Missions & Complexes

Might be a little abstract, It's American politics When Democrats are in office all Republicans are liars and thief's, When Republicans are in office all Democrats are liars and thief's.

edit: The funny part is they are probably both right,

Sorry for bringing the in house drama here. I will restrain from further off topic discussions.

[2013.04.07 18:32:50]Jack Earthfire > there is a "NO CONTEST" -policy we are trying to set up... several contests the week are part of it, and this is something we simply need to accept... but we dont accept that we are chased down till disband
[ 2013.04.07 18:32:54 ] Jack Earthfire > so at the point we see more cruel intentions than sportsmanship were going to close it
[ 2013.04.07 18:32:56 ] Redd Deadd > Jack. No other community that I am aware of wants a No Contest policy. is this true? is DIN the only one who wants No Contest? and don't other people get a vote or a say?
[ 2013.04.07 18:33:02 ] Janoah Regyri > so if isn were to contest, do you kill mom and let tvp standing there? is this how it works?
[ 2013.04.07 18:33:15 ] Jack Earthfire > that is correct


There is your answer....

Look at all these sad highsec carebears.

*grabs popcorn*

Anyone else surprised? 7'62 made another post \o/ with absolutely nothing of value to add to the thread itself.

Someone really should keep score we could make it into a mini game.

ISN voice comms, "doctored" only slightly:

FC: "Yeah so this is one of the hardest few minutes of any incursion site, so I need you guys to stay on top of your broadcasts, especially during the alpha strike as we...."
Krany: "EXCUSE ME FC....(thick Dutch accent)"
FC: "Um, yes Krany?"
Krany: "I know that I am not LC or anything but I would like to say a word to the fleet."
FC: "*sigh* Again?
Krany: "WHAT?!"
FC: "Ummm, sure, go ahead Krany."
Krany: "Don't make me go ape**** on your face!"
Krany's Crony: "ZOMG you don't wanna make Krany MAD! I'm just SAYIN!"
FC: "Comms please. GO AHEAD Krany."
Krany: "Well, I would just like to repeat what has already been said about a million times in regards to broadcasting, except I am going to say it all very slowly in a thick Dutch accent and threaten to withhold reps from anyone who pisses me off for not doing it like I know you all know it should be done."
FC: "Okay, well, LC is the cap chain stable?"
Krany: "Oh, are 40 people waiting on a gate for me to STFU so we can go into the site?"
LC: "Yes, I am just trying to make sure that Basi we were waiting for is...."
Krany: "WHAT?! Are you backtalking me LC?!"
LC: "No, I was replying to the FC...."
FC: "I think he was trying to answer my question actually, because..."
Krany: "Because as you can hear perfectly well I am a FEMALE and several guys in this fleet follow me around like puppies and what I have to say is therefore extremely important."
FC: "Yes, I realize that, but..."
Krany: "You think I'm sexy don't you."
FC: "Ummm..."
Krany: "You know I am baby, yeah!"
Krany Crony: "ZOMG you're so sexy Krany!"
Krany: "Awwwwww thank you baby <3"
FC: "Look um, suddenly RL is calling. Everyone align to planet 1."
Krany: "Was it something I said?!"

Um, learn to take a joke? How would I have a "log" of voice comms anyway?

Sorry for ignoring you bro, but as you said you were leaving, I assumed you meant it, and that guy posting as you was like an imposter or something. Imagine that, assuming YOU actually MEAN what you SAY. My bad.

So you consider your last three posts "on topic" for this thread? I salute your powers of self-delusion. Simply staggering.

But fine, perhaps I am guilty of not adding anything as constructive as your last 3 posts in this thread. Let's see .... How about....

Nope cant think of anything that would actually reach a part of your brain where it will benefit you.

No no, strike that last bit! I was channeling Krany again for a second there. Hmmmmmm... something constructive.... Okay, I think I have something that might actually be of use to you Goldiiee. This is constructive criticism. You keep using the word "restrain". What I think you mean to say is "refrain". As in when you promised the OP to RESTRAIN from continuing to post off-topic posts to his thread, and then did so anyway. Once is a typo, but twice indicates lack of education. Let's go over the difference between the two words, "restrain" and "refrain".

You "restrain" someone with handcuffs.
You "refrain" from making off-topic posts.
Or if you really must use "restrain" then the correct form would be "I will restrain MYSELF from further off-topic posts."

Well actually, you don't refrain from off-topic posts, you just say you're going to, then do so anyway, then proclaim to the world that you aren't actually doing it, when you are. But that's not the point. We're being constructive here, and this is just an example, not a condemnation of your continued off-topic posts.

So there ya go. Constructive criticism. I have added something constructive to this conversation. Your turn.

You really hit "POST" after typing that? You do realize anyone can scroll back and see that many of my posts contain actual logs, links, and other evidence and facts while your replies do not. Of course you do. You must....right?

You've also turned the term "straw man", which you picked up in this thread from someone else, from a noun into a verb and capitalized it to try to give it weight. You've also implied, but offered no evidence, that I had to use google to find the definition of a word that you clearly did not know how to use. Then you managed to infer, from your own lack of vocabulary skills, that I am the one with problems learning.

At this point I am beginning to feel twinges of guilt, as if my actions are somehow analogous to beating a puppy who simply cannot comprehend that he's ****ing all over his own rug. Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is not doing my karma any good at all.

Here, let me throw you a bone, and allow you to remove some of this egg from your face. When I posted a log from ISN's public chat channel, you claimed that I had "doctored" it. As you were obviously in the channel (since you were speaking in it at the time) it should be trivial for you to prove your point about evidence and facts by providing the "undoctored" version of the log, thereby proving once and for all that you are right and I am wrong.

So let's see an example of how it's done Goldiiee. Let's see the "evidence and facts", and put me in my place.