These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Heresy: a speculative guide to Under(mine) the New Order (long)

Author
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#61 - 2013-04-20 11:45:40 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
I'm here to chew popcorn and enjoy the drama. And I'm all out of popcorn Cool

*Unlocks and opens a large secure container full of popcorn*

Here, help yourself...Smile

Remove standings and insurance.

rswfire
#62 - 2013-04-20 12:40:13 UTC
Shao Huang wrote:
Edit: My OP does a mediocre job of taking seriously the 'theological' context of the NO as emergent play making it hard to parse I think. The thing about the course of action suggested for the miners is that it constitutes simply amplifying and recontexualizing what they are already doing. If done well, it does not 'attack' the NO as such, but potentially alters the play experience of the Knight. It is a process of drowning them in the tears and lamentations they have requested, through all available means. It also gives converted miners something to occupy their time while being forced to stay at the keyboard with nothing else to do. It is consistent with the underlying strucuture of the NO logic in that it is an increased form of participation and interaction. It is essentially role playing the miner they have been told they are in ways that are as grandiose and florid as the NO itself and could be quite fun.

I suppose an interested miner could start an Alliance called the Whining Miners, or Miner Whine or some such using a permanent docked character and sponsor wardecs based on kill mails of the Knights and non-affiliates who are also not in one of the NPC corps. Since they are perma docked they then also accept anyone wanting a greater diversity of high sec targets into the Alliance. This creates a non CONCORD preemptive level of play with respect to high sec PvP, which ostensibly should also be welcomed by the NO. Heck, all parties aligned with the aims of the NO should wardec themselves and compete in this preemptive way for ganks. Currently they are using the relative pre-gank safety of high sec to their own advantage, which is also a Heresy.

The sponsor of Miner Whine could actually make a business of it by charging a fee to join the alliance for people who wanted a target rich high sec. If priced right I am sure their would be people willing join such an alliance since ganker or non-ganker a PvP target is a PvP target.


I approve this product and/or service!

Dec any corp that aligns themselves with the "New Order" via "Mining Permits."
Shao Huang
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#63 - 2013-04-20 13:29:30 UTC
rswfire wrote:
Dec any corp that aligns themselves with the "New Order" via "Mining Permits."


To be clear, though this is a fine idea it is not exactly what I was suggesting. It is also unlikely to happen.

Take the universal case of what I was suggesting, which is also unlikely to happen. If everyone, or even the majority of people, were always war decced in high sec want effect would that have?

I was suggesting starting a war deccing business where you did not actually ever fire a shot, but simply made more and more people available targets to one another in high sec based on market interest. Probably to make the business run you would need two or two competing war dec aggregators? Likely the most profitable model would be a single owner of both aggregators at some level.

The business model would have to be worked out to determine whether or not it would be financially profitable. It is potentially the case for it might be ideologically profitable for someone therefore does not need to be financially profitable, but only distribute the costs of the war dec. The aggregator (Miner Whine or whatever) would need to be able to report at any time things like trends in available targets in high sec so investors would understand what they are getting, etc.

The high sec data from Poetic Stanziel could easily be used to create predictive investment models based on corporate/alliance activity. Also parsing by CONCORD kills would do.

Private sig. Do not read.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#64 - 2013-04-20 13:39:34 UTC
Tetsuo Tsukaya wrote:
Shao Huang wrote:


There is contained within the New Order credo an inherent Heresy. The theology is based on that all actions should contain risk, presumably commensurate with reward.


I stopped here. You may think using highly formal language is helping your argument but it's just making it unreadable.




Not for all of us.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#65 - 2013-04-20 14:47:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Bing Bangboom
The New Order does not sell protection. Neither do we promise that the purchase of a mining permit fulfills the obligations of the miner required by the New Halaima Code of Conduct.

