These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

And you thought HI was too safe???? Welcome to Thunderdome™

First post
Author
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#181 - 2013-03-18 20:09:07 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
baltec1 wrote:


What? The high sec lords doing things for themselves?!


Can you please name a few of these HI SEC lords & thier titles? RollBlink
(eg: Shaddo NULL SEC lord of Thunderdome™, The Mittani NULL SEC lord of TECH, Montolio the NULL SEC lord of NEO & blobs etc...)
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#182 - 2013-03-18 20:12:11 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


What? The high sec lords doing things for themselves?!


Can you please name a few of these HI SEC lords? RollBlink
(eg: Shaddo NULL SEC lord of Thunderdome™, The Mittani NULL SEC lord of TECH, etc...)


You can be the lord of bitterness.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#183 - 2013-03-18 20:16:12 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


What? The high sec lords doing things for themselves?!


Can you please name a few of these HI SEC lords? RollBlink
(eg: Shaddo NULL SEC lord of Thunderdome™, The Mittani NULL SEC lord of TECH, etc...)


You can be the lord of bitterness.


I wouldn't be the HI SEC lord of bitterness... I'd be the Forum lord of bitterness while you & a few Goons could be called the Forum lords of hyprocacy
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#184 - 2013-03-18 20:59:25 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:


I wouldn't be the HI SEC lord of bitterness... I'd be the Forum lord of bitterness while you & a few Goons could be called the Forum lords of hyprocacy


That would require us to promote or try to enforce standards, attitudes, lifestyles, virtues, beliefs, principles, etc., that we do not actually hold ourselves.

Lords of chaos would be more apt.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#185 - 2013-03-18 21:01:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:


I wouldn't be the HI SEC lord of bitterness... I'd be the Forum lord of bitterness while you & a few Goons could be called the Forum lords of hyprocacy


That would require us to promote or try to enforce standards, attitudes, lifestyles, virtues, beliefs, principles, etc., that we do not actually hold ourselves.

Lords of chaos would be more apt.



Funnily enough, when I was watching Batman Begins with my son last night... the way the Goons are handling things, very much resembles the League of Shadows.

Just sayin.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#186 - 2013-03-18 21:16:21 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:

You would think 15% of players controlling the space would be incentive for the other 85%.

Why?

Lol

Because you are posting in a 9 page thread that goes on and on about how these Moons are so valuable and controlled by a small portion of the player base. Somehow moving them will bring about war, then perhaps people should try and conquer them.


What? The high sec lords doing things for themselves?!


Sure they do, they join you guys.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#187 - 2013-03-18 21:40:19 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
OK since we're playing Thunderdome™ does this mean Master/Blaster where Shaddo is the dwarf Master & Mittans is the mental midget/physical giant named Blaster or the other way around?!?!?!... of course there's no denial Montrolio isTina Turner Bear

Who runs EVE err I mean barter town???
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Frying Doom
#188 - 2013-03-18 21:46:02 UTC
Well knowing CCP they will probably do something completely random

Like remove tech, declare it an exploit and remove the approximate isk from the alliances based on a price calculated by some extremely strange formula.Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#189 - 2013-03-18 21:56:08 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
OK since we're playing Thunderdome™


So, since you don't seem to like the idea of the Nullsec empires blowing up trillions of ISK for poops and giggles, why are you complaining about it on the forums instead of making preparations to disrupt them?

There are literally no game mechanic barriers to totally disrupting the Thunderdome you've been moaning about for the past few weeks. Or, if your issue is that moons aren't going to be in play, take them while their owners are distracted.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Goddamned American Capitalist
Doomheim
#190 - 2013-03-18 22:11:29 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
OK since we're playing Thunderdome™


So, since you don't seem to like the idea of the Nullsec empires blowing up trillions of ISK for poops and giggles, why are you complaining about it on the forums instead of making preparations to disrupt them?

There are literally no game mechanic barriers to totally disrupting the Thunderdome you've been moaning about for the past few weeks. Or, if your issue is that moons aren't going to be in play, take them while their owners are distracted.


