These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Price Cartels

Author
Raindeth
FACTION Inc.
Still Irrelevant
#1 - 2013-03-12 22:55:09 UTC
A couple of apologies first: 1. I'm not sure whether this has been suggested before. If so, excuse the dead-horse beating; and 2. This might be better suited for ideas discussion forum, but I'd like feedback on it first.

Right now, if you submit a sell order at the exact price of the lowest sell order, all of your goods will be sold after ALL of the goods that were already at that price are sold. This doesn't allow for a wonderful market tool: PRICE FIXING.

Would it not be infinitely better if all goods priced exactly the same would have an equal chance of being sold? This would allow some cooperation among sellers and therefore more accurately depict what happens in real economies.


Hmm, perhaps a skill that would allow your items marked at the same price as another sell (or buy) order to have a percentage chance of moving even though they were put up later.

Thoughts? Flames?
Claire Voyant
#2 - 2013-03-12 23:02:46 UTC
Raindeth wrote:
A couple of apologies first: 1. I'm not sure whether this has been suggested before. If so, excuse the dead-horse beating; and 2. This might be better suited for ideas discussion forum, but I'd like feedback on it first.

Right now, if you submit a sell order at the exact price of the lowest sell order, all of your goods will be sold after ALL of the goods that were already at that price are sold. This doesn't allow for a wonderful market tool: PRICE FIXING.

Would it not be infinitely better if all goods priced exactly the same would have an equal chance of being sold? This would allow some cooperation among sellers and therefore more accurately depict what happens in real economies.


Hmm, perhaps a skill that would allow your items marked at the same price as another sell (or buy) order to have a percentage chance of moving even though they were put up later.

Thoughts? Flames?

The Eve Market is based on an auction system. The person who places the first order at price X first gets filled first. If you want to get filled sooner than them, you need to beat their price. If you were at an auction and bid $100 for an item and then another guy bid $100 for the same item and won the auction you would agree that something was screwed up, wouldn't you?
Angelique Duchemin
Team Evil
#3 - 2013-03-13 00:38:27 UTC
I am impressed.

This is a genuine issue isn't it?

People are tired of competing and now rather than claiming the customers by offering he same service for a lower price they want to offer the same service for the same price. In order to accomplish this you urge CCP to change the game to just plain hand you the customers rather than competing for them.

The very sun of heaven seemed distorted when viewed through the polarising miasma welling out from this sea-soaked perversion, and twisted menace and suspense lurked leeringly in those crazily elusive angles of carven rock where a second glance shewed concavity after the first shewed convexity.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#4 - 2013-03-13 02:21:16 UTC
Raindeth wrote:
A couple of apologies first: 1. I'm not sure whether this has been suggested before. If so, excuse the dead-horse beating; and 2. This might be better suited for ideas discussion forum, but I'd like feedback on it first.

Right now, if you submit a sell order at the exact price of the lowest sell order, all of your goods will be sold after ALL of the goods that were already at that price are sold. This doesn't allow for a wonderful market tool: PRICE FIXING.

Would it not be infinitely better if all goods priced exactly the same would have an equal chance of being sold? This would allow some cooperation among sellers and therefore more accurately depict what happens in real economies.


Hmm, perhaps a skill that would allow your items marked at the same price as another sell (or buy) order to have a percentage chance of moving even though they were put up later.

Thoughts? Flames?


You don't seem to understand how cartels work.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Shadow Lord77
Shadow Industries I
#5 - 2013-03-13 02:31:13 UTC
I often wondered about making the eve markets more like the stock market system, specifically in the area of automatic sells and buys and automatic price falls should someone undersell you. How it would function is that you have a minimum price you will sell at, and a maximum price you will buy at should it change. Just add in a minimum sale volume so you don't undercut a 1 volume sale with a 1000 volume one.

It'd be interested I think to see the entire markets shift and spike with every sale order that was updated, but I think it would just reduce margins even more.

The current system I think is I would like to say tedious but the 5 min delay, and the fact that you have to manually update buy/sell orders means that at least if you are actively market PVPing you will have an advantage over other marketeers.