Following The Code makes the miner a better player (and a better person too). By tanking their ship, staying alert at the keyboard, keeping in mind that ganks are part of the fun of EvE and generally participating in emergent gameplay, the miner moves off the path of bot aspirancy and literally, changes the road they are on. A player who follows The Code soon finds that mining, especially afk mining, is not either a fun or profitable way to spend their gaming time. Dozens of New Order Agents and Knights are reformed miners who now reject their former world view and have moved from being a form of in-game livestock to being the predator and warriors they aspired to be the day they downloaded the client. Without The Code they were sucked into the perverse world of highsec mining. The New Order, through the generosity and the down right pity of James 315, freed them.

Those who have not yet been healed of their malformation seem to think the permit is the core of the New Order. This is untrue. James 315 himself clearly explains that the permit fee was a requirement put on the New Order by CCP itself who required that our actions generate an expectation of profit. Now, the New Order has been wildly profitable but not from the selling of permits. Selling the permits pushes aside any possibility of our ganking and bumping as being harrassment and turns it into legitimate, emergent, goodoldfashionedEve, hijinks. It serves a small purpose of acting as a wakeup call to the ISK fixated miner. It serves to show him that watching his ISK total tick up up up isn't winning Eve or, considering how slowly mining makes ISK, even desirable.

Now, the idea at the core of the OP has been suggested many times during the last several months. No one has made a serious attempt to initiate it. This is probably due to a combination of inertia and risk adverse nature of the opponents of the New Order. In other words, a combination of self interest and cowardice has prevented anyone from actually making a sacrifice of their time and ISK for the perceived greater good of the mining community. The New Order, not only attuned to self sacrifice but organized around a core of service to all of Eve, is unburdened by these constraints.

But lets say someone does attempt it. They would find that New Order permit holders, those who DO follow The Code, would be extremely difficult to gank. A good tank combined with good situational awareness would create a hard target. Since the Knights of the New Order go after poorly tanked, AFKing bot aspirants the success rate is much higher. In such a competition the occasional victory of the anti-New Order forces would pale vs the continued efforts of the NO to cull the mining herd of the weak and sick (ie, the bot aspirants). Lacking the conviction and organization of the New Order AND besides that being on the side of bot aspirancy and all other things bad and double bad, the countereffort would soon fade back to the background noise it came from.

Those who truly understand the New Halaima Code of Conduct know that fighting it fulfills it. This is not to say the the miner cannot "win". He just has to understand that the way to win is to follow The Code.

Be a winner, not a whiner. Follow The Code.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

Bing Bangboom
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Belligerent Undesirable

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

Tetsuo Tsukaya
Perkone
Caldari State
#66 - 2013-04-20 14:48:15 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:
Tetsuo Tsukaya wrote:
Shao Huang wrote:


There is contained within the New Order credo an inherent Heresy. The theology is based on that all actions should contain risk, presumably commensurate with reward.


I stopped here. You may think using highly formal language is helping your argument but it's just making it unreadable.




Not for all of us.


Considering that a good portion of the post contains sentences that are grammatical train wrecks just so he can throw in more thesaurus results, I guess some of you guys are dazzled by bull ****.

Or should I say; "in so far as the missive contained therein on page one of this archive and subsequent clarifications are an attempt to spread a new paradigm on resisting the informal collective of belligerents that is the new order, the grammatical idiosyncrasies present through all iterations of the exposition leads to elevated instances of having no idea wtf the OP is even trying to say because it sounds like it was typed in German, run through google translate and then subjected to "find and replace" with a ******* thesaurus. It's terrible. OP needs to talk like a normal person or at least learn the correct context and usage for them there fancy words he seems to love so much.

"Take the universal case of what I was suggesting, which is also unlikely to happen" does not even make sense. OP is bad and should feel bad.
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#67 - 2013-04-20 15:19:59 UTC
rswfire wrote:
Seems to me some gankers could set up shop and start ganking any miner who has an attribution to the "New Order." After all, these are the miners who are the most risk-averse among them all. So target them, kill them...then you'll start hearing the outrage!


This was exactly what I meant.

Manny Moons wrote:
If you could find enough players willing to sacrifice their time, ISK, and security status (unlikely, as has been proven each time this plan has been suggested)...


Ummm...

