These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EvE Online: Odyssey!!!

First post
Author
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#141 - 2013-03-24 02:09:48 UTC
Oberine Noriepa wrote:
So... when do we get to play with this stuff on the test server(s)? Smile

Soonish. The expansion is still over two months from now.
Atomic Option
NO Tax FAT Stacks
#142 - 2013-03-24 02:17:07 UTC
Obviously I have to wait for details to panic. The scanning change is scary, but I'm cautiously optimistic. Very happy to see that *something* is being done for POSes even if it turns out not to be the complete modularity re-do they were thinking about a while ago. The notes about expanded exploration have my interest.

I wait to see,
What the **** is going on?
Do well, CCP!
Jame Jarl Retief
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#143 - 2013-03-24 02:18:55 UTC
Well, I do like the name, it's very fitting.

Though, at the same time, I can't help but think "EVE Online: More of the Same - 2013" is just as fitting. Little things? UI improvements? Really? After ten years that's the best you guys could come up with? Incarna is still vaporware, tons of broken stuff, drones haven't been seriously looked at since they were nerfed to oblivion (to a 5-drone limit), etc., etc. And THIS is what you do for a 10 year anniversary? Hope you know what you're doing.
BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#144 - 2013-03-24 02:24:08 UTC  |  Edited by: BEPOHNKA
If one of use give the next theme name dose he. or she gain anything?


here was my idea on the forum when you were picking names....

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2495433#post2495433


ccp use my theme name idea hehehe.. Shocked
La'Krul
HolyTrident
Tactical Narcotics Team
#145 - 2013-03-24 02:29:18 UTC
i'm a bit shocked by this. with all the things wrong with the game they are now going to break exploration, which is currently working nicely aside from the stupid NPC AI which annihilates drones. i hate to be an old cynic but my money is on them dumbing down exploration and ruining the current system by replacing it with a half-assed version that won't work and will be left unfinished. If they introduce any new scanning or exploration skills i will mega rage - i'm starting to get sick of skills just for the sake of it.

Eve was starting to shape up nicely, low sec is great, the ship rebalancing is great, bots are getting banned. mining barges are good, bounties are fun, wormholes are always good, exploration is really nice. If they put a big effort into fixing null we would be looking at a golden age of Eve. Now I'm a little worried, how much longer can the game operate with null sec the way it currently is, or old systems such as incursions, sov, drone ui, poses, walking in stations, aurum, missions, left to rot half finished?
Horus V
The Destined
#146 - 2013-03-24 02:36:07 UTC
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
Quintessen wrote:
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
I just want to say to CCP, please do not simplify or dumb down the scanning system in anyway.

That is my only concern. Apart from that interested to see what they mean by allowing us to explore new frontiers which we have never seen before. Hopefully null sec exploration will become a bit more profitable.


As long as it's not press button, get cookie I have trouble thinking of how it could be easier. Anyways, I'll wait till I see the proposal before I get upset or anything.


The current probing mechanics are complex if that is what you are referring too. They take quite a lot of skill and knowledge to effectively master. Obviously finding anomolies is really simple though. I just hope they don't dumb down the probing mechanics.


I agree with that 100 %. I like the fact that you actually need to put in some effort. In fact some signatures should be only accessible for people with lv5 skills in astrometrics group. At the moment its just too easy because after few days of training i can scan all signatures there are in the game. Thats just stuipid and boring.

V

Warcalibre
NovaTech Holdings
#147 - 2013-03-24 02:41:48 UTC
La'Krul wrote:
i'm a bit shocked by this. with all the things wrong with the game they are now going to break exploration, which is currently working nicely aside from the stupid NPC AI which annihilates drones. i hate to be an old cynic but my money is on them dumbing down exploration and ruining the current system by replacing it with a half-assed version that won't work and will be left unfinished. If they introduce any new scanning or exploration skills i will mega rage - i'm starting to get sick of skills just for the sake of it.

Eve was starting to shape up nicely, low sec is great, the ship rebalancing is great, bots are getting banned. mining barges are good, bounties are fun, wormholes are always good, exploration is really nice. If they put a big effort into fixing null we would be looking at a golden age of Eve. Now I'm a little worried, how much longer can the game operate with null sec the way it currently is, or old systems such as incursions, sov, drone ui, poses, walking in stations, aurum, missions, left to rot half finished?


This.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#148 - 2013-03-24 02:59:16 UTC
La'Krul wrote:
i'm a bit shocked by this. with all the things wrong with the game they are now going to break exploration, which is currently working nicely aside from the stupid NPC AI which annihilates drones. i hate to be an old cynic but my money is on them dumbing down exploration and ruining the current system by replacing it with a half-assed version that won't work and will be left unfinished. If they introduce any new scanning or exploration skills i will mega rage - i'm starting to get sick of skills just for the sake of it.

Eve was starting to shape up nicely, low sec is great, the ship rebalancing is great, bots are getting banned. mining barges are good, bounties are fun, wormholes are always good, exploration is really nice. If they put a big effort into fixing null we would be looking at a golden age of Eve. Now I'm a little worried, how much longer can the game operate with null sec the way it currently is, or old systems such as incursions, sov, drone ui, poses, walking in stations, aurum, missions, left to rot half finished?


Ah... I see you've found the crystalball...What?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

CCP BunnyVirus
C C P
C C P Alliance
#149 - 2013-03-24 03:39:39 UTC
BEPOHNKA wrote:
If one of use give the next theme name dose he. or she gain anything?


here was my idea on the forum when you were picking names....

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2495433#post2495433


ccp use my theme name idea hehehe.. Shocked




good job :D

3D Artist

Zircon Dasher
#150 - 2013-03-24 03:48:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Zircon Dasher
Takseen wrote:
The last exploration focused expansion was awesome.


I too enjoyed farming A-type invuls in 4/10s.

MOAR PLZ!Lol

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Finarvas
Borderline Procurements
#151 - 2013-03-24 04:03:46 UTC
Takseen wrote:


I think there's definitely design space for a cruiser or BC with scanning bonuses that could fill this dual role of scanning and plex combat.


http://i.imgur.com/4socR7Z.jpg

Seems like they have something planned!
Zircon Dasher
#152 - 2013-03-24 04:14:31 UTC
So I just checked out the Odyssey page.... i cannot figure out WHY THEY BROKE THE APOC! It was fine before ffs!

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#153 - 2013-03-24 04:35:57 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
enough to probe down grav sites in 0.0 with nothing but astrometrics II and no other scanning skills. :)


Hee hee... I love how people say that all of hisec is nothing but nullsec alts. They don't seem to realize that it works both ways. Blink

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#154 - 2013-03-24 04:41:01 UTC
Zircon Dasher wrote:
So I just checked out the Odyssey page.... i cannot figure out WHY THEY BROKE THE APOC! It was fine before ffs!

You now have two Apocalypses
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#155 - 2013-03-24 04:57:15 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Unezka Turigahl wrote:
CCP wrote:
A rebalance of major areas of space from highsec to nullsec include changes in exploration sites, industrial resources, some types of NPC loot and moreā€¦



I'm calling it here, 4/10 loot tables are being nerfed. P




will make sure 4/10 will get nerfed just for you :d


Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
not unless you add 6/10 DEDs in HI SEC.... then YYYYYYYYEEEEESSSSSS
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#156 - 2013-03-24 05:06:51 UTC
I wonder if 'rebalance of industrial resources' includes not just ores PI etc but slots and bills

Looking forwards to balancing of magnetometric sites with other sites and some good risk:reward jazz
Lord Fudo
Doomheim
#157 - 2013-03-24 05:07:10 UTC
I really hope that they completely randomize all PvE in EvE so players have to actually risk their ships to earn isk. I hope this expansion will be the end of players memorizing spawns and spawn triggers.

If CCP makes, at least lvl 4 missions more difficult, then maybe all these solo anti-social carebears will actually go seek out some friends to mission with. However CCP also needs to make mission payouts scale with the amount of players in the mission site. The difiiculty and number of enemy should should also scale up when more players are in the mission.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#158 - 2013-03-24 05:11:42 UTC
I Love Boobies wrote:
Holding off on an opinion until more details are released. Blink



WTF?!?!?! I'm sperging all my rightous opinions as a true Forum warrior should you Forum NOOB P
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#159 - 2013-03-24 05:20:21 UTC
Not the sort of name I was expecting.
I would have thought that name would be reserved for an expansion that iterates on wormholes and exploration and such
Quintessen
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#160 - 2013-03-24 05:28:09 UTC
Frankly I wouldn't mind if sites would tell you their group right away so I didn't have to waste time on sites I didn't care about. Is this game supposed to be grindy in that way?