The only thing I can say that relates to OPs suggestion of percentage chance of selling at close to or on the lowest sell amount is to give the markets the ability to buy items at higher price values and actually buy them from that seller and not the lowest priced seller while giving him the money that the higher priced seller was asking for. But this would run the risk of making ISK laundering a very tricky thing to spot for CCP. Since you could just buy a 1B warp disruptor something and claim it was an honest mistake. Perhaps limit the ability to buy items only 100% above the average cost? Thanks.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#6 - 2013-03-13 03:00:50 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Shadow Lord77 wrote:
I often wondered about making the eve markets more like the stock market system, specifically in the area of automatic sells and buys and automatic price falls should someone undersell you. How it would function is that you have a minimum price you will sell at, and a maximum price you will buy at should it change. Just add in a minimum sale volume so you don't undercut a 1 volume sale with a 1000 volume one.


The price you enter on a sell order is the minimum price that you're telling your broker that you are willing to sell at. Just like when you call your broker to have them put in an ask order (if he finds a bid that's higher than your ask, he'll accept it, but he won't accept one that's lower... just like the EVE market).

Similarly with buy orders and bids.


What you're asking for is a legal market bot.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Raindeth
FACTION Inc.
Still Irrelevant
#7 - 2013-03-13 05:01:41 UTC
Claire Voyant wrote:

The Eve Market is based on an auction system. The person who places the first order at price X first gets filled first. If you want to get filled sooner than them, you need to beat their price. If you were at an auction and bid $100 for an item and then another guy bid $100 for the same item and won the auction you would agree that something was screwed up, wouldn't you?


I already described how it works. Imagine we're not at an auction, like most of the trading you do in real life. If you were at McDonald's and the guy behind you said, "I'll pay a penny less for that Big Mac" and the cashier said, "excuse me, let that guy through." you would agree that something was screwed up, wouldn't you?

Angelique Duchemin wrote:
I am impressed.

This is a genuine issue isn't it?

People are tired of competing and now rather than claiming the customers by offering he same service for a lower price they want to offer the same service for the same price. In order to accomplish this you urge CCP to change the game to just plain hand you the customers rather than competing for them.


I, too, am impressed. Somehow people can get the notion that by updating your order to the same price instead of updating it to 1 penny less, you somehow are no longer competing. Apparently, once you've updated your price to match a competitors, it is impossible for any other competitors to undercut the both of you? This logic is remarkable.

RubyPorto wrote:


You don't seem to understand how cartels work.


I know you are but what am I?


Kosher Jew
#8 - 2013-03-13 05:28:58 UTC
I'm interested. Convo me.
Samroski
Middle-Earth
#9 - 2013-03-13 05:36:19 UTC
For items that are priced low and move in high volumes, e.g. tritanium, 0.01 ISK may be a significant amount to undercut by, and thus the temptation to "undercut" at the same price. Does not make too much sense for items that have high prices per unit. I think the market works fine the way it is with the need to undercut and thus a bit of pvp.

Shadow Lord77 wrote:

The current system I think is I would like to say tedious but the 5 min delay, and the fact that you have to manually update buy/sell orders means that at least if you are actively market PVPing you will have an advantage over other marketeers.

How about a skill to reduce the 5 minute delay? Each level reduces the time by 10% (or 1 min). I suggest 10x training time, as I do not update my orders Twisted

Any colour you like.

Shadow Lord77
Shadow Industries I
#10 - 2013-03-13 05:57:31 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
The price you enter on a sell order is the minimum price that you're telling your broker that you are willing to sell at. Just like when you call your broker to have them put in an ask order (if he finds a bid that's higher than your ask, he'll accept it, but he won't accept one that's lower... just like the EVE market).

Similarly with buy orders and bids.


What you're asking for is a legal market bot.


Hypothetically speaking of course.
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#11 - 2013-03-13 06:51:53 UTC
Shadow Lord77 wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
The price you enter on a sell order is the minimum price that you're telling your broker that you are willing to sell at. Just like when you call your broker to have them put in an ask order (if he finds a bid that's higher than your ask, he'll accept it, but he won't accept one that's lower... just like the EVE market).

Similarly with buy orders and bids.


What you're asking for is a legal market bot.


Hypothetically speaking of course.


What would happen if CCP allowed market bots, just like in the real world the top .1% would literally take total and complete control over the markets from every single direction and to every single end.

this would lead to market bot wars, AKA whoever has the fastest connection/most powerful computer wins.
This would in turn, turn any possibility of new players even wanting to play the game as is, instead the only reason they would want to join is RMT.

The final step would be CCP devs becoming corrupt and taking real life bribes, just like it happened to the last 3 games quit and never looked back and the same thing will happen with this one,

Finally the result will be The market, industry and tech will be literally removed as a form of gameplay.

