These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

(Moderators, Please Lock Thread) To those miners and missioners who wish to be left alone.

First post
Author
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#141 - 2011-10-31 23:45:55 UTC
At some point the banking will lead to prices of materials rising. Then the price will rise so high that it becomes worth risking a Hulk or Mackinaw to harvest ice. This will not encourage hisec mining, since harvesting ice in null sec is far safer: your alliance is already controlling who is in that system, and you have the option of shooting first.

So for the moment, the price of oxytopes will rise, the ROI of harvesting ice in Gallente space will drop, and three gankers will continue to be enough to lock down a hisec system.

Would the ice interdiction be stopped if the costs of sustained ganking rose by an order of magnitude? Would opportunistic suicide ganking of freighters be stopped if the costs of sustained ganking rose by an order of magnitude?

Consider the cost of interdicting all mining activities in a null sec system: one AFK capsuleer flying a cloaky ship of any variety (though ideally a covert ops or recon with a covert cyno). The hisec interdiction is effectively the same thing, though hisec denizens do not have the same tools available to defend against the interdiction: the only options are to declare war against the parties involved (which won't work since they'll just hop corps or flood the system with a thousand corp mates), or move out. Ganking the interdiction fleet will not help since they effectively have unlimited funds, there is no way of preventing them keeping a medical clone in the same system, and there is no way of preventing them from importing all the resources they need to continue the process.

What it then boils down to is time. The interdiction is a numbers game, currently biased quite heavily in favour of the interdictors. To maintain an interdiction of a system should require more than three pilots. Working on the time factor should help in some ways: perhaps GCCs in hisec could be extended where a pilot incurs more than one GCC in a 24 hour period? Say, a doubling for every offence within 24 hours of a previous one, with the timer halving for every 24 hour period since the last offence, with a floor at 15 minutes? This could quickly lead to the situation of the interdiction requiring the involvement of more pilots, costing more player time. The quick remedies would be to move more alts from the same account into the system: this would maintain a stable state at 12 hours of GCC for each character, assuming each character was used to gank as soon as possible after the last attempt.

Having suicide ganks incur a faction standing hit might have some benefit: say a faction standing hit of 10% for each unlawful aggression in a faction's space. Thus a sustained ganking programme will end up with faction navies attacking the ganker. This will not impact too severely on opportunistic suicide gankers, they will have ample opportunity to restore their faction standings through storyline missions.

I don't believe that "buffing" CONCORD will have any impact, since gankers will simply adjust to kill the target before CONCORD arrives. Buffing faction navies might help to some degree, especially if suicide ganks incur a faction standing hit.

In the meantime, the system is as it is. It's up to the players to adapt to the game being played by other players. Goonswarm is creating content & drama, which is a good thing. I think they have it too easy though.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#142 - 2011-10-31 23:50:04 UTC
The Apostle wrote:

Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves.




Yes they do.

The vast bulk of miners will never be suicide ganked.
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#143 - 2011-10-31 23:53:27 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
The Apostle wrote:

Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves.




Yes they do.

The vast bulk of miners will never be suicide ganked.


Most people are ganked in Hisec at least once; I base this off of eye-witness "Testimony" and seeing it first hand many times; Especially in Hek.

The pie is a tautology

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#144 - 2011-10-31 23:55:43 UTC
Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp. You could then site in hidden belts mining ABC ore making 10x what you do in highsec. Most corporations will buy your ore close to Jita price and even if it is lower its still more then you make in highsec. Added to the fact that you are surrounded by intel channels and have a clear idea of who is hostile or not. Lastly as a miner you generally aren't really expected to do much other then maybe a mining Op 1-2 times a week.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Hauling Hal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#145 - 2011-10-31 23:56:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Hauling Hal
As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further. Ironically, this means that the gankers are parasites, living off the efforts of their hosts. A perfectly acceptable game mechanic, but please don't cry when CCP try not to let you kill their game by driving the majority of the players away.

The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game:

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming
Aida Nu
Perkone
Caldari State
#146 - 2011-11-01 00:03:31 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Aida Nu wrote:
The Apostle wrote:


risk vs reward poor miners blah blah etc stuff



Poor miners? How are they poor? Cut the crap man seriously.
And 3m/h might apply for starter characters that are a couple week old. Miners sit on their fat asses doing nothing and earn isk while watching a movie, reading a book or whatever they do. And just by paying just a tiny bit of attention they dont risk anything.
Rewards in highsec are already to high vs risk. Highsec should be nerfed not buffed.

But as many have said, yes doing minor changes to, for example insurance (cutting it in half if you are killed by Concord), is something that most players can accept.
Making miners immune to game mechanics is not something people will accept.
Deal with it, accept it, adapt or move on to another game. Period.

Then the only thing we can agree on is that we disagree. If you seriously believe that ganking is so easily avoided then anything I have to say is void. The statistics speak for themselves.


PS: I must admit I chuckle at "he" shouldn't be allowed to do what he wants when one of the potential solutions is about preventing "you" from doing what "you" want. I don;t know if you have the intelligence to see the irony.


What statistics man? You keep claiming things without backing them up with proof.
Like the claim that EVE will die if CCP doesnt turn it into carebear land.

And yes I believe that if you dont afk while mining your chances of avoiding being ganked increase alot.
The problem here is not that you can gank miners in highsec. The problem is that miners do not take steps to protect themselves as other professions do. They believe that they should be able to do their thing in peace even if all of EVE was burning down around them.
That is not how it works. Miners should not make the game adapt to them, they must adapt to the game.

And I find it funny when you claim that miners cannot play the game at its current state when all the highsec fields are crawling with mining ships.
More proof that you are making things up to manipulate people into believing that the game should change to fit your needs.

Also I am now convinced that your flawed viewpoint has run out of arguments. I cannot think of another reason why you would try to insult my intelligence.


Vricrolatious
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#147 - 2011-11-01 00:03:58 UTC
Henry Haphorn wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Vricrolatious wrote:
Honestly, the best advise I could give to someone that wants to mine and be safe... join a decent nullsec alliance and move out of empire. I've mined (I'm not afraid to admit it) in High, Low and Nullsec and mining in Nullsec was probably the safest I've been when it came to mining. The best belts need to be scanned down, which means the reds and neutrals need probes to find you and that gives you extra time to warp to a POS and safe up before they find you and make veldspar dust out of you.

As perverse as it is for me to agree with a Goon this is perfectly true and may well prove to a consequence of continued highssec ganking. Better the known enemy.

But it may cause issues for Eve as a whole because to mine for Alliance X and sell to Alliance Y could well be seen as treason.

There may be alliance embargoes about selling rocks on the open market, in addition to alliances themselves putting the squeeze on miners profits through ridiculous refining percentages.

This will become a very serious inflation issue if the rumour about Drone mineral drops are also true.


Thus, another reason why I left Majesta Empire.


Yeah, it does matter what alliance (or even the corp in the alliance) policies are, but if you know what you want, it shouldn't be an issue finding a home that fits your needs / wants. I can't speak for Goon Indy Policies or even my own corp's (not sure we have any at the moment, lol) since I haven't mined since WIDot became WICorp and joined Goons, but... WIDot had a few programs for buying minerals and in some cases the corps had programs as well (my former home, SSRG, did) and the prices for buying minerals were close to Jita prices, so it was a good deal. From what I've seen though, as long as you're not selling Super Caps outside Alliance and friends, we don't much care what you do with that ore once you've mined it. I could, of course, be wrong, but I've seen nothing that states otherwise during my time with Goons and WICorp.

WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric

Henry Haphorn
Killer Yankee
#148 - 2011-11-01 00:04:56 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp. You could then site in hidden belts mining ABC ore making 10x what you do in highsec. Most corporations will buy your ore close to Jita price and even if it is lower its still more then you make in highsec. Added to the fact that you are surrounded by intel channels and have a clear idea of who is hostile or not. Lastly as a miner you generally aren't really expected to do much other then maybe a mining Op 1-2 times a week.


Not exactly. You are ignoring the fact that renter alliances and null sec alliances tend to treat miners like crap. Miners are generally regarded as extra firepower that can be used as cannon fodder when needed. CTAs are common, some mining ops tend to force miners to mine for free, the list goes on. It is true one can make profit in null sec, but the action is minimal in terms of how often you get attacked unless you mine near a contested system.

Adapt or Die

Aida Nu
Perkone
Caldari State
#149 - 2011-11-01 00:06:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Aida Nu
Hauling Hal wrote:
As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further. Ironically, this means that the gankers are parasites, living off the efforts of their hosts. A perfectly acceptable game mechanic, but please don't cry when CCP try not to let you kill their game by driving the majority of the players away.

The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game:

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming


Feel free to back up your claim that the majority of EVE´s players are highsec hugging carebears that only do missions and mining and nothing else.
If you do not have the numbers stfu.
Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#150 - 2011-11-01 00:15:17 UTC
Aida Nu wrote:
Hauling Hal wrote:
As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further. Ironically, this means that the gankers are parasites, living off the efforts of their hosts. A perfectly acceptable game mechanic, but please don't cry when CCP try not to let you kill their game by driving the majority of the players away.

The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game:

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming


Feel free to back up your claim that the majority of EVE´s players are highsec hugging carebears that only do missions and mining and nothing else.
If you do not have the numbers stfu.

Even if he's right and the high sec carebears outnumber everybody else it doesn't mean that CCP should drastically change their game to make them more secure. That would have a much worse effect on the game than anything we (Goons) do.
Paragon Renegade
Sebiestor Tribe
#151 - 2011-11-01 00:19:54 UTC
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:
That would have a much worse effect on the game than anything we (Goons) do.


Written in the books.

The pie is a tautology

Vricrolatious
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#152 - 2011-11-01 00:22:10 UTC
Henry Haphorn wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp. You could then site in hidden belts mining ABC ore making 10x what you do in highsec. Most corporations will buy your ore close to Jita price and even if it is lower its still more then you make in highsec. Added to the fact that you are surrounded by intel channels and have a clear idea of who is hostile or not. Lastly as a miner you generally aren't really expected to do much other then maybe a mining Op 1-2 times a week.


Not exactly. You are ignoring the fact that renter alliances and null sec alliances tend to treat miners like crap. Miners are generally regarded as extra firepower that can be used as cannon fodder when needed. CTAs are common, some mining ops tend to force miners to mine for free, the list goes on. It is true one can make profit in null sec, but the action is minimal in terms of how often you get attacked unless you mine near a contested system.


Whoa... hang on, this is not true or at least not entirely true and really varries from alliance and corp to alliance and corp. Going back to what I said a couple posts up, WIDot had a very active indy group and they were (and still are) some decent PvP pilots too. We accepted miners (or indy pilots in general,) but made sure they were willing to learn (if they didn't know already) how to fly fleet doctrine ships and if we're accepting indy pilots into WICorp, it's going to be the same way. If it's an actual CTA, yes, every ship counts and we want everyone to be able to defend their home. If you're unwilling to defend your home, then you don't belong out there. Doesn't mean you need to be able to fit a Maelstrom, but at least be willing to get in a Rifter and scout / tackle.

On topic, I'd actually love to see ganking force miners to consider moving to nullsec alliances as it might actually allow us to be more self dependent and allow more things to built in null without having to import things like Veldspar ;-)

WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#153 - 2011-11-01 00:22:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Brooks Puuntai
Henry Haphorn wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp. You could then site in hidden belts mining ABC ore making 10x what you do in highsec. Most corporations will buy your ore close to Jita price and even if it is lower its still more then you make in highsec. Added to the fact that you are surrounded by intel channels and have a clear idea of who is hostile or not. Lastly as a miner you generally aren't really expected to do much other then maybe a mining Op 1-2 times a week.


