These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

The Importance of Patience and Shutting Up

Author
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#1 - 2013-04-14 12:19:23 UTC
Karin Midular has been sent to Pator

This is why jumping to conclusions and flailing about in unbridled rage is extremely unwise when things haven't even settled down. Since the whole Caille massacre, I have emphasized the importance of waiting until they've even scraped the blood off the walls. But no, we demanded that the rest of the cluster functions to our timetable and our demands. I could go on, but I have a feeling even those who jumped at the chance to decry the Federation knew all they had to do was shut up, sit down, and wait.
Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#2 - 2013-04-14 13:51:00 UTC
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
Karin Midular has been sent to Pator

This is why jumping to conclusions and flailing about in unbridled rage is extremely unwise when things haven't even settled down. Since the whole Caille massacre, I have emphasized the importance of waiting until they've even scraped the blood off the walls. But no, we demanded that the rest of the cluster functions to our timetable and our demands. I could go on, but I have a feeling even those who jumped at the chance to decry the Federation knew all they had to do was shut up, sit down, and wait.


I can see you're a person to whom being "right" is important.

It happens so rarely, It is no wonder you savor it, I suppose.

Is it just maybe possible she is being relocated because of the outcry? Couldn't be...

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#3 - 2013-04-14 14:10:47 UTC
Seriphyn Inhonores advising people to shut up?

That's sort of like the Empress praising atheism.

Also, what Ava says.

Hadrian Tivianne
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2013-04-14 15:39:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Hadrian Tivianne
Ava Starfire wrote:


Is it just maybe possible she is being relocated because of the outcry? Couldn't be...


Very likely. And now it won't be the Federation's responsibility if she dies because of the move.

I suppose if it's acceptable to nag on someone for making a claim at being right, it's also acceptable to discuss how wonderful it is that the Republic was kind enough to thank the Federation for the transfer, for waiting to do it until she was stabilized, and for her care in general?


Oh. Double checking, that's not actually in the Republic's statement. Ah well.
Streya Jormagdnir
Alexylva Paradox
#5 - 2013-04-14 15:39:46 UTC
I have to agree with the shaman. Seriphyn, you might be seeing events out of order; the outcry could very well have been the reason she was transferred. As a Gallentean who believes in democratic ideals, I think you know about the importance of public opinion and how it can sway the minds and decisions of leaders.

I am also a human, straggling between the present world... and our future. I am a regulator, a coordinator, one who is meant to guide the way.

Destination Unreachable: the worst Wspace blog ever

Quinzel Nikulainen
Kokako Acquisitions
#6 - 2013-04-14 15:43:58 UTC
Gotta say, when I read 'The importance of Patience and Shutting Up' and that it had been posted by Mr. Inhonores, I was almost sure this was going to be a thread about self-discovery and a public apology.

Ex-Kaalakiota citizen. Ex-Hyasyoda citizen. CEO of KŌKAK, a Nugoeihuvi affiliate corporation.

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#7 - 2013-04-14 15:46:08 UTC
Hadrian Tivianne wrote:
Ava Starfire wrote:


Is it just maybe possible she is being relocated because of the outcry? Couldn't be...


Very likely. And now it won't be the Federation's responsibility if she dies because of the move.

I suppose if it's acceptable to nag on someone for making a claim at being right, it's also acceptable to discuss how wonderful it is that the Republic was kind enough to thank the Federation for the transfer, for waiting to do it until she was stabilized, and for her care in general?


Oh. Double checking, that's not actually in the Republic's statement. Ah well.


Thank you for allowing incompetent security to guard my chief, which resulted in her assassination attempt and the deaths of dozens of people.

Thank you for years of treating me and mine like we are children.

Thank you for your arrogant, pompous attitude towards every situation and absolute refusal to accept responsibility for anything.

Thank you for attempting to force your ways, from your views that tattoos are "barbaric" to attempting to force your government on us, under the guise of "assistance".

And thank you for continuing to fight a deadly, bloody war against the Caldari, which recently culminated in an event so horrid that it resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of people.

From the bottom of my heart,

THANKS.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2013-04-14 15:46:22 UTC
Quinzel Nikulainen wrote:
Gotta say, when I read 'The importance of Patience and Shutting Up' and that it had been posted by Mr. Inhonores, I was almost sure this was going to be a thread about self-discovery and a public apology.


