These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Yet another Forums are not good enough topic and discussion

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
mentalkiller
Celestial Eyes
#1 - 2013-03-17 05:10:14 UTC  |  Edited by: mentalkiller
I think the forums are too linear.
Yes we got a new forums interface with the like button feature and subscribing to a topic feature.

Yet I think we need a more fun out of game interface, maybe add these features to the EVE GATE or forums:
*Send and receive ISK
*Market and hangar management
*Bounty placing
*Skill queue change

If we got a ship viewer why can't we get some love of that kind out of game?
These are not Ideas suggestions, just a general discussion asking you guys if you think we have enough fun out of game.

bibidi babidi bu asdfads




edit:
Pantiy wrote:
yeah we need them to take time from making the game better, so you guys who never undock have more content.... sorry but no, we dont need new forums in fact i wish they would get rid of them totally. my day would be a whole lot more productive.



So if in 1 day you have 5 hours to play in-game, and 5 hours to play out of the game, would you drop these 5 valuable hours just because you want EVE to be a better place?

/mentalKiller
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#2 - 2013-03-17 05:20:50 UTC
Yes I have enough fun out of game.

.
mentalkiller
Celestial Eyes
#3 - 2013-03-17 05:22:53 UTC
Roime wrote:
Yes I have enough fun out of game.


I may have forgotten to specify the context I was referring to which was outside the game, before real life lol xD

/mentalKiller
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-03-17 07:09:43 UTC
Pantiy
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2013-03-17 10:27:49 UTC
yeah we need them to take time from making the game better, so you guys who never undock have more content.... sorry but no, we dont need new forums in fact i wish they would get rid of them totally. my day would be a whole lot more productive.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#6 - 2013-03-17 10:48:30 UTC
Wait is this to improve the forums, or to make it easier for people not to log in? Cause I was gonna say adding in spoiler tags, but it seems you want Eve Web Client.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden
Whitehound
#7 - 2013-03-17 11:07:56 UTC
I'd already be happy if people posted their ideas into Features and Ideas Discussion and not just drop them off in GD.

On the topic: No, thank you. Please do get out of the forum once in a while and play the game. Besides, any resources spend on this forum software is like injecting penicillin into a dead horse.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
mentalkiller
Celestial Eyes
#8 - 2013-03-17 15:01:33 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
I'd already be happy if people posted their ideas into Features and Ideas Discussion and not just drop them off in GD.

On the topic: No, thank you. Please do get out of the forum once in a while and play the game. Besides, any resources spend on this forum software is like injecting penicillin into a dead horse.


as I said my point was to discuss the main point and not to suggest the idea so is a general discussion

/mentalKiller
mentalkiller
Celestial Eyes
#9 - 2013-03-17 15:02:43 UTC
Pantiy wrote:
yeah we need them to take time from making the game better, so you guys who never undock have more content.... sorry but no, we dont need new forums in fact i wish they would get rid of them totally. my day would be a whole lot more productive.



So if in 1 day you have 5 hours to play in-game, and 5 hours to play out of the game, would you drop these 5 valuable hours just because you want EVE to be a better place?

/mentalKiller
Whitehound
#10 - 2013-03-17 16:30:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
mentalkiller wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
I'd already be happy if people posted their ideas into Features and Ideas Discussion and not just drop them off in GD.

On the topic: No, thank you. Please do get out of the forum once in a while and play the game. Besides, any resources spend on this forum software is like injecting penicillin into a dead horse.


as I said my point was to discuss the main point and not to suggest the idea so is a general discussion

It is called Features and Ideas Discussion. You not only post there to make a suggestion and then walk off hoping it will somehow catch on. That is how noobs do it. Instead, you do discuss it in FID and try to sell it to as many as possible.

General Discussion is not for when one has generally no clue, but for discussions that do not fall into any of the existing categories. The clueless stuff often just ends up getting locked or moved.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2013-03-17 16:59:38 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
mentalkiller wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
I'd already be happy if people posted their ideas into Features and Ideas Discussion and not just drop them off in GD.

On the topic: No, thank you. Please do get out of the forum once in a while and play the game. Besides, any resources spend on this forum software is like injecting penicillin into a dead horse.


as I said my point was to discuss the main point and not to suggest the idea so is a general discussion

It is called Features and Ideas Discussion. You not only post there to make a suggestion and then walk off hoping it will somehow catch on. That is how noobs do it. Instead, you do discuss it in FID and try to sell it to as many as possible.

General Discussion is not for when one has generally no clue, but for discussions that do not fall into any of the existing categories. The clueless stuff often just ends up getting locked or moved.

actually F&I is for game discussion

also, while posting in the ~wrong forum~ out of ignorance is a really minor thing, your horrible intentional offtopic posting and backseat moderation are not. it's spam and it's disruptive
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-03-17 17:03:25 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
your horrible intentional offtopic posting and backseat moderation are not. it's spam and it's disruptive


+1. Can we have less of this backseat moderation? It's painful to my eyes.

Dodixie > Hek
Whitehound
#13 - 2013-03-17 17:09:59 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
actually F&I is for game discussion

also, while posting in the ~wrong forum~ out of ignorance is a really minor thing, your horrible intentional offtopic posting and backseat moderation are not. it's spam and it's disruptive

Seems you feel just as disrupted by my comments as I am by OP's wrong choice of forum. If OP had posted into the right section then we would not have this kind of discussion in the first place.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2013-03-17 17:29:26 UTC
it's almost like you're able to read and respond to text but unable to comprehend meaning
Whitehound
#15 - 2013-03-17 17:53:45 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
it's almost like you're able to read and respond to text but unable to comprehend meaning

I got a new pair of undies. Says it is 97% troll resistant. And it works!

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
ISD Flidais Asagiri
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#16 - 2013-03-17 20:35:39 UTC
Greetings

This is more of a features and Ideas discussion, so it has been moved.

On On

ISD Flidais Asagiri Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department
Mag's
Azn Empire
#17 - 2013-03-17 22:20:24 UTC
I wonder if this will get moved? Blink

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.