These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

[Lobbyism] Wishlist of Issues the MD would like to present to CSM8

First post
Author
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#1 - 2013-04-01 19:40:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Caleb Ayrania
Hello MD.

I thought this would be a good time to start a thread and collecting all those ideas, and issues MD find important.

When posting here could you please appoint ideas priority and points as follow.

Priority issues 5 points

Medium Priority 3 points

Low priority 1 point.

When commenting on other peoples ideas or issues grant point the same way.
I will collect the points and list them in post as votes come in.

Please try and focus on realistic ideas and fixes, and any bigger issues leave links to posts describing details, and for deeper discussions.

NB: Excuse the drafty format until more content is gathered. Will also collect these into a google doc eventually. (If anyone got links, info etc please eve-mail what you want added)
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#2 - 2013-04-01 19:45:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Caleb Ayrania
-Reserved-

Mari Hata
Randomized NPC events: 1 Point : Priority Low
Idea for getting more random effects into the npc activity and thus pve elements.

Arronicus
Ingame Banking : 3 Point : Priority Mediun
Ingame mechanics for issuing loans, preferably a feature that has npc-to-player and player-to-player option.

Kara Brooks
Micro-corps : 3 points : Priority Medium
Variation on the CCP Soundwave introduced idea to tier corporations and "nerf" npc corps

Post
POS access roles : 5 points : Priority High
Fixing POS roles and functionality. (Is already on CCP list and getting worked on)


Post
Statistical and Historical data access : 5 points : Priority High
More datamining options, and release of information like from QEN dr.E and CCP Diagoras



A few examples for consideration:

Reset Shares feature: Vote proposal function to force buy back, at suggested price and vote enforced.

Player to player billing: With settings to automatically change standing at default.

Contracts feature granting temporary positive standing, with option for temporary access to POS and STATION etc.

Corp order highlight and corp order manipulation by members with accountant rights.

Corp and Alliance seller info visible on markets.
Mari Hata
Main Street Crafts and Goods
#3 - 2013-04-01 19:54:47 UTC
Low priority :
Random crisis affecting NPC stations and players assets within (blaze, strike, quarantine, tax hike, theft, takeover by another NPC corp, you name you favorite wildcard).

♫ ♪ ♪

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#4 - 2013-04-01 21:14:30 UTC
Hey it's the biannual MD pie in the sky wishlist thread for stuff that will never happen.

Let's get this one stickied when you're done so we can save the next set of suckers the hassle.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#5 - 2013-04-01 21:18:32 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Hey it's the biannual MD pie in the sky wishlist thread for stuff that will never happen.

Let's get this one stickied when you're done so we can save the next set of suckers the hassle.


Bitter vet syndrome sets in earlier and earlier these days
Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#6 - 2013-04-01 21:38:47 UTC
Was there a list you sent to CSM7 or CSM6? If so, I didn't see it...

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#7 - 2013-04-02 00:23:30 UTC
the only csm that mattered was the one that mittani lead, during monocle gate. and even then, they got ignored.

i guess what im saying is, what do u hope to gain from this thread? when there is an entire forum "features and ideas" that gets ignored daily.

@JerryTPepridge

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#8 - 2013-04-02 01:30:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Kara Books
Institution of an in-game banking system + a completely different type of corporation altogether with full fledged features and all the bells and whistles we all know we want.
All characters to specialize in merchanting on any and all levels, only characters in Merchant corporations will be allowed to spam any kind of sales, want to buy or contracts in public, while the rest will be limited to once every hour.
(edit-forgot 2nd part)
Creation of Industrial corporations, allowing members of these only to use in station services like invention, copying etc.
All others will need to have a running POS with correct fitings in place and running to do the same.
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-04-02 03:00:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Arronicus
5 pt: Nullsec industry incentives. As it stands, unless you are building supers (0.0), or capitals (lowsec), or mass producing tech 2 off a bpo (upgraded amarr stations), theres little to no reason to produce in 0.0, and this means that there is very little use for 0.0 markets, other than heavily inflated items.

3 pt: Facilitation for loans and banks in game. Would take some fleshing out, but means of having secure loans, where one party could not simply 'run off with' the goods. Including perhaps functionality for collateral, that wasn't returned till the loan was paid in full?