Written by captain Inhonores? Really? No, it had to be something along the lines of "I win", as it was. Pretty out of place, as has been propperly argumented by captain Starfire.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Narcisa De Fontaine
Core Medical Group
#9 - 2013-04-14 15:48:32 UTC
Inhonores, don't you think there has been enough finger pointing and blame cast around for one weekend?

Out of all of the days for you to choose to crusade for the Federation's reputation, perhaps now is not a good time.
Hadrian Tivianne
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-04-14 15:56:21 UTC
Ava Starfire wrote:
Hadrian Tivianne wrote:
Ava Starfire wrote:


Is it just maybe possible she is being relocated because of the outcry? Couldn't be...


Very likely. And now it won't be the Federation's responsibility if she dies because of the move.

I suppose if it's acceptable to nag on someone for making a claim at being right, it's also acceptable to discuss how wonderful it is that the Republic was kind enough to thank the Federation for the transfer, for waiting to do it until she was stabilized, and for her care in general?


Oh. Double checking, that's not actually in the Republic's statement. Ah well.


Thank you for allowing incompetent security to guard my chief, which resulted in her assassination attempt and the deaths of dozens of people.

Thank you for years of treating me and mine like we are children.

Thank you for your arrogant, pompous attitude towards every situation and absolute refusal to accept responsibility for anything.

Thank you for attempting to force your ways, from your views that tattoos are "barbaric" to attempting to force your government on us, under the guise of "assistance".

And thank you for continuing to fight a deadly, bloody war against the Caldari, which recently culminated in an event so horrid that it resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of people.

From the bottom of my heart,

THANKS.

I think you meant "thank the Federation", but I'll accept your apology on that one personally, since you really have no idea what my own opinion on any of those matters is.

The only opinions that I have actually expressed on a personal level are that I think it is good that Midular is back with her people. However, I also find it curious that for days the theme is talking about how poor the Republic's diplomacy and idea of friendship must be and yet, if someone points out something similar for the Minmatar, they get a rage filled response such as this one above.

It's interesting, is all.
Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#11 - 2013-04-14 15:59:53 UTC
And I get a "I can do no wrong", holier-than-thou response like this.

So, we're both living up to the stereotype, then?

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Hadrian Tivianne
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-04-14 16:05:20 UTC
Ava Starfire wrote:
And I get a "I can do no wrong", holier-than-thou response like this.

So, we're both living up to the stereotype, then?

I suppose if that is how you choose to read in to it. I'm just not sure how you can assume that all of those points you listed are upheld by me personally without stereotyping.

I guess I didn't know that having an interest in the dynamics of a debate or argument made me a champion of all of the Federation's opinions. My apologies.
Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#13 - 2013-04-14 16:18:24 UTC
Hadrian Tivianne wrote:
Ava Starfire wrote:
And I get a "I can do no wrong", holier-than-thou response like this.

So, we're both living up to the stereotype, then?

I suppose if that is how you choose to read in to it. I'm just not sure how you can assume that all of those points you listed are upheld by me personally without stereotyping.

I guess I didn't know that having an interest in the dynamics of a debate or argument made me a champion of all of the Federation's opinions. My apologies.


Herein lies the problem.

To you it is a debate. An argument.

To us, it concerns the chief of our Tribe, the leader of our extended family, and, oh yeah, the lives of over 300 other people, too.

It isnt a debate. It isnt an argument. It isnt a game. It is a very real, very awful situation in which people are trying to say they're "right".

It is, in short, utter bullshit.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#14 - 2013-04-14 16:28:15 UTC
Hadrian Tivianne wrote:
Ava Starfire wrote:
And I get a "I can do no wrong", holier-than-thou response like this.

So, we're both living up to the stereotype, then?

I suppose if that is how you choose to read in to it. I'm just not sure how you can assume that all of those points you listed are upheld by me personally without stereotyping.

I guess I didn't know that having an interest in the dynamics of a debate or argument made me a champion of all of the Federation's opinions. My apologies.


I'm sorry for interrupting, sir, but it seems as if you are unaware of the way you expressed emotion in your original statement. I think I have found where Shaman Surionen's reply originates.

If I may, sir, it was in your use of sarcasm. You spoke sarcastically about a lack of gratitude from the Republic, thus demonstrating your opinions and engendering the good Shamans' response. Your following claim that you did not express an opinion... I'm not entirely sure where that comes from. I'm sorry, sir, my social skills are actually rather poor. But I think this is an adequate summary of the initial exchange.

Thank you for admitting my interruption.
Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#15 - 2013-04-14 17:20:27 UTC
All I have to say is that I will turn my thoughts toward hope for her recovery, and that as she heals so will the wound that our people have suffered in unity.

