These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Anti-Ganker Barge Fits.

First post
Author
Velicitia
XS Tech
#141 - 2013-04-17 16:53:39 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:


orca bonuses are percentage based. therefore have no impact upon which mines more.
also, the modulated strip miner II's cycle time with orca bonuses is 121.78 seconds, not the 123.3 you claim.
you're off to a bad start.

a cu vapor particle bore stream does mine 125.71m3 with an orca bonus of 15% yield. and 8 of them do mine 1005.685m3 per cycle.
consider the following; a mackinaw with the same bonuses mines 1585.493m3 of ore in the same time.
so considering a mackinaw mines more than your shitfit, how do you expect your shitfit to rival a hulk's yield?

edit: hang on, you did remember to load some mining crystals when you got your calculator out, didn't you?


123.3 looks about right for a L4 skilled Orca pilot, possibly missing the (OH GOD WTF HAPPENED) bil and a half mining implant. I don't have anything handy atm as I'm at work ... so it might be 5/5 (but still missing the link ... you're only getting a 50% bonus to the effectiveness of the module).

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Dave stark
#142 - 2013-04-17 16:57:49 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:


orca bonuses are percentage based. therefore have no impact upon which mines more.
also, the modulated strip miner II's cycle time with orca bonuses is 121.78 seconds, not the 123.3 you claim.
you're off to a bad start.

a cu vapor particle bore stream does mine 125.71m3 with an orca bonus of 15% yield. and 8 of them do mine 1005.685m3 per cycle.
consider the following; a mackinaw with the same bonuses mines 1585.493m3 of ore in the same time.
so considering a mackinaw mines more than your shitfit, how do you expect your shitfit to rival a hulk's yield?

edit: hang on, you did remember to load some mining crystals when you got your calculator out, didn't you?


123.3 looks about right for a L4 skilled Orca pilot, possibly missing the (OH GOD WTF HAPPENED) bil and a half mining implant. I don't have anything handy atm as I'm at work ... so it might be 5/5 (but still missing the link ... you're only getting a 50% bonus to the effectiveness of the module).


123.3 is indeed missing the last 3% from the industrial command ship skill thingy.
regardless, it's still % based and therefore irrelevant to which mines more.
Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Vigilante Carebears
#143 - 2013-04-17 17:22:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Edited.
Dave stark
#144 - 2013-04-17 17:36:25 UTC
Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha wrote:
Just another example that you don't know what your talking about. It's no problem. It's expected.


care to point out this example, since i've systematically pointed out every error you've made and you've yet to point out one of mine.

this should be amusing.
Haulie Berry
#145 - 2013-04-17 17:54:19 UTC
He's gotta be trollin'.

No one can possibly be this dumb in real life.
Dave stark
#146 - 2013-04-17 17:55:31 UTC
Haulie Berry wrote:
He's gotta be trollin'.

No one can possibly be this dumb in real life.


he's mad he didn't get 200 endorsements for csm.
Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Vigilante Carebears
#147 - 2013-04-20 01:06:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Edited.
Debra Scully
Imperial Phoenix Legion
#148 - 2013-04-22 14:24:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Debra Scully
I'm still fairly noob so maybe I just don't get it, but why do so many of the OP's fits have EM shield mods/rigs? What ganker is using EM damage?

From what I've seen, gankers care about kill boards, loot, and lulz. Fitting an expensive barge (aka loot pinata) is asking to be ganked, because even losing a bunch of 15M ISK Gankalysts to kill an expensive Mackinaw is still a win on the killboard, win for lulz/tears, and may even be profitable depending on the loot fairy.

My Retriever:

High: 2x Strip Miner I

Med: Adaptive Invulnerability Field I

Lows: Damage Control I
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane I
Power Diagnostic System I

Rigs: Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Anti-Thermic Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Kinetic Screen Reinforcer I

Drones: 3x Hornet EC-300
2x Hobgoblin I (for belt rats)

Pretty cheap and not worth ganking unless I **** someone off.
Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Vigilante Carebears
#149 - 2013-04-23 18:11:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Edited.
Markus Navarro
Osmon Integrated Robotics
#150 - 2013-04-23 20:53:06 UTC
You are STILL better off with a shield extender and 3 mining upgrades. Possiblyan EM rig, but nothing more.

I sell drones and drones accessories.

Dave stark
#151 - 2013-04-23 20:54:36 UTC
Markus Navarro wrote:
You are STILL better off with a shield extender and 3 mining upgrades. Possiblyan EM rig, but nothing more.


better off without the shield extender or the rig, it's just extra isk on the killmail.

it's easier to just move 1 jump away than to sacrifice 30% mining yield fitting "tank" on a ship. that's just the situation and no amount of posting shitfits is going to change it *shrug*
Markus Navarro
Osmon Integrated Robotics
#152 - 2013-04-23 22:03:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Markus Navarro
Better that than barebone. The additional cost is minimal.

Edit : And what i meant is that the extra cost is IMO worth the chance of discouraging a ganker.Why attack one with some (minimal)tank if i'm not gonna get more loot, and there are 10 other without sitting next to it.