(more to come)
Thur Barbek
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2013-04-02 05:56:06 UTC
high priority:

Fix pos access / corp roles so that its not give 100% access or 0% access.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#11 - 2013-04-02 07:33:54 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Hey it's the biannual MD pie in the sky wishlist thread for stuff that will never happen.

To be fair, most of the ideas that appear in threads like these are awful and should never happen.
Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2013-04-02 07:52:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
Two step wrote:
Was there a list you sent to CSM7 or CSM6? If so, I didn't see it...

we have a discussion on CSM candidates and feature requests at least once per year.

a non-exhaustive list of examples that came up in a quick search:

2008:
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=766496
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=741708

2009:
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=1060298
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=998973

2010:
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=1402988

2011:
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=1471649

2012:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1066066

as the requests haven't really changed in the past 5 years or so it is assumed that everyone with a passing familiarity of MD is already well aware of them.

in our experience most CSM candidates don't care about MD at all but we usually try to find one candidate who can be expected to champion our cause. In 2008 this was LaVista Vista, in 2009 it was Omber Zombie, in 2010 it was T'Amber, in 2011 it was Kalrand (who withdrew during election time), in 2012 it was T'Amber and this year it is going to be corestwo.

.

11 of 11
The 11th Hour
Abacus Alliance.
#13 - 2013-04-02 07:54:33 UTC
#1 - Stop the bots controlling the markets. That shuts everything down. Period.

11 of 11
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#14 - 2013-04-02 09:12:12 UTC
I'd say, this year, the CSM will have people on it who understand MD's issues. Maybe not agree on all of them, but not discount them.

Mynnna's a regular here. I'm at least a regular lurker.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Premier Sovian
New Sun Ventures
#15 - 2013-04-02 09:54:36 UTC
I just want a better looking UI. The UI of the future is pretty darn ugly.

A choice of in game UI skins I can pick from would make me a happy bunny.
flakeys
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-04-02 10:03:52 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:
and this year it is going to be corestwo.



Looks like i'm gonna be voting goon this year then Blink

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

flakeys
Doomheim
#17 - 2013-04-02 10:04:44 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
Varius Xeral wrote:
Hey it's the biannual MD pie in the sky wishlist thread for stuff that will never happen.

Let's get this one stickied when you're done so we can save the next set of suckers the hassle.


Bitter vet syndrome sets in earlier and earlier these days



Doesn't mean bitter boy isn't right though ...

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Samroski
Middle-Earth
#18 - 2013-04-02 13:48:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Samroski
Caleb Ayrania wrote:

Priority issues 5 points

Medium Priority 3 points

Low priority 1 point.

How about being able to assign -5, -3, and -1 priority to bad ideas?
Kara Books wrote:

All characters to specialize in merchanting on any and all levels, only characters in Merchant corporations will be allowed to spam any kind of sales, want to buy or contracts in public, while the rest will be limited to once every hour.
(edit-forgot 2nd part)
Creation of Industrial corporations, allowing members of these only to use in station services like invention, copying etc.
All others will need to have a running POS with correct fitings in place and running to do the same.

Somehow I do not like these ideas. They are interesting to consider, but with all due respect I'd like to assign low priority (or -3) to these ideas. Not being able to set up buy orders as an industrialist would be a big hassle, necessitating creation of a sister trade corp. Most big corps need divisions dedicated to industry, trade, PvP etc. etc., and I do not think this idea would be well received.

Edit: The idea could be useful, though, to create an isk sink. You could have corp management skills for trade, industry et al. or possibly licences. To create a simple corp where you do nothing but chat costs 1m. A trade licence costs 10m, industry licence costs 50m. Better even, the skills are required to validate the licences :)

I am strongly against this idea, and would like to give it -5, and hope CCP never hear of it :)

Any colour you like.

Beckie DeLey
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-04-02 14:29:32 UTC
Samroski wrote:

How about being able to assign -5, -3, and -1 priority to bad ideas?


But then, how would we get anyth... oh.

Oh!

My siren's name is Brick and she is the prettiest.

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#20 - 2013-04-02 14:45:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Varius Xeral
Hey, at least a few people get it.

I would support, or at the very least have no objections to, compiling a reasonable and thoughtful list of "hey, here's a few things that would make market play much better for everyone if you guys have the time/opportunity".

Instead it will be a bunch of internet spaceships banks and stock markets bs, that represents fundamental changes to the character of the game and a ridiculous effort to impact ratio.

Edit: despite the best intentions of the OP.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

123Next pageLast page