These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why your CSM8 vote doesn't matter...

First post
Author
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#101 - 2013-04-07 00:21:32 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Do away with the CSM, do EVE a favor.

Yes because EvE worked so well before the CSM came into existance.



And it do so well after...


It took a mass log off to get CCP to give us a sizable portion of what we have been asking for for years. Engine trails were suddenly "feasible" again, along with a whole host of other additions... no CSM required.



[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Frying Doom
#102 - 2013-04-07 00:30:11 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Do away with the CSM, do EVE a favor.

Yes because EvE worked so well before the CSM came into existance.



And it do so well after...


It took a mass log off to get CCP to give us a sizable portion of what we have been asking for for years. Engine trails were suddenly "feasible" again, along with a whole host of other additions... no CSM required.




No they got more happy to comply after they stuffed up massively and ended up getting the CSM chairman who was also the head of the largest alliance at the time, to help cool every thing down.

Yes they responded because it cost them money, and they are now happier to work with the CSM as it has proven to stop them from blowing their own foot off with the cost of millions.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#103 - 2013-04-07 00:48:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Funny you should say that, I seem to recall the CSM's of that time period being particularly rude, close minded and down right insulting to us paying customers. I certainly don't remember being "calmed down" I in fact recall being told by a particular CSM that they are not employed by CCP (and thus do not represent CCP directly) and because of that they were entitled to basically tell me to go **** myself.

When I pointed out that their words were representing this company, they disagreed.



Funny enough, you will notice now that they are being far more respectful and diplomatic these days. All it took was a certain someone mentioning suicide in-front of sony game executives to make CCP force them to agree. Big smile



The CSM had nothing to do with CCP fixing eve with the post Incarna expansion, nor did they have a hand in calming us down. CCP made us leave with a broken patch, CCP made us come back by un-breaking it. Taking this change in paradigm out of the hands of EVE's population and attempting to give the CSM credit for it, is, quite frankly, insulting. It was back then, and it is still now.


CSM's did not organize the Jita protest.
They did not occupy Jita and all major market hubs.
They did not organize the substantial decline in subscriptions.
They did not make us sub or resub.

Nor did they prevent the various failures leading up to Incarna in the first place, which would have prevented all of the above from happening at all. Duh? I mean, isn't that part of the reason why they are there? To anticipate what we, the consumer, wants and to give realistic feedback?




Thus... they did absolutely nothing but **** people like me off.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#104 - 2013-04-07 00:53:29 UTC
I have no problem with the CSM, but i am wondering when this period pre CSM was, as I have the minutes (or chat logs, whatever you prefer) from the Council meetings in 2003 and 2004
Frying Doom
#105 - 2013-04-07 01:03:06 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
I have no problem with the CSM, but i am wondering when this period pre CSM was, as I have the minutes (or chat logs, whatever you prefer) from the Council meetings in 2003 and 2004

from the CSM?

I will just quote

The Mittani wrote:

The Bad Old Days
The CSM as it currently stands is not the CSM that was originally pitched by CCP, wounded in the media by the T20/Band of Brothers cheating and corruption scandals. The original CSM was mooted as a body similar to today’s Internal Affairs department, a group of elected player-auditors who would ensure that Sabre BPOs were no longer being handed out gratis. After a lot of high-profile press, the ‘watchdog CSM’ was quietly abandoned after the T20 crisis died down and vanished for almost a year.

When it returned and was actually implemented in 2008, the CSM had transformed into what amounted to a focus group with six month terms. Another trumpet blast of loud, high profile media coverage resulted, which nicely covered over the fact that the first CSM was riven with infighting sparked by its controversial and ineffective chairman, Jade Constantine, and the ensuing campaign to oust him from office. The dev blog which wrapped up the CSM1 experience was an exercise tiptoeing around the fact that absolutely nothing of note had been accomplished. The CCP rep assigned to the CSM was reduced to saying that “We decided against enumerating the CSM's accomplishments - this is not a pissing contest. We know they made a difference and we are confident that the council will continue to make a difference.” Yet in every CSM since the first, CCP has worked hard to enumerate the accomplishments and relevance of the council.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#106 - 2013-04-07 01:06:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Rhivre
The BPOs postdate the CSM by quite a while..

THIS is the CSM I was referring to:

CSM2004

Or to go even older:

CSM2003
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#107 - 2013-04-07 01:07:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Frying Doom wrote:

The CSM as it currently stands is not the CSM that was originally pitched by CCP, wounded in the media by the T20/Band of Brothers cheating and corruption scandals




And I quote:

Eternum Praetorian wrote:
The CSM suffered another crippling blow in the eyes of the players after the Mitanni scandal and the CSM's failure to prevent one of the worst and most costly expansions in CCP history. Many players citing CSM rude behavior towards customers and bias towards certain forms of game play, while disregarding all others, as a major grievance towards the aging game EVE Online

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Frying Doom
#108 - 2013-04-07 01:10:24 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
The BPOs postdate the CSM by quite a while..