Katran Luftschreck wrote:
But for people with multiple accounts... well, isn't that what multiple accounts are for?


After all, it's pretty much well known that the Bumptards are funded by non-neg mains anyway (probably AFK miner toons). What's to stop the counter-movement from doing the same thing themselves?

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Audrik Villalona
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#68 - 2013-04-20 15:55:31 UTC
rswfire wrote:
Seems to me some gankers could set up shop and start ganking any miner who has an attribution to the "New Order." After all, these are the miners who are the most risk-averse among them all. So target them, kill them...then you'll start hearing the outrage!


This is incorrect, and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of human psychology. In any conflict, the most risk-averse are not those who choose a side, but those who flee the conflict. In this case, those who flee the conflict either stopped mining, or run to other systems. Again, as a permit-holding miner, I categorically welcome your attempt to gank me, so that I can laugh at your failure (and your wrecks). The rebels are wonderful at talking about how they 'should' gank the permit-holding miners, but in actuality, the best gankers join the new order, and the miners with tanked barges buy permits. when the unskilled rebel gankers try to gank permit-holding miners, they invariably fail and log off in shame. When may I expect you?
rswfire
#69 - 2013-04-20 16:04:54 UTC  |  Edited by: rswfire
Audrik Villalona wrote:
This is incorrect, and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of human psychology. In any conflict, the most risk-averse are not those who choose a side, but those who flee the conflict. In this case, those who flee the conflict either stopped mining, or run to other systems. Again, as a permit-holding miner, I categorically welcome your attempt to gank me, so that I can laugh at your failure (and your wrecks). The rebels are wonderful at talking about how they 'should' gank the permit-holding miners, but in actuality, the best gankers join the new order, and the miners with tanked barges buy permits. when the unskilled rebel gankers try to gank permit-holding miners, they invariably fail and log off in shame. When may I expect you?


I'm not a ganker, which shows a fundamental lack of reading comprehension on your part. And I just have to ask -- don't you ever get tired of talking like you're part of some religious movement, or have the lines of reality blurred so much for you that you have essentially been brainwashed into your imaginary cult?

Edit: Also, I think the better solution is to simply set up a corp and wardec all those permit-holding lemmings of yours and kill them without CONCORD intervention.
Lady Areola Fappington
#70 - 2013-04-20 16:17:12 UTC
rswfire wrote:


I'm not a ganker, which shows a fundamental lack of reading comprehension on your part. And I just have to ask -- don't you ever get tired of talking like you're part of some religious movement, or have the lines of reality blurred so much for you that you have essentially been brainwashed into your imaginary cult?

Edit: Also, I think the better solution is to simply set up a corp and wardec all those permit-holding lemmings of yours and kill them without CONCORD intervention.



I find that for gankers, the reality/EVE line is a lot more set in stone, than your average carebear. You don't see New Order operatives insulting a target and wishing death on the RL player, for example.

Do you get tired of logging into a science fiction video game, just to continue being yourself?

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

rswfire
#71 - 2013-04-20 17:00:02 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
I find that for gankers, the reality/EVE line is a lot more set in stone, than your average carebear. You don't see New Order operatives insulting a target and wishing death on the RL player, for example.


I don't recall a carebear convincing people to grief a guy so hard he almost killed himself.

Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Do you get tired of logging into a science fiction video game, just to continue being yourself


I absolutely love being me in Eve. It's why I play this game.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#72 - 2013-04-20 17:28:17 UTC
rswfire wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
I find that for gankers, the reality/EVE line is a lot more set in stone, than your average carebear. You don't see New Order operatives insulting a target and wishing death on the RL player, for example.


I don't recall a carebear convincing people to grief a guy so hard he almost killed himself.




With all due respect there is a flaw with that statement. The carebear doesn't need to do any convincing in order to wish RL harm or death to the ganker. And it does happen. Quite frequently. minerbumping.com does have the screenshots posted throughout their blogs.

I encourage you to focus on "miner tears #X" if you look it up to research the very act happening.

It is very distasteful for anyone to show such bad form, especially from a carebear who wishes "peace".

