These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

carebears are scaring off noobs with boredom.

First post
Author
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#301 - 2013-04-08 15:13:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Tippia wrote:
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
So the corp bans the new members from using the forums, going on the official wiki, going on other eve wikis, using the rookie channel, using the help channel, using google, doing the tutorial, doing the career missions, and ever leaving the corp.
No, but why would they do any of that? All they apparently need to know is provided by the helpful corp members…

…too bad that the corp members are wrong.

If an educated adult already has the answer to his question, why would he waste time finding the answer to his question?


Which goes back to my point that if they ignore all other resources (including the evelopedia manual they get directed to in tutorial) and trust the first corp they come across...they are a sheeple with a gullible mindset probably going to ragequit sooner or later anyway, probably after trusting someone who was giving away their stuff for 1 tritanium.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#302 - 2013-04-08 15:15:33 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
So the corp bans the new members from using the forums, going on the official wiki, going on other eve wikis, using the rookie channel, using the help channel, using google, doing the tutorial, doing the career missions, and ever leaving the corp.
No, but why would they do any of that? All they apparently need to know is provided by the helpful corp members…

…too bad that the corp members are wrong.

If an educated adult already has the answer to his question, why would he waste time finding the answer to his question?

this is only true for little children (who depends of parents).

any amateur (and Eve Online players are mostly amateur arent' they?) person should look around. This is what life teaches you to do.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#303 - 2013-04-08 15:19:29 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
any amateur (and Eve Online players are mostly amateur arent' they?) person should look around.
They should. Many don't, and the forums are full of evidence of it.
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#304 - 2013-04-08 15:27:47 UTC
Tippia wrote:
…too bad that the corp members are wrong.

What exactly is it that you are contending as "wrong"?

And I am curious as to why you are calling for CCP to ban these players, considering they may be speaking from their own experiences in other areas of the game. You're calling for them to be BANNED; simply because they're propagating what YOU think is wrong information (ie, doesn't jive with your definition).

Would you have the same zealous and over-protective attitude towards a new player complaining he was lied to joining goonswarm and scammed or lured into a gatecamp? What if it was a ganker telling a new player that lo sec is actually safe? Would you demand these players be banned as well?

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Shao Huang
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#305 - 2013-04-08 15:44:01 UTC
I am the part of the 'they' referred to in this thread, i.e. a rookie, noob, etc. I have no idea what this thread is actually about. What it pretends to be about is concern for new players and player retention or something. I do not pretend to have any view on most of the assertions flying around in the thread.

What it sounds like is the OP lacks a recruiting strategy.

Private sig. Do not read.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#306 - 2013-04-08 15:46:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
What exactly is it that you are contending as "wrong"?
Common items on the list are:
· Anything to do with aggression flagging.
· Anything to do with low and nullsec.
· Basic rules about what you can and cannot do.
· Basic game design decisions concerning problems players are supposed to face.

And here's the thing: even very old carebear players are wrong about these things. There are half-decade old frequent posters on these forums (who obviously know of and have access to all these information sources) who still don't know what griefing is; what highsec is for; how aggression works. The whole “oh they're adults, they'll figure it out” is proven wrong on a daily basis.

Quote:
And I am curious as to why you are calling for CCP to ban these players, considering they may be speaking from their own experiences in other areas of the game.
The things I'm talking about are not a matter of experience, and they're speaking from nothing but elitism or (at best) assumptions based on others telling them the same some time in the past.

And yes, I think it's tantamount to griefing (a ban-worthy offence) to actively try to make new players not play the game and instead wait for some completely arbitrary and irrelevant condition to be fulfilled in the remote future.

Quote:
Would you have the same zealous and over-protective attitude towards a new player complaining he was lied to joining goonswarm and scammed or lured into a gatecamp? What if it was a ganker telling a new player that lo sec is actually safe? Would you demand these players be banned as well?
Don't tell me you can't tell the difference between tricking someone into an in-game trap and making the actual player have a completely incorrect picture of how the game works.

