These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Take a Moment to Review the Battleship Changes for the Next Coming Patch...
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2013-04-09 15:22:40 UTC
Doc Severide wrote:
Crap, just Crap... If it works Nerf it. This game has become Nerf Online...

Please do point out the nerfs.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Doc Severide
Doomheim
#42 - 2013-04-09 15:36:13 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Doc Severide wrote:
Crap, just Crap... If it works Nerf it. This game has become Nerf Online...

Please do point out the nerfs.

All of them...
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#43 - 2013-04-09 15:40:19 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
I have created a thread in F&I discussion forum for those Minmatar pilots concerned about the current changes. From the Minmatar proposal thread the consensus seems to be that the Tempest would be much better suited to the fast attack projectile BS role, and the Typhoon more the heavy hitting armored brick with a large drone bay.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=223874&find=unread

There are some basic proposal there and they will be updated from further feedback received in the thread. Hopefully it may be of some use to CCP rise.

I'll check that out. There will likely be a lot of controversy as although the Tempest was often used at close range, the Typhoon has always been the faster and more nimble hull.


Yes, although the consensus in the minmatar proposal thread seemed to think that the Tempest would fufill the fast attack role better than the Typhoon.

And just generally, if you looks at the Tempest, it is a smaller ship than the typhoon, and also the typhoon looks like a big slow brick. So in terms of ship design it actually looks as if the Tempest should be faster than the typhoon anyway.

I think a lot of people are dead against the primary attack ship of minmatar being a missile ship though.
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#44 - 2013-04-09 16:14:04 UTC
Doc Severide wrote:
Crap, just Crap... If it works Nerf it. This game has become Nerf Online...


how can this be true.

Looks like a buff to the geddon, maybe they should nerf the nerf now, before they nerf nerfing.

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#45 - 2013-04-09 16:25:13 UTC
ROOOARRRR CHANGE IS BAD MURDER KILL SLAUGHTER HATE FLOSS DESTROY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Meh, I don't fly battleships anyway. Battle cruisers man, that's where it's at. Who needs a big bloated battle ship to run missions and exploration sites. You wimps.


Edit: Alright, what did they do to my drake? C'mon this isn't funny.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#46 - 2013-04-09 17:18:34 UTC
I encourage everyone to go to the BS re-balance threads and add their constructive criticism and ideas to the discussion. Right now there are some... rather odd... ideas being proposed by CCP and they could use more player input.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.
Lord Fudo
Doomheim
#47 - 2013-04-09 17:20:35 UTC
Bring on the neuting geddon and torp phoon. I cant wait.
Demica Diaz
SE-1
#48 - 2013-04-09 20:22:28 UTC
I am glad they are rethinking again about Gallente Megathron and Hyperion ships. Initial changes for both were horrible. Roll
Budrick3
Moira.
#49 - 2013-04-10 14:15:58 UTC
Demica Diaz wrote:
I am glad they are rethinking again about Gallente Megathron and Hyperion ships. Initial changes for both were horrible. Roll


I agree, it seemed as if whoever was making the changes never flew those ships ever in Eve.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#50 - 2013-04-10 14:20:42 UTC
Can somebody summarise the good, bad and ugly of each ship change?
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#51 - 2013-04-10 19:11:06 UTC
Kerdrak wrote:
Why you want 3 laser battleships? Question

Then give those drones to the flying banana instead of destroying the Armageddon.

Twisted.

Remove standings and insurance.
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#52 - 2013-04-10 19:29:10 UTC
Kerdrak wrote:
Being honest I like the changes (the new geddon is sexy). But, on the other hand, I hope they leave faction navy battleships as they are for the sake of variability.


They won't. Which really bothers me. I like my Navy Geddons, so much so that I never fly a regular one, and have about 20 of them. If I wanted a Bhall, I would just buy one...What?

CCP has no idea what they are doing anymore, they are simply throwing stuff out there, then hoping for the best.
Look at what they are doing to Faction cruisers, Stabber fleets will be a joke with the patch.

And Faction BC's? At least we know they have a long term plan...Nerf the drake multiple times, then put out a faction variant that will cost 3x the price....I too want a 200 mil Faction Drake....Roll

Signature removed - CCP Eterne
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#53 - 2013-04-10 19:57:27 UTC
This is there way in saying, if you want good ships then pay AUR for them.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2013-04-10 20:22:20 UTC
Miilla wrote:
This is there way in saying, if you want good ships then pay AUR for them.

Except that there are no ships for AUR so how does that work?
mr mcbob
Weekend Workers
#55 - 2013-06-06 10:51:42 UTC
where do i post for CCP to actually fix stuff?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#56 - 2013-06-06 10:54:38 UTC
Gotta say, I am very happy with my megathron and hyperion changes.
Previous page123