Ease of logistics and power projection dooms that to fail before it has even begun unless the attackers could rally 1000's of people.

Since 85% of the Eve population are 0.0 residents and their high-sec, out of corp neutral hauler alts, this would also be discovered woefully quickly.
Alara IonStorm
#191 - 2013-03-18 23:31:18 UTC
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:

Ease of logistics and power projection dooms that to fail before it has even begun unless the attackers could rally 1000's of people.

Are you saying to take on the largest Empires of EVE you need an Army. Why can't you be like Rambo and solo World War II? CCP Fix!
Goddamned American Capitalist
Doomheim
#192 - 2013-03-18 23:39:55 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:

Ease of logistics and power projection dooms that to fail before it has even begun unless the attackers could rally 1000's of people.

Are you saying to take on the largest Empires of EVE you need an Army. Why can't you be like Rambo and solo World War II? CCP Fix!


You're the one asking CCP to fix that, I never said that it shouldn't take an army, you're attempting to put words in my mouth. I am simply pointing out that it wouldn't be nearly so easy as Ruby would like to imply it would be.

Also, you're forgetting the heroes of pizza, they seem to be half-decent at running an insurgency.
Alara IonStorm
#193 - 2013-03-18 23:45:26 UTC
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:

You're the one asking CCP to fix that, I never said that it shouldn't take an army, you're attempting to put words in my mouth. I am simply pointing out that it wouldn't be nearly so easy as Ruby would like to imply it would be.

Also, you're forgetting the heroes of pizza, they seem to be half-decent at running an insurgency.

Problem solved. CCP close the thread, people who want Tech start recruiting.
Goddamned American Capitalist
Doomheim
#194 - 2013-03-18 23:49:56 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:

You're the one asking CCP to fix that, I never said that it shouldn't take an army, you're attempting to put words in my mouth. I am simply pointing out that it wouldn't be nearly so easy as Ruby would like to imply it would be.

Also, you're forgetting the heroes of pizza, they seem to be half-decent at running an insurgency.

Problem solved. CCP close the thread, people who want Tech start recruiting.


Why not encourage those who have Tech (apparently the only moon goo worth mention) to ramp up recruitment? Everyone in 0.0 should be encouraged to recruit hero tackles.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#195 - 2013-03-19 01:13:25 UTC
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:

Ease of logistics and power projection dooms that to fail before it has even begun unless the attackers could rally 1000's of people.

Are you saying to take on the largest Empires of EVE you need an Army. Why can't you be like Rambo and solo World War II? CCP Fix!


You're the one asking CCP to fix that, I never said that it shouldn't take an army, you're attempting to put words in my mouth. I am simply pointing out that it wouldn't be nearly so easy as Ruby would like to imply it would be.

Also, you're forgetting the heroes of pizza, they seem to be half-decent at running an insurgency.


I simply said that, unlike the case in HS, there are exactly zero game mechanical obstacles to disrupting their thunderdome if you don't like it.


Logistics are exactly as hard for them as they would be for you (actually easier for you, since you probably don't need to run battleship fleets). The fact that they're better at it is not a game mechanical obstacle.

Supers and Titans are available on the open market. You have access to the exact same tools they have to project power. The fact that they're better at it is not a game mechanical obstacle.


There are no game mechanical obstacles to disrupting the thunderdome or taking the Tech moons (which, incidentally, are worth less per hr than Ice mining). There are simply players in your way. Being unable to overcome player generated obstacles is not the game's fault.*

*Before Darth tries to says something about this: Thunderdome is not a reaction to being unable to power through the (game mechanical) giant ****-berry pie that is Sov grinding, it's being unwilling to bury your face in it when the pie-eating contest prize is getting to eat a septic tank** (and when you finish that, they give you a breath mint***).

** The hundreds of millions of EHP of Sov (and PI) structures left over after a bloc collapses and the war is "won".

***You get to own Sov... that holds no advantage over what you already have... and you have to bulk up your renter wing to pay the bills on it, which means you have to deal with renters... hooray!

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Ustrello
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#196 - 2013-03-19 01:18:40 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:


I wouldn't be the HI SEC lord of bitterness... I'd be the Forum lord of bitterness while you & a few Goons could be called the Forum lords of hyprocacy


That would require us to promote or try to enforce standards, attitudes, lifestyles, virtues, beliefs, principles, etc., that we do not actually hold ourselves.

Lords of chaos would be more apt.


I call Malal
Esteban Dragonovic
Saidusairos Nebula Concern
#197 - 2013-03-19 07:40:10 UTC
It would seem that OP has absolutely no concept of what actually happens in a sov war under the current sov system and what makes most people with half a mind and some experience shutter at the whole idea. I'll outline the events very shortly and terribly in this manner:

1. Lets say the two largest coalitions currently in the game (CFC, HBC just for example) declare open sov war upon one another.

2. The two proceed to invade one another in a series of stalemates and structure grinding that continues for YEARS, not weeks, not months, YEARS. The size and disposition of the established powers under the current system would likely see a more drawn out conflict that would continue perpetually without end. Neither side would never actually manage to gain the upper hand for any significant amount of time long enough to produce more than a superficial impact.

3. Eventually after a great deal of time and little if any progress made, both sides finally burn out and quit eve because of the whole horrible ordeal.

4. This massive drop in subscriptions from what is likely to be almost 1/3rd of eve's player base proceeds to send the game in downward spiral due to what is probably more than half of the user generated content leaving the game.

5. After hemorrhaging subscriptions for a time eve finally dies as the sandbox cannot cope with such an extreme stress on the system.

Granted this scenario in particular may not be what would actually occur on the specifics, but the horrid process of the whole thing is probably fairly close.

Simply "Fiddling with tech" will not solve this problem as it is merely a symptom of the larger issue at the core design of the sov system. As it stands, the sov system, as well as a majority of the space in null, needs to be redesigned from the ground up to fix the numerous standing issues on how to encourage new blood in null as well as how to make large scale bloc wars actually damn fun instead of an eye clawing nightmare.

TL:DR : OP has no clue wtf hes talking about; fix the problem, not the symptoms
Anunzi
Solace Corp
#198 - 2013-03-19 08:22:19 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Anunzi wrote:


So, what happened to you Nefarius? A huge percentage of your posts are ranting and raving at the “risk adverse nullbears” as you like to call us.
Did you get griefed while applying to the gewns or something? Did PL hot drop you?

I just cant help noticing the amount of bitter pouring out of you is so intense its even made your avatar look like he’s just drank a pint of neat lemon juice.

Also, blue donut eh?
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=16845619



So in order to prove to me there is no big blue doughnut you post a kill in HI SEC?
Looks like NULL has run out of targets because they're all blue & has to resort to traveling to HI by your account yet still gank blue targets Lol

Welcome to Thunderdome™ Udema


Ahhhh I see, you are just a bitter troll. You cannot possibly be that stupid to actually mean what you posted here.

Or can you…


"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#199 - 2013-03-19 10:12:56 UTC
Anunzi wrote:

Ahhhh I see, you are just a bitter troll. You cannot possibly be that stupid to actually mean what you posted here.

Or can you…

translation: i have nothing to say but i need to do it!

Lol

to keep is simple: killing bears of friendly alliance is almost never the sign of war or conflict. Sometime alliances even reset standings to allow free roams inside their territory. Like it was in Delve/Querious in the middle of 2012.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Anunzi
Solace Corp
#200 - 2013-03-19 10:32:07 UTC
March rabbit wrote:


translation: i have nothing to say but i need to do it!

Lol

to keep is simple: killing bears of friendly alliance is almost never the sign of war or conflict. Sometime alliances even reset standings to allow free roams inside their territory. Like it was in Delve/Querious in the middle of 2012.



So the fact that Goons are shooting PL is a NOT a sign of conflict and yet more :proof: of the blue donut.

Gotcha.

"It was the way she said it, Rimmer, to rhyme with scum"