Maybe it wont happen exactly like that, But im pretty convinced that it will happen in that exact order.
Raindeth
FACTION Inc.
Still Irrelevant
#12 - 2013-03-13 06:56:09 UTC
Kara Books wrote:
Shadow Lord77 wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
The price you enter on a sell order is the minimum price that you're telling your broker that you are willing to sell at. Just like when you call your broker to have them put in an ask order (if he finds a bid that's higher than your ask, he'll accept it, but he won't accept one that's lower... just like the EVE market).

Similarly with buy orders and bids.


What you're asking for is a legal market bot.


Hypothetically speaking of course.


What would happen if CCP allowed market bots, just like in the real world the top .1% would literally take total and complete control over the markets from every single direction and to every single end.

this would lead to market bot wars, AKA whoever has the fastest connection/most powerful computer wins.
This would in turn, turn any possibility of new players even wanting to play the game as is, instead the only reason they would want to join is RMT.

The final step would be CCP devs becoming corrupt and taking real life bribes, just like it happened to the last 3 games quit and never looked back and the same thing will happen with this one,

Finally the result will be The market, industry and tech will be literally removed as a form of gameplay.

Maybe it wont happen exactly like that, But im pretty convinced that it will happen in that exact order.


Hey!

Yo!

Interesting conversation, but not on the topic. You wanna legalize market bots? Discuss it in your own thread. Thanks Lol
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#13 - 2013-03-13 10:05:29 UTC
Raindeth wrote:
I already described how it works. Imagine we're not at an auction, like most of the trading you do in real life. If you were at McDonald's and the guy behind you said, "I'll pay a penny less for that Big Mac" and the cashier said, "excuse me, let that guy through." you would agree that something was screwed up, wouldn't you?


You want to turn EVE into McDonalds?

Are you for serious?
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#14 - 2013-03-13 11:38:02 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Raindeth wrote:
I already described how it works. Imagine we're not at an auction, like most of the trading you do in real life. If you were at McDonald's and the guy behind you said, "I'll pay a penny less for that Big Mac" and the cashier said, "excuse me, let that guy through." you would agree that something was screwed up, wouldn't you?


EVE's Contract system is the retail market. EVE's market is the commodities market.

Ever tried to order 20,000 Big Macs from a McDonalds?

Quote:
RubyPorto wrote:
You don't seem to understand how cartels work.
I know you are but what am I?



Here's a hint. Most Cartels alter supply to achieve their ends. The ones that don't (OTEC) are just making use of highly inelastic demand for their product.

Being able to make sales at the same price as an earlier order has no impact on either (esp since most people will undercut to get a 100% chance of making the sale first), meaning that your proposal would have little to no effect*.


*It would mean that people would stop matching me with 30d orders, thinking they're gonna get the sale without undercutting.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Angelique Duchemin
Team Evil
#15 - 2013-03-13 13:01:05 UTC
Raindeth wrote:
I, too, am impressed. Somehow people can get the notion that by updating your order to the same price instead of updating it to 1 penny less, you somehow are no longer competing. Apparently, once you've updated your price to match a competitors, it is impossible for any other competitors to undercut the both of you? This logic is remarkable.


Why would he? All he has to do is put it in at the same price and just make sure he put in more items in total than you and he will take the market.

The very sun of heaven seemed distorted when viewed through the polarising miasma welling out from this sea-soaked perversion, and twisted menace and suspense lurked leeringly in those crazily elusive angles of carven rock where a second glance shewed concavity after the first shewed convexity.

Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
#16 - 2013-03-13 17:56:18 UTC
Shadow Lord77 wrote:
I often wondered about making the eve markets more like the stock market system, specifically in the area of automatic sells and buys and automatic price falls should someone undersell you. How it would function is that you have a minimum price you will sell at, and a maximum price you will buy at should it change. Just add in a minimum sale volume so you don't undercut a 1 volume sale with a 1000 volume one.


My idea is for Buy Orders and Sell Orders that automatically "wander", in a fashion pre-programmed by the issuer.

For instance I might set up a Sell Order for 600k Widgets at 8.30 ISK p/u, with a pre-programmed "wander" that at every 3rd downtime the price shall drop by 0.01 ISK, until my minimum, which I've set at 7.90 ISK p/u.

I create the Sell Order, and then I walk away. I walk away. I do so, confident that it'll keep working for me, lowering itself, making itself more available, and eventually someone will find it attractive enough to grab it.

