These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Pirate tears

Author
Zelda Wei
New Horizon Trade Exchange
#1 - 2011-10-30 13:07:04 UTC
Idea There should be a scanner module that detects pirate gankers and summons CONCORD to destroy them.

This would generate lots of pirate tears.
Goodwill George
For a fistful of Veldspar
#2 - 2011-10-30 13:10:47 UTC
Zelda Wei wrote:
Idea There should be a scanner module that detects pirate gankers and summons CONCORD to destroy them.

This would generate lots of pirate tears.


Features and Ideas are that way. ---->
Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#3 - 2011-10-30 15:06:02 UTC
The insurance payout for exhumers industrial ship freighter should be up quite a bit. In order to motivate honest pepole having very good standings.

Maybe the higher the security standings the better the insurance...:)

Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#4 - 2011-10-30 15:19:10 UTC
By the way i think that a pirate shouldn t be allowed to get inshured at all

common pirate corp very low standings and very frequently destroyed by concorde----> no insurance at all for this guy

any mission agent of any corp(not pirate corp) should be aware nof his action (piracy) and do not allow any mission

incurtion shouldn t be allowed in any way , common concord allowing pirates to do mission

You have to have 8 of standing in order to get a jump clone from a corp.

There should be a minimum of standing require to get inshured and a minmum for doing incurtion
Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#5 - 2011-10-30 15:25:52 UTC
The truth is you choose to be a pirate be a pirate---->very hard to get back in empire

Live like a pirate no low sec pos access----- POS should allow only positive security standings even if hes member of the corp

No NPC station in low sec access same for whole empire.

Live like an true outlaw.
Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#6 - 2011-10-30 15:45:44 UTC
You want more, you know that concord looks for criminals.

Why a gate director would allowed a jump to a minus 10 security status.


So at lvl -8 security status no gate jump would be allowed.
With all thoses improvements their life would truly looks as a outlaw life.
Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#7 - 2011-10-30 16:00:01 UTC
You want more


Why concord would pay any bounty to someone having a -10 standings with them. Common be serious about that.
Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#8 - 2011-10-30 16:13:13 UTC
Ok you want more

A guy with negative security standings wouldn t be allowed to received any bounty from ratting in belts but would received standing from concord.

When his security standings would be positive then only then he would receid bonty from ratting or doing incurtion.

That would be nice.
Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#9 - 2011-10-30 16:42:51 UTC
Ok very last post here

To be completely honest someone having a negative security status is a criminal. And all bounty payout from concord should and must be forbitten.

Concord doesn t pay any bounty to criminals. End of the discussion,
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#10 - 2011-10-30 17:11:14 UTC
Mederik wrote:

Maybe the higher the security standings the better the insurance...:)

+1

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Mederik
Absolute Order XVI
Absolute Honor
#11 - 2011-10-30 17:43:09 UTC
i know i ve said i would stop but i can t....:)


In empire low sec should work the same way as hi sec does.

The low sec pos should obey the same rules the security lvl the system have.

SO let say a - 1 security pilot can access -4 security systems and below

a - 2 security pilot can access -3 security systems but not -4 systems or dock in a -4 system

- 3 security pilot can access - 2 security system and lower but not -3 or higher

- 4 security pilots can access - 1 security systems

Thoses are light weight criminals but -5 and higher shouldn t be grant access to any empire systems.

0.0 would be there place. Shure they could cyno in low sec they want in but there pos wont let them in.

Same goes for station no docking if you don t meet the security lvl.

There medical clone should be remove to nul sec or execute (since they are criminals) and notify by concord.
Taint
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2011-10-30 17:46:05 UTC
Goons should be payd to kill miners and people traveling on autopilot.
Mary Mercer
Doomheim
#13 - 2011-10-30 20:37:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Mary Mercer
You should not be able to jump into a system you can not legally be in. Be funny if you ganked a ship and got stuck in the 05 you are in because a 06 is between you and the Low sec.

Also stop allowing people to dock up at stations when they are to negative for the system.

It doesn't stop them from using alts, but it certainly makes it harder on them. Not enough punishment for criminal activity is the biggest problem that I see.

OH and thumbs up on the no insurance payout.

Also thumbs up on better insurance based on sec status. How awesome would it be to get 90% coverage on the market value of a ship if you had a 5.0 or > sec status.
Taijha Assari
StarDancer Excavations
#14 - 2011-10-30 20:42:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Taijha Assari
Zelda Wei wrote:
Idea There should be a scanner module that detects pirate gankers and summons CONCORD to destroy them.

This would generate lots of pirate tears.


Definitely this. My inner-troll would squeal with glee.

Also I agree with Mary Mercer. :)
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#15 - 2011-10-30 21:15:00 UTC
Terrible posters should be CONCORDED every time they undock.

That should clear out threads like these.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2011-10-31 00:07:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Barbara Nichole
Zelda Wei wrote:
Idea There should be a scanner module that detects pirate gankers and summons CONCORD to destroy them.

This would generate lots of pirate tears.



lol, I hear pirates like tears... cheers for anyone who recognised that this poster is in no way serious.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]