If I bluff you into believing I have a full house in poker, and you fold your three of a kind that would have beaten my pair of 2s, then that's radically different from me telling you that my pair of two is actually a stronger hand than your three of a kind.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#307 - 2013-04-08 15:52:34 UTC
Tippia wrote:


If I bluff you into believing I have a full house in poker, and you fold your three of a kind that would have beaten my pair of 2s, then that's radically different from me telling you that my pair of two is actually a stronger hand than your three of a kind.


And heres Tippia yet again thinking that people who concoct ridicules arguments in the 1st place are capable enough of abstract thinking to actually get that example......
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#308 - 2013-04-08 15:58:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Tippia wrote:
And yes, I think it's tantamount to griefing (a ban-worthy offence) to actively try to make new players not play the game and instead wait for some completely arbitrary and irrelevant condition to be fulfilled in the remote future.

If I bluff you into believing I have a full house in poker, and you fold your three of a kind that would have beaten my pair of 2s, then that's radically different from me telling you that my pair of two is actually a stronger hand than your three of a kind.


Hyperbole.

Telling people that "low sec is dangerous" and "don't pvp until you have 5 million SP" are opinions. You can't ban people for giving opinions.

And try telling a poker site to refund your money because you were mised by a friend who tutored you in poker, see what they say. Lol They are going to say "well there's a page on our site with the rules, why didn't you read that before entering a table?" and you are going to say....?

Anyway this is a completely different topic. The OP was describing corps who, for better or worse, genuinely think their way is the best way, and encourage others to do it. You're describing a corp set up by someone who knowingly deceives people into people into playing the most boring way because they want to grief and get players to quit. DIFFERENT things altogether.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#309 - 2013-04-08 15:59:26 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
So the corp bans the new members from using the forums, going on the official wiki, going on other eve wikis, using the rookie channel, using the help channel, using google, doing the tutorial, doing the career missions, and ever leaving the corp.
No, but why would they do any of that? All they apparently need to know is provided by the helpful corp members…

…too bad that the corp members are wrong.

If an educated adult already has the answer to his question, why would he waste time finding the answer to his question?

this is only true for little children (who depends of parents).

any amateur (and Eve Online players are mostly amateur arent' they?) person should look around. This is what life teaches you to do.


Yet after14 months of very public barge ganking most miners still dont fit any tank.

People dont look for info in games these days, they simply follow the leader.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#310 - 2013-04-08 16:08:09 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Yet after14 months of very public barge ganking most miners still dont fit any tank.

and i still have to see thread of "miners tears" at least as large as gankers tears about barge buffing....

baltec1 wrote:
People dont look for info in games these days, they simply follow the leader.

exactly.
Leader said: we hate miners!
Ally-members: woof! woof! woof!
And forums get filled by hate.Lol

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#311 - 2013-04-08 16:12:22 UTC
Shao Huang wrote:
I am the part of the 'they' referred to in this thread, i.e. a rookie, noob, etc. I have no idea what this thread is actually about. What it pretends to be about is concern for new players and player retention or something. I do not pretend to have any view on most of the assertions flying around in the thread.

What it sounds like is the OP lacks a recruiting strategy.



You are seeing a glimpse of a much deeper argument that has raged between those that think EVE should only be about the hostile exchange of ammo in space and those that think there is room for many play styles in EVE.

Let's use highly simplified definitions for this post. PvPer = someone that thinks the game should be all about swapping ammo in a violent way. Carebear = person that wants to avoid this hostile exchange of ammo. These are not 100% accurate descriptions, but it will make this post shorter than "War and Peace".



The PvPers rage at the large number of players that live in high sec, that won't fight when they get war dec'ed, that are angry that CCP has made suicide ganking less profitable, and generally made it easier for those wishing to avoid BOOM, to avoid most BOOM. CCP's own numbers say that in any given month, less than 20% of accounts will lose a ship to boom, and less than 4% of toons will show up on a kill mail as a killer.


The PvPers think, "Oh, this game would be so much better, if it were easier to make those carebear's ships go boom." They come up with all these suggestions to make it easir to BOOM carebear ships. Let's remove local. Let's remove NPC corps. Let's remove some of the bight from CONCORD. Let's rollback the tank buffs given to exhumers. On and on.

The easy counter to all these "ideas" is simply to point out that the players that want to avoid PvP, play this game, because it is possible to avoid PvP. Remove the things that allow them to avoide PvP, and they will simply stop playing.