Same way, if you need Widgets, you set up a Buy Order for 200k Widgets at 8.01 ISK p/u, and pre-program a "wander" of +0.02 ISK every single downtime, with no maximum. Because you want those Widgets.
Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
#17 - 2013-03-13 17:59:00 UTC
Samroski wrote:

How about a skill to reduce the 5 minute delay? Each level reduces the time by 10% (or 1 min). I suggest 10x training time, as I do not update my orders Twisted


That'd be a good idea, but for starters the period of time should be increased. Start with, e.g., 60 minutes.

1st skill level halves it to 30. 2nd to 15. 3rd to 7.5 minute. 4th to 3.75 minutes. 5th to a little under 2 minutes.

How badly do you want it? How quickly and often do you want to be able to modify your Orders?
Tom Hagen
Twilight Empire
#18 - 2013-03-13 18:29:03 UTC
First of, Raindeth isn't asking or want to discuss about any features that would update your orders by automatic.
He want's to be able to set up orders at the same price as another one and have a feature that somehow distribute the sales between the different sellers.

I personally don't see the reason for this, Why would I want to share my sales with someone else?
When I set the price on my order, if the price is 1000 ISK/unit and I think it is worth my time to sell it at that price, I will sell it at 999.99 ISK also no matter what.
If I can sell it at that price someone else can do it also, unless I can control the supply. But if I can control the supply this wouldn't even be an issue to start with :-P

People who talk about any kind of legal bot activity on the market, in my eyes they must be close to ********.

Me and those around me can easily together get hundreds of manufacturing slots and thousands of orders and have the ISK to back it up. If we only had to update our orders once every 90 days, we would accept returns of 1-2%. we don't even consider us self as a big fish in the market. There are people out there with substantial bigger financial muscles that will pretty soon push out all the small or new traders out there. The return on small investment must be higher, but with regional buy and sell orders that don't have to be updated most items will reach a point were there isn't any room for small time investors Sad
Raindeth
FACTION Inc.
Still Irrelevant
#19 - 2013-03-13 22:56:47 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:

Here's a hint. Most Cartels alter supply to achieve their ends. The ones that don't (OTEC) are just making use of highly inelastic demand for their product.

Being able to make sales at the same price as an earlier order has no impact on either (esp since most people will undercut to get a 100% chance of making the sale first), meaning that your proposal would have little to no effect*.


*It would mean that people would stop matching me with 30d orders, thinking they're gonna get the sale without undercutting.



That is an example of a much more useful post, Thank you.

Paikis wrote:
Raindeth wrote:
I already described how it works. Imagine we're not at an auction, like most of the trading you do in real life. If you were at McDonald's and the guy behind you said, "I'll pay a penny less for that Big Mac" and the cashier said, "excuse me, let that guy through." you would agree that something was screwed up, wouldn't you?


You want to turn EVE into McDonalds?

Are you for serious?


That isn't.

While it is amusing sometimes to feign stupidity, I'm sure you realize McDonald's isn't the only establishment that doesn't operate in a non-auction environment.

Tom Hagen wrote:
First of, Raindeth isn't asking or want to discuss about any features that would update your orders by automatic.
He want's to be able to set up orders at the same price as another one and have a feature that somehow distribute the sales between the different sellers.

I personally don't see the reason for this, Why would I want to share my sales with someone else?
When I set the price on my order, if the price is 1000 ISK/unit and I think it is worth my time to sell it at that price, I will sell it at 999.99 ISK also no matter what.
If I can sell it at that price someone else can do it also, unless I can control the supply. But if I can control the supply this wouldn't even be an issue to start with :-P
]


Yes, and from your and RubyPorto's comments, I see that my thoughts on the market were too narrow. I was considering my own use of the market and thinking it somehow applies to everyone else. Duh, it doesn't.

Caelis Boirelle
Aurora Investments
#20 - 2013-03-13 23:50:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Caelis Boirelle
Two things.

Firstly, you shouldn't be in any situation where literally 0.01 isk sits between profit and loss. Even with minerals. If you're trying to 0.01 with minerals you're doing it wrong.

Secondly, why would I want to share my orders with anyone else? I happily slash margins pretty aggressively to ensure my order sits on top for as long as possible and fill before anyone elses. That way I can turn them around and plough the isk back into more buy orders quickly, while the rest of them are still jostling for top position to fill the rest of their own orders.