These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Incursion Agreement
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#21 - 2013-03-26 06:21:19 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:

And what Exploit?



Actually there used to be a exploit b4 CCP fixed it: you use to be able to shoot Sansha structures in sites with little to no resistances & win sites due to the high DPS done on them

The old communities got together & stifled it at about he same time CCP fixed the incursion mechanics bug I seem to recall

Oh I knew that, His post is clear as mud now :)

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#22 - 2013-03-26 06:24:12 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:

Who bought CCP..... ISN is preventing others from getting skills..... really confused here.
I am really not trolling, I want to know where you were going with this. Or at least where you got the ideas?


I think he was being facetious there, no?
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#23 - 2013-03-26 06:28:45 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:

Who bought CCP..... ISN is preventing others from getting skills..... really confused here.
I am really not trolling, I want to know where you were going with this. Or at least where you got the ideas?


I think he was being facetious there, no?

Probably right, You would think we deserve a better class of trolls. Big smile

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#24 - 2013-03-26 06:30:39 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:

Probably right, You would think we deserve a better class of trolls. Big smile


lol Don't feed the TrollsAttentionBlink
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Miles Forrester
Eire Engineers
#25 - 2013-03-26 06:44:56 UTC
Meanwhile, let's get back to discussing an agreement.
If you don't like the posted one, at least provide feedback in what you'd like to see changed in the agreement.

Even if it only lasts for a year then we can always go back to the tables.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#26 - 2013-03-26 07:07:35 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
delete
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Lord BryanII
#27 - 2013-03-27 02:03:52 UTC
no agreement. I too am enjoying whats going on recently. Got pretty exciting when the DIN fail gank fleet landed on us Sunday. Funny as hell watching all those pods warping to the sun after the fail, lol
Mark Blema
#28 - 2013-03-30 01:34:07 UTC
My personal favorite was watching 76 angry Germans loose to a 40 man isn fleet... Lulz insued behind my mic. Just saying.
Geinus
Vermis foramen Industrius
#29 - 2013-03-30 18:08:30 UTC
I can see peoples frustration with some fleets...... and hence the attempt for a type of aggreement ..

The Reallity is, any form of contest is basical just another way off trolling...
Easy answer dont feed them....

We had a "shiney" fleet land on one of our traiuning fleets in a vg, so we just stoped shooting ...
the site took 12mins (as the rats wernt web'd or had any other form of drp on them).
So that shiney fleet lost a complete site (in timed efficencey)

I dont think aggreement is needed just DONT FEED THE TROLLS,
And they will feck off.....

And i wont embarrass the Shiney fleet ( They know how they are... ;))
Miles Forrester
Eire Engineers
#30 - 2013-04-04 04:52:01 UTC
Noting recent events, let's bring this back up again.
Ludus Lucrius
WildCards 22nd
#31 - 2013-04-04 09:23:40 UTC
too many drama queens to have effective agreement :)
Turelus
Utassi Security
#32 - 2013-04-04 10:21:20 UTC
Incursions seem to have more entertaining politics than NullSec now Shocked

Also agreements never work, someone will break them or a new group will come along and realise they make more money if they don't follow it.

Turelus CEO Utassi Security
Dianila Artemisa
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#33 - 2013-04-05 14:34:26 UTC
Turelus wrote:
Incursions seem to have more entertaining politics than NullSec now Shocked

Also agreements never work, someone will break them or a new group will come along and realise they make more money if they don't follow it.


Then there should be a good reason to be part of the agreement. I'm pretty sure that everybody would join if there would be mutual benefits.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#34 - 2013-04-05 19:48:39 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Turelus wrote:
Incursions seem to have more entertaining politics than NullSec now Shocked

Also agreements never work, someone will break them or a new group will come along and realise they make more money if they don't follow it.


lol we need a big blue Incursion doughnut in the Incursion Journal entry Lol

last agreement lasted a year plus so it worked for quite awhile
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Horse Feathers
CAStabouts
#35 - 2013-04-06 14:45:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Lenier Chenal wrote:
I like running sites when I'm bored, but goodness I had no idea incursion communities were so dramatic! Hilarious!

I really don't see how it could come out any other way, with the current mechanics....

With incursions, there's always a way to, at least temporarily if not indefinitely, stop an entire fleet from making isk, (or several entire organizations, in the case of the mom), and it almost always results in the stronger fleet making even more isk from it. (meaning it's encouraged)

Couple all of that with the fact that incursion runners most often fly under the banner of some channel or another, and you inevitably will get a bunch of groups arguing with each other.

thhief ghabmoef
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#36 - 2013-04-08 15:57:54 UTC
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:

Couple all of that with the fact that incursion runners most often fly under the banner of some channel or another, and you inevitably will get a bunch of groups arguing with each other.


Slightly more ISK in the case of the Mom, but it also kills the isk/hour for every community not willing to fly in lowsec or unable to get standings to safely run an incursion in null, and so is mostly something that a community does to grief the other timezones near the end of their primetime, or when its getting close to the "no one gets LP" deadline if there isn't drama for the sake of modifying the behavior of others.

That said, I have no stance on the recent mom popping other than that has messed with my fireworks plans.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp
Miles Forrester
Eire Engineers
#37 - 2013-04-15 07:30:41 UTC
Drama appearing to have subsided for the time being, let this be discussed again.
Previous page12