Intergalactic Summit

Hm. Interesting. Cultural isolationism, then, instead of segregation. While I still think that your belief is couched on a sort of cultural superiority, at the very least your views aren't imperial in nature. Credit where credit is due.

I'll have to give myself some time to think on this. Something still unsettles me, even though you've established yourself not necessarily as a Gallente nationalist, but an sort of unorthodox isolationist.

Get of the GalNet before I take the console from your room. You're not supposed to be active yet. Doctor's order.

You are wrong, Ms Lagann. Given his past expressed views it is PRECISELY the context he was intending to use it for. Cultural Imperialism is not a trait limited to Imperial cultures.

Hey, I'm qualified for this alright? I don't want him to have TOO much neural stimulation til his latest results come in. After that, I'll be comparing the ones we had over the past few days to measure his healing rate and see if all is well. I expect him to be released tonight after conferring with Scherezad. If not tonight, tomorrow for sure.

At least in my opinion. I always consider second opinions from people in the same field. It's just good practice.



Oh don't be a baby it's just to make sure your IV drip and meds don't need replenishing. You can post what you want, just don't over do it til we do a comparison on a few tests alright?

...ya big baby.

I think Pieter was trying to make that the point. The guy is probably a walking contradiction to Pieter. This was established WELL before this thread started...at least in Pieter's mind.

Cultural isolationism would indeed be an accurate description of my views, Captain.

It is also not completely unorthodox, where I come from. I like to say that we named our region Solitude for a reason. Senators from back home continue to try to prove me wrong on that, but then again, what can you expect from people who would seek Federal office?

And you, Captain, come across as little more than a common thug. Very simple, just as you say. Then again, I have come to expect little better from most UoC graduates.

Shall we consider this discourse concluded?

It never ceases to amaze me how many self haters our culture seems to produce. Calling Msr. Belfleur names because he disagrees with your particular brand of nonsense demonstrates in word if not deed your commitment to... tolerance.

Neat! Be there soon!

Something happens. The Federation is somehow involved. The whole Union get the blame for all the events, no matter what is done.

This is perfectly normal. There will never be an event involving this Union where people will universally express a positive reaction towards the Union. I guess that ultimately, the nature of this Federation and it's relationship with everyone else makes this impossible to achieve. Well, it's the usual, so I can live with that.

There is one thing, however, that bothers me greatly about this topic. Anslo. Do me a major service. Get over yourself.

Your conduct is, quite frankly, unacceptable. You speak and behave as if any viewpoint towards your own is illegal, anyone who voices them subject to a verbal and - as stated by yourself - actual beat-down.

This whole line of debate is saturated with it. Your tendencies towards this behavior is far older however. In this case, Pilot Emile Belfleur, makes perfectly viable arguments and presents them in a consistent and clear manner, and you go out of your way to threaten him with violence, call him a nationalist (I suppose this is a bad thing now) and a racist, pretty much pulling your justification for that insult out of thin air.

There are multiple viewpoints expressed in the news-feed that started this tread. None of them are "wrong" in any sense, they are after all viewpoints. But you Anslo, you my dear Hero Of Justice predictably attach yourself to the statements shared by the one's who rail on the Union for the handling of the Ray of Matar incident, and blast the other's as some sort of evil unto themselves. Very Black and white, very classy.

I would seriously appreciate it if you would become a more civilized debater and behave in a better way when you get involved in arguments like these. This is not as cut and simple as you seem to think, and you blunt-force approach will not work.

Once you do that, we can argue and discuss this as much as we wish and maybe some progress can be made.