These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EvE Online: Odyssey!!!

First post
Author
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#501 - 2013-03-28 17:36:03 UTC
"A New "Spacescape"

A rebalance of major areas of space from highsec to nullsec include changes in exploration sites, industrial resources, some types of NPC loot and more…"

DETAILS!!!!!

As a high sec carebear, how many of my alt mining accounts will I be unsubscribing with this "industrial resource rebalance"?

Come on CCP.... give us some 411 on what may possibly be the biggest change to the carebear play style in half a decade or more.


we're less than 3 months away. Should I cancel my re-subs now? I guess I really should. No reason to auto-resub for 6 month subscription in May if in June I won't be playing anymore.

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#502 - 2013-03-28 17:40:58 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
"

As a high sec carebear, how many of my alt mining accounts will I be unsubscribing with this "industrial resource rebalance"?


Hopefully all of them you whiny man child... But i guess just like everyone else, you have to wait and see.
Dave Stark
#503 - 2013-03-28 18:27:40 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
LHA Tarawa wrote:
"

As a high sec carebear, how many of my alt mining accounts will I be unsubscribing with this "industrial resource rebalance"?


Hopefully all of them you whiny man child... But i guess just like everyone else, you have to wait and see.


indeed. it's about time high sec mining wasn't an isk printing machine and null was worth mining in once again.
Quintessen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#504 - 2013-03-28 18:57:33 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
LHA Tarawa wrote:
"

As a high sec carebear, how many of my alt mining accounts will I be unsubscribing with this "industrial resource rebalance"?


Hopefully all of them you whiny man child... But i guess just like everyone else, you have to wait and see.


indeed. it's about time high sec mining wasn't an isk printing machine and null was worth mining in once again.


So why isn't null worth mining?
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#505 - 2013-03-28 19:06:09 UTC
Quintessen wrote:

So why isn't null worth mining?



AFK cloakies
Null rents and politics
Stress
Others can dictate to you, your play style
Difficulty transporting, lack of trade hubs, hassles converting mins to ISK
Too much boom


I want to log in, do my thing for a couple hours, be left alone, no stress, make some ISK, then log out.

EVE may be life to you. It is a casual escape from the stresses of my life for me. I don't need a game that is more work than fun, thanks.
Quintessen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#506 - 2013-03-28 19:12:46 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Quintessen wrote:

So why isn't null worth mining?



AFK cloakies
Null rents and politics
Stress
Others can dictate to you, your play style
Difficulty transporting, lack of trade hubs, hassles converting mins to ISK
Too much boom


I want to log in, do my thing for a couple hours, be left alone, no stress, make some ISK, then log out.

EVE may be life to you. It is a casual escape from the stresses of my life for me. I don't need a game that is more work than fun, thanks.


Lack of industry in general seems to be the problem, not that null mining isn't worthwhile. It seems the fundamental problem is that you can't see locally which causes the miners/industrialists to be even bigger targets causing more stress. The other stuff is just a part of null and isn't going to change (e.g. politics, dictating play style).

Though that's partly, but not entirely, due to the major null alliance's opinion of industrialists. The first and overriding criteria of a lot of null alliances is, do you have lots of PvP experience and can you fly the ships if our PvP fleet doctrines.

Easier industry would be good, but so would null sec alliance adjusting their attitudes towards industrialists (some not all have this problem).
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#507 - 2013-03-28 19:17:19 UTC
Quintessen wrote:


Easier industry would be good, but so would null sec alliance adjusting their attitudes towards industrialists (some not all have this problem).


It depends on the type of industrialist. If its a industrialist who is actually willing at times to participate in combat(either to defend home terf, or help the corp/alliance) then usually that's not a issue. If it's a industrialist who wants everything handed to them on a silver platter, and whines when something doesn't go their way, then no.

