These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
First pagePrevious page8910
 

Is High Sec a Mith?

First post First post
Author
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#181 - 2013-03-18 19:32:43 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:



I didn't click on it. The op is about Golem and I am referring to ships that have a specific function and role in the game. I am not discussing rookie ships.


Well lets talk about freighters then

Afterall, stupidity knows no bounds.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#182 - 2013-03-18 19:35:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Tippia wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I didn't click on it.
So you were talking out of your ass when you said that “It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing”. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you. Roll

.



I was talking about the freighter that I mentioned in previous posts. The same type of ship I have been referring to all along. So no I am not talking out of my ass, you simply have the selective reading comprehension of a 16 year old cheerleader researching justin bieber headlines. Good for you.



I simply ignored the links provided by baltec1. As I just did again.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Namdor
#183 - 2013-03-18 19:35:48 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I didn't click on it.
So you were talking out of your ass when you said that “It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing”. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you. Roll

That's how the pros do it.

Informed replies are for newbs.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#184 - 2013-03-18 19:36:26 UTC
Namdor wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I didn't click on it.
So you were talking out of your ass when you said that “It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing”. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you. Roll

That's how the pros do it.

Informed replies are for newbs.



Here is another one. This is how "pros" read. Win?

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#185 - 2013-03-18 19:41:31 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:


I simply ignored the links provided by baltec1. As I just did again.


Ignore anything that contradicts you, thats the way to go about discussions!
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#186 - 2013-03-18 19:43:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I was talking about the freighter that I mentioned in previous posts.
Then perhaps you should choose your quotes more carefully and not go off and discuss something completely different than what you're quoting. In the post in question, there was exactly one ship mentioned: a n00bship, so common courtesy makes us conclude that you are not a complete idiot and that you are in fact talking about that one ship when you refer to “that ship”.

I suppose it'll be better to not offer such courtesies in the future.

Quote:
So no I am not talking out of my ass, you simply have the selective reading comprehension
Not really. You just failed to read what you were responding to, and thus made an uninformed comment about something you had no clue about, as you just admitted.

That's ok. You just need to learn to actually read what people write when writing your responses so that you don't accidentally say something you don't mean.

baltec1 wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I simply ignored the links provided by baltec1. As I just did again.
Ignore anything that contradicts you, thats the way to go about discussions!
Of course. Also notice how the other KM linked contradicts his claim that ganking is all about ze mad profitz. Lol
Josef Djugashvilis
#187 - 2013-03-18 19:43:42 UTC
This thread should be locked.

This is not a signature.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#188 - 2013-03-18 19:48:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

I was talking about the freighter that I mentioned in previous posts. The same type of ship I have been referring to all along. So no I am not talking out of my ass, you simply have the selective reading comprehension of a 16 year old cheerleader researching justin bieber headlines. Good for you.


Wrong demographic, I'd say the average person searching for Justin Bieber headlines has yet to hit puberty. You seem to be following the rather worrying trend of shiptoasters who either insult or ignore anyone that doesn't agree with their somewhat myopic view.

Speaking of selective reading comprehension, commenting on posts where you have ignored any relevant links, makes you look like a hypocrite and a fool.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#189 - 2013-03-18 19:52:03 UTC
Wow.

Took a 1/2 hour nap and woke up to 45 updates to this nonsense OP.

Welp, we haven't had a good Threadnaught in awhile. Big smile

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#190 - 2013-03-18 19:55:38 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Wow.

Took a 1/2 hour nap and woke up to 45 updates to this nonsense OP.

Welp, we haven't had a good Threadnaught in awhile. Big smile


I may have just nuked him.

Apologies
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#191 - 2013-03-18 19:56:35 UTC
Would you guys stop arguing in this thread?

I'll grant you the OP's tears were pretty good, but it hurts my eyes to keep seeing the word "Mith" on the front page.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#192 - 2013-03-18 19:57:10 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Some ganks as as easy as ratting in a belt. Nerf ratting?


probably because some players are dumber than NPCs

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

S'Way
State War Academy
Caldari State
#193 - 2013-03-18 20:04:49 UTC
baltec1 wrote:


Well lets talk about freighters then

Afterall, stupidity knows no bounds.

Shocked
A few more like that and I guess we should expect CCP to get requests about adding a tutorial section on how to make double wrap hauler contracts for anyone buying a freighter or an "are you sure you want to be this silly" button when they undock carrying over X amount in cargo.

As for the OP - if you undock it - you're prepared to lose it, welcome to EvE where concord provides consequences not protection.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#194 - 2013-03-18 20:13:30 UTC
S'Way wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


Well lets talk about freighters then

Afterall, stupidity knows no bounds.

Shocked
A few more like that and I guess we should expect CCP to get requests about adding a tutorial section on how to make double wrap hauler contracts for anyone buying a freighter or an "are you sure you want to be this silly" button when they undock carrying over X amount in cargo.


Oh have have worse cases than that one.
Nova Satar
Pator Tech School
#195 - 2013-03-18 20:15:17 UTC
i have to admit, even as a non-missioner i do think this is getting a bit ********. people saying "dont use if you cant afford to lose it" are utter imbeciles. I think you mean "dont risk it if you cant afford to lose" The high of hig-sec is that there should be minimal risk, and dont tell me thats for pussys, its jsut a fact, whats the point in low-sec if high is no different.

There should be limited risk, but not to the point where 4 or 5 BC's can kill pretty much any ship at will.

Anyone with relative brain activity will know its going to be nerfed soon. Mission runner is a style of play for many people, and one they enjoy, there should always be risk and inclusion into the game further than their own little bubble, but its too much at current.

It also makes office and deadspace mods pretty much obsolete except for supercaps and idiot lossmails spammed with CFC BOT DOWN comments.
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#196 - 2013-03-18 20:17:05 UTC
Quote:
3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.

4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.

5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

12. Spamming is prohibited.

Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or nonsensical post that has no substance and is often designed to annoy other forum users. This can include the words “first”, “go back to [insert other game name]” and other such posts that contribute no value to forum discussion. Spamming also includes the posting of ASCII art within a forum post.

22. Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.

26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.

34. Posting of kill reports outside of the Crime & Punishment forum channel is prohibited.

More often than not, posts of this nature are made with inflammatory intent and are designed to promote trolling and flaming. Therefore, the posting of links to kill reports from any third party site, or the direct copy-pasting of kill reports from in game is prohibited on all forum channels of the EVE Online Forums, with the exception of the Crime & Punishment Channel.


As there are far too many breaches of the above rules, and the thread has veered hugely off topic, this thread is locked.

ISD LackOfFaith

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums.

First pagePrevious page8910