EVE General Discussion

Hello All! I recently did some research on a corp mates High-Sec Hulk loss. After doing some digging I found that the corp that was responsible for the kill (xX-Crusader-Xx) which is part of the Hegemonous Pandorum Alliance. This Corp is using -10 security toons to come into High sec and gank your Barges and Indys. Hegemonous Pandorums CEO has this posted on His BIO which is public Information ............

Stationmonkey

www.shatteredcrystal.com/index.php/~175618

Because everyone wants plex!!

Want to talk to us? You can do that here.

hp.myevehost.com/index.php

So the CEO of a High-Sec Ganking Alliance Promotes and advertises for www.Shatteredcrystal.com.
CCP indorses this site, but at the same time they are abusing the system to killing off indys and other ships in EVE for people to make a NON-PVP living. From what I have read the outlined goal is to stop subscription paying players from being able to make money Via mining in High-Sec and force them to purchase ETC from Shatteredcrystal.com and convert it into PLEX which they intern sell to the market. CCP needs to make High-Sec "secure"

>xX-Crusader-Xx >Hegemonous Pandorum> Executor > Hegemoney> CEO and Founder >Citizen Vigilante CEO

Your tinfoil hat is broken.

Same way I mine in low sec; tank your ship, learn to use d-scan, use local, make friends with the locals.

Never AFK mine and expect to come back to a intact ship

while i understand your frustration i disagree with your logic what i like most about eve is its so free any ass hole can do bad things any time he likes to good people

ok do i agree that just because they can the should..... no but you know what if ever miner in the game said ok we refuse to mine and sell for a week you could make a hell of a statment instead of crying in forums unit the miners in game and demand respect after all how will they kill you with out ships to do it in ? you forget you run eve not them

Ok i will waste one forth of my months subscription good idea.

You're taking labels and giving meaning where none was implied. Hi-sec is 'safer' not absolute saftey. Low-sec is less safe but frankly, quieter systems are less 'dangerous' than Caldari ice fields. . .

I understand your point. You want an absolute; an absolute safe region of the game. That's not EVE.

Why does CCP need to make Hi Sec Secure and not you?

Fact is economic wars happen and these Gankers strategy isn't all that secure, it can be countered. People could refuse their services. People could fly ships that are not economical to gank like Skiffs. People can tank their ships. People can fly only what they can comfortably afford to lose.

I have hauled, mined, missioned, ect and I take steps to insure I do not get ganked. I take more steps to insure I always have enough assets to be comfortable. Why should CCP punish them for your poor choices.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, people say EVE is a breeding ground for griefers, pirates, profiteers, thieves and such, they all can't do sh*t to you if you stay one step ahead of them. So why don't you?

Very.... I was hoping they would see the real message.

So, what does highsec mean then? Thought highsec meant highsec. Hes trying to say they shouldnt be able to kill you and not get podded, which is what happened. These guys hang in Goram moon 4.

Thank you for the post. My original post stated High-Sec should be secure not safe. Your point is what i was talking about. A -10 should not have the right to use the gates and enter the High-Sec regions. I do appreciate the degrading statement as well .