I sell drones and drones accessories.

Ersahi Kir
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#153 - 2013-04-24 09:45:27 UTC
Debra Scully wrote:
I'm still fairly noob so maybe I just don't get it, but why do so many of the OP's fits have EM shield mods/rigs? What ganker is using EM damage?


Before the blaster change the thrasher use to be the king of cheap ganks. Many gankers can fly both, and if you fly around with 0% em resist they can just switch to thrashers with emp ammo.
Dave stark
#154 - 2013-04-24 10:22:08 UTC
Ersahi Kir wrote:
Debra Scully wrote:
I'm still fairly noob so maybe I just don't get it, but why do so many of the OP's fits have EM shield mods/rigs? What ganker is using EM damage?


Before the blaster change the thrasher use to be the king of cheap ganks. Many gankers can fly both, and if you fly around with 0% em resist they can just switch to thrashers with emp ammo.


i keep a thrasher in my orca for this very reason. probability is that they're kin/therm tanked and i will waste a thrasher if you continually target my asteroids.
Dav Varan
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#155 - 2013-04-24 10:33:25 UTC
Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha wrote:

There are no incorrect fits for barges, only stronger and weaker. In the following thread you will see a great deal of barge suggestions, be aware that fitting items like survey scanners, mining laser upgrades, shield boosters (should be for null sec only), and drone augmentors, will greatly reduce vital defenses, and create chinks in your defenses that gankers will try to exploit once they have scanned you. Also, if you stack invulnerability shields, it has a nasty draw back. Better to use active shield hardeners.



All hardners stack, not just Invuln fields.

If you fit a active or passive EM hardner and a Invuln the
EM portion of the invuln field protection will stack with the EM hardner.

You can not avoid stacking pens by using different mods.
There is no drawback to using multiple invulns.

The only resist bonus that does not stack is the bonus from the damage control mod.
Atahl
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#156 - 2013-04-26 03:03:10 UTC
Quote:
He's gotta be trollin'.

No one can possibly be this dumb in real life.


I've listened to this guy/kid in his local system, and yes he pretty much is that dumb. ANYONE who fits their ships similar to how the OP posts is bound to fail, plain and simple. Why would you EVER put expensive meta 4/cosmos/T2 Rigs on a ship that can't take the gank fire from a single T1 fit Destroyer before Concord gets them is beyond me. Said dessy would cost maybe 3 mil and could EASILY destroy most of his 80-120 mil Barge fits.

Unless.... He is actually a ganker's alt who is posting this thread in order to mislead all the Eve noobs into believing he has the knowledge of an Eve god. Well, at least he has the ego of one, as most of his replies are "your stupid, that's expected" or "well it's either fit this way or die" kind of garbage.
Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Vigilante Carebears
#157 - 2013-04-27 14:19:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Grand Admiral Simo-Hayha
Edited.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#158 - 2013-04-29 01:56:01 UTC
I have come up with a powerful set of high-sec anti-gank fits for all types of barges:

Procurer:
High Slots:
* Strip Miner
Mid Slots:
* Asteroid Scanner
* Capacitor Battery
Low Slots:
* Damage Control
* Mining Laser Upgrades

Retriever:
High Slots:
* Strip Miners
Mid Slots:
* Asteroid Scanner
Low Slots:
* Damage Control
* Mining Laser Upgrades

Covetor:
High Slots:
* Strip Miners
Mid Slots:
* Asteroid Scanner
Low Slots:
* Damage Control
* Mining Laser Upgrades

Skiff:
High Slots:
* Strip Miner
Mid Slots:
* Asteroid Scanner
* Capacitor Battery
Low Slots:
* Damage Control
* Mining Laser Upgrades

Mackinaw:
High Slots:
* Strip Miner
Mid Slots:
* Asteroid Scanner
* Capacitor Battery
Low Slots:
* Damage Control
* Mining Laser Upgrades

Hulk:
High Slots:
* Strip Miner
Mid Slots:
* Asteroid Scanner
* Capacitor Battery
Low Slots:
* Damage Control
* Mining Laser Upgrades

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Mahuika
AIR WATER
#159 - 2013-04-29 05:28:35 UTC
Quote:
The expensive end of barges is there as an option because most of them can handle 6 T2 catalysts themselves, or more, especially Mackinaws which have much higher defensive capability then Hulks.


Wait what? Did you actually just say the Mack can tank 6 T2 Catys? Even with T2 Rigs and every single slot low/high for tank + 6% Imps + 100% fully T2 bonus for Shield Harmonizing gang link WITH the slot 10 Siege Imp you still can't even get to 50K EHP, which can be ganked by (2-3) T2 Catys with time to play a game of cards before Concord shows up.
Eowyth
Obumbrata Ltd
#160 - 2013-04-29 05:34:48 UTC
I would suggest that CCP lock this horrible troll thread but it's actually kind of amusing seeing how the OP tries to come up with responses to the valid points pretty much every single person has made. More to point he DOESN'T come up with anything just shrugs it off and keeps spewing fail.