which is a month of training time. I worked this out a long time ago, but basically if you install two +5 implants, one for the primary attribute and one for the secondary attribute, it will take roughly one year of extra training to be as cost efficient as simply buying a PLEX. And this is assuming that your +5 implants actually last for year.
…and then there's the whole training time vs. speed gain to consider. It's not quite as large an affect as the ISK, but it's there nonetheless.

The difference in skill training between +3 and +5 implants is 767,250 SP, and that training earns you a training speed increase of 180 more SP per hour (assuming you get a set that always cover what you're going to train). That means it takes 4260 hours / 177 days to earn back the time spent on training the Cybernetics skill.
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#333 - 2013-04-24 14:02:10 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:

Also, this thread is now about Bacon and Eggs. (Thanks Tippia, now I'm hungry).

Heh. Now I am, too. P

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#334 - 2013-04-24 14:03:46 UTC
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:
Thank you for responses. Some of you called me moron/thick-headed/fail-planner etc others gave in-depth explanations which I additionally thank for to voice of reason


And both were correct.

No problem for the responses it is our pleasure. I won't bother reading the rest of your post and will assume you have realised that you were behaving like a self entitled baby, and you have calmed down now we have pointed out to you that you can still achieve BC and Dest if you stop complaining on the forums and play the game.
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#335 - 2013-04-24 14:11:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Rebecha Pucontis
Tippia wrote:
…and then there's the whole training time vs. speed gain to consider. It's not quite as large an affect as the ISK, but it's one to consider nevertheless.

The difference in skill training between +3 and +5 implants is 767,250 SP, and that training earns you a training speed increase of 180 more SP per hour (assuming you get a set that always cover what you're going to train). That means it takes 4260 hours / 177 days to earn back the time spent on training the Cybernetics skill.


Yes that is true. I deliberately left out the speed gain as I feel the isk factor is much more important for new players unless they are bankrolling themselves with real life cash.

But yes, if you work out the speed gain you are achieving roughly a month of extra SP over the course of one year over having +3s. And then you have to negate the cost of the cybernetics training time also. My maths is a little hazy as I worked it out a long time ago but I think that is roughly correct.

But basically - new players should stick with +4s for the first year in my advice unless they can afford to bank roll themselves with real life cash, and even then they could better spend the isk on lots of new ships when their old ones get blown up.
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#336 - 2013-04-24 14:21:39 UTC
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:

But basically - new players should stick with +4s for the first year in my advice unless they can afford to bank roll themselves with real life cash, and even then they could better spend the isk on lots of new ships when their old ones get blown up.

I've been around a lot longer than a year, and I *still* stick with +4s. Because the extra training speed the +5s grant simply isn't as important as what I'm doing day-to-day. I can use the ISK that +5s cost elsewhere to better effect, and I have no pressing need to learn skills faster than I already do.

I'm sure some will think I'm 'doing it wrong' but I really don't see the need. Just like there are a lot of skills that I'll never train to 'V', as well. Cost/benefit just isn't there for me.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Royal Executioner Shazih
Doomheim
#337 - 2013-04-24 14:32:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Royal Executioner Shazih
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
Royal Executioner Shazih wrote:
Thank you for responses. Some of you called me moron/thick-headed/fail-planner etc others gave in-depth explanations which I additionally thank for to voice of reason


And both were correct.

No problem for the responses it is our pleasure. I won't bother reading the rest of your post and will assume you have realised that you were behaving like a self entitled baby, and you have calmed down now we have pointed out to you that you can still achieve BC and Dest if you stop complaining on the forums and play the game.


Nice trolling try. Next time compound my sentences word by word and u probably will come up with something even more fascinating.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#338 - 2013-04-24 14:40:23 UTC
Tippia wrote:


1. US gets split into UCAS, CAS, NAN and CFS in 2017 after the treaty of Denver.


Yea, but then you gotta decide if your going to be a Mage or a Shaman. Good thing is that Tir Tairngire is a great place to Vacation in the summer..
Hemmo Paskiainen
#339 - 2013-04-24 14:45:45 UTC
Whine

Whine

Whine

Just make some isk and buy another character.... it is not that hard....most people are just toooo lazy to think & plan ahead to make isk.

Get off your lazy but, go figur out stuff, and use those grey braincells for other stuff than whining to get free stuff

SAD

If relativity equals time plus momentum, what equals relativity, if the momentum is minus to the time?

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#340 - 2013-04-24 14:48:27 UTC
Next thing you know the OP will be complaining that old people get a pension paid to them regularly, and that it's hideously unfair that newborns don't. OP can GTFO my lawn.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack