Missions & Complexes

Here's some cheese to go with all that whine you left.

Oh my gawd. I don't even know who you are but that was probably the most epic off topic troll reply I've ever seen. You are so far off from thread topic it's pathetic. In fact, you just advanced trolling to a whole new level. I gotta say I'm glad I only read this one post of yours which was the biggest piece of BS I've ever seen. Talk about a 'Cry me a river' bleeding heart speech.

lol, all that ranting about me being in NPC corp, bla bla bla, being a disease upon the very core and foundation of Eve, bla bla bla, not having to run or contribute to a corp/alliance, bla bla bla, etc..

Well bud, that's just too freakin bad. Get over it already. While you're at it, stop trying to tell others how to play this game and above all else, stay on topic.

DMC

If it is zero risk then that is the fault of the player base not being willing to supply said risk.
Changing rewards is just the short hand way of saying people would rather have mommy CCP change the theme park.

Oh right. I forgot. Suicide ganking is the only way of supplying risk.

I love eye-roll wars don't you?

There's just far too many quotes to do this properly.

DeMichael Crimson wrote = Funny how people keep saying high sec exploration has too much reward v risk.
Kodama Ikari wrote = its zero risk, and yes, this is the topic of the thread.
Zero risk? Oh you mean like the passive income from research agents? Sorry Charley, thread topic is a lot more than just risk v reward. It pertains to T3's running 4/10's in high sec but apparently you forgot about that.

DeMichael Crimson wrote = Funny how there isn't a lot of high sec exploration sites available (except w-holes).
Kodama Ikari wrote = If the only hisec sites you consider are 4/10s, then yeah it may seem a little sparse. If 1/10s and 2/10's aren't spawning correctly, then that deserves a look from CCP.
Ahhh, you're right. I forgot to include Rogue Drone sites with the w-holes. Obviously you don't do any high sec exploration or you'd know what that statement means.

DeMichael Crimson wrote = Funny how those who don't fly T3 Cruisers keep saying ban them from high sec sites.
Kodama Ikari wrote = Many if not most of the people saying this fly t3's.
Now that's a bunch of BS. You seriously expect me to believe the majority of high sec explorers in T3 Cruisers are asking for their ships to be banned from high sec sites?

DeMichael Crimson wrote = Funny how low sec PvP's keep saying move 4/10's out of high sec.
Kodama Ikari wrote = Yes, Mio and myself and all the others in this thread are just ebil piwates looking to kill you, and not simply other disillusioned explorers. Feel free to check my kill log for all the juicy explorer's I've ganked in lowsec.
If only I had more targets...
Oh nooooooo. Was that a threat? Now I'm really scared. I travel in both high and low sec systems all the time. Feel free to look me up.....................seriously.

By the way, stop trying to group yourself with St Mio. You may be in the same game but you'll definitely never be in the same league as St Mio.
Looks like St Mio wants low sec exploration rewards to be buffed.

Now about this:
Gawd, how lame can you get?.
I didn't disagree with the motives of anyone in this thread, whatever that's supposed to mean nor have I ever said "Don't listen to them, they just want to gank you!" Obviously those points I listed must have hit very close to home to merit the troll attacks. I have noticed you and a few others constantly trolling this thread. Do everyone a favor and just go back to GD sub-forum.

As for your reply, you basically just re-stated everything I said while trying to twist it around in a pathetic failed attempt to shame me. Please spare us your constant rant about 'Zero' risk in high sec exploration. Why would you care anyway if you're just an ebil piwate looking to kill explorers? Oh right, that's the whole point of you posting in this thread, trying to get more targets.....

Now about being a Dweeb, only a Geeky kid would use that term. If you were a mature adult, you'd know that signing a document is done with a written name, not with initials. I don't 'Sign' my posted replies, I leave my initials and quite honestly it makes me extremely happy to know that it bothers you so much.



DMC

Heh.

So defensive.. trying to protect something?

Again.. take off the jaded sunglasses, clear your mind of biased cliff-jumping.. and read my posts again, and put forth some effort into thinking. I have made rather strong points concerning EVE explorations and the mentality behind it all. Better than simply stating...



Followed up with a long winded story that hints at making exploration sites Instanced.. if, I suppose, there can't be more of them so You have a better chance at gaining loot. Greedy.

Sorry.. but it wasn't Your vigil site. Get over it.. Dude.

You have the option to report me if you wish. You're the one flinging 'troll/flames/rants/whines' around at me and others. Again.. open your mind and read my posts again. Don't be so quick to snap judgement at the first line that threatens your current cashcow activity. Fact remains tho.. you use NPC corps as a safety net, no reason not to admit doing so when you have stated such in the past.. Dude.

The risk in doing highsec exploation is that your site can be taken from you by a better pilot. A pilot who can scan the site down faster than you and blitz it better than you.

You don't like that? Tough. Train your skills, get a better ship, and beat them at their own game. Otherwise, HTFU.

TL;DR: Highsec exploration working as intended.

This.

Risk vs reward is completely broken in EVE, and Tech 3 ships are too much for hi sec.
I live in a low class wspace system (C2) and the money here is terrible compared to other areas of the game. When i need iskies, i simply go to hi sec or to rat in null when i have the chance. Low effort for a very high reward.

So, i could run radars/mag sites or anoms in my system or in my low class static but for what... 5,10, 15 millions? I did it before but now i see it as a waste of time.
Why do that when you can go for a DED site in hi sec. And there are many sites. Honestly, I don't see where is the competion for the pot of gold here. Good scanning skills and practice also makes this easier.

I did yesterday 2 DED sites (3/10 and 4/10) in Caldari space with a cheap Tengu and i don't want to say what modules i found because that was simply ridiculous. Thanks for the loot, Mr. Pith and company.

You're assuming that the explorer will have help, when a lot of explorers operate solo.

Granted that Ishtar you see in local could be bait, but you'd approach that pilot carefully if it was PVP fit irregardless of what the pilot was doing, and that pilot if PVP fit would have a much better chance against a solo threat.

It is a risk. You risk your time and effort, for the possiblity of no reward. You obviously only see risk as the possiblilty of losing your ship or pod.