These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Moving All Level 4 Agents to Low-Sec

First post
Author
Mei Sui
Hades Covenant
#1 - 2013-04-12 01:10:41 UTC
Ready the flamethrowers, but I think it's time to consider moving the level 4 agents to low sec.

One of the key tenants of the EVE universe has been the risk to reward scale going from hi-sec to low-sec to null-sec. The farther you go, the greater the rewards. When it comes to mining for example, the base ores are in high sec with the most valuable in null sec. Added to that the population density in high sec and all of the belts are picked clean with the need to either move farther out into the frontier or into low sec. This shows a good example of the risk to reward escalation.

Missions on the other hand are different. While there are better paying missions in the lowsec/null sec areas, they are a small increase versus the change in risk that is associated. Level 4 missions in high sec give a substantial, multi-million ISK reward for practically no risk at all. And a character can easily get to level 4 agents in a few weeks with good Social skills.

While I do agree that new pilots need a foothold when they join EVE, this mechanic should scale with the rewards offered and I believe that by moving the level 4 agents into low sec, the risk can match the reward more effectively. (While keeping Level 1-3 agents in high sec)

There is another reason for this and that is to fight the large influx of ISK entering the EVE economy from missions. During last years Fanfest in 2012, it was pointed out that 26 Trillion ISK enters the EVE economy via missions. I believe this will go a long way in curbing inflation as pilots must now truly asses the risk of entering low sec with the greater rewards that level 4 and 5 agents offer.

Anyways, that's my idea. Flame away! P
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#2 - 2013-04-12 01:24:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Micheal Dietrich
A simple search would have provided you with years of threads all saying the same thing and they would of provided you with the exact same answer in each one.

My pets will provide the appropriate example.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#3 - 2013-04-12 01:29:48 UTC
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
A simple search would have provided you with years of threads all saying the same thing and they would of provided you with the exact same answer in each one.


This one is different, I sense a great darkness inside it.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#4 - 2013-04-12 01:30:09 UTC
I always like to post in these threads: Yah... ofc all level 4 missions should be in lowsec.

Not a new idea. It is a good idea though, but the entitlement party of highsec would cry too much.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Mei Sui
Hades Covenant
#5 - 2013-04-12 01:32:57 UTC
I did run a search just now and it does show up in several threads. But usually as responses to other ideas or to address another topic. i.e inflation.

But, a good idea is worth repeating I think, even if it is in other threads.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#6 - 2013-04-12 01:33:02 UTC
Signed for great justice.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Alternate Poster
Zerious Fricken Biziness
#7 - 2013-04-12 01:40:56 UTC
All missions, stations, belts, moons and sigs should be in Jove space.
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#8 - 2013-04-12 02:02:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Il Feytid
You are a fool to think anyone farming level 4 missions would all of the sudden decide to go to low sec to keep farming them. The only thing they would do is start farming level 3 missions.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#9 - 2013-04-12 02:07:04 UTC
Posting in another "we killed everything that moved in lowsec for no reason and now there's no more targets" thread.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
#10 - 2013-04-12 02:09:46 UTC
I'll refine the suggestion. (because frankly, that will never happen)

Increase the income spread between high sec and low sec agents, so that high sec provides considerably less income and low-sec slightly more than now. That way, Massive amounts of content won't be stripped from high sec, while the high-sec/low-sec income spread is increased to where many people feel it should be.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#11 - 2013-04-12 02:21:04 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
You are a fool to think anyone farming level 4 missions would all of the sudden decide to go to low sec to keep farming them. The only thing they would do is start farming level 3 missions.

This is what makes the idea so awesome.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Fairren
HellrisCorp
#12 - 2013-04-12 02:40:13 UTC
Mei Sui wrote:
Ready the flamethrowers, but I think it's time to consider moving the level 4 agents to low sec.

One of the key tenants of the EVE universe has been the risk to reward scale going from hi-sec to low-sec to null-sec. The farther you go, the greater the rewards. When it comes to mining for example, the base ores are in high sec with the most valuable in null sec. Added to that the population density in high sec and all of the belts are picked clean with the need to either move farther out into the frontier or into low sec. This shows a good example of the risk to reward escalation.

Missions on the other hand are different. While there are better paying missions in the lowsec/null sec areas, they are a small increase versus the change in risk that is associated. Level 4 missions in high sec give a substantial, multi-million ISK reward for practically no risk at all. And a character can easily get to level 4 agents in a few weeks with good Social skills.