We must all remember that the monster that did this stuck first at our bond to each other. If we honor the fallen, we should honor the strength of that bond. We should ensure that it overcomes any hate or evil that strikes to weaken it.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#16 - 2013-04-14 17:33:39 UTC
Good to hear she is back in the Republic, one problem solved. Now what about the gunman, who is he and what about his motives, no "terrorist organization" claimed responsibility for the attacks yet.

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Hadrian Tivianne
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2013-04-14 17:39:25 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Hadrian Tivianne wrote:
Ava Starfire wrote:
And I get a "I can do no wrong", holier-than-thou response like this.

So, we're both living up to the stereotype, then?

I suppose if that is how you choose to read in to it. I'm just not sure how you can assume that all of those points you listed are upheld by me personally without stereotyping.

I guess I didn't know that having an interest in the dynamics of a debate or argument made me a champion of all of the Federation's opinions. My apologies.


I'm sorry for interrupting, sir, but it seems as if you are unaware of the way you expressed emotion in your original statement. I think I have found where Shaman Surionen's reply originates.

If I may, sir, it was in your use of sarcasm. You spoke sarcastically about a lack of gratitude from the Republic, thus demonstrating your opinions and engendering the good Shamans' response. Your following claim that you did not express an opinion... I'm not entirely sure where that comes from. I'm sorry, sir, my social skills are actually rather poor. But I think this is an adequate summary of the initial exchange.

Thank you for admitting my interruption.

Without sounding completely insensitive - as you've mentioned your social skills may be poor and their is nothing wrong with that - I'll simply say that sarcasm does not equal an opinion. So, making a sarcastic, flippant remark isn't a demonstration of opinion. It may be rude, callous, or un-necessary, but it is not automatically a demonstration of opinion unless someone is simply assuming.

I'd also like to note the concept of playing Devil's Advocate.

All in all, as I said, I simply find the inner workings of debate, argument, and emotion in such things interesting. Hence the initial comment. I simply find it curious that over the last few days the Federation has, for the most part, been bashed endlessly for it's latest choices. And yet when someone mentions a particular choice that the Republic made that could be perceived negatively, that person is raged it.
Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#18 - 2013-04-14 17:54:43 UTC
You ignorant Federals (oh, and I get to call you that since, technically, I still hold Federal citizenship) are making it harder and harder for people to take anything you say seriously. Please drop the condescending, arrogant and patronizing attitudes. I was taught by my Gallentean parents that in order to get respect one must give respect. I wish you would at least make a token attempt to live up to the high ideals enshrined in the Federal constitution. Instead all we get is finger pointing, disrespect, intolerance and bigotry.

Damned if I'm not starting to doubt my upbringing and believe the Caldari accusations of cultural imperialism. At least the Amarr are honest about what they want.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Hadrian Tivianne
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-04-14 18:59:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Hadrian Tivianne
Anabella Rella wrote:
You ignorant Federals (oh, and I get to call you that since, technically, I still hold Federal citizenship) are making it harder and harder for people to take anything you say seriously. Please drop the condescending, arrogant and patronizing attitudes. I was taught by my Gallentean parents that in order to get respect one must give respect. I wish you would at least make a token attempt to live up to the high ideals enshrined in the Federal constitution. Instead all we get is finger pointing, disrespect, intolerance and bigotry.

Damned if I'm not starting to doubt my upbringing and believe the Caldari accusations of cultural imperialism. At least the Amarr are honest about what they want.

Your ad hom isn't getting you anywhere.

You're doing exactly what you claim others are doing, you do realize. Is it really that hard to accept the idea that just because someone has a different opinion than you that they're not being ignorant? You're reading way too much into peoples' observations. Why is it condescending, arrogant, or patronizing to ask a simple question? Because the person is a member of the Federation? That doesn't make much sense, considering you're raging that people are being bigots.

Why are you reading in to it so much? It is a very simple, open question.

Why is it acceptable that the Federation get insulted or questioned on it's every choice over the last few days and yet, when the Republic makes a choice that could be construed as negative and someone points it out, that person is immediately jumped on as being negative or condescending?

This is an observation and a pretty reasonable topic for debate.

I will add though that I don't entirely agree with how this thread was started or the way things were worded in the first post.
Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#20 - 2013-04-14 19:20:49 UTC
This is seriously little more than a debate to you, isnt it? Were you captain of the logic club in university or something?

Ad hom?

Wow. You really do not get it, do you?

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

123Next page