Also due to the limitations of null industry currently, anything outside of super production is too much of a hassle then its worth. When it comes to managing it.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#508 - 2013-03-28 19:21:09 UTC
Quintessen wrote:
The other stuff is just a part of null and isn't going to change (e.g. politics, dictating play style).


And is sufficient to make me not be a null industrialist.

Right now, I can play EVE as a high-sec, carebear industrialist.

I can log in, find belts to mine, mine them with little to no stress, convert my mins to ISK with little hassle, log out... all with low stress and few hassles. In fact, i can even easily do this on 4 accounts, so I run 4 accounts.


If the Odyssey changes eliminate my ability to play this casual, no stress, no hassle, always something profitable to do, play style, then CCP will have eliminated me, and my four accounts, from the game.

In preparation for this possibility, I thought it only prudent to cancel the auto-renewal of my 4 subscriptions that were scheduled for May.

Dave Stark
#509 - 2013-03-28 19:24:11 UTC
Quintessen wrote:
So why isn't null worth mining?


ignoring the other ******** answers above; it's worth less isk/hour than high sec mining. that's the short version.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#510 - 2013-03-28 19:28:10 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:

It depends on the type of industrialist. If its a industrialist who is actually willing at times to participate in combat(either to defend home terf, or help the corp/alliance) then usually that's not a issue. If it's a industrialist who wants everything handed to them on a silver platter, and whines when something doesn't go their way, then no.



I'm the latter. I'm not willing to fight, to put up with hassles. It is a game, and is supposed to be fun. I'm not going to play if it is work, a hassle, high stress.

I'm a casual player. I've embraced, and owned, the role of high-sec carebear.

If so many players want me out of the game, and CCP is hinting they may be moving that direction, then how can it be anything but prudent for me to cancel my auto-renewal of subscriptions?

I can't see how urging other high-sec carebears to do the same is a rant or rumor mongering.


Perhaps if CCP would give us some details on what they are thinking with this "remove tediousness" and "industrial resource rebalance" talk, then maybe it wouldn't be prudent to prepare to unsub all those accounts. With lack of details, it has to be considered prudent to not have multiple accounts auto-renew their subscription, for extended periods of time, a month or two before what could possibly be a significant change to the high-sec, carebear play style.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#511 - 2013-03-28 19:32:57 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Quintessen wrote:
So why isn't null worth mining?


ignoring the other ******** answers above; it's worth less isk/hour than high sec mining. that's the short version.


That answer is insufficient. Even if null paid 2x what high sec mining paid, I would still not do it. Heck, even 4x.

Move all your stuff, get set up.. work your butt off, upgrade your system... Poof.. One AFK cloakie shows up and it was all for not. Don't even bother logging in for weeks while you hope they give up and go away.


You can't nerf high sec mining enough, or buff null mining enough, to make me put up with all the BS that comes along with null living.

EVE may be life to you. It is a casual hobby, a stress free release from the BS of real life, to me.
Dave Stark
#512 - 2013-03-28 19:39:54 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Quintessen wrote:
So why isn't null worth mining?


ignoring the other ******** answers above; it's worth less isk/hour than high sec mining. that's the short version.


That answer is insufficient. Even if null paid 2x what high sec mining paid, I would still not do it. Heck, even 4x.

Move all your stuff, get set up.. work your butt off, upgrade your system... Poof.. One AFK cloakie shows up and it was all for not. Don't even bother logging in for weeks while you hope they give up and go away.


You can't nerf high sec mining enough, or buff null mining enough, to make me put up with all the BS that comes along with null living.

EVE may be life to you. It is a casual hobby, a stress free release from the BS of real life, to me.


no you wouldn't do it, but what you do and don't do is irrelevant.

the fact remains null sec mining is less isk/hour than high sec mining.

now go and pretend i care what you have to say somewhere else.
LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#513 - 2013-03-28 19:53:14 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:

no you wouldn't do it, but what you do and don't do is irrelevant.


It seems it was not irrelevant to the person that asked ME the question that you jumped in and answered.