Not exactly. You are ignoring the fact that renter alliances and null sec alliances tend to treat miners like crap. Miners are generally regarded as extra firepower that can be used as cannon fodder when needed. CTAs are common, some mining ops tend to force miners to mine for free, the list goes on. It is true one can make profit in null sec, but the action is minimal in terms of how often you get attacked unless you mine near a contested system.


Reason some alliances treat miners like crap is because a lot of miners expect to be treated like gods. Your post even hints on it. Mining ops for example if done 1-2 times a week aren't a big deal even if they are free. The corp/alliance generally has bills, upkeep costs, and needs financial backing to protect the space you mine in. For combat pilots you generally end up losing some isk even with corp/alliance reimbursements and are put under heavier CTAs and loss potential. Where as miners are generally not used for CTAs unless its a serious thing, which if you wanted to continue your mining operation you would want to help out. Also miners generally have a low operational cost if you know what you are doing and don't die a lot.

That was one of the biggest issues I had when running a nullsec corp and helping with alliance crap. It was always the miners bitching. Refine Tax was too high(5%), Corp buyback was to low, Weekly mining ops should be split more, so and so is mining all the highends right after downtime, etc. PVP pilots where easy. Give them time to chill and rat and make sure they got their reimbursements in a timely matter and they didn't say ****.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Cambarus
The Baros Syndicate
#154 - 2011-11-01 00:22:35 UTC
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:
Aida Nu wrote:
Hauling Hal wrote:
As I said in another thread, the miners and mission runners that you despise so much make up the majority of the players, so your 'HTFU or GTFO' comment is a little naive, as you'd soon get very bored with noone to shoot and a game that is no longer financially viable to develop any further. Ironically, this means that the gankers are parasites, living off the efforts of their hosts. A perfectly acceptable game mechanic, but please don't cry when CCP try not to let you kill their game by driving the majority of the players away.

The 'hard core' players don't get the 'game' concept as much as the PvE players don't get the 'gank' concept. The hard core players are either trying to win at a MMO (well, DUH!) or trying to make RL money out of it, whilst everyone else is just playing a game:

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/online_gaming


Feel free to back up your claim that the majority of EVE´s players are highsec hugging carebears that only do missions and mining and nothing else.
If you do not have the numbers stfu.

Even if he's right and the high sec carebears outnumber everybody else it doesn't mean that CCP should drastically change their game to make them more secure. That would have a much worse effect on the game than anything we (Goons) do.

Hell, even if he managed to get the numbers to show that this is true, how many of those carebears do you think are just alts raising isk for someone's pvp habit? I know I only pvp with 3 of my toons, and I've had dozens over the years that I've used for various forms of PVE.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#155 - 2011-11-01 00:22:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Anyone who seriously mines in highsec deserves to be ganked. As a miner you could easily get accepted into any renter alliance or nullsec alliance that has a Indy Corp.


Well, that's all well and good until they (a) get ganked on the first null sec gate they jump through because the invite to null sec was just a scam oriented towards padding out kill boards, or (b) are ejected from the alliance due to not participating in CTAs, never sending defence fleets, and not having appropriate numbers of kills per month. Being part of a renter alliance simply means that you're a target who your landlord is not shooting yet.

Of course, if you are recruiting, go ahead and post a link to your recruitment post in the EVE Online recruitment forums or your alliance's own external site. If you're not recruiting, I would suggest that you are commenting based on hearsay and are not actually aware of who is doing the mining or where the minerals are actually coming from.

In the meantime, the safest assumption for an industrialist to make is that any invitation by a null sec alliance to come out to null sec and "do industry" is a scam, and will inevitably involve people who are blue to you shooting you for giggles (especially if they're talking billion-ISK-a-month rentals to be paid in advance). The greatest obstacle to "doing industry" in null sec is the people who live in null sec. There are people who do industrial stuff in null sec. Many of them burn out after a few months due to "little red hen syndrome", but they were people who were part of the alliance and started manufacturing or mining while they were out there. Eventually they log in one night and realise that they've been busy running jump freighters from Jita, managing assembly lines and stocking markets for three months and haven't actually had any fun. It usually comes to a head when someone makes demands along the lines of, "why do these frelling scourge missiles cost so much? I insist that items sold in null sec cost at most 10 percent higher than Jita!"