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

rswfire
#73 - 2013-04-20 17:41:11 UTC
Murk Paradox wrote:
With all due respect there is a flaw with that statement. The carebear doesn't need to do any convincing in order to wish RL harm or death to the ganker. And it does happen. Quite frequently. minerbumping.com does have the screenshots posted throughout their blogs.

I encourage you to focus on "miner tears #X" if you look it up to research the very act happening.

It is very distasteful for anyone to show such bad form, especially from a carebear who wishes "peace".


I am more than happy to concede that anyone who wishes harm on someone in real life is going too far, regardless of how they are labeled in this game. But it's not really a flaw in my statement; I was pointing out it is not limited to any single group of people. It's not even something that should be labeled under a group. Those are individuals who for any number of reasons have anger or mental issues and so forth.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#74 - 2013-04-20 17:52:30 UTC
Yea but the point is those who gank (NO specifically) are quite polite and friendly. Granted they are the ones causing the chaos, but still. The game supports it.

Those who wish to ignore the tenets of the game and do what they wish, when they wish and how the wish, follow the same rules and yet when "lose" go nerdraging crazy wishing RL harm.

Yet it's the gankers who are the bad guys, because they ask for 10mil isk.

Anyhow, that's all I got. For now =).

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Lady Areola Fappington
#75 - 2013-04-20 17:54:26 UTC
rswfire wrote:

I don't recall a carebear convincing people to grief a guy so hard he almost killed himself.


I adore it when the 'bears bring up one guy's drunken misbehavior as some sort of.. representative of the EVE ganker community. Never you mind he paid for his action above and beyond the sanction CCP laid down.

As for your quoted comment, I'm going to quote a message one of our agents received, after blowing up a spaceship in the PVP oriented video game EVE Online. It will be censored as to adhere to forum rules.


Quote:
I kindly ask you to go **** yoursel, your mom and daddy. Also I would like you childerns (if you have ones) will die from brain cancer in agony before your eyes (if you don't have ones - die yorself please). Also you can eat your granny viscera or if they drop dead early you can digg their tombs and will eat bones.

With best wishes of scary diseases for you and your family."



That, from a peace loving carebear. If you try to play it off as "LOL it's obvs they wasn't serious"...well, remember Mittens. He wasn't serious either.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

rswfire
#76 - 2013-04-20 18:05:14 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
rswfire wrote:

I don't recall a carebear convincing people to grief a guy so hard he almost killed himself.


I adore it when the 'bears bring up one guy's drunken misbehavior as some sort of.. representative of the EVE ganker community. Never you mind he paid for his action above and beyond the sanction CCP laid down.

As for your quoted comment, I'm going to quote a message one of our agents received, after blowing up a spaceship in the PVP oriented video game EVE Online. It will be censored as to adhere to forum rules.


Quote:
I kindly ask you to go **** yoursel, your mom and daddy. Also I would like you childerns (if you have ones) will die from brain cancer in agony before your eyes (if you don't have ones - die yorself please). Also you can eat your granny viscera or if they drop dead early you can digg their tombs and will eat bones.

With best wishes of scary diseases for you and your family."



That, from a peace loving carebear. If you try to play it off as "LOL it's obvs they wasn't serious"...well, remember Mittens. He wasn't serious either.



You're full of assumptions, aren't you? First, you assume I'm a bear. Are you? Because if it's a word you use to describe "all the people of highsec" then I will consider the statement accurate; otherwise, it's not in my case. You assume my comment was "representative of the ganker community." That's not even remotely logical and if you had read my additional comments, I was pointing out that such behavior exists in all groups, and while I'm sure that includes yours, it's really about individuals, not groups. At any rate, the dude before you (Murk) had a nice summary in his last post; I liked it. He seems pretty cool.
Shao Huang
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#77 - 2013-04-20 18:08:50 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:
The New Order does not sell protection. Neither do we promise that the purchase of a mining permit fulfills the obligations of the miner required by the New Halaima Code of Conduct.

