These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Your New CSM is!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Charlies Ponzi
Doomheim
#1 - 2013-04-04 21:53:00 UTC
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#2 - 2013-04-04 21:56:55 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
http://postimg.org/image/j0j4cpdjp/


Quick someone hack into that website & change the code so javascript votes for some1 else Pirate
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#3 - 2013-04-04 22:02:01 UTC
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
http://postimg.org/image/j0j4cpdjp/


Is this the only way those blobbing F1 monkies out in NULL know how to vote? Roll
They remind me of Sansha zombots
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#4 - 2013-04-04 22:03:06 UTC
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
http://postimg.org/image/j0j4cpdjp/

It's actually not a bad list.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Frying Doom
#5 - 2013-04-04 22:15:18 UTC
Ok I will admit I did find it as funny as hell.

On a similar note, according to CCP Dolan, an STV system will give almost exactly representational vote compared to the voters. I will admit I disagree as this assumes the voters have a clue but anyway this election will at least show how big a percent of voters are from Null. Also whether CCPs big plans to get hi-sec off its butt actually works or not.

But at least I am going to be crying alligator tears apparently. Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Felicity Love
Doomheim
#6 - 2013-04-04 22:21:42 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Ok I will admit I did find it as funny as hell.

Also whether CCPs big plans to get hi-sec off its butt actually works or not.



Easily tested for a "14 Day Live Trial" by reverting all of High Sec to 0.0... and far more amusing than the melodrama of CSM elections. Twisted

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#7 - 2013-04-04 22:24:52 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
http://postimg.org/image/j0j4cpdjp/

It's actually not a bad list.

I'm not fond of the order, but other than that… sure.
Dave Stark
#8 - 2013-04-04 22:38:13 UTC
wish i had known about that.

i'd have gladly voted for their list of 14 just to save me the trouble of clicking all 14 candidates myself, several times...
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#9 - 2013-04-04 22:46:03 UTC
Calls by the CSM to get CCP to provide linkable ballots (like the Vote Me links last year) to make this sort of thing accessible to everyone were unfortunately ignored.

maybe next year :s

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#10 - 2013-04-04 22:48:52 UTC
The CSM is regarded as stakeholder within CCP.

And as anyone who has any experience in this kind of project knows, a competent stakeholder is vital to the success to a project.

But a ******, single view , "Whaa! I want my lolly!" stakeholder will just be ignored.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.
Zhade Lezte
#11 - 2013-04-05 01:03:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Zhade Lezte
Frying Doom wrote:
But at least I am going to be crying alligator tears apparently. Lol


You're a wormhole guy, right? You'll probably get a couple guys on the CSM.

Alt smugpost: You're a wormhole guy, right? You're fine, our ballot has one WH candidate on it P

(In seriousness, I thought you were a highsec guy for the longest time based on how you talked about null blocs, and only realized you weren't when you posted your 14 choices. You also seem to take things a bit more in stride compared to a year or two ago, vOv)
Frying Doom
#12 - 2013-04-05 01:08:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Zhade Lezte wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
But at least I am going to be crying alligator tears apparently. Lol


You're a wormhole guy, right? You'll probably get a couple guys on the CSM.

Alt smugpost: You're a wormhole guy, right? You're fine, our ballot has one WH candidate on it P

(In seriousness, I thought you were a highsec guy for the longest time based on how you talked about null blocs, and only realized you weren't when you posted your 14 choices. You also seem to take things a bit more in stride compared to a year or two ago, vOv)

Yes I think I have mellowed a bit, And yeah I think WHs will get 2 candidates this year, 3 if we are really good and make lots of sacrifices to BoB.

Edit: Plus last year Null sec where trying to prove something that would be detrimental to the CSM, the 10,058 votes. It would have made this year harder to sell the elections to the Hi-sec populous.

But this year CCP stepped in and fixed that and made the elections harder instead Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2013-04-05 04:20:20 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Edit: Plus last year Null sec where trying to prove something that would be detrimental to the CSM, the 10,058 votes. It would have made this year harder to sell the elections to the Hi-sec populous.


Will the high-sec players even care? If EvE goes to hell in a hand-basket, we'll just unsub and play something else.

Those vested and interested in this CSM stuff are the vets. It's their mini-game. They talk about issues for themselves anyway. And anything high-sec related is about torture and demons.

Yeah, it's vet voodoo. See it any game that exists longer than 5 years.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
Frying Doom
#14 - 2013-04-05 04:27:44 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Edit: Plus last year Null sec where trying to prove something that would be detrimental to the CSM, the 10,058 votes. It would have made this year harder to sell the elections to the Hi-sec populous.


Will the high-sec players even care? If EvE goes to hell in a hand-basket, we'll just unsub and play something else.

This is why so few games ever make it to 5 years let alone 10.

If the newer players like the game then they need to be aware of the CSM and what it can do, and to voice their opinions at it.

Other wise you will play game after game that dies complaining that they did not last very long.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2013-04-05 04:37:57 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Other wise you will play game after game that dies complaining that they did not last very long.


The games I care about and have played still exist and continuing on.

EQ/EQII = EQNext.
WoW = Titan.
BF2142 = BF4

No CSM either, but carrying on.

This is why I keep saying alienating the noobs doesn't matter, they have games always to return too -- and some just as old and even older!

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2013-04-05 04:50:26 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
http://postimg.org/image/j0j4cpdjp/


Quick someone hack into that website & change the code so javascript votes for some1 else Pirate


Encouraging people to perform felonies for space politicians isn't a good idea.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Frying Doom
#17 - 2013-04-05 05:02:05 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Other wise you will play game after game that dies complaining that they did not last very long.


The games I care about and have played still exist and continuing on.

EQ/EQII = EQNext.
WoW = Titan.
BF2142 = BF4

No CSM either, but carrying on.

This is why I keep saying alienating the noobs doesn't matter, they have games always to return too -- and some just as old and even older!

Well that is fair enough. You have admitted you don't care about EvE, so now explain to me why EvE should care about you?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#18 - 2013-04-05 05:16:23 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
Charlies Ponzi wrote:
http://postimg.org/image/j0j4cpdjp/


Quick someone hack into that website & change the code so javascript votes for some1 else Pirate


Encouraging people to perform felonies for space politicians isn't a good idea.


Nah Nahhh Nah na nahhh naaaa INTERNET POLICE CATCH ME IF u CAN TwistedEvilP
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2013-04-05 05:23:43 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Well that is fair enough. You have admitted you don't care about EvE, so now explain to me why EvE should care about you?


Didn't say anything of that sort, but I can see how you would see it: losing control hurts.

I believe in actual sandbox games, where players can truly do their own thing...not be dictated too.

Frying Doom wrote:
so now explain to me why EvE should care about you?


EvE doesn't have to care, but like any game out there, apathy doesn't attract and keep players now does it.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
pussnheels
Viziam
#20 - 2013-04-05 05:24:25 UTC
and people still think CSM elections are relevant and fair ?

Sheesh CCP just stop this CSM fetish you not only your time but ours aswell

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire
123Next page