Anyone who seriously does any kind of industry in null sec has rocks in their head, or has serious dependency issues.
Aida Nu
Perkone
Caldari State
#156 - 2011-11-01 00:27:22 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
a lot of miners expect to be treated like gods



Here is the problem ladies and gentlemen.
/thread
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#157 - 2011-11-01 00:45:44 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:


Well, that's all well and good until they (a) get ganked on the first null sec gate they jump through because the invite to null sec was just a scam oriented towards padding out kill boards, or (b) are ejected from the alliance due to not participating in CTAs, never sending defence fleets, and not having appropriate numbers of kills per month. Being part of a renter alliance simply means that you're a target who your landlord is not shooting yet.

Of course, if you are recruiting, go ahead and post a link to your recruitment post in the EVE Online recruitment forums or your alliance's own external site. If you're not recruiting, I would suggest that you are commenting based on hearsay and are not actually aware of who is doing the mining or where the minerals are actually coming from.


Funny how you are turning this anti-Goons, by implying that corp recruitment scamming is common, and its your first point. You can generally take 5-10min to realize if a corporation offer is legit or scam. The same way that most corporations will take the extra couple minutes to check your background you should do the same. If you are ejected due to lack of participation then you probably didn't do **** within that group. Which would make sense. This is a MMO after all if you want to play single player spaceships go get X3 or Freelancer. Add to the fact that corporations are generally made to work together, not I want everything handed to me, but I don't want to actually do anything in return.


CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

bilingi
Grandeur Illusions
#158 - 2011-11-01 00:49:14 UTC
So since yall dont mine your gods??? HAHAHHAHAA... got to love posters now days.. want to be MS 13 canidates on the internet Roll

Im terrified and anyone claiming high sec numbers arent greater than everyone else is an idiot since if you look at dev blogs CCP even admits it.as for alliances in 0.0 taking miners and industrials?? HAHAHAHAHA and have some one compete with thier BOTS i dont think so,Roll

Isacc Lemmont
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#159 - 2011-11-01 00:54:16 UTC
I'll go PVP

as soon as they fix the ******** mechanics for it.

and yes I have tried to PVP before, I got bored one day of mining and missioning on some of my accounts, and seeing as I had an ample amount of SP (15mil) on my combat account, I decided to give it a go, so I fitted what I could afford (and lose) easily and headed for the first low-sec pool.

I went through about 6 different systems before I found somebody, but when I did, it was a lone stabber, I thought i could take it relatively easily, and for the greater portion of the time I was winning while trading blows like knights.

and then.

I saw a cyno appear on scanner

the bastard had a friend come reinforce him and pop a cyno so that he could jump in not 1, not 2, not even 3, but 5 Super Capitals, what was a winning endeavor turned into pure dread as many things ran through my mind on as to WHY would you field 5 super capitals in a tiny 1vs1 clash.

Needless to say I was popped by about a billion drones, missiles and various other stupid things. podded shortly after I tried to run.

Made it my word that until this stupid mechanic is fixed, I'm not gonna step in that cesspool you call Null-Sec, cause I'm gonna assume that instead of super capitals its Titans.(and politics, i hate politics)

The upcoming Super-cap Nerf, MIGHT incline me to go, but thats huge might.

(and yes, I have been tried to be ganked before in high-sec, but my Hulk is fitted with a 'go away' tank, needless to say my system is very low visit rating, almost nobody ever comes into it, so I can usually mine in peace)

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#160 - 2011-11-01 01:09:17 UTC
bilingi wrote:
So since yall dont mine your gods??? HAHAHHAHAA... got to love posters now days.. want to be MS 13 canidates on the internet Roll

Im terrified and anyone claiming high sec numbers arent greater than everyone else is an idiot since if you look at dev blogs CCP even admits it.as for alliances in 0.0 taking miners and industrials?? HAHAHAHAHA and have some one compete with thier BOTS i dont think so,Roll



Drugs are bad mmkay.


CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden