These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Mining: Working As Intended

First post
Author
Javajunky
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2013-03-21 18:12:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Javajunky
As a hardcore miner, I’ve enjoyed and commented on a hundreds S&I posts, articles, and blogs related to the subject. I do not pretend to be good at much in the game of Eve, but I’ve been an empire miner, a null sec miner and even a WH miner. As many Mining posts that get written, there are few that will tell you Mining is working as intended and here is why.

For CCP, mining is a subscription business. It doesn’t matter that you think mining is boring. Mining as it is today is quite lucrative for CCP. It is one of the major reasons for legitimate multi-boxing and CCP loves multi-boxers. We’re not talking about botters, we’re talking the subset of hardcore miners. The sweet spot, some may call them fanatical but in reality they are just ridiculously reliable in paying subscriptions or buying plex because they are the OCD types who are executing a business plan. It’s what appeals to the industry types that PVP folks or market traders rarely grasp or comprehend. There are many hardcore miners in Eve, personally I know 10 guys between them account for more than 150 accounts.

Aside from being another venue of OCD industry folks executing a business plan, Hardcore miners create content for the PVP folks, we are defenseless, and we are the hunted, basically targets of opportunity. We are the players with the balls to sit in the belt with a Rorqual because it’s more efficient hauling. We make mistakes, just last month I accidentally warped one of my hulks back into an Ice field and lost it. ISBoxer accidents happen and they are delicious kill mails for the hunters. Mining for the hardcore multi-boxer is very active, it’s a dance, a mini-game of efficiency and we have to stay on our toes to keep from getting tunnel vision. We even AFK it in a belt now and then because yes we know we should safe up for a bio but we calculate the risk and the amount of time it takes for us to get set back up, sometimes we say screw it and on the rare occasion have paid for it. We don’t complain about how quickly we die when we get tackled, that’s the game of cat and mouse we accept.

The odds that CCP makes a change to mining that would hurt this community, well that is slim and none and slim got laid off 99 weeks ago, he’s probably filing for permanent disability at this point. Again CCP loves multi-boxers, I’m surprised we don’t get VIP pass offers for Fan Fest. CCP isn’t going to change how asteroids are mined because there are a lot legitimate accounts at stake.

Sorry PVP guys we know you spent 5 minutes mining and decided you need to fix something you’d only do for another 5 minutes before you got bored. Spreadsheet market traders, sure you can read some patch notes and write a VLookUp statement, but that doesn’t touch the human factors that make mining the profession it is today. On the bright side, Moon belt mining represents an opportunity for a different kind of mining but that seems to be a few expansions away.

I’m not saying that mining is perfect, but there is balance. Sure I have a bone to pick with CCP Fozzie over the mining crystal capacity of a hulk but don’t expect any serious changes. Maybe null sec gets lucky with some grav site changes, getting access to some more low ends and maybe losing some of those big high end rocks in the grav sites. CCP definitely over compensated high ends with the drone region nerf. Maybe even swapping out these added high end rocks in the grav sites for low end rock volume? Just going to wait and see or maybe even stalk a Dev at Fanfest….
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#2 - 2013-03-21 19:02:29 UTC
Posting in a stealth Goon Troll Thread to get more multi-Boxers (i.e. TARGETS) to subscribe.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Stegas Tyrano
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2013-03-21 19:09:53 UTC
If they do anything to Mining it will be supplementary to what is already in place. Well I hope it is, I don't mind mining semi-afk while browsing the forums or watching youtube videos Smile

Herping your derp since 19Potato - [url=https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2403364][Proposal] - Ingame Visual Adverts[/url]

Javajunky
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2013-03-21 20:38:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Javajunky
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Posting in a stealth Goon Troll Thread to get more multi-Boxers (i.e. TARGETS) to subscribe.


Yes because no one ever mines in Goonswarm lol. I've been an SI poster on the subject for years.

Suck it. Suck it long time.

Lol
Dyphorus
Inritus Astrum
#5 - 2013-03-21 21:25:49 UTC
Actually logged in just to agree with this... Big smile


Mining really is in a pretty good place for both the purpose it fulfills, and the opportunities it provides players. OP explained it as well as I've ever seen it put.

Dave stark
#6 - 2013-03-21 21:38:34 UTC
tl;dr

mining is fine, it's things related to mining that need fixing.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#7 - 2013-03-21 21:46:35 UTC
Javajunky wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Posting in a stealth Goon Troll Thread to get more multi-Boxers (i.e. TARGETS) to subscribe.


Yes because no one ever mines in Goonswarm lol. I've been an SI poster on the subject for years.

Suck it. Suck it long time.

Lol



As long as you assplode the Boxers, it's fine by me.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#8 - 2013-03-22 17:16:58 UTC
Ah yes, I remember this one, LoLPatrol, Smartygeddons

Invite me to fleets, no need ship replacement, can fund myself.
Castor Narcissus
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-03-23 03:02:04 UTC
It must be great for you. I would have fun in mining as well if I could use a bot to mine in your pseudo null space as well, safe and more profitable than high sec.
Dave stark
#10 - 2013-03-23 10:09:56 UTC
Castor Narcissus wrote:
more profitable than high sec.


and just like that, with 5 words, you've demonstrated how clueless and stupid you are.

high sec mining is the most lucrative area of eve to mine in, do the maths and you'll see that.
Javajunky
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2013-03-23 11:34:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Javajunky
Dave Stark wrote:
Castor Narcissus wrote:
more profitable than high sec.


and just like that, with 5 words, you've demonstrated how clueless and stupid you are.

high sec mining is the most lucrative area of eve to mine in, do the maths and you'll see that.



On a spreadsheet, yes you can wax philosophical single/dual box mining operation gets and how single scordite rock is making you all the mad ISK. But when you''ve got a single PC with 11 Miners a Rorq in the POS boosting and crunch ore and a Rorq / Orca hauling in, human factors make being in empire not worth it. Human factors are where spreadsheet nerds fail.

- Empire Rocks typically die after a few cycles, as a multi-boxer, the more accounts, the more efficiency is lost because you're losing cycles in your dance to keep hauling, eyes on local and intel and chasing strips that are constantly dying. In null sec, I can leave one pilot on a crockite rock and he is maximum efficiency for an hour while two others are on Ark, 3 are on the ungodly amount of bistot, virtually working at 100% efficiency.
- Remember, your mining crystal degrades the second you start a cycle not when it completes so partials hits from rocks dying are numbers that add up when you start getting more accounts in play. Adding to the fact that CCP Fozzie killed the Hulk in null sec due to mining crystal limitations doesn't help much either. We really didn't care about the tank, hit.
- We don't log in and find that our belts didn't get a refreshed and we don't typically have to worry about someone else coming in and getting the favorite rock of the day and lose time hunting for that rock in other belts. Null sec its all about grav sites.\

If you asked me to take my fleet to empire and try and vacuum up the 1,000,000 m3 per hour that I vacuum up in null-sec, I'd tell you to take your keyboard and shove it where the sun doesn't shine, I simply don't hate myself that much. I'd have to venture a guess but I'd probably lose 40% of my efficiency moving my fleet around and chasing rocks because they popped so quickly. The hardcore multi-boxer just does things differently for different reasons and because things become more or less practical when you start managing a higher volume of accounts simultaneously.
Dave stark
#12 - 2013-03-23 11:54:44 UTC
that doesn't change the fact that mining in high sec is more profitable.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#13 - 2013-03-23 12:22:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
Dave Stark wrote:
Castor Narcissus wrote:
more profitable than high sec.


and just like that, with 5 words, you've demonstrated how clueless and stupid you are.

high sec mining is the most lucrative area of eve to mine in, do the maths and you'll see that.



...and you don't even have to do the math. http://ore.cerlestes.de/index.html#site:ore


edit: Although technically Low is more profitable, the logistics involved nerf the profits with the typical mining setup that is possible in High.

I've been playing in Low the past few months and will be making a scathing report about it soon-ish. We know it's broken, but BOY is it ever hopelessly broken. Had to see for myself.....and my God...........

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Dave stark
#14 - 2013-03-23 12:24:59 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Castor Narcissus wrote:
more profitable than high sec.


and just like that, with 5 words, you've demonstrated how clueless and stupid you are.

high sec mining is the most lucrative area of eve to mine in, do the maths and you'll see that.



...and you don't even have to do the math. http://ore.cerlestes.de/index.html#site:ore


well, you kinda do, because you can't just cherry pick a grav site in null, you have to mine the whole thing. which makes those hed/hemo/arkonor roids less attractive when you realise you've got to mine **** like spod and gneiss.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#15 - 2013-03-23 12:27:39 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
........when you realise you've got to mine **** like spod and gneiss.


Yup. And that's what exactly is found in Low as well. Ugh

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Dave stark
#16 - 2013-03-23 13:11:23 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
........when you realise you've got to mine **** like spod and gneiss.


Yup. And that's what exactly is found in Low as well. Ugh


but in low you can cherry pick to an extent, but low is just a dreadful place to mine before we even begin to discuss the quality of ore.
Javajunky
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2013-03-23 13:15:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Javajunky
The ISK m3 hour discussion is irrelevant to the general principle that mining is working as intended.

Too much ABC in grav sites is already well known. Not enough Low Ends in Null Sec is already a known.

That really doesn't change the topic about how mining is done is actually working exactly as it should be.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#18 - 2013-03-23 14:24:14 UTC
Javajunky wrote:
The ISK m3 hour discussion is irrelevant to the general principle that mining is working as intended.

Too much ABC in grav sites is already well known. Not enough Low Ends in Null Sec is already a known.

That really doesn't change the topic about how mining is done is actually working exactly as it should be.



That is very true.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#19 - 2013-03-23 14:25:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
I fully expect to receive flame-throwers on full when I post about Low from Trolls who want to either get rid of High, or force 'highseccers' into Low. It'll be interesting.



edit: I got so tired of hearing about it, I decided to find out for myself.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Javajunky
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2013-03-23 14:40:18 UTC
CCP had the best intentions were made with the Drone Regions change. I remember watching the stream where they said they wanted mining to be valuable again. It was progress but I think a little polish is in order. Getting this giant ABC's out of the Grav Sites would really be a good idea. Maybe keelp that love in the XL but that the LG and MED should be nerfed. That would easily bring balance back to the Mining Force.

You won't get grief from me on your post. There should be different mining in different places with appropriate risk/investment/reward schema.
123Next pageLast page