This is clearly demonstrated by players like me, that would rether lose 1 billion ISK in opportunity cost by not undocking duiring a war, rather than undock in war, earn half a billion ISK mining in barges, then lose 100 million in ISK when barges go BOOM. For me, it is not just about the lost revenue. It is more about avoiding showing up on someone's kill board as a kill.


This, risk averse play style, enfurates those that play the game to pad their kill board stats with lots of easy kills. Not my problem.

Either let me mostly avoid BOOM, or I simply won't play the game. I don't play the game, and hundreds of thousands of other like me do the same, well, CCP is toast as a viable company....

The PvPers are mad that we always win the argument, with a simple "We'll all quit". Or, put another way. You can't make me play, so you can't make me play in a way that makes it easy for you to make my ship go boom.

The OP of this thread is a failed attempt to counter that argument. His assertion is that more players are driven away by carebears teaching new players to play in a boring style (avoid PvP) then would be driven away by getting rid of the carebears.
Moth Eisig
Gallente Federation
#312 - 2013-04-08 16:14:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Moth Eisig
Good grief.

If a person is dumb enough that he or she A) can't figure out what options the game offers on their own, B) wants to PvP and without doing any research joins a random hi-sec corp instead of FW or RvB or EveUni or going to low/null and C) after not getting PvP in that corp decides it's the game's fault and quits instead of considering looking around for another corp or place to find fights, then I daresay that person is probably not cut out for EVE any more than the person that jumps into PvP with low SP and gets killed a lot and quits.
Bellanea Rajanir
Obolka Kin
#313 - 2013-04-08 16:14:51 UTC
Quote:
Yes, if you don't pvp your a carebear.


This game don't have "pvp off" option.

It was a day when the forum post became sentient

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#314 - 2013-04-08 16:15:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
LHA Tarawa wrote:
You are seeing a glimpse of a much deeper argument that has raged between those that think EVE should only be about the hostile exchange of ammo in space and those that think there is room for many play styles in EVE.
So you're saying that the OP is arguing against no-one?
After all, he belongs to the latter category and there is no-one who actually belongs to the former.

The rest of your post has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Hyperbole.
Not really, no. The hyperbole is in the nonsensical and provably false claims these people make, which are not that “loswsec is dangerous” and “don't pvp until you have 5 million SP” — it's “you can't survive in lowsec” (a lie) and “you don't stand a chance in PvP without tons of SP” (a lie).

Quote:
And try telling a poker site to refund your money because you were mised by a friend who tutored you in poker, see what they say. Lol They are going to say "well there's a page on our site with the rules, why didn't you read that before entering a table?" and you are going to say....?
Congratulations, you've just illustrated the OP's point. Teaching players the wrong thing means they'll get burned when the gaming authorities tells them that, no, all they've learned is wrong.

Quote:
Anyway this is a completely different topic. The OP was describing corps who, for better or worse, genuinely think their way is the best way, and encourage others to do it. You're describing a corp set up by someone who knowingly deceives people
Nope. I'm describing corps who, for better or worse, perpetuate myths about the game because they have never actually experienced large parts of it and only spread on what they once heard… which was never true to begin with. The damage to the newbies is the same, no matter what.
Skeln Thargensen
Doomheim
#315 - 2013-04-08 16:26:22 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Yet after14 months of very public barge ganking most miners still dont fit any tank.

People dont look for info in games these days, they simply follow the leader.


well, that's a horrible generalisation. tank versus yield is entirely situational, just as tank versus DPS is in missions.

forums.  serious business.

Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#316 - 2013-04-08 16:27:20 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Congratulations, you've just illustrated the OP's point. Teaching players the wrong thing means they'll get burned when the gaming authorities tells them that, no, all they've learned is wrong.


I never denied this. Find a post where I denied it happened, you won't. My only point was that the person is at fault not the corporation, because he has so much more information and was too gullible and/or lazy too research for himself. Eve punishes the gullible and lazy.

Quote:
Nope. I'm describing corps who, for better or worse, perpetuate myths about the game because they have never actually experienced large parts of it and only spread on what they once heard… which was never true to begin with. The damage to the newbies is the same, no matter what.


