These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Should nullsec industry > hisec industry?

First post First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#981 - 2013-03-16 11:16:09 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Andski wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
or should NULL just realize that's the price of living in NULL?


what's the cost of living in hisec?


My annual sub.


0/10

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Dave Stark
#982 - 2013-03-16 11:20:02 UTC
Malcanis wrote:

And hi-sec shouldn't have level 4s or ships that can't be flown by trial accounts because it's just a starter area amirite?


i think high sec shouldn't have level 4s because i think the reaction to the removal of l4s in high sec would be comedy gold.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#983 - 2013-03-16 11:35:41 UTC
Andski wrote:

please tell me more about the egregious cost of living in hisec


Getting to hear about stuff like the Battle of Asakai ... and going "I wish I was there".

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Fret Thiesant
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#984 - 2013-03-16 15:36:42 UTC
Sandbox game man. We as a majority have decided on a nbsi policy. Naturally that makes the economy worse.

Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#985 - 2013-03-16 15:55:59 UTC
Fret Thiesant wrote:
Sandbox game man. We as a majority have decided on a nbsi policy. Naturally that makes the economy worse.


That has nothing to do with it.
flakeys
Doomheim
#986 - 2013-03-16 16:19:35 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Andski wrote:

please tell me more about the egregious cost of living in hisec


Getting to hear about stuff like the Battle of Asakai ... and going "I wish I was there".


Black rise ... low-sec ... how hard can it be ?

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#987 - 2013-03-16 16:44:58 UTC
Why isn't this thread dead yet?

Don't ban me, bro!

flakeys
Doomheim
#988 - 2013-03-16 17:46:30 UTC
Mr Kidd wrote:
Why isn't this thread dead yet?



Because these null vs high discussions will only stop once the servers are killed in X years ?

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#989 - 2013-03-16 18:24:28 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:


sorry I did mix that up/ NULL SEC should have worse logistics & industry likethe wild west for the most part had ( except for some good precious ore refining )


We have had ten years of building in 0.0.

Ten yeas ago most of this was a desert.


So, the fact that the richest powers in EVE cant even build an industry to supply their own forces with enough ammo to do ratting let alone fight a war in their own empires doesn't sound broken to you?
Tesal
#990 - 2013-03-16 18:59:29 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:


sorry I did mix that up/ NULL SEC should have worse logistics & industry likethe wild west for the most part had ( except for some good precious ore refining )


We have had ten years of building in 0.0.

Ten yeas ago most of this was a desert.


So, the fact that the richest powers in EVE cant even build an industry to supply their own forces with enough ammo to do ratting let alone fight a war in their own empires doesn't sound broken to you?


"You people" aren't just asking for enough slots to build ammo, you are also asking for hi-sec industry to be nuked.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#991 - 2013-03-16 19:07:52 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Tesal wrote:


"You people" aren't just asking for enough slots to build ammo, you are also asking for hi-sec industry to be nuked.


No we would be happy with simply the same slot availability as high sec. We are even willing to pay hundreds of billions in up front building costs. A level ground to compete on is enough.
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#992 - 2013-03-16 20:05:15 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Tesal wrote:


"You people" aren't just asking for enough slots to build ammo, you are also asking for hi-sec industry to be nuked.


No we would be happy with simply the same slot availability as high sec. We are even willing to pay hundreds of billions in up front building costs. A level ground to compete on is enough.


Ok, as soon as all the nullsec ore and PvE content is put into highsec. Plus I want to build and fight with Titans in highsec too. Roll

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Dave Stark
#993 - 2013-03-16 20:08:12 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Tesal wrote:


"You people" aren't just asking for enough slots to build ammo, you are also asking for hi-sec industry to be nuked.


No we would be happy with simply the same slot availability as high sec. We are even willing to pay hundreds of billions in up front building costs. A level ground to compete on is enough.


Ok, as soon as all the nullsec ore and PvE content is put into highsec. Plus I want to build and fight with Titans in highsec too. Roll


congratulations, let's fix the obvious issues with industry by breaking mining by introducing all the null sec ores in to high sec to make high sec worth even more isk/hour even though it's already worth more isk/hour than null sec.

what kind of stupid are you?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#994 - 2013-03-16 20:09:36 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
Ok, as soon as all the nullsec ore and PvE content is put into highsec. Plus I want to build and fight with Titans in highsec too. Roll
Ok, as soon as all of highsec offers the same inherent security as nullsec. Plus, highsec-CSAAs will cost 50bn to anchor.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#995 - 2013-03-16 20:10:43 UTC
Sentamon wrote:


Ok, as soon as all the nullsec ore and PvE content is put into highsec. Plus I want to build and fight with Titans in highsec too. Roll


So you like the fact that industrialists are the only group of players that are punished for taking greater risks.
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#996 - 2013-03-16 20:14:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Sentamon
PUNISHED!? Big smile Are you in pain?

How about all the crying blue donut children abandon nullsec and leave it for the adults to manage.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#997 - 2013-03-16 20:21:34 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
PUNISHED!? Big smile Are you in pain?
Of course. It rather pains anyone with any kind of insight into the matter to see how mismanaged this part of the game is.

And yes, punished is a pretty apt description for what happens if you try to do null industry.

Quote:
How about all the crying blue donut children abandon nullsec and leave it for the adults to manage.
They already have.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#998 - 2013-03-16 20:22:36 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
PUNISHED!? Big smile Are you in pain?

How about all the crying blue donut children abandon nullsec and leave it for the adults to manage.


The fact you are spouting the blue donut myth shows you have no clue about null let alone null industry.
Tesal
#999 - 2013-03-16 21:33:21 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Sentamon wrote:
PUNISHED!? Big smile Are you in pain?

How about all the crying blue donut children abandon nullsec and leave it for the adults to manage.


The fact you are spouting the blue donut myth shows you have no clue about null let alone null industry.


Yah, hi-sec publords have no clue. Right on. Show them who is boss.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1000 - 2013-03-16 22:58:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
After 50 pages worth of bullshit, this thread is still not going places.

[edit]

1000th post in the thread. Congratz to me.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server