Following The Code makes the miner a better player (and a better person too). By tanking their ship, staying alert at the keyboard, keeping in mind that ganks are part of the fun of EvE and generally participating in emergent gameplay, the miner moves off the path of bot aspirancy and literally, changes the road they are on. A player who follows The Code soon finds that mining, especially afk mining, is not either a fun or profitable way to spend their gaming time. Dozens of New Order Agents and Knights are reformed miners who now reject their former world view and have moved from being a form of in-game livestock to being the predator and warriors they aspired to be the day they downloaded the client. Without The Code they were sucked into the perverse world of highsec mining. The New Order, through the generosity and the down right pity of James 315, freed them.

Those who have not yet been healed of their malformation seem to think the permit is the core of the New Order. This is untrue. James 315 himself clearly explains that the permit fee was a requirement put on the New Order by CCP itself who required that our actions generate an expectation of profit. Now, the New Order has been wildly profitable but not from the selling of permits. Selling the permits pushes aside any possibility of our ganking and bumping as being harrassment and turns it into legitimate, emergent, goodoldfashionedEve, hijinks. It serves a small purpose of acting as a wakeup call to the ISK fixated miner. It serves to show him that watching his ISK total tick up up up isn't winning Eve or, considering how slowly mining makes ISK, even desirable.

Now, the idea at the core of the OP has been suggested many times during the last several months. No one has made a serious attempt to initiate it. This is probably due to a combination of inertia and risk adverse nature of the opponents of the New Order. In other words, a combination of self interest and cowardice has prevented anyone from actually making a sacrifice of their time and ISK for the perceived greater good of the mining community. The New Order, not only attuned to self sacrifice but organized around a core of service to all of Eve, is unburdened by these constraints.

But lets say someone does attempt it. They would find that New Order permit holders, those who DO follow The Code, would be extremely difficult to gank. A good tank combined with good situational awareness would create a hard target. Since the Knights of the New Order go after poorly tanked, AFKing bot aspirants the success rate is much higher. In such a competition the occasional victory of the anti-New Order forces would pale vs the continued efforts of the NO to cull the mining herd of the weak and sick (ie, the bot aspirants). Lacking the conviction and organization of the New Order AND besides that being on the side of bot aspirancy and all other things bad and double bad, the countereffort would soon fade back to the background noise it came from.

Those who truly understand the New Halaima Code of Conduct know that fighting it fulfills it. This is not to say the the miner cannot "win". He just has to understand that the way to win is to follow The Code.

Be a winner, not a whiner. Follow The Code.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

Bing Bangboom
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Belligerent Undesirable


This is a beautiful post.

The unilateral assertion of an ideology does not constitute any truth value of the ideology itself.

I am fully aligned with conclusion of you post that "high sec is worth fighting for" and feel that my suggested strategy, malformed as it may be, is consistent with that in every way.

Private sig. Do not read.

Shao Huang
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#78 - 2013-04-20 18:30:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Shao Huang
Tetsuo Tsukaya wrote:
Murk Paradox wrote:
Tetsuo Tsukaya wrote:
Shao Huang wrote:


There is contained within the New Order credo an inherent Heresy. The theology is based on that all actions should contain risk, presumably commensurate with reward.


I stopped here. You may think using highly formal language is helping your argument but it's just making it unreadable.




Not for all of us.


Considering that a good portion of the post contains sentences that are grammatical train wrecks just so he can throw in more thesaurus results, I guess some of you guys are dazzled by bull ****.

Or should I say; "in so far as the missive contained therein on page one of this archive and subsequent clarifications are an attempt to spread a new paradigm on resisting the informal collective of belligerents that is the new order, the grammatical idiosyncrasies present through all iterations of the exposition leads to elevated instances of having no idea wtf the OP is even trying to say because it sounds like it was typed in German, run through google translate and then subjected to "find and replace" with a ******* thesaurus. It's terrible. OP needs to talk like a normal person or at least learn the correct context and usage for them there fancy words he seems to love so much.

"Take the universal case of what I was suggesting, which is also unlikely to happen" does not even make sense. OP is bad and should feel bad.