It's still only giving opinions, you can't ban them for that. It's the difference between say, a Dominican nun and a cable televangelist. They are both peddling BS but only the televangelist is griefing.
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#317 - 2013-04-08 16:31:34 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Common items on the list are:
· Anything to do with aggression flagging.
· Anything to do with low and nullsec.
· Basic rules about what you can and cannot do.
· Basic game design decisions concerning problems players are supposed to face.

- Misunderstanding aggression flagging isn't something that only hi sec carebear corps do. And this also does not constitute grief play.
- Your opinions on lo and null sec are highly subjective. If a corp member speaks of lo/null sec in a negative light because of the experience he's faced there himself that is something that he is entitled to, even if yfou don't like it and regard it as "grief".
- What exactly is it they are being told they can and cannot do? Are these corp policies (ie only mine and mission)? If that is the case, you are welcome to leave. If they are forcing you to stay, then feel free to file a petition. If a carebear joins a pirate corp and is "forced" to PVP miners, will you feel the same level of compassion as a player being "forced" to mine and mission in a different corp? I didn't think so.
Otherwise, I'm curious as to what is it they are being told (i.e., "you can absolutely not enter lo sec as it is game-mechanically impossible").
- You don't get to dictate what decisions players make in a game where a player's decisions are entrusted to the player. You are certainly welcome to form your own ideas and decisions and even share them with other players. But the decision is ultimately the individual's to call. Again, corp members are certainly welcome to persuade you. There's nothing "bannable" about this.

Quote:
The things I'm talking about are not a matter of experience, and they're speaking from nothing but elitism or (at best) assumptions based on others telling them the same some time in the past.
Really? Do you have anything to back this claim up? If a corp member warns another corp member about lo sec being dangerous, as he himself as been blown up many times, which of your two assumptions does this fall under, "elitism" or "because someone told me that's how it is"?

Quote:
And yes, I think it's tantamount to griefing (a ban-worthy offence) to actively try to make new players not play the game and instead wait for some completely arbitrary and irrelevant condition to be fulfilled in the remote future.
I underscored the key words. You certainly have a right to your opinion. But that is all it is.

Quote:
Don't tell me you can't tell the difference between tricking someone into an in-game trap and making the actual player have a completely incorrect picture of how the game works.

If I bluff you into believing I have a full house in poker, and you fold your three of a kind that would have beaten my pair of 2s, then that's radically different from me telling you that my pair of two is actually a stronger hand than your three of a kind.


Pirate lies to an unsuspecting victim by telling him there is no gatecamp on the other side of the gate.

Carebear lies to a passerby by telling him there is always a gatecamp on the other side of the gate.

I'll agree that the intent may be different. But the outcome is still the same. Either both are "ban-worthy offences" or none.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#318 - 2013-04-08 16:31:41 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Yet after14 months of very public barge ganking most miners still dont fit any tank.

and i still have to see thread of "miners tears" at least as large as gankers tears about barge buffing....

baltec1 wrote:
People dont look for info in games these days, they simply follow the leader.

exactly.
Leader said: we hate miners!
Ally-members: woof! woof! woof!
And forums get filled by hate.Lol


There has been not tears shed by gankers on the barge buff. We are still able to gank miners for profit.

What you saw is calls for barge imbalances to be fixed.

As for the second part, we dont hate miners. We love them because they are so bad st this game and we make so much isk blowing them up.
Onomerous
Caldari Black Hand
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#319 - 2013-04-08 16:32:46 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Onomerous wrote:
2/10

Posting in a stealth "nerf hi-sec" thread.

This has nothing to do with highsec.


from OP:

I find that often times when new players look for corporations they get sucked into a high sec corporation run by carebears.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#320 - 2013-04-08 16:34:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Hrm... The OP is crying like a baby on the forums when in fact they need a good dose of HTFU and go spend some time actually recruiting newbs in to PVP corps.

Oh wait what? You mean the OP doesn't have PVP corp that recruits newbies with complimentary PVP training?

Oh I see. I suppose nothing will ever come of this threadnaught except more tears on how the bad carebears touched them without ever spending more time to actually... You know... Go out and recruit newbies themselves.

That would be too much effort.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server