THIS is the CSM I was referring to:

CSM2004

Or to go even older:

CSM2003

Same name but effectively a different thing.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#109 - 2013-04-07 01:32:34 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
The BPOs postdate the CSM by quite a while..

THIS is the CSM I was referring to:

CSM2004

Or to go even older:

CSM2003

Same name but effectively a different thing.



Where as some of us say same **** different day.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Frying Doom
#110 - 2013-04-07 01:39:04 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
The BPOs postdate the CSM by quite a while..

THIS is the CSM I was referring to:

CSM2004

Or to go even older:

CSM2003

Same name but effectively a different thing.



Where as some of us say same **** different day.

So because something had the same name 10 years ago you feel that is justification for sticking the knife into the backs of every EvE player.

Look at it this way if you feel the need to complain about eve in the next 12 months STFU.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#111 - 2013-04-07 01:45:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Frying Doom wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
The BPOs postdate the CSM by quite a while..

THIS is the CSM I was referring to:

CSM2004

Or to go even older:

CSM2003

Same name but effectively a different thing.



Where as some of us say same **** different day.

So because something had the same name 10 years ago you feel that is justification for sticking the knife into the backs of every EvE player.

Look at it this way if you feel the need to complain about eve in the next 12 months STFU.


I think we have already established that since I stay home on election-day I get to complain as loudly and as often as I want about the mess that you and the people that you voted for make Lol


Also, get less angry and spend more time concocting more valid/logical counter arguments. You will find your time on the eve forums more enriching.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Frying Doom
#112 - 2013-04-07 01:54:10 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:


I think we have already established that since I stay home on election-day I get to complain as loudly and as often as I want about the mess that you and the people that you voted for make Lol


Also, get less angry and spend more time concocting more valid/logical counter arguments. You will find your time on the eve forums more enriching.

Actually I have a great time.

But as you choose not to participate in the CSM now, why should you be able to participate in them later.

And under an STV system where votes required to get elected are tied directly to total number of votes, any bad decisions that the CSM and CCP are obviously your fault for failing to vote.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#113 - 2013-04-07 01:57:37 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
And I quote:

Eternum Praetorian wrote:
The CSM suffered another crippling blow in the eyes of the players after the Mitanni scandal and the CSM's failure to prevent one of the worst and most costly expansions in CCP history. Many players citing CSM rude behavior towards customers and bias towards certain forms of game play, while disregarding all others, as a major grievance towards the aging game EVE Online


Finally, someone else sees it.

CSM is a layer of government that doesn't actually do things to improve the game (well, that's not their intention for having some game power, it's to game the system for their advantage or pet ideas. CCP allows it because they keep the players deluded in any sense of real power). It keeps the game status quo and stagnate.

Essentially this is what SOE once had with their booster club, which in turn got scuttled due to the same game interference CCP did with helping BoB and more (the whole Aeralik scandal was a mess or messes). It's designed as a way to hype/promote a game according to how CCP wants it, with an illusion of some control (as those who run are control freaks and have egos to match...just look at the arrogance of some of the current CSMs running for examples).

So seen it before, and in the end the same history is repeating itself, in yet another niche game.

Want to see real changes that matter. Practical changes that dovetail in improving the game for more actual new players...not more alts for vets (a stagnate community).

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Frying Doom
#114 - 2013-04-07 02:05:22 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
And I quote:

Eternum Praetorian wrote:
The CSM suffered another crippling blow in the eyes of the players after the Mitanni scandal and the CSM's failure to prevent one of the worst and most costly expansions in CCP history. Many players citing CSM rude behavior towards customers and bias towards certain forms of game play, while disregarding all others, as a major grievance towards the aging game EVE Online


Finally, someone else sees it.

CSM is a layer of government that doesn't actually do things to improve the game (well, that's not their intention for having some game power, it's to game the system for their advantage or pet ideas. CCP allows it because they keep the players deluded in any sense of real power). It keeps the game status quo and stagnate.

Essentially this is what SOE once had with their booster club, which in turn got scuttled due to the same game interference CCP did with helping BoB and more (the whole Aeralik scandal was a mess or messes). It's designed as a way to hype/promote a game according to how CCP wants it, with an illusion of some control (as those who run are control freaks and have egos to match...just look at the arrogance of some of the current CSMs running for examples).

So seen it before, and in the end the same history is repeating itself, in yet another niche game.

Want to see real changes that matter. Practical changes that dovetail in improving the game for more actual new players...not more alts for vets (a stagnate community).

Why is the CSM a lobby group?

Because so small a number of people actually vote, that they allow Null sec to rule the CSM.

How does this problem get fixed?

With a higher number of voters giving a more representative council. The council is representative of the voters the larger the percentage the more representative of EvE it becomes.

So if you don't vote, should you complain?
Hell NO you are the reason that the CSM is a lobby group, favoring the Null sec alliances. It is like shooting yourself in the foot and then complaining that you are bleeding.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#115 - 2013-04-07 02:20:11 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:

Why is the CSM a lobby group?