While I do agree that new pilots need a foothold when they join EVE, this mechanic should scale with the rewards offered and I believe that by moving the level 4 agents into low sec, the risk can match the reward more effectively. (While keeping Level 1-3 agents in high sec)

There is another reason for this and that is to fight the large influx of ISK entering the EVE economy from missions. During last years Fanfest in 2012, it was pointed out that 26 Trillion ISK enters the EVE economy via missions. I believe this will go a long way in curbing inflation as pilots must now truly asses the risk of entering low sec with the greater rewards that level 4 and 5 agents offer.

Anyways, that's my idea. Flame away! P

I don't think you understand mission runner income well.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#13 - 2013-04-12 02:52:41 UTC
I always wondered what all those pirate battleships were doing deep in high-sec. This would make more sense lore wise:

Level 1 : 1.0 and lower
Level 2 : 0.8 and lower
Level 3 : 0.6 and lower
Level 4 : 0.5 and lower
Level 5 : 0.4 and lower

Payout modifications are no longer by security status but simplified to high-sec, low-sec and null-sec.

Nerf enough?
DRGaius Baltar
Perkone
Caldari State
#14 - 2013-04-12 02:58:46 UTC
Mei Sui wrote:
Ready the flamethrowers, but I think it's time to consider moving the level 4 agents to low sec.

One of the key tenants of the EVE universe has been the risk to reward scale going from hi-sec to low-sec to null-sec. The farther you go, the greater the rewards. When it comes to mining for example, the base ores are in high sec with the most valuable in null sec. Added to that the population density in high sec and all of the belts are picked clean with the need to either move farther out into the frontier or into low sec. This shows a good example of the risk to reward escalation.

Missions on the other hand are different. While there are better paying missions in the lowsec/null sec areas, they are a small increase versus the change in risk that is associated. Level 4 missions in high sec give a substantial, multi-million ISK reward for practically no risk at all. And a character can easily get to level 4 agents in a few weeks with good Social skills.

While I do agree that new pilots need a foothold when they join EVE, this mechanic should scale with the rewards offered and I believe that by moving the level 4 agents into low sec, the risk can match the reward more effectively. (While keeping Level 1-3 agents in high sec)

There is another reason for this and that is to fight the large influx of ISK entering the EVE economy from missions. During last years Fanfest in 2012, it was pointed out that 26 Trillion ISK enters the EVE economy via missions. I believe this will go a long way in curbing inflation as pilots must now truly asses the risk of entering low sec with the greater rewards that level 4 and 5 agents offer.

Anyways, that's my idea. Flame away! P



Oh its you again
stoicfaux
#15 - 2013-04-12 03:13:28 UTC
Don't use a bigger stick, instead give everyone else a bigger carrot. The easier, sub-saving way is to make everything else (i.e. Incursions, FW, null-sec, industry, trading) more profitable than level 4s. Let (human) nature run its course.





Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Grayson Cole
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-04-12 03:17:08 UTC
What an original idea! Great thread, would read again.

Also, no.

.

Rexxorr
Perkone
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-04-12 03:39:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Rexxorr
Nothing much would change, a few might unsub but most would just farm lvl 3 missions. Then in a few months we would have whine threads about how lvl 3 missions are to much isk for too little risk.

This has happened before with lvl 5 missions being removed from high sec completely, The result is almost no one runs lvl 5 missions anymore.

This is mostly just thinly disguised whine about not having enough baby seals to club, Really move missions ? If isk is truly a problem, just reduce npc bounties...
Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis
The Lost Drone Society
#18 - 2013-04-12 03:40:35 UTC
But think about the mission gankers. Without level 4's in Hi-Sec, who's going to fly those faction fit Golems out of Osmon for them to gank? Pirate

I"m not really the Evil One, I'm just his answering service.

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-04-12 03:43:25 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
You are a fool to think anyone farming level 4 missions would all of the sudden decide to go to low sec to keep farming them. The only thing they would do is start farming level 3 missions.

This is what makes the idea so awesome.

translation: i don't need anything myself if it makes you lose something too Cool

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#20 - 2013-04-12 03:54:26 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
You are a fool to think anyone farming level 4 missions would all of the sudden decide to go to low sec to keep farming them. The only thing they would do is start farming level 3 missions.

This is what makes the idea so awesome.

translation: i don't need anything myself if it makes you lose something too Cool

It's pretty sad that you can make more money in nearly perfect safety running L4s as opposed to doing anoms in, say, low-sec. L4s are completely out of whack; L3s are plenty for high-sec.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

123Next pageLast page