There was an ongoing conversation, that YOU jumped into the middle of. Then you get angry and say you don't care what someone that was already in the conversation, has to say? Then don't jump into the middle of an ingoing conversation!



Dave Stark wrote:

the fact remains null sec mining is less isk/hour than high sec mining.



And, I never said it was not less profit.

I simply said that making null sec mining more profitable would not be sufficient to get me to become a null sec miner.
DrHekki
Confederacy of Independent Forces
#514 - 2013-03-28 19:56:38 UTC
Listen you spotty 13 year old.

High-sec Care-bears are good for the game and have a much more competitive industry to live in than some of you null sec whining care bears.

For what it is worth my opinion of the state of the game is the only thing that needs to change is null sec. I like low sec where it is around about now, but null sec is an endless emptiness with quite possible up to 90% of null sec being unused other than to moon mine a few of the moons in the system.

Your anger at high sec care bears is completely misdirected, not everyone's end game is to become a member of a flock of sheep. Not everyone wants to play the game in a group.

Dave Stark
#515 - 2013-03-28 19:56:45 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
It seems it was not irrelevant to the person that asked ME the question that you jumped in and answered.

[irrelevant crap, as per usual]

I simply said that making null sec mining more profitable would not be sufficient to get me to become a null sec miner.


except, they quoted me, so they were asking me. not you.
once again, it's irrelevant what you would and wouldn't do.

you've already created two threads, and had them locked, so you could have a little cry. this thread isn't your tear overflow area.
Bellanea Rajanir
Obolka Kin
#516 - 2013-03-28 19:57:45 UTC
Quote:
It is a casual hobby, a stress free release from the BS of real life, to me.


No wai.

We are all a 40 year old, hardcore, fat, neckbearded nerds living in moma's basement, with cheetos smelling keyboards.

Eve can't be less hardcore, because people with lives could ruin our self esteem by talking about their succesful lives. X

It was a day when the forum post became sentient

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#517 - 2013-03-28 20:07:29 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
[
you've already created two threads, and had them locked, so you could have a little cry. this thread isn't your tear overflow area.


Actually, I only created the one. I'm not sure how the second one got created with me as the author. I assure you that I did not open that second one.

I don't see that thread as either a rant or rumor mongering.. simply prudent preparation in the face of unknown coming changes. But, of course, we're not allowed to talk about moderation.

Dave Stark
#518 - 2013-03-28 20:08:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
LHA Tarawa wrote:
I don't see that thread as either a rant or rumor mongering


you were the only one. not that it matters. ISD closed it after i reported it's lack of content.
Quintessen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#519 - 2013-03-28 20:09:05 UTC
Since every nullsec mineral is worth more in terms of isk/m3, how is it that it's less profitable? And would it matter that it's more profitable than hi sec mining if it's still less profitable than all the other things you can do in null that are so much more profitable? Would it really need to be a 100M/hour kind of thing to viable?
Dave Stark
#520 - 2013-03-28 20:16:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
Quintessen wrote:
Since every nullsec mineral is worth more in terms of isk/m3, how is it that it's less profitable? And would it matter that it's more profitable than hi sec mining if it's still less profitable than all the other things you can do in null that are so much more profitable? Would it really need to be a 100M/hour kind of thing to viable?


because a minerals isk/m3 is irrelevant. however i will assume you mean ore, because that is relevant. simply put you're wrong saying "every" because not all of them are. combined with the fact that you can't cherry pick ore in 0.0 you end up having to mine 2m isk/jetcan ores along with the 7m isk/jetcan ores. due to the composition of the sites in 0.0 most of these sites are worth less isk/m3 than scordite, which can be cherry picked in high sec.

at the end of the day, how much isk/hour mining makes in comparison to activity Y isn't the issue here (nor does it massively matter in the grand scheme of things) the issue is the fact that null sec mining simply isn't worth getting in to, in comparison to high sec mining. this is before we even consider logistics, and the restraints of being in a player corp, etc.