Because it is. The lipstick is a different color, but a pig is still a pig. Other games had/have the same booster club, and it turns out the same: Egos amok, status quo alive, game is stagnate, and overrun by bots (I quit WoW to get away from the bots in the BGs, LFR and even dungeons now, thinking no macros in EvE = no multibox software. Wrong! It's okay to have THOSE macros).

Look at the canvas. Look were this is all going. CCP profitting, yet the game is but alts and bots (how many actual new players play EvE each day? Not many, it's vets who keep adding more accounts). And players seem oblivious to it all, as they're seeing their tiny corner of the painting and careless of the overall picture...and how ugly it is.

I GOT MINE!!!

As a dumb "whale".

If you want the same o' same o' bot filled and alt filled games, keep voting. Tail chasing is fun, huh?

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Frying Doom
#116 - 2013-04-07 02:40:50 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

Why is the CSM a lobby group?


Because it is. The lipstick is a different color, but a pig is still a pig. Other games had/have the same booster club, and it turns out the same: Egos amok, status quo alive, game is stagnate, and overrun by bots (I quit WoW to get away from the bots in the BGs, LFR and even dungeons now, thinking no macros in EvE = no multibox software. Wrong! It's okay to have THOSE macros).

Look at the canvas. Look were this is all going. CCP profitting, yet the game is but alts and bots (how many actual new players play EvE each day? Not many, it's vets who keep adding more accounts). And players seem oblivious to it all, as they're seeing their tiny corner of the painting and careless of the overall picture...and how ugly it is.

I GOT MINE!!!

As a dumb "whale".

If you want the same o' same o' bot filled and alt filled games, keep voting. Tail chasing is fun, huh?

So I like your plan

You don't like something so you do nothing about it and just complain.

As to new players look in the rookie channel some time. You cannot tell me experienced players are asking those questions.

If society was driven by people like you, we would still be walking around as learning to tame a horse would just be too hard. All the while you would be complaining that something should happen by magic, as your feet hurt.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#117 - 2013-04-07 03:13:21 UTC
You should watch more George Carlin on youtube Mr. Doom, he has already trumped all of your counter arguments quite nicely. Doing so again here would only be redundant.


"Vote"
"Your choice matters"
"Save the earth/gaming universe"


In the words of the all knowing comedian, EVE was bought and sold a long time ago. It's real owners like the way things are, and they do not want a player population composed of educated critical thinkers. They want players who will keep paying a sub as they bend over and take it, and they want players like you who think that whoever they vote for on CSM day will matter a damn one way or the other.


Jokes on you bud.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#118 - 2013-04-07 03:15:02 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
You don't like something so you do nothing about it and just complain.


That's the script you go by and probably even believe.

I vote with my wallet. That's the real powerbroker. As even CCP can't deny the power of greenbacks.

Blizzard was arrogant too. They dreamed up a new TBC remake in Cata. Got carried away and simply told players to "L2P". After that one blog post, 300,000 players unsubscribed (almost like next day even, the drop was that dramatic). In the end, they lost 1.7mil subscriptions, cut over 600 employees, the most in their history. They changed quickly, and the rhetoric of Cata being the best thing since slice bread, turned into the worst expansion in WoW's history.

Money talks. Bullshit walks.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Frying Doom
#119 - 2013-04-07 03:33:09 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
You don't like something so you do nothing about it and just complain.


That's the script you go by and probably even believe.

I vote with my wallet. That's the real powerbroker. As even CCP can't deny the power of greenbacks.

Blizzard was arrogant too. They dreamed up a new TBC remake in Cata. Got carried away and simply told players to "L2P". After that one blog post, 300,000 players unsubscribed (almost like next day even, the drop was that dramatic). In the end, they lost 1.7mil subscriptions, cut over 600 employees, the most in their history. They changed quickly, and the rhetoric of Cata being the best thing since slice bread, turned into the worst expansion in WoW's history.

Money talks. Bullshit walks.

So you have no attachment to the game, and believe that minor unsubbing over a short period effects a companies long term prospects.

As to blizzards arrogance, remind me again how much money they make a month off a game they designed with the expectation of around 300,000 subscribers?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#120 - 2013-04-07 04:48:14 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
So you have no attachment to the game


I'm a multigamer, Frying. I play many games. Have many accounts. My accounts in EvE show it's paid for this month. Hmmmm...how do you be unsubscribed like that, again? Hmmm, my main WoW account shows it's paid until May, too.

You like to believe EvE is a special snowflake among all gaming, so unique it's above all the other muck games can produce?

It isn't.

It's a game with the same players even (who do play other games too) and they play for their reasons and interests.

Some may find interest in CSM elections. Some won't. But if you're so deluded to think because what you think isn't done the way you like it, they're "unloyal" and what not?

Sit down and recheck that ego.

Hint: MMOs share the same player pool. Many play more than 1 MMO. The trick is getting them to play your MMO and keep playing it.

As for Blizzard: let's put it this way, they saw the abyss, and pulled back.

No game is an island. No game is immuned to the pocketbook. Even Goliath can fall, quick.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell