These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

@ Hilmar and Zulu. Care to elaborate?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#1 - 2011-10-29 16:06:45 UTC
https://twitter.com/#!/ArnarHrafn/status/121939274303143936

Are you serious or just trolling?

Serioulsy hope you're trolling...

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#2 - 2011-10-29 16:11:55 UTC
*PrtScn*
David Grogan
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2011-10-29 16:15:13 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
https://twitter.com/#!/ArnarHrafn/status/121939274303143936

Are you serious or just trolling?

Serioulsy hope you're trolling...


boohoo suicide gankers might soon find that ganking untankable mining barges will have harsher consequences

miners have had to put up with gankers for years

deal with it

Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs.
Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere
Coalition of the Unfortunate
#4 - 2011-10-29 16:16:24 UTC
What gets me is why they don't up the defences on the mining barges and other exhumers. ORE needs to get their ass in gear. If I was designing ships that kept getting blown up I'd see to it that they got more armour slapped on them.

As for CONCORD -- an increasing % of security status loss would probably be in order. For example, if you repeatedly gank you should suffer a greater security status penalty each time than if you do it rarely. This log should probably run for 3 to 6 months.
XIRUSPHERE
In Bacon We Trust
#5 - 2011-10-29 16:18:06 UTC  |  Edited by: XIRUSPHERE
Miners have had years to learn that saving their barges is stupidly easy and nearly 100% fool proof but would rather be lazy victims. They don't need more tank, they don't need concord fixes. The pilots need to step up and actually fly the ship.

The advantage of a bad memory is that one can enjoy the same good things for the first time several times.

One will rarely err if extreme actions be ascribed to vanity, ordinary actions to habit, and mean actions to fear.
Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#6 - 2011-10-29 16:19:24 UTC
Its working as intended.. does not need fixing. Maybe remove insurance for concordokken ships.. but despite maybe that CONCORD is working perfectly.

Don't **** with CONCODOCD

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#7 - 2011-10-29 16:21:18 UTC
Sentient Blade wrote:

As for CONCORD -- an increasing % of security status loss would probably be in order. For example, if you repeatedly gank you should suffer a greater security status penalty each time than if you do it rarely. This log should probably run for 3 to 6 months.


Well.. That actually would make sense I guess.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2011-10-29 16:22:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#9 - 2011-10-29 16:25:28 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Renan Ruivo wrote:
https://twitter.com/#!/ArnarHrafn/status/121939274303143936

Are you serious or just trolling?

Serioulsy hope you're trolling...

He wasn't trolling. I thought he was. He was offended that I thought he was.

https://twitter.com/#!/HilmarVeigar/status/122062994824900608

https://twitter.com/#!/HilmarVeigar/status/122073565842518017


LOL
Kievan Arakyd
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2011-10-29 16:34:15 UTC
Why is it so hard to make a screenshot?

Got my Dust514 key...
Rocky Deadshot
In The Goo
EVE Trade Alliance
#11 - 2011-10-29 16:36:28 UTC
holy crap... goons actually caused a flood of tears that got CCP to act.
just Amazing...
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2011-10-29 16:36:38 UTC
Kievan Arakyd wrote:
Why is it so hard to make a screenshot?
Why is it so hard for you to click a link?
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#13 - 2011-10-29 16:37:24 UTC
Wait.. What did I miss about the goons?
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2011-10-29 16:37:56 UTC
Rocky Deadshot wrote:
holy crap... goons actually caused a flood of tears that got CCP to act.
Got them to talk about acting, at any rate. No one knows for sure if they are actually making changes. But best to assume they are acting upon that conversation unless they confirm otherwise.
JC Anderson
RED ROSE THORN
#15 - 2011-10-29 16:38:53 UTC
Or is this just about the whole goon ice ops interdiction?
Kievan Arakyd
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2011-10-29 16:39:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Kievan Arakyd
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Kievan Arakyd wrote:
Why is it so hard to make a screenshot?
Why is it so hard for you to click a link?


Says page doesnt exist.

Got my Dust514 key...
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#17 - 2011-10-29 16:42:19 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
https://twitter.com/#!/ArnarHrafn/status/121939274303143936

Are you serious or just trolling?

Serioulsy hope you're trolling...


Goons 1 you 0
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-10-29 16:43:34 UTC
Kievan Arakyd wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Kievan Arakyd wrote:
Why is it so hard to make a screenshot?
Why is it so hard for you to click a link?


A litter herp in your derp? Page does not exist.


It does, change your settings, browser, brains, drugs, alcohol whatever, but do something.
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#19 - 2011-10-29 16:46:16 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Renan Ruivo wrote:
https://twitter.com/#!/ArnarHrafn/status/121939274303143936

Are you serious or just trolling?

Serioulsy hope you're trolling...

He wasn't trolling. I thought he was. He was offended that I thought he was.

https://twitter.com/#!/HilmarVeigar/status/122062994824900608

https://twitter.com/#!/HilmarVeigar/status/122073565842518017

My final two replies to him went unanswered:

https://twitter.com/#!/PoeticStanziel/status/122066794918854656

https://twitter.com/#!/PoeticStanziel/status/122166106629734400



How about now they blow you up before they show up? Lol
Vachir Khan
Rugged Ruff and Ready
#20 - 2011-10-29 16:46:55 UTC
I figured it out!

Goons are doing this to force CCP's hand, but when CCP asks their Goon overlords on how to do it the answer will be "don't buff concord, buff the icemining ships instead". CCP will then buff the Mackinaws and a while later (after having had yet another "chat" with their overlords) CCP decides to move ice belts to 0.0 and specifically to Goon space. Now goons can bot mackinaws with ease on their Rifter accounts (increased tank needs less SP and isk to tank 0.0 rats).

It's all a plot you see.
123Next pageLast page