These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

ORE ship reimbursement and upcoming expansion

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#361 - 2013-03-11 10:54:10 UTC
I think the ISDs are just keeping this thread going so all the trolls congregate in one place and can be more easily managed.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#362 - 2013-03-11 10:59:37 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
You are indeed only parroting CCP, but this was never in question. The question is how would you feel if some of your Gunnery skills would turn into Social or Trade skills?
No, that was never the question. It was just a silly and irrelevant hypothetical you dreamed up.

The question was if you should get a reimbursement when you haven't lost anything. The answer is and always has been an unambiguous “no”.

Quote:
Beaten down?! By what? By parrots, who fail to see the arguments of the players but jump onto CCP's arguments which are aimed to deny us to revisit our decision while they revisit the skill tree? These arguments have been acknowledged by CCP
You are entirely allowed to revisit your decisions when they revisit the skill tree… if that revisit actually changes anything. So not in this case. Both of these facts have indeed been acknowledged by CCP, so the only question that remains is why on earth anyone should be reimbursed when they haven't lost anything. This has also been acknowledged by CCP and their answer is a simple “you shouldn't because it makes no sense.”
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#363 - 2013-03-11 10:59:38 UTC
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
there are no trolls. ruby and malcanis are beating down whitehound, ...

I do not know where you see this, maybe they told you they were trying, but if so then they must see me as a threat to their CSM votes.


Honestly.... if you were a real threat, you wouldn't have been beaten down so easily.


I didn't see Whitehound being beaten down... I guess we all see what we want to believe. In fact Whitehound would wipe the floor with both Malcanis and Ruby hands down if he ever stood as a canditate for CSM.

LOL

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
ISD Gallifreyan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#364 - 2013-03-11 11:00:34 UTC
This has been a great thread, but let's keep it on topic.

Thanks.

ISD Gallifreyan

Lt. Commander

Community Communication Liaisons (CCL)

Interstellar Services Department
Whitehound
#365 - 2013-03-11 11:03:18 UTC
Tippia wrote:
No, that was never the question...

And nobody was asking you.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#366 - 2013-03-11 11:04:39 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
And nobody was asking you.
You were.
And I'm asking you: why on earth anyone should be reimbursed when they haven't lost anything?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#367 - 2013-03-11 11:05:16 UTC
And yeah, the whole gunnery into social thing is what we like to call a "non sequitur".

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#368 - 2013-03-11 11:07:15 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
there are no trolls. ruby and malcanis are beating down whitehound, remiel's being entirely too serious, and i think solstice is trying to score

no trolls


I'm allowed to take things seriously, I'm autistic. Cool


You have something on your face.


Yes, it's called a nose. Roll

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Whitehound
#369 - 2013-03-11 11:07:35 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
And nobody was asking you.
You were.
And I'm asking you: why on earth anyone should be reimbursed when they haven't lost anything?

No, I was not. Now you know.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#370 - 2013-03-11 11:10:21 UTC
"I didn't ask you" = "I know you're right and that's why you should shut up"

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#371 - 2013-03-11 11:10:46 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
No, I was not.
Incorrect.
You posted it right here, so it was for me. If you wanted some other result you should have posted elsewhere.

Either way, what I really would like to know is: why on earth anyone should be reimbursed when they haven't lost anything?
Whitehound
#372 - 2013-03-11 11:13:28 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
No, I was not.
Incorrect.

You thought that I was asking you. I am telling you that I am not. Now you do not believe me.

I see no ground for any discussion between you and me.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#373 - 2013-03-11 11:14:04 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Whitehound wrote:
The question is how would you feel if some of your Gunnery skills would turn into Social or Trade skills? They still will be of use to some, just not for you likely.


The reality: Some skill prerequisites are being changed, but you will still be able to do what you could do before.
Your hypothetical: Some skills are changed entirely, so that you will not be able to do what you could do before.

These two situations aren't remotely alike.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#374 - 2013-03-11 11:14:10 UTC
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
This has been a great thread, but let's keep it on topic.

Thanks.
*LOL*


And ... OMG TIPPIA ENTERED !!! FINALLY !!! xD
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#375 - 2013-03-11 11:14:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Whitehound wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
No, I was not.
Incorrect.

You thought that I was asking you. I am telling you that I am not. Now you do not believe me.

I see no ground for any discussion between you and me.


Dude, when you post on a public forum, you post it for everyone that has access. That includes Tippia. So get over yourself and answer the question, or continue to dodge it and make excuses for having no answer. Your call.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Whitehound
#376 - 2013-03-11 11:16:01 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
"I didn't ask you" = "I know you're right and that's why you should shut up"

I was asking Roberto. And as you can see is Tippia not capable of following a simple discussion. You know I am right, don't you?

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#377 - 2013-03-11 11:16:32 UTC
Guys, I think titans should be able to one-shot POSes.
BTW I'm not talking to Tippia, Remiel, or anybody else who understands how titans work or disagrees.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Whitehound
#378 - 2013-03-11 11:17:25 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
No, I was not.
Incorrect.

You thought that I was asking you. I am telling you that I am not. Now you do not believe me.

I see no ground for any discussion between you and me.


Dude, when you post on a public forum, you post it for everyone that has access. That includes Tippia. So get over yourself and answer the question, or continue to dodge it and make excuses for having no answer. Your call.

You may think so, but when I am telling you that I was not asking you, but you do not want to believe me then what good is it?

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#379 - 2013-03-11 11:17:33 UTC
Since you won't let Tippia answer I think I should field this one.

Whitehound wrote:
You are indeed only parroting CCP, but this was never in question. The question is how would you feel if some of your Gunnery skills would turn into Social or Trade skills?
No, that was never the question. It was just a silly and irrelevant hypothetical you dreamed up.

The question was if you should get a reimbursement when you haven't lost anything. The answer is and always has been an unambiguous “no”.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#380 - 2013-03-11 11:18:09 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
"I didn't ask you" = "I know you're right and that's why you should shut up"

I was asking Roberto. And as you can see is Tippia not capable of following a simple discussion. You know I am right, don't you?

This is a public forum, meaning anyone can respond to what you said.
You're only making yourself look bad by having a hissy fit about it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)