It is true that my use of language is often odd and sometimes simply bad. I don't feel bad. I do feel that at the level of form I attempted something that I did not quite pull off. The NO rhetoric is really quite wonderful to me. The post immediately above yours is an example. While a formal failure the strategy itself is not wholly a failure, it seems to me. Some of that is developed and revealed in the dialectical nature of certain parts of the thread.

I think of it a bit like this. Would you consider creating EFT fittings for s ship you know you will not fly for quite some time, if ever? I have done this already as a way of attempting to understand certain aspects of fitting and game mechanics. Having done this would it be of use to share that fitting with much more experienced players, in the knowledge that it while aspects of it might make sense, other aspects simply do not? The criticism would help reveal that.

This thread is in part analogous to that for me, as I attempt to indicate at the top. It is also other things for me. What it is for you or anyone else I can't say.

I don't use a thesaurus. I have typed much of it on a mobile device during times I am unable to actually log in to the game, which compromises for me some of the ability to do the simple editing my writing always requires. I have studied quite a few languages and linguistics. Admittedly this has done nothing to make me a better writer. And admittedly I am not a gifted writer. Apologies for that.

While your first example is a really good case of rhetorical and writting failure, your second is not. The practice of taking a particular and universalizing it is a pretty well established practice of working with 'thought problems'. It could more or less be considered the basis for Kants 'The Metaphysics of Morals'.

I am sorry my 'fit' attempt was painful for you and equally grateful for your candor in the matter.

Private sig. Do not read.

rswfire
#79 - 2013-04-20 18:34:12 UTC
I like your writing style. It's refreshing.
Audrik Villalona
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#80 - 2013-04-20 18:44:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Audrik Villalona
rswfire wrote:
Audrik Villalona wrote:
This is incorrect, and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of human psychology. In any conflict, the most risk-averse are not those who choose a side, but those who flee the conflict. In this case, those who flee the conflict either stopped mining, or run to other systems. Again, as a permit-holding miner, I categorically welcome your attempt to gank me, so that I can laugh at your failure (and your wrecks). The rebels are wonderful at talking about how they 'should' gank the permit-holding miners, but in actuality, the best gankers join the new order, and the miners with tanked barges buy permits. when the unskilled rebel gankers try to gank permit-holding miners, they invariably fail and log off in shame. When may I expect you?


I'm not a ganker, which shows a fundamental lack of reading comprehension on your part. And I just have to ask -- don't you ever get tired of talking like you're part of some religious movement, or have the lines of reality blurred so much for you that you have essentially been brainwashed into your imaginary cult?

Edit: Also, I think the better solution is to simply set up a corp and wardec all those permit-holding lemmings of yours and kill them without CONCORD intervention.



I never claimed you were a ganker, which shows a fundamental lack of reading comprehension on your part. The question "when may I expect you", was made to illustrate the typical uselessness of those who post about how vulnerable the New Order is to to competitive ganking squads--they have historically been keen to propose that 'other people' should compete with the New Order, but they typically aren't willing to do it themselves. This is exactly my point, and the flaw with every one of these proposals. You are just the latest in a long string of proposals for 'other people' to compete with the New Order; these proposals have never amounted to anything; nothing you have said is new or interesting. I fully understand that you are not a ganker; I thought that was quite clear from my post.

To answer your question of whether I ever get tired of speaking 'in character' while playing a role: Yes I do,but luckily I do other things in EVE than converse in that manner, and I do other things in my life than play EVE; so what you see as a drawback worthy of question is in reality just an obvious and irrelevant fact. I also get tired of playing sports, going to parties, and eating Italian food; just to give 3 more completely irrelevant and obvious things that I do that I wouldn't want to do 24/7. And no, I haven't had reality blurred for me so that eating Italian food functions as a brainwashing method to put me into the cult of eating Italian food. What a ridiculous question for you to ask.

"Also, I think the better solution is to simply set up a corp and wardec all those permit-holding lemmings of yours and kill them without CONCORD intervention."

when may I expect your wardec?